Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Those are both silly.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:58 pm Idk. I go back and forth on the reasonableness of Jay defending Dunya by proxy making them w/w or him directly accusing her making them not w/w.
For a guy who supposedly scumreads me because I'm not trying to read you, you're awfully dismissive of my attempts to read you.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:00 amThose are both silly.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:58 pm Idk. I go back and forth on the reasonableness of Jay defending Dunya by proxy making them w/w or him directly accusing her making them not w/w.
Why would I do that when I already found a wolf? Maybe even two. I only get to lynch one player.
I just don't want to read more wah wah I do this I do that stuff. Just find mafia and convince others to lynch them.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:03 amWhy would I do that when I already found a wolf? Maybe even two. I only get to lynch one player.
By all means, think things. I'm in a dicky mood.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:02 amFor a guy who supposedly scumreads me because I'm not trying to read you, you're awfully dismissive of my attempts to read you.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:00 amThose are both silly.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:58 pm Idk. I go back and forth on the reasonableness of Jay defending Dunya by proxy making them w/w or him directly accusing her making them not w/w.
I think those are good reasons to think things.
bump
Good.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:07 amThat's the only scummy thing you've said all day.
Says you.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:05 amBy all means, think things. I'm in a dicky mood.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:02 amFor a guy who supposedly scumreads me because I'm not trying to read you, you're awfully dismissive of my attempts to read you.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:00 amThose are both silly.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:58 pm Idk. I go back and forth on the reasonableness of Jay defending Dunya by proxy making them w/w or him directly accusing her making them not w/w.
I think those are good reasons to think things.
My meaning: I am very comfortable voting for an accuser of my suspect as a civilian, and I am very comfortable crapping on my teammate as a mafioso. These kinds of associations are very difficult to draw at this point in the game without good shit. Do your thing though.
Fixed it for you.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:11 am To be fair, there were moments in our recent yelling and screaming that dunya felt like a parrot wolf on my shoulder.
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:10 amSo shoot them tomorrow if they don't show up. Whatever.
Given my time, yes.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:12 amHave you done everything that you can do to maximize the value of the posts we do have?
Oh no, we have targets and a shipment of guns coming in tomorrow.
I'll give you a free townread if you get enough posts D1 to outpost me at the end of the game.
Ugh why?
Cool. What was the point of your question?
I'm exploring the potential that your complaint is an appeal to the nerd who made a video about Day 1 play instead of something you're really feeling in the moment. How many among us actually have zero posts, by the way? One or two?
Lol.dunya wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:22 pmJackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 5:27 pmSo tempted to vote Speedchuck in response to this.
[VOTE: Dunya] aubergine
10.27pm my time
10.33pm my time
11.40pm my timeJackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 6:40 pm#justunconvincingmetathingsdunya wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:42 pmthis is bullcrap. when i'm a mafioso, i care too muchJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:39 pmNothing better than a mafioso role card to help you slide comfortably into those "I don't care" pants.dunya wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:37 pmwerd. let's lynch jay because he's trying to rile up our feathers and get us to react when all we wanna do is shoot peopleSloonei wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:35 pmYour answer does matter one way or the other to me. I know it’s gonna exist and I know essentially what it will say. I saw people talking about something and I had a position which countered theirs, so I stuck my pretty little nose in.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:30 pm Sloonei's crime is defending me in the face of DDL's/Epi's observations that I'm doing nothing when I had indeed done nothing other than vote for Sloonei.
He interfered with the sacred act of allowing me to answer for myself and absolved me before I even needed to.
i'm lebanon. i'll take care of me and only me. 3rd world country represent.
feels forced dunnit?
Defending Long Con and Audrey is such a bitch move. You're bad.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:21 am Yes, I count two with zero posts. One of them is eight. So... Long Con. He's unlikely to be so low in activity forever. What's the point of this complaint, Epi?
And I'm exploring your own commitment to that video. Cool.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:19 amI'm exploring the potential that your complaint is an appeal to the nerd who made a video about Day 1 play instead of something you're really feeling in the moment. How many among us actually have zero posts, by the way? One or two?
Dunya's trio of Jack posts where I vote her and attack her twice after leaves out the two first posts that I called her scummy, which predate my vote on her.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:26 pm Sure. The accusation came six minutes after the vote while Jack was catching up, so that may represent Jack justifying the vote by force (while yucking a post that multiple others had already yucked).
You have greater than zero posts but you're still a chump.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:22 amAnd I'm exploring your own commitment to that video. Cool.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:19 amI'm exploring the potential that your complaint is an appeal to the nerd who made a video about Day 1 play instead of something you're really feeling in the moment. How many among us actually have zero posts, by the way? One or two?
I don't care who has zero posts. I think the answer is 2, but I'm not keeping track. It doesn't matter.
This kind of mealy mouthed bullshit can only come from the mouth of a scum.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:23 amDunya's trio of Jack posts where I vote her and attack her twice after leaves out the two first posts that I called her scummy, which predate my vote on her.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:26 pm Sure. The accusation came six minutes after the vote while Jack was catching up, so that may represent Jack justifying the vote by force (while yucking a post that multiple others had already yucked).
Does this change your opinion about me retroactively justifying a vote?
I need a point to complain.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:21 am Yes, I count two with zero posts. One of them is eight. So... Long Con. He's unlikely to be so low in activity forever. What's the point of this complaint, Epi?
Fuck you dadMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:22 amDefending Long Con and Audrey is such a bitch move. You're bad.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:21 am Yes, I count two with zero posts. One of them is eight. So... Long Con. He's unlikely to be so low in activity forever. What's the point of this complaint, Epi?
Defending yourself by making wifom cases is the type of thing I attribute to scum more often than not. You're bad.
Hey watch your mouth young manJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:24 amFuck you dadMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:22 amDefending Long Con and Audrey is such a bitch move. You're bad.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:21 am Yes, I count two with zero posts. One of them is eight. So... Long Con. He's unlikely to be so low in activity forever. What's the point of this complaint, Epi?
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:23 amYou have greater than zero posts but you're still a chump.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:22 amAnd I'm exploring your own commitment to that video. Cool.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:19 amI'm exploring the potential that your complaint is an appeal to the nerd who made a video about Day 1 play instead of something you're really feeling in the moment. How many among us actually have zero posts, by the way? One or two?
I don't care who has zero posts. I think the answer is 2, but I'm not keeping track. It doesn't matter.
The devil is in the details.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:23 amThis kind of mealy mouthed bullshit can only come from the mouth of a scum.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:23 amDunya's trio of Jack posts where I vote her and attack her twice after leaves out the two first posts that I called her scummy, which predate my vote on her.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:26 pm Sure. The accusation came six minutes after the vote while Jack was catching up, so that may represent Jack justifying the vote by force (while yucking a post that multiple others had already yucked).
Does this change your opinion about me retroactively justifying a vote?
What a joke of a wall. What kind of person could possibly find a way to make a comment on every single person already. I'll tell you who. A bad one. Smoke laramie.leetic wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 10:38 pm With over 24 hours having passed since the start of D1, I'll once again do the exercise where I look over the ISOs of everyone and determine if they look towny or scummy. This time, I won't say null unless a player has not posted at all. These might not be the most accurate (the last time I did this, only one out of my four scumreads was correct!) but the point is to create content and start discussion. For reference, I'll put a player's name in italics if I have played a game where they were town and bold if I have played a game where they were scum. Well, we have 19 people to get through, so let's go!
AudreyTheTattleTail - Once again, does not seem to have done anything, so completely null. Has anyone even mentioned her?
ColinIsCool - Hasn't done much. Doesn't seem to have many strong opinions here, and backed off of his dunya vote rather quickly after it proved unpopular. Scum lean.
DFaraday - Only three posts. Posted a couple of reads, but nothing majorly alignment indicative. Would be null, but since I'm forcing myself to choose, very slight scum lean I guess.
DragonDLuffy - Like DF, three posts, and not too much within those three posts. For the sake of consistency, very slight scum lean I guess.
dunya - Feeling more confident in calling her town. I don't think scum would give up like this this early in a day phase, and has started putting in some genuine effort.
Epignosis - Handled my pressure vote decently well, but was a bit quick to change his opinion on me... He's a bit hard to read, slight town I suppose.
Jackofhearts2005 - Town, but mostly because he is playing much differently than in the last game I was with him. He's getting heat for his dunya vote, but in Shockheaded Peter the first person he voted was one of his scumpartners. Of course, he probably would change his strategy a bit for his next game as scum, but it still feels quite unlike his first outing (that I was a witness of).
JaggedJimmyJay - After a brief period of inactivity, seems to be mostly back to his old self again. Town lean. Still, (and this goes for other people that I townread as well) it's a bit difficult since even scum can put in genuine efforts at scumhunting here.
leetic - Is a cool cat.
Long Con - Another do-nothinger, don't think I've played with him.
Lunalee - Only posted "Hi!" Did a bit more in Shockheaded Peter, so town lean I guess?
Macdougall - Very inactive for some reason, last game I played with him he was not like that at all. Scum lean.
Novaselinenever - Laying a bit low, more similar to his behavior in Community than in Shockheaded Peter. Scum lean.
nutella - Has a wagon on her. Nothing in her ISO really pinged me, but nothing looks really good either. Not too much in the way of content in her posts. Since I recall her having a bit more energy in Shockheaded Peter, slight scum lean.
poutanko - I know I said I wouldn't post null unless they post nothing, but given that her only posts are completely NAI and I have absolutely no experience with this person, I have no other choice in this case.
Quin - Nothing really in the way of content. Since I forced myself to not go null, I'll say slight scum lean for the weird "I think" comment.
sabie12 - Hasn't really posted many game-related things. I'll say a slight town lean since this is similar to her behavior in the other two games I played with her, but not really sure how she would act as scum.
Sloonei - Seems a bit null. Has a wagon around him for not doing much, but I'm not really seeing it - he didn't do much until his last moments in Shockheaded Peter and he was town there. Since I don't want to be agnostic about this, I'll say slight town for trying to get some work done.
speedchuck - Nothing really in the way of game-related content. Similar to how he started Shockheaded Peter, but with one difference - there he tried a fake push on nutella. Since there's nothing like that here, slight town lean.
ts account - At least seems to have been doing something, unlike quite a few people on this list - town lean.
Only took me about an hour! Main thing I learned is that a lot of people really need to be more active. I should really go to bed now.
The scum is in the role card.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:25 amThe devil is in the details.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:23 amThis kind of mealy mouthed bullshit can only come from the mouth of a scum.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:23 amDunya's trio of Jack posts where I vote her and attack her twice after leaves out the two first posts that I called her scummy, which predate my vote on her.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:26 pm Sure. The accusation came six minutes after the vote while Jack was catching up, so that may represent Jack justifying the vote by force (while yucking a post that multiple others had already yucked).
Does this change your opinion about me retroactively justifying a vote?
I'm sorry, I read this four times and I am still unclear on your question. Please rephrase this in some way, or specifically point to what you're referencing and explain it to me like I'm five.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:23 amDunya's trio of Jack posts where I vote her and attack her twice after leaves out the two first posts that I called her scummy, which predate my vote on her.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:26 pm Sure. The accusation came six minutes after the vote while Jack was catching up, so that may represent Jack justifying the vote by force (while yucking a post that multiple others had already yucked).
Does this change your opinion about me retroactively justifying a vote?
Scum engaging with scumnutella wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:15 pmShhhh [VOTE: sloonei] aubergineSloonei wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 7:50 pmYou guys I figured out who ts account is! It's me.ts account wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 7:47 pm I always find building town circles and lynching by PoE to be the easiest strategy for me since I typically roll vanilla town and can't rely on PR info to make deductions
when ISOing players I employ confirmation bias and read them as though they are a wolf
occasionally they make a post that does not make sense and they cannot be a wolf, which is cool
sometimes you can't find wolves by behavior alone and you have to find who *could* be a wolf
note that this isn't what I did to find my friends
I like these posts. I feel like I can see her reads on dunya and jack developing in real time. I ought to find someone else to vote for, but I've kinda exceeded my mafia capacity for the day elsewhere.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:02 am Sloonei, a quick review of nutella's more recent stuff and an update on your perspective would be swell.
