Re: Lawyers, Guns and Money- [DAY 1]
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 6:52 am
Oh that’s ugly, sorry.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
You are still in the Pool of Mystery for me, so I guess I don't have one either. You are one of the high posters, but most of them are one line posts, except when Marmot showed, you had some more in depth interaction with him.
I made an assumption. I don't actually know but I'm pretty sure you just like questions. My point was I don't think you're suspicious because of that.Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:58 amI appreciate your thoughts!Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:44 am I don't feel too great making a decision without at least hearing from everyone first. It feels like some people have been way too absent to make a good call. For now, I feel good about SVS, Kate, and Marmot. Scotty has been very inquisitive, but that's not necessarily AI; Seanzie and SVS feels more like a misunderstanding IMO. Golden has been back and forth and it's scaring me very far away from them.
Don’t take this the wrong way- I’m just being inquisitive after all- but how do you know what is alignment indicative of me if we’ve never played together before?
I learned something new here. I thought "Alignment Indicative" meant in general, like say posting a lot of OT, or asking a lot of questions, *in general* is not AI. I did not realize it is a specific thing for an individual. Like I would say "AI" in general, and "AI for Scotty" if I was comparing it to his specific meta. I've been using it wrong.Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:30 amI made an assumption. I don't actually know but I'm pretty sure you just like questions. My point was I don't think you're suspicious because of that.Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:58 amI appreciate your thoughts!Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:44 am I don't feel too great making a decision without at least hearing from everyone first. It feels like some people have been way too absent to make a good call. For now, I feel good about SVS, Kate, and Marmot. Scotty has been very inquisitive, but that's not necessarily AI; Seanzie and SVS feels more like a misunderstanding IMO. Golden has been back and forth and it's scaring me very far away from them.
Don’t take this the wrong way- I’m just being inquisitive after all- but how do you know what is alignment indicative of me if we’ve never played together before?
Wait now I'm confused. I thought it was general, like if something is AI it's just suspicious behavior, is it not? And it can be specific but I definitely didn't mean to imply I know scotty/his playstyle.S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:34 amI learned something new here. I thought "Alignment Indicative" meant in general, like say posting a lot of OT, or asking a lot of questions, *in general* is not AI. I did not realize it is a specific thing for an individual. Like I would say "AI" in general, and "AI for Scotty" if I was comparing it to his specific meta. I've been using it wrong.Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:30 amI made an assumption. I don't actually know but I'm pretty sure you just like questions. My point was I don't think you're suspicious because of that.Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:58 amI appreciate your thoughts!Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:44 am I don't feel too great making a decision without at least hearing from everyone first. It feels like some people have been way too absent to make a good call. For now, I feel good about SVS, Kate, and Marmot. Scotty has been very inquisitive, but that's not necessarily AI; Seanzie and SVS feels more like a misunderstanding IMO. Golden has been back and forth and it's scaring me very far away from them.
Don’t take this the wrong way- I’m just being inquisitive after all- but how do you know what is alignment indicative of me if we’ve never played together before?
This feels weird. Why be active and posting but not try to participate? This is the same with Jack and Wigly, so unless someone wants to tell me this is just how they play, I don't like it.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 11:57 pmHonestly, I don't know. My brain is only 1/9th present this gameSabiplz wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 11:41 pmWhat are your thotsfalcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 11:21 pm Has stuff happened yet?
I am a windmill, on a cold, quiet night. So much wasted potential if ya ask me
I'm expecting I'll get a second wind 'round D3 or so
IME it means both/could mean either depending on context.S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:34 amI learned something new here. I thought "Alignment Indicative" meant in general, like say posting a lot of OT, or asking a lot of questions, *in general* is not AI. I did not realize it is a specific thing for an individual. Like I would say "AI" in general, and "AI for Scotty" if I was comparing it to his specific meta. I've been using it wrong.Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:30 amI made an assumption. I don't actually know but I'm pretty sure you just like questions. My point was I don't think you're suspicious because of that.Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:58 amI appreciate your thoughts!Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:44 am I don't feel too great making a decision without at least hearing from everyone first. It feels like some people have been way too absent to make a good call. For now, I feel good about SVS, Kate, and Marmot. Scotty has been very inquisitive, but that's not necessarily AI; Seanzie and SVS feels more like a misunderstanding IMO. Golden has been back and forth and it's scaring me very far away from them.
Don’t take this the wrong way- I’m just being inquisitive after all- but how do you know what is alignment indicative of me if we’ve never played together before?
AI does not necessarily mean suspicious. If someone towntells, it is definitely AI. If someone passes the turing test, it is not AI.Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:39 amWait now I'm confused. I thought it was general, like if something is AI it's just suspicious behavior, is it not? And it can be specific but I definitely didn't mean to imply I know scotty/his playstyle.S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:34 amI learned something new here. I thought "Alignment Indicative" meant in general, like say posting a lot of OT, or asking a lot of questions, *in general* is not AI. I did not realize it is a specific thing for an individual. Like I would say "AI" in general, and "AI for Scotty" if I was comparing it to his specific meta. I've been using it wrong.Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:30 amI made an assumption. I don't actually know but I'm pretty sure you just like questions. My point was I don't think you're suspicious because of that.Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:58 amI appreciate your thoughts!Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:44 am I don't feel too great making a decision without at least hearing from everyone first. It feels like some people have been way too absent to make a good call. For now, I feel good about SVS, Kate, and Marmot. Scotty has been very inquisitive, but that's not necessarily AI; Seanzie and SVS feels more like a misunderstanding IMO. Golden has been back and forth and it's scaring me very far away from them.
Don’t take this the wrong way- I’m just being inquisitive after all- but how do you know what is alignment indicative of me if we’ve never played together before?
Thank you, that’s what I thought. It just seemed that Scotty was implying Dennis misused the term so it confused me.Seanzie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:52 amIME it means both/could mean either depending on context.S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:34 amI learned something new here. I thought "Alignment Indicative" meant in general, like say posting a lot of OT, or asking a lot of questions, *in general* is not AI. I did not realize it is a specific thing for an individual. Like I would say "AI" in general, and "AI for Scotty" if I was comparing it to his specific meta. I've been using it wrong.Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:30 amI made an assumption. I don't actually know but I'm pretty sure you just like questions. My point was I don't think you're suspicious because of that.Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:58 amI appreciate your thoughts!Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:44 am I don't feel too great making a decision without at least hearing from everyone first. It feels like some people have been way too absent to make a good call. For now, I feel good about SVS, Kate, and Marmot. Scotty has been very inquisitive, but that's not necessarily AI; Seanzie and SVS feels more like a misunderstanding IMO. Golden has been back and forth and it's scaring me very far away from them.
Don’t take this the wrong way- I’m just being inquisitive after all- but how do you know what is alignment indicative of me if we’ve never played together before?
It's sometimes how I play....oh, alas the good ole' days when ever game of Maf I played commanded most to all of my attention.Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:45 amThis feels weird. Why be active and posting but not try to participate? This is the same with Jack and Wigly, so unless someone wants to tell me this is just how they play, I don't like it.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 11:57 pmHonestly, I don't know. My brain is only 1/9th present this gameSabiplz wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 11:41 pmWhat are your thotsfalcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 11:21 pm Has stuff happened yet?
I am a windmill, on a cold, quiet night. So much wasted potential if ya ask me
I'm expecting I'll get a second wind 'round D3 or so
First time anyone has ever said I was an enigma and hard to read in mafia before. ( paging @katze the cat shaped enigma)S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:20 amYou are still in the Pool of Mystery for me, so I guess I don't have one either. You are one of the high posters, but most of them are one line posts, except when Marmot showed, you had some more in depth interaction with him.
For me, you're a bit enigmatic. We've had very little direct interaction (I don't recall questioning you about Marmot as you said in one post, but I didn't go back to look, this is more of an impressions post than a fact checker post), although I do recall asking you about Seanzie after you said his tunnelling post felt off, it seemed so out of character to you that you asked if he was all right. Yet that is exactly what he went on to do, to randomly tunnel someone. Personally, having been in many civ/civ Battle Royales myself, that is how this feels to me. As a random ship in the night, I'm not easy to sink, though.
You are the only one of the people I don't know (you, Lucy, Seanzie & falcon) who is being openly engaging with people, answering question, providing reads on people others may not be familiar with. Seanzie is also doing this a bit, when he's not actively trying to kill me. This makes me feel positive about you in general.
But your reads list is a short list, which makes it a safe list. You don't have reads on many people yourself, but you seem to think it's wild that Dennis has none on you.
I have no reason to think you're bad, and that's how I play, I look for baddies rather than clear civvies, although I'm trying to get better at that, since apparently it's the thing to do now. But I'm a hunter, not a politician.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@Kate you could also ask me. When I read back over last night, I realized we've not really interacted at all. You've asked everyone else about the Seanzie thing but not me. Unless someone tells me the tunnelling thing is unlike him, I have no reason to think he's bad, if the dog with a bone thing is his norm. I talk alot and it's easy to find something to twist out of shape when a person won't shut up, lol, and I'm aware of that and I expect it. And as a Grade A tunneller myself, I know civs can twist words and meanings as well as baddies. I don't plan on engaging with him any further because two brick walls slamming into each other over and over is no fun for the rest of the thread, not to mention the walls.
But I also have no plans to vote for him, he doesn't look particularly bad to me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am keeping my vote on Lucy for now, I see no town reason for actively trying to limit the suspicion pool to three people for reasons unrelated to the thread. That would be like saying, "We should try to be suspicious of SVS, Scotty and Seanzie becasue their names all start with S". It's possible one is bad, but not for those reasons. Again, can't see a town rationale for that.
I'll be following, but will have to try to stay TF out of here today at work lol.
Scotty feels pockety thus far, to both myself and WilgyS~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 9:44 amThank you, that’s what I thought. It just seemed that Scotty was implying Dennis misused the term so it confused me.Seanzie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:52 amIME it means both/could mean either depending on context.S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:34 amI learned something new here. I thought "Alignment Indicative" meant in general, like say posting a lot of OT, or asking a lot of questions, *in general* is not AI. I did not realize it is a specific thing for an individual. Like I would say "AI" in general, and "AI for Scotty" if I was comparing it to his specific meta. I've been using it wrong.Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:30 amI made an assumption. I don't actually know but I'm pretty sure you just like questions. My point was I don't think you're suspicious because of that.Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:58 amI appreciate your thoughts!Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:44 am I don't feel too great making a decision without at least hearing from everyone first. It feels like some people have been way too absent to make a good call. For now, I feel good about SVS, Kate, and Marmot. Scotty has been very inquisitive, but that's not necessarily AI; Seanzie and SVS feels more like a misunderstanding IMO. Golden has been back and forth and it's scaring me very far away from them.
Don’t take this the wrong way- I’m just being inquisitive after all- but how do you know what is alignment indicative of me if we’ve never played together before?
I have mixed feels on Scotty. I know he plays a very analytical game, and there’s not much to analyze before the first elimination. So I’m low keying my expectations of him a bit until Day 2.
But he also seems to be on the same thing as Lucy re Dennis, albeit on a lesser scale. That bothers me a bit. Sabiplz said she thinks Scotty’s buddying me. I didn’t get that feeling. We just finished a game where we we both town, and he low key suspected me pretty much the whole game. So I was just thinking that having just watched me closely in that game, he had a better feel for my town game.
But I also know I can be susceptible to that, so her saying it makes me more aware to watch for it.
If any one of the three of you flip mafia, I now have permission to flip the other two of you in succession.
Yeah this.Sabiplz wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 1:18 amUnfortunately yes.
It's when he doesn't post at Allis when he's scum
S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:20 amYou are still in the Pool of Mystery for me, so I guess I don't have one either. You are one of the high posters, but most of them are one line posts, except when Marmot showed, you had some more in depth interaction with him.
For me, you're a bit enigmatic. We've had very little direct interaction (I don't recall questioning you about Marmot as you said in one post, but I didn't go back to look, this is more of an impressions post than a fact checker post), although I do recall asking you about Seanzie after you said his tunnelling post felt off, it seemed so out of character to you that you asked if he was all right. Yet that is exactly what he went on to do, to randomly tunnel someone. Personally, having been in many civ/civ Battle Royales myself, that is how this feels to me. As a random ship in the night, I'm not easy to sink, though.
You are the only one of the people I don't know (you, Lucy, Seanzie & falcon) who is being openly engaging with people, answering question, providing reads on people others may not be familiar with. Seanzie is also doing this a bit, when he's not actively trying to kill me. This makes me feel positive about you in general.
But your reads list is a short list, which makes it a safe list. You don't have reads on many people yourself, but you seem to think it's wild that Dennis has none on you.
I have no reason to think you're bad, and that's how I play, I look for baddies rather than clear civvies, although I'm trying to get better at that, since apparently it's the thing to do now. But I'm a hunter, not a politician.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@Kate you could also ask me. When I read back over last night, I realized we've not really interacted at all. You've asked everyone else about the Seanzie thing but not me. Unless someone tells me the tunnelling thing is unlike him, I have no reason to think he's bad, if the dog with a bone thing is his norm. I talk alot and it's easy to find something to twist out of shape when a person won't shut up, lol, and I'm aware of that and I expect it. And as a Grade A tunneller myself, I know civs can twist words and meanings as well as baddies. I don't plan on engaging with him any further because two brick walls slamming into each other over and over is no fun for the rest of the thread, not to mention the walls.
But I also have no plans to vote for him, he doesn't look particularly bad to me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am keeping my vote on Lucy for now, I see no town reason for actively trying to limit the suspicion pool to three people for reasons unrelated to the thread. That would be like saying, "We should try to be suspicious of SVS, Scotty and Seanzie becasue their names all start with S". It's possible one is bad, but not for those reasons. Again, can't see a town rationale for that.
I'll be following, but will have to try to stay TF out of here today at work lol.
Matahari wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:45 am i want to post my thoughts so far, while I have a minute. They are definitely not deep thoughts, but how deep can they be on day 1?
New players get a pass, until later in the game. Absent players, as well.
if I don't mention you, its because I have you as town for now.
Falcon45ca- I didn't find it suspicious that you chose someone quickly because with movable votes, it seems like a lot of players throw votes around in a slap-happy fashion. then you were questioned about it, and you promptly posted quotes for why you made your vote. This looked legit to me at the time. Later it occurred to me that maybe you did all that too quickly, Pre-planned? But someone, Sabiplz, I think, said this was normal for your town game.
Soneji posted, I think, but I'll need to go back and look to make sure. ???
Lucy- so far, is reminding me of Dr. Wilgy. Too random to read, and weird posting just annoys me because I don't know what to do with it. I'd like to hear from players who are familiar with them.
Seanzie made a very risky statement for a town player to make. Or just an 'I can't be bothered' statement. Since it was preceded by an 'Ugh', I'm going with the former.
Sabiplz drew attention to his post, then backed away from it, then said she rarely voted early or often, then 17 minutes later she voted for Seanzie. None of this feels right.
Golden got a vote from Falcon, and although Falcon's reasons would not be enough to convince me to vote someone, I thought they were ok for a day 1. However after post 486 ( I think, I'll go back and check later and do an ebwop if necessary), I have Golden as town.
Marmot, no clue. I'd like to hear what other players think of him. ???
Everyone else, I have as probably town. I have no absolutes this early, but I'm watching the players above who pinged me. I'd like to hear what other players think of my not so deep thoughts, please.
Marmot wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:48 amMatahari wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:45 am i want to post my thoughts so far, while I have a minute. They are definitely not deep thoughts, but how deep can they be on day 1?
New players get a pass, until later in the game. Absent players, as well.
if I don't mention you, its because I have you as town for now.
Falcon45ca- I didn't find it suspicious that you chose someone quickly because with movable votes, it seems like a lot of players throw votes around in a slap-happy fashion. then you were questioned about it, and you promptly posted quotes for why you made your vote. This looked legit to me at the time. Later it occurred to me that maybe you did all that too quickly, Pre-planned? But someone, Sabiplz, I think, said this was normal for your town game.
Soneji posted, I think, but I'll need to go back and look to make sure. ???
Lucy- so far, is reminding me of Dr. Wilgy. Too random to read, and weird posting just annoys me because I don't know what to do with it. I'd like to hear from players who are familiar with them.
Seanzie made a very risky statement for a town player to make. Or just an 'I can't be bothered' statement. Since it was preceded by an 'Ugh', I'm going with the former.
Sabiplz drew attention to his post, then backed away from it, then said she rarely voted early or often, then 17 minutes later she voted for Seanzie. None of this feels right.
Golden got a vote from Falcon, and although Falcon's reasons would not be enough to convince me to vote someone, I thought they were ok for a day 1. However after post 486 ( I think, I'll go back and check later and do an ebwop if necessary), I have Golden as town.
Marmot, no clue. I'd like to hear what other players think of him. ???
Everyone else, I have as probably town. I have no absolutes this early, but I'm watching the players above who pinged me. I'd like to hear what other players think of my not so deep thoughts, please.
I think Marmot has been a decent player thus far this game. He was MIA for the early part of Day 1, but I don't think that's AI for him. When he did show up, he's posted an assortment of fluff, but he's at least mixed some well-thought reads into those posts. His tone is pretty stellar. Actually, I'm gonna go ahead and call him locktown for now, but if he's still alive and hasn't killed a wolf by Day 4, I'll definitely reconsider.
Seanzie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:13 pmThis:
is a wolf.
Thank you for the rainbow list. You're absolutely correct that some of my list lacks direction. As I said, I was posting my thoughts as the game progressed, On day 1, its hard for me to draw hard conclusions. The people I listed are people I was pinged by, which is an ancient mafia term for watch-worthy/mildly suspicious.Marmot wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:03 pm Here's that rainbow list that no one asked for. Players are listed alphabetically in tiers.
Town
S~V~S
Dennis
Light Town
falcon45ca
Kate
Sabiplz
Scotty
Null or No Content
bea
DrWilgy
fingersplints
jack shepherd
lucy
Roxy
Seanzie
Soneji
Mafia Lean
Golden
Matahari
And to include a recap on players I haven't talked about yet that I have now sorted into tiers:
falcon45ca: I also don't really trust Golden, albeit might be for different reasons. His vibes don't strike me as hitting the notes of his scum game.
Scotty: Has been active and prodding, and also mostly harmless. I think of the townleans I have, his is the least strongest, but GTH, I do think he's town, and I have seen enough content from him to slot him here for now.
Matahari: Some of her thoughts that she posted in #529 lack direction. That is fine. But I get the feeling that she is pushing herself to talk about players when she doesn't have anything specific to say about them. Soneji in particular.
No, I'm Marmot hunting in a Marmot-full game.
I don't think D1 has been that weird or that quiet and I think someone who thinks it's been quiet is likely not reading the game critically like a townie who is hunting would be doing.
There are nearly 550 posts, that’s a pretty chatty day one. For me posts are a better metric than votes for gauging activity.
Pretty big reaction to such a "dumb and empty" reason to wolf read you.