Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
The question is do you fight or make love?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:59 pm What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?
Might as well try both.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:06 pmThe question is do you fight or make love?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:59 pm What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?
Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:23 pmWould you like to join the sisterhood of the time-traveling pants?
You're willing to wait that long in line?ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:16 pm If I could travel back in time, I would definitely try to punch myself in the face.
Did your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:59 pm What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?
*affectingGolden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:30 pmDid your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:59 pm What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?
There's only three plausible options:
1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.
Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.
hmm okay... Should I be doing anything with my hands? Peel offa butterfly's wings or something?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:30 pmDid your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:59 pm What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?
There's only three plausible options:
1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.
Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.
Golden's use of "effecting" is correct.Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:59 pm*affectingGolden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:30 pmDid your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:59 pm What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?
There's only three plausible options:
1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.
Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.
*currectEpignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:01 pmGolden's use of "effecting" is correct.Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:59 pm*affectingGolden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:30 pmDid your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:59 pm What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?
There's only three plausible options:
1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.
Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.
Whatchu got against strawberry?
MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:03 pmSig is scum. Wrap it up.
This is ludicrous when we are talking about cause and effect. Stupid language.Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:59 pm*affectingGolden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:30 pmDid your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:59 pm What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?
There's only three plausible options:
1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.
Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.
If you’re mafia, you should be trying to go back in time to kill yourself.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:00 pmhmm okay... Should I be doing anything with my hands? Peel offa butterfly's wings or something?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:30 pmDid your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:59 pm What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?
There's only three plausible options:
1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.
Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.
What should I be trying to retro cause?
Here we go again.
Except he was good in that game.
I have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.
Golden-MacGolden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:21 pmI have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.
I’ve got time travel, I can just skip around and find a good spot.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:36 pmYou're willing to wait that long in line?ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:16 pm If I could travel back in time, I would definitely try to punch myself in the face.
And correct your comma splice.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:12 pmI’ve got time travel, I can just skip around and find a good spot.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:36 pmYou're willing to wait that long in line?ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:16 pm If I could travel back in time, I would definitely try to punch myself in the face.
Good, but wrong.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:53 pmGolden-MacGolden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:21 pmI have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.
Teammates 2483
I hope he’s right. We make a good team.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:03 pmGood, but wrong.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:53 pmGolden-MacGolden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:21 pmI have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.
Teammates 2483
I've looked into it before, have yet to find the extension for it.
Day 0 is until D1 starts.
Bad boys bad boys watcha gonna do watcha gonna do when they cum4u?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:07 pmI hope he’s right. We make a good team.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:03 pmGood, but wrong.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:53 pmGolden-MacGolden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:21 pmI have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.
Teammates 2483
"LIKE!"MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:51 pmBad boys bad boys watcha gonna do watcha gonna do when they cum4u?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:07 pmI hope he’s right. We make a good team.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:03 pmGood, but wrong.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:53 pmGolden-MacGolden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:21 pmI have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.
Teammates 2483
I legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:28 pm As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.
Does his accusation feel serious to you?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:32 pmI legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:28 pm As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.
It’s never been flippant before.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:38 pmDoes his accusation feel serious to you?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:32 pmI legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:28 pm As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.
So you would have me believe that I am wrong AGAIN!?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:40 pmIt’s never been flippant before.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:38 pmDoes his accusation feel serious to you?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:32 pmI legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:28 pm As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.
Macs day one guy is fucking legendary. And pretty good. But for whatever reason he doesn’t get me.
I mean, yeah, if a roulette ball lands on a black space three or four times in a row, there's definitely a higher chance that it'd land on a red space on the next spin. That's just common sense.MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 1:05 amSo you would have me believe that I am wrong AGAIN!?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:40 pmIt’s never been flippant before.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:38 pmDoes his accusation feel serious to you?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:32 pmI legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:28 pm As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.
Macs day one guy is fucking legendary. And pretty good. But for whatever reason he doesn’t get me.
Agreed.insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 1:10 amI mean, yeah, if a roulette ball lands on a black space three or four times in a row, there's definitely a higher chance that it'd land on a red space on the next spin. That's just common sense.MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 1:05 amSo you would have me believe that I am wrong AGAIN!?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:40 pmIt’s never been flippant before.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:38 pmDoes his accusation feel serious to you?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:32 pmI legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:28 pm As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.
Macs day one guy is fucking legendary. And pretty good. But for whatever reason he doesn’t get me.
It doesn't really matter what you believe.MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 1:05 amSo you would have me believe that I am wrong AGAIN!?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:40 pmIt’s never been flippant before.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:38 pmDoes his accusation feel serious to you?Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:32 pmI legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:28 pm As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.
Macs day one guy is fucking legendary. And pretty good. But for whatever reason he doesn’t get me.
