The Syndicate

I am a player in this game.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 7:34 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 7:33 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 7:31 pm
Pennywise wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 7:29 pm Can't say I've ever played a game that started on day 0. >_>
It's a bit different, but at least you get a little head start with your teammates in BTSC right?

Pretending you care about my Day 0 shit, bad look.

I'd care too if your Day 0 shit was in my corn flakes.

Oh hi Day 1.

[VOTE: Dizzy] aubergine to keep things even.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 7:46 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 7:42 pm Who is we lynchin INH?
Dunno. I utterly suck at early-game read divination, so I plan on following people I think seem like gen-u-ine townies. I've been getting good vibes from you, JJJ, and Dys. Someone not checking their role PM before posting would draw my ire if it was anyone other than Scotty.

Does that ire correlate to a vote?

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 8:37 pm [VOTE: sprityo] aubergine with his 1 post

I'll keep posting so this guy doesn't notice me.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 9:34 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 9:22 pm
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 7:46 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 7:42 pm Who is we lynchin INH?
Dunno. I utterly suck at early-game read divination, so I plan on following people I think seem like gen-u-ine townies. I've been getting good vibes from you, JJJ, and Dys. Someone not checking their role PM before posting would draw my ire if it was anyone other than Scotty.
Does that ire correlate to a vote?
I'm not gonna vote for Scotty because he did it, mainly due to Scotty's eccentricities. If another player did it, I'd cast an eye in their direction, but I don't don't know if I'd vote for them.

Is anyone particularly drawing your ire, Mr. Marmot? Oh, sorry, Mr. Marmot was your father.

Nope, nothing yet. I've gotta run now though. What you got for me? I'll read it when I get back.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:08 am I wanted to soul read Marmot as town. I think I can soul read Marmot, and that can be my superpower. He should post more things.

I've given the other game a lot of attention, so I'm posting fewer things here right now k.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:32 am Marmot asked a single question in his eight posts of pertinence to making reads (about INH potentially voting Scotty). That's a civilian ratio for Marmot.

JaggedJimmyJay called me a civilian for the most minimal of content ever offered in the history of Marmots.

Lynch this bear.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:52 am
Marmot wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:49 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:32 am Marmot asked a single question in his eight posts of pertinence to making reads (about INH potentially voting Scotty). That's a civilian ratio for Marmot.
JaggedJimmyJay called me a civilian for the most minimal of content ever offered in the history of Marmots.

Lynch this bear.
You always lament your lack of credit, but when you get it you get scared.

Your response made me laugh.

Damn, and I already voted for you and everything.

[VOTE: JaggedJimmyJay] aubergine

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:56 am What a waste of time. This looks suspicious. Is this a joke vote? JJJ isn't getting lynched Day 1, what world do you think we're in?

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:06 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:02 am
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:00 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:58 amI don't think it's bad. All we have right now is the reading of intentions.
Yeah, intensions. I think scum is more likely to feel they need a "good enough reason" to vote, while I know for my part when I'm town I just want to make things happen. Especially if I feel I have little to work with.
Do you think scum will try to evoke false suspicion on Civs intentionally, or is that just a simplistic fairy tale I should forget about?
Since you ask, it's a bit simplistic. If anything I feel, especially day 1, that scum are more likely to sit back and not stick their neck too far out, as town are usually quite good at suspecting each other and getting into arguments on their own as well. Since scum is conscious that their suspicions are fake, they would generally be more conscious of constructing reasons that sounds believable. Whether or not they succeed is a different thing. But it's not inherently scummy to form wagons or pressure players with light reasoning or even no reasoning on D1, or vote a lot and start exploring. The exploring is the towny thing to do imo, as scum doesn't need to explore. Or do you disagree with this?

I sincerely consciously suspect you truly for sincere real constructed reasons k

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:20 am
Marmot wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:17 am
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:06 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:02 am
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:00 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:58 amI don't think it's bad. All we have right now is the reading of intentions.
Yeah, intensions. I think scum is more likely to feel they need a "good enough reason" to vote, while I know for my part when I'm town I just want to make things happen. Especially if I feel I have little to work with.
Do you think scum will try to evoke false suspicion on Civs intentionally, or is that just a simplistic fairy tale I should forget about?
Since you ask, it's a bit simplistic. If anything I feel, especially day 1, that scum are more likely to sit back and not stick their neck too far out, as town are usually quite good at suspecting each other and getting into arguments on their own as well. Since scum is conscious that their suspicions are fake, they would generally be more conscious of constructing reasons that sounds believable. Whether or not they succeed is a different thing. But it's not inherently scummy to form wagons or pressure players with light reasoning or even no reasoning on D1, or vote a lot and start exploring. The exploring is the towny thing to do imo, as scum doesn't need to explore. Or do you disagree with this?
I sincerely consciously suspect you truly for sincere real constructed reasons k
Dude you're supposed to put the new word after the crossed-out word, it doesn't make sense this way.

but I wasnt replacing words, I was just removing the ones that Dizzy said r bad

What are the reasons for voting Avito? I read his iso. He comes across as brusque, and hasn't posted anything on topic, aaaaand that's all I've got.

I see a similar thing from JackofHearts2005. Why are your votes on him?

But I feel good that the votes are on players with minimal to no content, rather than someone with high content who made one "disgusting" post.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:47 am
Marmot wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:34 am I see a similar thing from JackofHearts2005. Why are your votes on him?
Of the people I designated as having no civilian credit, he's the one I'd least expect to see there.

Sure.

Comparatively, I don't understand why I received civilian credit from you when I did. If you were flavored skittle, you'd be a mandarin right about now. It feels like you're handing out credit rather carelessly.

I'll bite though.

[VOTE: JackofHearts2005] aubergine

Spoiler: show

I'll bear that in mind.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 1:11 pm Lord JJJ is more likely to be civilian than Quiet JJJ. Absolutely true.

Lord dunya is more likely to be civilian than Quiet dunya. Yes, I remember Fire Emblem.

Lord Sloonei is more likely to be civilian than Quiet Sloonei.

Lord Golden is more likely to be civilian than Quiet Golden.

Fixed.

It's Day 1 peeps. Be careless.

The King of Fuck Mountain, LordTownLoudJay decrees it.

(I'm just giving Jay a hard time, I think he's town)

The rest of you on the other hand, should be lynched carelessly.

Oh I have a vote and it's entirely vague and unfounded.

Life feels better now.

lapluie wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 11:59 pm
sig wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 11:27 pm Wolbre is being to nice. I think he's mafia.
Nice = mafia
Mean = town

Hey now lapluie, play nice!

See what I did there?

I hope Long Con is lynched so he doesn't vote for me again tomorrow.

Marmot wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 11:38 am I'll bite though.

[VOTE: JackofHearts2005] aubergine

Here's why I voted for you Jack, you can add it to your list.

I see Jay can't make his mind up on me. That's cool.

I want to play, but I'm about to go eat pizaz and play board games so :/

I lied, we ordered pizza.

I dont eat meat fam :[

One thing's for sure. Probably. I doubt that Epignosis is scum and JaggedJimmyJay is civilian.

I'm having flashbacks of Epignosis vs Sloonei in Lord of the Rings Mafia. They were both mafia in that game.

sprityo wrote: ↑Sat May 05, 2018 1:42 am caught up.

*middle fingers to the crowd*

im going to sleep

According to Lapluie's Law, you're a pure townie.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat May 05, 2018 1:46 am
Marmot wrote: ↑Sat May 05, 2018 1:44 am I'm having flashbacks of Epignosis vs Sloonei in Lord of the Rings Mafia. They were both mafia in that game.
Neat. Have you ever seen a Jay vs. Epi when one or both was bad?

Nope, never even seen a baddie Jay.

Or maybe I have, can't remember.

Let's skip all this petty nonsense, and you just give me my towncard, k?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat May 05, 2018 1:53 am Epi is bad. I dunno if Jay is bad too but Epi hounded Jay straight out of the gates for reasons he can't remember and punctuation and seems more interested in trolling Jay than finding bad guys. His gimmick this time was meh as fuck and I bet he did it to play to his meta. I don't know how anyone can think he comes out of that interaction looking good.

They both softly prodded each other and then it predictably turned into a full blow up. They both look worse for it but Epi is just straight up talking shit.

Lynch Epi.

And here I was thinking the opposite. Why would Epi pick a fight with Jay Night 1 if he was mafia and Jay wasn't?

I've eaten his cornflakes.

Not caught up at all, so I'm voting off-wagon on myself, whIle sitting on a toilet in a coffee shop.

wolbre04 wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 1:49 pm
dunya wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 12:55 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 12:34 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 12:26 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 12:14 pm I have seen these “technicolor vote” things many times and still have no idea what they mean. An clear explanation would be appreciated.
I list all the votes (including abandoned votes) in the order they were made. Each color is one person who was voted for.

So this way we can see who started each wagon, who jumped on it, and any counter-wagons that may have been made.
We should all put in a few bucks and hire a programmer to code that into the vote tags, so we can call it up automatically.
I'd chip in for that.
I'll throw in $20 if someone will do it

It's on my list of things to do.

But if there's anyone here with php experience and has an interest in it, PM me. That would be amazing.

Linki: oooh colors!

Oops, that should be in OT green, but oh well.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 9:15 pm My problem with JJJ is threefold:

1) He jumped on LC for no reason Day 1 even after I said I thought LC was good.

2) He voted for a quiet player who turned out to be good.

3) He himself is now cool with a quiet thread.

Why'd you vote for me?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 7:49 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 7:28 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 9:15 pm My problem with JJJ is threefold:

1) He jumped on LC for no reason Day 1 even after I said I thought LC was good.

2) He voted for a quiet player who turned out to be good.

3) He himself is now cool with a quiet thread.
Why'd you vote for me?
I agreed with the other guy who voted for you.

Were you caught up? What did you agree with?

I voted me so as not to miss the lynch poll, having no knowledge of what was happening here.

No reason is different than agreeing with the other guy.

why did we not lynch epi?

So many dead townies, so sad

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 8:46 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 8:45 pm why did we not lynch epi?
Why should we?

He's made two bad votes with inconsistent reasoning.

Linki: I was preoccupied for the last 24 hours, sorry about that.

juliets wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 8:48 pm Damn. RIP sprityo.

So Marmot you weren't silenced?

I don't wanna talk about it.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 6:59 pm [VOTE: Marmot] aubergine

Shit or get off the pot.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 9:42 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 9:29 pm Epignosis, why did you vote for Marmot?
No reason. Please stop mentioning me.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 7:49 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 7:28 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 9:15 pm My problem with JJJ is threefold:

1) He jumped on LC for no reason Day 1 even after I said I thought LC was good.

2) He voted for a quiet player who turned out to be good.

3) He himself is now cool with a quiet thread.
Why'd you vote for me?
I agreed with the other guy who voted for you.

Regardless, neither reason is a good one.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 9:02 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 8:55 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 6:59 pm [VOTE: Marmot] aubergine

Shit or get off the pot.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 9:42 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 9:29 pm Epignosis, why did you vote for Marmot?
No reason. Please stop mentioning me.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 7:49 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Mon May 07, 2018 7:28 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 9:15 pm My problem with JJJ is threefold:

1) He jumped on LC for no reason Day 1 even after I said I thought LC was good.

2) He voted for a quiet player who turned out to be good.

3) He himself is now cool with a quiet thread.
Why'd you vote for me?
I agreed with the other guy who voted for you.

Regardless, neither reason is a good one.
I don't care about having a good reason.

What was my inconsistency?

I'll save you some trouble:

I don't care about being inconsistent either.

You probably don't care about the roof either.

Search found 110 matches