The Syndicate

tedxtr wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:27 am

Marmot wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 11:36 pm I know nothing about this show. Am I at a disadvantage?

samesies

just play werewolf

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 4:07 am

Alison wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:58 am

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:40 am alison - did you post the marmot case anywhere?

I suspect Marmot based on one interaction.

Marmot wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 10:16 pm

KZA wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 10:15 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 10:14 pm

KZA wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 10:09 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 9:56 pm @KZA why are you so staunch in your townread of Sloonei?

I don't think I have been? I'm not worried about him right now so no reason to redact the read anyway

Maybe that wasn't the right word. I saw you called him town multiple times, but I couldn't find an explanation before.

His early case on Alison seemed like a reasonable Sloonei thought even if I didn't really agree with it

This is a reasonable KZA thought.

This interaction markets itself as being two townies doing solving and analyzing each other. However reading through it I can't find any evidence that either of them genuinely care about exposing the other's alignments. It's a bunch of play-acting and blowing smoke up town's asses.

got it

and i'm fine with a kza vote since i had a few thoughts on that slot myself early on

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:31 am no, but for real, apart from alison's explanation, why are people voting marmot?

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:37 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:34 am

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:31 am no, but for real, apart from alison's explanation, why are people voting marmot?

What in the actual fuck?

Why do you give the faintest shit?

because he was one of my few isos that i've looked into and i came up with a slight town read and just don't see any reason to vote for him

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:58 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:50 am

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:45 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:42 am

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:41 am are you finding it unreasonable?

No not at all quite reasonable keep at it.

if you're trolling : how is it unreasonable?

if you're not trolling : reaction tests don't work on me

The mindset required for you to take issue with that wagon requires the following steps.

1. Need to ISO Marmot
2. Discovery that he is slightly townie
3. Observation that he has a wagon
4. Recognisation that it requires flagging

My issue is in point 3 and 4.

Problem the first. SPF and Michelle are not present to answer you. That is very apparent. So nobody currently wagoning rodent boy can even answer. Which makes your question an effort in posturing.

Problem the second. Who cares about someone having a 2 vote wagon containing people that may not even be up to date on the haps in a composition where there are multiple wagons greater than said number?

because he's being voted by people that usually have good reasons for votes and i wanna see what those reasons are

which is why i'm asking about it

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 1:59 pm marmot - hasn't done much

ted - has motly slanked this game and when he makes reads, he's lock mafia because he cares about his single read

tsp - has been a wildcard and his posts and arguments have been confusing


these are the top wagons with reasons from alison's big post

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:27 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:26 pm

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:14 pm

Alison wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:10 pm Based on all these points I don't think Syndicate D1s are lazy or clout based.

i've just quoted 3 of your reasons for wolves and 2 of them contain slanking

It isn't lazy to chop "slankers" when a wealth of rationale has been provided to support the choice by various different people.

It is lazy to decline to chop "slankers" merely because they are "slankers".

i've been asking for this wealth of rationale on at least one wagon for quite a bit and nobody is able to write anything that's concrete

for example : marmot

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:29 pm the only reply i got for marmot was from alison stating he had a weird interaction with kza

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:33 pm

staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:31 pm

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm spf, why is marmot scum?

i struggle to believe that marmot believes the stuff that he has been saying. his reads lack a certain level of conviction that i would expect marmot to have if he was playing from a villager mindset.

marmot constantly floated tutuu as one of his number one suspects throughout the early-game (calling her an openwolf at one point), but when he was asked to go into more detail about his scumread on tutuu, he said this:

Marmot wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 12:10 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 12:03 am @Marmot could you elaborate on those nanook and tutuu reads?

Tutuu's been an active presence in the thread, but changing her reads on a whim.

i find it difficult to believe that marmot carried this underlying suspicion about tutuu throughout the entirety of the game, and was only able to provide one short sentence explaining his scumread on her when he was prompted to. it concerns me even more that marmot voted for tutuu shortly after making this post. it gives me the impression that marmot does not particularly care about the accuracy of his read on tutuu and is pushing on her moreso for aesthetics sake

there were several moments where i felt that marmot outed reads/thoughts that felt ingenuine. i did not like his opinion about me and tutuu on https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewt ... 34#p761634. i did not like the false bravado on https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewt ... 75#p762175.

i am not confident about marmot being a wolf, but i find him wolfy

thanks, this is at the very least reasonable and it's not based on slank!

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:37 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:34 pm

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:27 pm for example : marmot

Rationale external to Marmot --> a pile of people have seemed town, removing them from candidacy

Rationale relating directly to Marmot --> degree of seriousness of his play parallels amount of suspicion presently heaped upon him; currently showing zero concern for the game state despite reading a bunch of POE'd players as town; griping with my generic cheerleader post as if it's remarkable; contributed to an environment of chaos with one of his goofy self-votes (i.e. eagerly participating in a state that I view as anti-town while not eagerly participating so much when the thread is healthier); beefing with SPF over adverbs as if Marmot is an adverb person

Probably not comprehensive

thanks x2 ; i believe the strongest reason is the showing zero concern with a PoE that's upside down from thread consensus

do you think wolf!marmot is likely to go for the "post the weakest reasons in order to go at people that are active and considered town"?

i know it seems like a loaded question, but realistically, that's what I feel like he's done

do you think it's a fake approach designed...to get town read on derpiness?

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 5:51 pm i think i'll be voting marmot over al

tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 5:58 pm [VOTE: Marmot ] aubergine

shrug