Re: GAME OF CHAMPIONS 2021
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:12 am
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
So you’re saying there’s a chance
Alison wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:37 pm Here is my case on Creature.
All of Creature's posts so far can be divided into one of three categories: useless fluff, attempting to derpclear himself for silly reasons, and "flame fanning".
Category 1: Useless FluffThese posts go beyond the usual RVS horsing around (although we are well out of RVS now). These are posts that show a clear lack of interest in the progression of the game. His questions are flat, shallow, and in many cases could have been easily answered by glancing at the OP. He is more interested in looking like he is around and engaging with the game than actually being around and engaging with the game. He had a ripe opportunity to engage with me about my push on him, and he responded by going "I'm not mafia, I'm annoyed now, go away". I don't get the sense that he cares whether or not I am town misreading him or scum trying to get him killed, and this is especially concerning because in my last scum game I tried to get him killed early on.Spoiler: show
I believe him when he says he is low energy. Take note that being low energy and unable to meaningfully engage with the game is a classic Creature scumtell.
Category 2: Attempting to derpclear himself for silly reasons
Creature makes an excessive number of posts attempting to insinuate that he is town, or in some way get people to "angleshoot" him as being town due to his lack of knowledge about the game mechanics or the inner workings of the mafia ("is there a soup kill?"). But a town Creature who genuinely wanted to know would just check the OP; asking in thread serves no purpose except to try to get people to falsely read him as town. He is aware that he struggles to gain the trust of the town when he is mafia, and he is cheaply attempting to earn this towncred through derptells and "townslips".Spoiler: show
Take note that he is trying to convince the game repeatedly that the mafia captain chose players rather than roles. If he is town, he has no reason to believe that the mafia captain chose players over roles. I, personally, have reason to believe that the mafia captain chose roles. I think nutella is much townier than her scum self would be, and as I have argued, a town nutella implies a town Alexa. I know I am town, and I do not think a mafia captain who picked players would pass over both me and Alexa. So this attempt to convince the town - with no evidence whatsoever - that the mafia captain picked players reeks of agenda-pushing to me.
Finally, I want to highlight this line: "Unless you want to argue that I'm 3p here? But would be better to seek for the seven mafia first." Nobody has accused him of being 3P. It comes completely out of the blue, and reads almost as though he is self-aware of his own scumminess and is trying to hang a lampshade of it. I don't think it's a line that would flow naturally from a townie's mouth.
Category 3: Flame FanningLinearPoint has been accused of fanning the flames. I think Creature is even more guilty of this sin. In his ISO of 19 posts (at the time I wrote this case), Creature utters provocative lines, egging on the suspicions of townies towards each other, three separate times. They are quoted in the spoilers above. Note that he first eggs on the "Alexa has a red check on nutella" narrative, then switches to "Alexa and nutella are wolves together". These narratives are contradictory. Creature does not have an opinion of his own; he just encourages whatever happens to be the prevailing opinion or thread sentiment at the time. This is strongly opportunistic, and this opportunism is exemplified even further by his agreement with 112 that Seanzie is wolfing. How is Seanzie being wolfy? Why has he not brought up this scumread on Seanzie before, if he thought he was the only one seeing it? In fact, if he thinks Seanzie is a wolf and fooling everyone except him, why would he keep quiet about it until someone else brings it up, at which point he eagerly jumps on the bandwagon? Answer: because he is nakedly taking advantage of 112's suspicion to push Seanzie.Spoiler: show
At no point does he contribute to the conversation. He does not add evidence to support any narrative. He does not refute the evidence or points that others have brought up. He does not, in fact, engage with the theories and accusations that have been thrown around the thread. He merely fuels the fire with provocative one-liners and moves on without explaining them.
-
Please vote Creature.
112 had a really spot on assessment of you that brought to words everything I was thinking about you, even if I’m misreading you and ur actually town I don’t think a scum would take this approach on youAlison wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:55 pmThese townreads seem unsupported to me. Please elaborate on them.ilario wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:42 pmLock 112 as town all the way until lylo112 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:47 pmI think it's way too early to write such a monster of a post--if you have so much to write against him/his slot right now, it's probably coming from a place of wolfy over-eagerness to project town or otherwise control the game.Alison wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:44 pmAre the other parts of my case NAI for him, too?c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:39 pmThis is extremely NAI for CreatureAlison wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:37 pm At no point does he contribute to the conversation. He does not add evidence to support any narrative. He does not refute the evidence or points that others have brought up. He does not, in fact, engage with the theories and accusations that have been thrown around the thread. He merely fuels the fire with provocative one-liners and moves on without explaining them.
112 c4 creature
These are almost never wolves
Alexa
Would be very surprised if she’s a wolf but most likely is town like 90+ % of the time here. This approach she’s taking would only be tailored to fool me if she’s mafia but idt she would do that in a lobby this big
The truth of the matter is Neeko didn't read your post as she didn't care to and still doesn't really care to.Alison wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:09 am1) I brought up three points against Creature, but you're dismissing the entire case against him because of one point you disagree with.LinearPoint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:07 amNah, Neeko speaks from the heart. The whole "fanning the flames" argument is just BS.Alison wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:03 amThe first thing that sprang to mind when I read your post is this: "you are completely full of it".LinearPoint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:01 amCreature is being accused of the same thing Neeko is so Neeko is pretty much writing off the case entirely since Neeko knows it is NAI.
Creature's accusations also seem largely based on meta which Neeko is not familiar with.
That being said Neeko is lukewarm to the idea of Creature being Town. Not locktown, but nothing overly sus has been observed.
[VOTE: LinearPoint] aubergine
2) It is obviously true that intentionally fanning the flames is a scummy move. Even if you think you personally haven't fanned any flames, it's disingenuous to extend that logic to protect Creature, without examining the specifics of why he's been accused of fanning flames.
3) None of the accusations I extended towards Creature were based on meta, except for the point about his low energy.
There is no logic in your post. There was no logic in your theory that alexa/nutella were partners, and that was why I dropped my townread on you. Now I have a full blown scumread on you.
@hollowkatt @EnderWiggin @falcon45caPhil and Gloria wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:10 am I either wanna kill Scotty or ignore my instincts entirely and towncore him... fellow towncore what do?
*vomits all over the floor*Marmot wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:13 amAlison wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:37 pm Here is my case on Creature.
All of Creature's posts so far can be divided into one of three categories: useless fluff, attempting to derpclear himself for silly reasons, and "flame fanning".
Category 1: Useless FluffThese posts go beyond the usual RVS horsing around (although we are well out of RVS now). These are posts that show a clear lack of interest in the progression of the game. His questions are flat, shallow, and in many cases could have been easily answered by glancing at the OP. He is more interested in looking like he is around and engaging with the game than actually being around and engaging with the game. He had a ripe opportunity to engage with me about my push on him, and he responded by going "I'm not mafia, I'm annoyed now, go away". I don't get the sense that he cares whether or not I am town misreading him or scum trying to get him killed, and this is especially concerning because in my last scum game I tried to get him killed early on.Spoiler: show
I believe him when he says he is low energy. Take note that being low energy and unable to meaningfully engage with the game is a classic Creature scumtell.
Category 2: Attempting to derpclear himself for silly reasons
Creature makes an excessive number of posts attempting to insinuate that he is town, or in some way get people to "angleshoot" him as being town due to his lack of knowledge about the game mechanics or the inner workings of the mafia ("is there a soup kill?"). But a town Creature who genuinely wanted to know would just check the OP; asking in thread serves no purpose except to try to get people to falsely read him as town. He is aware that he struggles to gain the trust of the town when he is mafia, and he is cheaply attempting to earn this towncred through derptells and "townslips".Spoiler: show
Take note that he is trying to convince the game repeatedly that the mafia captain chose players rather than roles. If he is town, he has no reason to believe that the mafia captain chose players over roles. I, personally, have reason to believe that the mafia captain chose roles. I think nutella is much townier than her scum self would be, and as I have argued, a town nutella implies a town Alexa. I know I am town, and I do not think a mafia captain who picked players would pass over both me and Alexa. So this attempt to convince the town - with no evidence whatsoever - that the mafia captain picked players reeks of agenda-pushing to me.
Finally, I want to highlight this line: "Unless you want to argue that I'm 3p here? But would be better to seek for the seven mafia first." Nobody has accused him of being 3P. It comes completely out of the blue, and reads almost as though he is self-aware of his own scumminess and is trying to hang a lampshade of it. I don't think it's a line that would flow naturally from a townie's mouth.
Category 3: Flame FanningLinearPoint has been accused of fanning the flames. I think Creature is even more guilty of this sin. In his ISO of 19 posts (at the time I wrote this case), Creature utters provocative lines, egging on the suspicions of townies towards each other, three separate times. They are quoted in the spoilers above. Note that he first eggs on the "Alexa has a red check on nutella" narrative, then switches to "Alexa and nutella are wolves together". These narratives are contradictory. Creature does not have an opinion of his own; he just encourages whatever happens to be the prevailing opinion or thread sentiment at the time. This is strongly opportunistic, and this opportunism is exemplified even further by his agreement with 112 that Seanzie is wolfing. How is Seanzie being wolfy? Why has he not brought up this scumread on Seanzie before, if he thought he was the only one seeing it? In fact, if he thinks Seanzie is a wolf and fooling everyone except him, why would he keep quiet about it until someone else brings it up, at which point he eagerly jumps on the bandwagon? Answer: because he is nakedly taking advantage of 112's suspicion to push Seanzie.Spoiler: show
At no point does he contribute to the conversation. He does not add evidence to support any narrative. He does not refute the evidence or points that others have brought up. He does not, in fact, engage with the theories and accusations that have been thrown around the thread. He merely fuels the fire with provocative one-liners and moves on without explaining them.
-
Please vote Creature.
jfc Alison you came to play. I take it you aren't the Gambit Demon this go around?
Well, glad you asked. I’d recommend letting him in to sleep on your couch at least. Maybe he can help with the dingoes out back in the mornPhil and Gloria wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:10 am I either wanna kill Scotty or ignore my instincts entirely and towncore him... fellow towncore what do?
flames*alexa wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:15 am @Alison in your case against creature, you say "Creature doesn't have an opinion of his own and is just fanning the games" (and you note his lol if nutella/alexa are wolves together comment) but that feels like a throwaway comment VS. some people were actually realistically entertaining that world who should be more suspicious?
Except you can't furnish any receipts for actually getting info about people's alignment.
Depends on context though, who the pusher is, who they’re being pushed by. If you’re in fact town here and creature is a wolf, chances are a bunch of slackers will just tag onto your case
wait how do you know mePaopan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:16 am Good players control the flow of information, not roles
As a captain. I'll probably pick 3-4 players (prob. GOATs) like Alexa or Scotty. Then mix in with some average ones (like me); and they then will they'll dictate OP roles we must pick
- from a capt perspective
How do you think Creature would handle this push by me if he was mafia? (Keeping in mind he has 6 teammates that could potentially coach him?)ilario wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:13 am 112 had a really spot on assessment of you that brought to words everything I was thinking about you, even if I’m misreading you and ur actually town I don’t think a scum would take this approach on you
C4 has a snarky critical vibe, doesn’t feel like they’re playing to be townread and the evaluations I’ve seen from him so far show a good depth of thought that i haven’t seen him replicate as scum yet outside of when he’s bussing. they had that one post we both liked as well
Creature is a hard one to explain. I just think he’s lhf bait, I think the way he’s handled your push is towny, he isn’t being appealy or anything and the way he’s assessed your push is towny. His insistence that he things he’s gonna be a universal tr by eod is towny since last time I saw him as a wolf he got outed and buried d1 as one of the best roles meanwhile everytime I’ve seen him town he’s been a universal tr. so I think that confidence is town for him
Alexa is too derpy and all over the place to be scum. The way she handled her claim was way too over eager and messy in a way that’s towny for specifically her.
We have already played before lolalexa wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:17 amwait how do you know mePaopan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:16 am Good players control the flow of information, not roles
As a captain. I'll probably pick 3-4 players (prob. GOATs) like Alexa or Scotty. Then mix in with some average ones (like me); and they then will they'll dictate OP roles we must pick
- from a capt perspective
Prove to me you didnt read the set up and you aren't just faking derps to clear yourself.ilario wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:02 pm I don’t read the op because I’m not a wolf lol, if I know the setup well that’s a wolf tell for me, as town I simply don’t care about mechanics, the principle of every setup is the same I just kill wolfy people and find townies until I’m nightkilled or I solve the game
Oh cool. So you are admitting that you did not read the post I asked you to read and respond to, and instead of saying that, you chose to make up a half-assed response. I was right to think you were full of it.LinearPoint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:13 amThe truth of the matter is Neeko didn't read your post as she didn't care to and still doesn't really care to.Alison wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:09 am1) I brought up three points against Creature, but you're dismissing the entire case against him because of one point you disagree with.LinearPoint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:07 amNah, Neeko speaks from the heart. The whole "fanning the flames" argument is just BS.Alison wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:03 amThe first thing that sprang to mind when I read your post is this: "you are completely full of it".LinearPoint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:01 amCreature is being accused of the same thing Neeko is so Neeko is pretty much writing off the case entirely since Neeko knows it is NAI.
Creature's accusations also seem largely based on meta which Neeko is not familiar with.
That being said Neeko is lukewarm to the idea of Creature being Town. Not locktown, but nothing overly sus has been observed.
[VOTE: LinearPoint] aubergine
2) It is obviously true that intentionally fanning the flames is a scummy move. Even if you think you personally haven't fanned any flames, it's disingenuous to extend that logic to protect Creature, without examining the specifics of why he's been accused of fanning flames.
3) None of the accusations I extended towards Creature were based on meta, except for the point about his low energy.
There is no logic in your post. There was no logic in your theory that alexa/nutella were partners, and that was why I dropped my townread on you. Now I have a full blown scumread on you.
The discussion about Creature in thread was a lot of meta talk and talk about fanning the flames.
The read given was based on Creature's posts and response to the pressure, none of which were bad imo.
Neeko also takes great offense to being associated with "no logic" when it was the obvious logical conclusion.
lmao why?Phil and Gloria wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:06 ammaybe it's the road beers talking but I wanna towncore you for thisilario wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:05 amhold up lemme bring out the font 7Phil and Gloria wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:47 pmI didn't know you were a bluekang altilario wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:42 pmLock 112 as town all the way until lylo
112 c4 creature
These are almost never wolves
Alexa
Would be very surprised if she’s a wolf but most likely is town like 90+ % of the time here. This approach she’s taking would only be tailored to fool me if she’s mafia but idt she would do that in a lobby this big
This got me laughing hard enough to choke, ggwpPhil and Gloria wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:47 pmI didn't know you were a bluekang altilario wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:42 pmLock 112 as town all the way until lylo112 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:47 pmI think it's way too early to write such a monster of a post--if you have so much to write against him/his slot right now, it's probably coming from a place of wolfy over-eagerness to project town or otherwise control the game.Alison wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:44 pmAre the other parts of my case NAI for him, too?c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:39 pmThis is extremely NAI for CreatureAlison wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:37 pm At no point does he contribute to the conversation. He does not add evidence to support any narrative. He does not refute the evidence or points that others have brought up. He does not, in fact, engage with the theories and accusations that have been thrown around the thread. He merely fuels the fire with provocative one-liners and moves on without explaining them.
112 c4 creature
These are almost never wolves
Alexa
Would be very surprised if she’s a wolf but most likely is town like 90+ % of the time here. This approach she’s taking would only be tailored to fool me if she’s mafia but idt she would do that in a lobby this big
Thoughts on Guillo?
yeah but how do you know me enough to say "i'd pick alexa if i was wolf captain" lmfaoPaopan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:18 amWe have already played before lolalexa wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:17 amwait how do you know mePaopan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:16 am Good players control the flow of information, not roles
As a captain. I'll probably pick 3-4 players (prob. GOATs) like Alexa or Scotty. Then mix in with some average ones (like me); and they then will they'll dictate OP roles we must pick
- from a capt perspective
Why didn't you express that scumread before 112 came along? Why must someone else say Seanzie is scum first before you call him out? For that matter, what did Seanzie do that was scummy in the first place?
What hints did you get?
Why? I can see Ender Wifoming there.
this is kinda towny thoAlison wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:09 am1) I brought up three points against Creature, but you're dismissing the entire case against him because of one point you disagree with.LinearPoint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:07 amNah, Neeko speaks from the heart. The whole "fanning the flames" argument is just BS.Alison wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:03 amThe first thing that sprang to mind when I read your post is this: "you are completely full of it".LinearPoint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:01 amCreature is being accused of the same thing Neeko is so Neeko is pretty much writing off the case entirely since Neeko knows it is NAI.
Creature's accusations also seem largely based on meta which Neeko is not familiar with.
That being said Neeko is lukewarm to the idea of Creature being Town. Not locktown, but nothing overly sus has been observed.
[VOTE: LinearPoint] aubergine
2) It is obviously true that intentionally fanning the flames is a scummy move. Even if you think you personally haven't fanned any flames, it's disingenuous to extend that logic to protect Creature, without examining the specifics of why he's been accused of fanning flames.
3) None of the accusations I extended towards Creature were based on meta, except for the point about his low energy.
There is no logic in your post. There was no logic in your theory that alexa/nutella were partners, and that was why I dropped my townread on you. Now I have a full blown scumread on you.
Scummy post.EnderWiggin wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:19 amThis got me laughing hard enough to choke, ggwpPhil and Gloria wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:47 pmI didn't know you were a bluekang altilario wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:42 pmLock 112 as town all the way until lylo112 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:47 pmI think it's way too early to write such a monster of a post--if you have so much to write against him/his slot right now, it's probably coming from a place of wolfy over-eagerness to project town or otherwise control the game.Alison wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:44 pmAre the other parts of my case NAI for him, too?c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:39 pmThis is extremely NAI for CreatureAlison wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:37 pm At no point does he contribute to the conversation. He does not add evidence to support any narrative. He does not refute the evidence or points that others have brought up. He does not, in fact, engage with the theories and accusations that have been thrown around the thread. He merely fuels the fire with provocative one-liners and moves on without explaining them.
112 c4 creature
These are almost never wolves
Alexa
Would be very surprised if she’s a wolf but most likely is town like 90+ % of the time here. This approach she’s taking would only be tailored to fool me if she’s mafia but idt she would do that in a lobby this big
It's just that the "fanning the flames" thing can just be town being provocative just like this case. I honestly felt the same about DrWilgy last game when they started asking me useless questions and bugging me into responding them which I thought was wolfy but in reality they were being provocative.
OK, admittedly Neeko thought you were asking in general for opinions on Creature, not to actually read that wall of text which she did not want to do.Alison wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:19 amOh cool. So you are admitting that you did not read the post I asked you to read and respond to, and instead of saying that, you chose to make up a half-assed response. I was right to think you were full of it.LinearPoint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:13 amThe truth of the matter is Neeko didn't read your post as she didn't care to and still doesn't really care to.Alison wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:09 am1) I brought up three points against Creature, but you're dismissing the entire case against him because of one point you disagree with.LinearPoint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:07 amNah, Neeko speaks from the heart. The whole "fanning the flames" argument is just BS.Alison wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:03 amThe first thing that sprang to mind when I read your post is this: "you are completely full of it".LinearPoint wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:01 amCreature is being accused of the same thing Neeko is so Neeko is pretty much writing off the case entirely since Neeko knows it is NAI.
Creature's accusations also seem largely based on meta which Neeko is not familiar with.
That being said Neeko is lukewarm to the idea of Creature being Town. Not locktown, but nothing overly sus has been observed.
[VOTE: LinearPoint] aubergine
2) It is obviously true that intentionally fanning the flames is a scummy move. Even if you think you personally haven't fanned any flames, it's disingenuous to extend that logic to protect Creature, without examining the specifics of why he's been accused of fanning flames.
3) None of the accusations I extended towards Creature were based on meta, except for the point about his low energy.
There is no logic in your post. There was no logic in your theory that alexa/nutella were partners, and that was why I dropped my townread on you. Now I have a full blown scumread on you.
The discussion about Creature in thread was a lot of meta talk and talk about fanning the flames.
The read given was based on Creature's posts and response to the pressure, none of which were bad imo.
Neeko also takes great offense to being associated with "no logic" when it was the obvious logical conclusion.
Holy shit I’m much closer to actual goats than GOATs Paopan damnPaopan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:16 am Good players control the flow of information, not roles
As a captain. I'll probably pick 3-4 players (prob. GOATs) like Alexa or Scotty. Then mix in with some average ones (like me); and they then will they'll dictate OP roles we must pick
- from a capt perspective
Yes.ilario wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:39 pmDo you have much experience with her wolf game? Have you caught her as a wolf?nutella wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:46 pmNah. Alison being guns blazing like this is townie and maybe this is the weakest point in the case but the rest is on the nose. Like the whole guilty conscience and 3p comment thing is pretty solid slam dunking imo.112 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:44 pmhonestly that whole alison post reads as scum casing townc4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:39 pmThis is extremely NAI for CreatureAlison wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:37 pm At no point does he contribute to the conversation. He does not add evidence to support any narrative. He does not refute the evidence or points that others have brought up. He does not, in fact, engage with the theories and accusations that have been thrown around the thread. He merely fuels the fire with provocative one-liners and moves on without explaining them.
I like to express reads when I have someone to mindmeld with instead of just throwing them whenever I get them.
this pasta is delicious, marmot gets a day pass.Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:49 pm Dear wolves,
Let’s make this clear so you don’t waste your time: I will not be one of your miselims this game.
You will soon think I could be, of course. Even with the postcap I will likely not be able to keep up with the tryhards on this roster, and I will inevitably be perceived as low-hanging fruit. ‘Marmot will be an easy chop’ you’ll think. ‘Probably a flash wagon candidate.’
But you will be mistaken. You simply won’t be able to mis-elim me. Not this time. I will pull out the WIM when I need to. I have tricks up my sleeves. In fact, save me the energy and just treat this post as an inno child claim. I am for all your intents and purposes untouchable. If you decide you want me out of this game, you will need to spend a kill on me.
It is not your fault you randed wolf, and I am nothing if not sympathetic to an unfortunate rand, so I give you this warning now to help you plan around it. Everyone deserves a fair shot.
In the words of Descartes, ‘I post therefore I am town’. Or, in the words of a more modern philosopher, ‘U Kant touch this’.
Good luck, wolves. Just don’t say I didn’t warn you.