Re: Mass Effect Mafia (Day 1)
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2017 7:01 pm
Ripperoni
I realize that's disappointing to you, but I doubt I'm going to play leader this time out. Without knowing about half the field, I would rather observe and speak up when I find something worth mentioning. I found nothing noteworthy today.MovingPictures07 wrote:Epignosis wrote:I don't have much- sorry. Too many new people.MovingPictures07 wrote:Epignosis wrote:Where the hell is sig when you need someone to lynch Day 1?![]()
What are your reads, good sir?
As I implied, I won't be voting fishfunk. Unfortunately I have to vote now. I'll probably just vote to make sure there's no tie.
You'll never get in my pants with that attitude.MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, I'm looking at JOH's ISO and despite all the content I'm not feeling super inspired. Also, despite recent reservations, I'd rather keep Llama around for now.
Vote JOH
....Nevermind, just tried to vote and saw that I missed it just barely.
Looking forward to whatever you can provide.Epignosis wrote:I realize that's disappointing to you, but I doubt I'm going to play leader this time out. Without knowing about half the field, I would rather observe and speak up when I find something worth mentioning. I found nothing noteworthy today.MovingPictures07 wrote:Epignosis wrote:I don't have much- sorry. Too many new people.MovingPictures07 wrote:Epignosis wrote:Where the hell is sig when you need someone to lynch Day 1?![]()
What are your reads, good sir?
As I implied, I won't be voting fishfunk. Unfortunately I have to vote now. I'll probably just vote to make sure there's no tie.
I can't believe it; I'm usually really good at making sure I switch my vote in time. Dammit. Oh well. I'm not feeling really confident in Llama's townieness anyway, but it's still really less than ideal.Long Con wrote:LOL MP... you have failed this city.
S~V~S wrote:Quite a few people missed the vote
thellama73 wrote:I am here!
I'm not bad this time (for realz) so can we please stop killing me so early?
Legacy reads or thoughts?thellama73 wrote:It was nice playing with you new people, although I can't say I have a very high opinion of your mafia hunting skills.
My shit will accumulate if circumstances allow- whether or not I get a pass from you or anybody else isn't relevant to me.MovingPictures07 wrote:Looking forward to whatever you can provide.Epignosis wrote:I realize that's disappointing to you, but I doubt I'm going to play leader this time out. Without knowing about half the field, I would rather observe and speak up when I find something worth mentioning. I found nothing noteworthy today.MovingPictures07 wrote:Epignosis wrote:I don't have much- sorry. Too many new people.MovingPictures07 wrote:Epignosis wrote:Where the hell is sig when you need someone to lynch Day 1?![]()
What are your reads, good sir?
As I implied, I won't be voting fishfunk. Unfortunately I have to vote now. I'll probably just vote to make sure there's no tie.
Not going to give you a pass for long though, so get your shit together or maybe I'll campaign to vote you out on D2.
Dammit, get your head in the game, son.Epignosis wrote:My shit will accumulate if circumstances allow- whether or not I get a pass from you or anybody else isn't relevant to me.MovingPictures07 wrote:Looking forward to whatever you can provide.
Not going to give you a pass for long though, so get your shit together or maybe I'll campaign to vote you out on D2.
Yeah. If you live in a town where they execute you for tilting against windmills, unjust as that may be, and you get executed for ... tilting against windmills, on some level, that is on you.Epignosis wrote:Once again, a Day 1 llama lynch. Yawn. By both people who know him and don't know him.
Maybe it's you llama.
Going after someone relentlessly without reassessment. Sometimes the connotation of the word implies that the player doing the tunneling is town, but I wouldn't say that's necessary.TonyStarkPrime wrote:Quick question to which I think I could guess the answer:
What is tunneling?
Why llama instead of Jack?gfishfunk wrote:Just gut right now, which I already established was bad.colonialbob wrote:Gfish, why llama?
I don't fully understand this pity party post of yours, considering Llama JUST RECENTLY hosed us both and won as a baddie, and I suspected him from Day 1 and allowed him the benefit of the doubt. I have no more sympathy for him than for any Civ lynched Day 1, and I'm certainly not in the state of mind to just let him go through the whole game again with me squashing down my bad feelings about him every EOD.Epignosis wrote:Once again, a Day 1 llama lynch. Yawn. By both people who know him and don't know him.
Maybe it's you llama.
I don't care about recency bias. You apparently do.Long Con wrote:I don't fully understand this pity party post of yours, considering Llama JUST RECENTLY hosed us both and won as a baddie, and I suspected him from Day 1 and allowed him the benefit of the doubt. I have no more sympathy for him than for any Civ lynched Day 1, and I'm certainly not in the state of mind to just let him go through the whole game again with me squashing down my bad feelings about him every EOD.Epignosis wrote:Once again, a Day 1 llama lynch. Yawn. By both people who know him and don't know him.
Maybe it's you llama.
Quin wrote:nekk minnitMarmot wrote:I'm not playing, so I can't possibly be lynched Day 1.sprityo wrote:Me: "I promise to be better."
Y'all: "Same"
Y'all: "Same"
Y'all: "Same"
Y'all: "Same"
Y'all: "Same"
Host: "Liars."
The new game is horribly underrated. At the heart of it, it's really just a redo of the first game's space exploration. The XB1 version isn't glitchy save for a few minor bits, and the open world-ness can be overwhelming, but I think it's in a good way. I've been playing it a lot and enjoying it tremendously. The combat has definitely improved over the previous games.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:This game is spoilertastic for ME2 ain't it? Cerberus is bad?
[spoiler]Shepard isn't dead?[/spoiler]
I guess I'll just have to start playing Mass Effect again.
But you're willing to let past instances of Civ Llama getting lynched early decide your play in this game.Epignosis wrote:I don't care about recency bias. You apparently do.Long Con wrote:I don't fully understand this pity party post of yours, considering Llama JUST RECENTLY hosed us both and won as a baddie, and I suspected him from Day 1 and allowed him the benefit of the doubt. I have no more sympathy for him than for any Civ lynched Day 1, and I'm certainly not in the state of mind to just let him go through the whole game again with me squashing down my bad feelings about him every EOD.Epignosis wrote:Once again, a Day 1 llama lynch. Yawn. By both people who know him and don't know him.
Maybe it's you llama.
Correct- that's out of courtesy, not strategy.Long Con wrote:But you're willing to let past instances of Civ Llama getting lynched early decide your play in this game.Epignosis wrote:I don't care about recency bias. You apparently do.Long Con wrote:I don't fully understand this pity party post of yours, considering Llama JUST RECENTLY hosed us both and won as a baddie, and I suspected him from Day 1 and allowed him the benefit of the doubt. I have no more sympathy for him than for any Civ lynched Day 1, and I'm certainly not in the state of mind to just let him go through the whole game again with me squashing down my bad feelings about him every EOD.Epignosis wrote:Once again, a Day 1 llama lynch. Yawn. By both people who know him and don't know him.
Maybe it's you llama.
Yes. It's the nounal version of "recent."S~V~S wrote:Is "recency" a word?
I would think that allowing him that "courtesy" so recently all the way to Mafia Llama beating you and winning the game would alleviate some of that inclination. How many times, in your estimation, will it take for Llama to beat you before the scales are balanced, and you'll treat him like other players?Epignosis wrote:Correct- that's out of courtesy, not strategy.Long Con wrote:But you're willing to let past instances of Civ Llama getting lynched early decide your play in this game.Epignosis wrote:I don't care about recency bias. You apparently do.Long Con wrote:I don't fully understand this pity party post of yours, considering Llama JUST RECENTLY hosed us both and won as a baddie, and I suspected him from Day 1 and allowed him the benefit of the doubt. I have no more sympathy for him than for any Civ lynched Day 1, and I'm certainly not in the state of mind to just let him go through the whole game again with me squashing down my bad feelings about him every EOD.Epignosis wrote:Once again, a Day 1 llama lynch. Yawn. By both people who know him and don't know him.
Maybe it's you llama.
What you have described is recency bias. What llama did elsewhere has no bearing on who he is here. Therefore, it doesn't matter to me. The fact that he gets lynched so often Day 1 for just being himself is a different matter. I'm inclined to allow him that courtesy until I can form an opinion that is independent of (or in light of) his Day 1 silliness. None of that precludes me from lynching him Day 3 or 4.Long Con wrote:I would think that allowing him that "courtesy" so recently all the way to Mafia Llama beating you and winning the game would alleviate some of that inclination.Epignosis wrote:Correct- that's out of courtesy, not strategy.Long Con wrote:But you're willing to let past instances of Civ Llama getting lynched early decide your play in this game.Epignosis wrote:I don't care about recency bias. You apparently do.Long Con wrote:I don't fully understand this pity party post of yours, considering Llama JUST RECENTLY hosed us both and won as a baddie, and I suspected him from Day 1 and allowed him the benefit of the doubt. I have no more sympathy for him than for any Civ lynched Day 1, and I'm certainly not in the state of mind to just let him go through the whole game again with me squashing down my bad feelings about him every EOD.Epignosis wrote:Once again, a Day 1 llama lynch. Yawn. By both people who know him and don't know him.
Maybe it's you llama.
Now you're coupling it with gambler's fallacy thinking.Long Con wrote:How many times, in your estimation, will it take for Llama to beat you before the scales are balanced, and you'll treat him like other players?
It is quite strategic.Long Con wrote:Or is this actually a strategic attitude on your part in this particular game? Maybe.
I'm sure someone has already said something, but this is natural Silver. It is still Is valid reaction, but I don't put too much stock into it.Long Con wrote: 1. This would be the reaction that tickled my suspiciometer. Defensive, with a thin slice of OMGUS at the end.
The only legitimately evil role I have ever received is in a one night mafia game where I rolled solo werewolf. Every other game has been town or neutral survivor.thellama73 wrote:So you're saying you're overdue...MovingPictures07 wrote:I haven't actually rolled a bad role in ages now. I'm on a long stretch of town roles these days. I'm loving it.thellama73 wrote:MP is always bad. He just has that sort of luck with Random.org. No, I'm not bad. In fact, my first post of this game was to point that out.DrWilgy wrote: Llama has MP done anything this game that indicates that he is bad? Are you bad?