The Syndicate

harry potter and the goblet is the best book but the worst movie and if you disagree im killing you first

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2018 8:25 pm Yeah part 1. It does a good job at capturing the whole dark atmosphere of the first half of the book.

As for 5 it captures the empire of Umbridge and the DA thing perfectly, and that's satisfying for me.

they deleted the scene between harry and petunia tho

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2018 9:23 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2018 7:58 pm Movie 4 is probably the worst in a more global sense.

But 3 casually forgets to explain the main plot and 6 casually skips the main battle of the book.

Ugh these films.

Best ones are 5 and 7. They are the only ones I'd call really good adaptions.
The fourth movie eliminated too many plot elements and came off as just a compilation of monster battles with Voldemort as the final boss.

Plus it's always bothered me to no end that they completely eliminated Ludo Bagman. Without him there's no reason for Harry to give his prize money to Fred and George, thus there's no explanation later as to why they're able to open and operate their shop. What, are we supposed to just believe that did it by magic?

It's been too long since I've seen any of the others to have specific gripes. I just remember being especially disappointed by Goblet of Fire because it was my favorite book.

plus seeing hermione own rita skeeter was so satisfying in the books

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2018 9:58 pm The movies really shined in some places, but having read the books first, the movies ended up subpar. Great aesthetic and a few good moments, perfect casting for preteen Harry Potter and for Snape, the feeling of the movies was perfect. There were a lot of things left out of movies that they needed, and the overall story was mutilated in some places. The final Harry vs Voldemort battle was awful, for one.

Decent movies if it weren't for the books though

the book made the point that voldemort was no more than a man in death

and yet the movie decided to complete disregard that

shame

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2018 11:29 pm juliets and I are not teammates.

There. Go. Find bad guys.

so you know you're on different teams

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2018 4:22 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 27, 2018 4:03 pm ColinIsCool - Keeper
DharmaHelper - Beater
insertnamehere - Chaser
JaggedJimmyJay - Seeker
Kylemii - Chaser
Turnip Head - Beater

We don't need #7. Championship.
TFW I'm late to Quidditch practice

Too bad Negan's a muggle.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:10 pm I'm going to have essentially zero time until Tuesday night or Wednesday. While I'm not here y'all best find excuses to do work and not excuses to do fuck all. Epi's recent grumbles are valid.

[VOTE: Quin] aubergine, because he said some shit I didn't like earlier. He provided a token response to Epi's dig at juliets which just looked like "this is where I am supposed to interject with this here comment" instead of "this is a problem and I want to address it".

on what planet would epis post actually be a problem though

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:02 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:01 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:10 pm I'm going to have essentially zero time until Tuesday night or Wednesday. While I'm not here y'all best find excuses to do work and not excuses to do fuck all. Epi's recent grumbles are valid.

[VOTE: Quin] aubergine, because he said some shit I didn't like earlier. He provided a token response to Epi's dig at juliets which just looked like "this is where I am supposed to interject with this here comment" instead of "this is a problem and I want to address it".
on what planet would epis post actually be a problem though
You tell me.

Jupiter?

timmer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:12 pm Oh and what the christ... as I went to post that, I got the "some posts were made while you were slow-ass typing on your phone" msg but the posts were all cut off and only the right hand side was visible? That a thing?

This just happened to me.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:58 pm juliets, Epi says you’re not on his team. Whaddya say to that?

All you're doing is asking juliets for a read on Epi. It's no more "token" than my bull, 3J.

that would be less token for those of you who are somewhat competent in the english language

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:18 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:14 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:58 pm juliets, Epi says you’re not on his team. Whaddya say to that?
All you're doing is asking juliets for a read on Epi. It's no more "token" than my bull, 3J.
I was asking juliets to respond in some capacity to what I interpreted to be an accusation. You ponderfaced Epignosis as if he'd said something suspicious. What was the point of your post?

It's a legal requirement in mafia for someone to respond in kind when a player mentions not being somebody's teammate.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:18 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:08 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:06 pm I didn't have a "dig" at juliets.

My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.

You don't have to believe that, of course, but I threw it out there anyway.
Oh.

What do you think of Quin's response?
I don't suspect him for it. I think he saw something in it, and went after it. I think that's a good mark for him, even if he was erroneous.

You think too much of me.

timmer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:44 pm Seriously though, does the left half of the posts thing happen on all phones? Do I need a new background skin thing?

No, it happened on my computer a bit earlier. For now best just post and read what people have said after.

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 2:28 am Less than zero interest in lynching Jay...

This seems to be a recurring theme with you. Why?

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 7:37 am
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 3:10 am
Glorfindel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 2:28 am Less than zero interest in lynching Jay...
This seems to be a recurring theme with you. Why?
I’m not sure what you mean by this remark, Quin? My personal view is that Jay is a fellow of superior intellect and capable of analysis far beyond that of mere mortals. On that basis, if he’s Town, I’d much prefer him on our side. If by some fluke he’s bad, he’ll reveal himself later down the track. I think he’s far more useful to us alive.

If you were by some chance referring to my last game here with Golden, I’ll confess - I do so wish he was playing this game. It would make my decision here infinitely easier.

Sure. On that same basis, if he's bad, I'd much prefer him dead. How do you think he'll reveal himself? Do you have any scum-3J tells to share?

I think there's a recurring theme when you play mafia where you prefer not to lynch the people you get along well with. That's normal, I'm not trying to tell you off or anything. But at the same time I think you need to be more mindful that we only get so much time in a game and we can't spend it protecting the people we like.

Or maybe I'm completely wrong about you.

Putting his usefulness if he's a civilian aside, do you actually think he is a civilian?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:05 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:03 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:02 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:00 am Did Owner slip when she conflated Dark Arts and Deathly Hallows mechanics?
I don't know how that would be a slip. They're two completely different things.

... unless you meant townslip.
No I mean did she scumslip. They're two completely different things. One of them you were talking about, the other one you weren't.
=.=

Yeah I don't get it.
Ok I'll walk you though it, because I love you.

Here you explain the Deathly Hallows mechanic. Which, since they're all locked behind secrets, the basic gist is "You get one if you kill the guys that have them or if you're the last vote on the guys that have one"

Here Owner says "Dark Arts" and not "Deathly Hallows". Her exact quote will be helpful in understanding my thought process so here:

Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:12 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:04 am what about me, owner? Give DH a break and flag me for a bit.
You knowing the intricacies of the Dark Arts stuff and sharing it could be an act to try to buy townie points. I remember reading the stuff about it but not nearly picking up enough about it to understand it all. Basically, if someone had or possessed Dark Arts abilities this game, they would probably read up on it or make sure they understood their abilities.

Technically, what you said is some form of mechanical-talk or a retelling of information, in which some of it is free to us. But it doesn't necessarily solve us the game or anything.

It's potenitally the kind of post meant to look like a person is being useful, but in reality, they aren't truly really adding to the thread.
"The intricacies of" - What's intricate about [SECRET] and "Keep what you kill"
"The Dark Arts Stuff" - if you've got Dark Arts on the mind and someone says Deathly Hallows, you might confuse the two. Freudian Slippage.
"I remember reading the stuff about it but not nearly picking up enough...." - [Secrets] and "Keep what you kill" doesn't strike me as hard to retain.

IDK thinking out loud, the best indicator of an actual slip here is conflating "Dark Arts" with "Deathly Hallows" because she had "Dark Arts" on the mind.

I am not very smart but could it also be the other way around?

Having Deathly Hallows on the brain and reading "Dark Arts."

In other words, maybe she's got a Hallow.

Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:37 am
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:15 am
Glorfindel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 7:37 am
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 3:10 am
Glorfindel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 2:28 am Less than zero interest in lynching Jay...
This seems to be a recurring theme with you. Why?
I’m not sure what you mean by this remark, Quin? My personal view is that Jay is a fellow of superior intellect and capable of analysis far beyond that of mere mortals. On that basis, if he’s Town, I’d much prefer him on our side. If by some fluke he’s bad, he’ll reveal himself later down the track. I think he’s far more useful to us alive.

If you were by some chance referring to my last game here with Golden, I’ll confess - I do so wish he was playing this game. It would make my decision here infinitely easier.
Sure. On that same basis, if he's bad, I'd much prefer him dead. How do you think he'll reveal himself? Do you have any scum-3J tells to share?

I think there's a recurring theme when you play mafia where you prefer not to lynch the people you get along well with. That's normal, I'm not trying to tell you off or anything. But at the same time I think you need to be more mindful that we only get so much time in a game and we can't spend it protecting the people we like.

Or maybe I'm completely wrong about you.

Putting his usefulness if he's a civilian aside, do you actually think he is a civilian?
I wish I had meta on you. I can read this post both ways, but part me, kind of wants to read you town for it. Could Glorfindel be with jay? Or enjoys playing with friends thing?

My town meta is "Wrongfully call out four scumslips, get overly full of myself and lose the game for the civilians."

My mafia meta is "Wrongfully call out six scumslips, get overly full of myself and get voted best mafioso 2k16."

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:19 pm We should make everyone say "I am scum" instead

I am scum.

karavalenge wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:26 pm Can we use it to make a statement that we don't know if it's true or false?

Like: There are a Prime Number of Death Eaters in Gryffindor.

If it is false, then there's either 4, 6 (Which is unlikely) or 0. If it is true, then there's 1, 2, 3, or 5.

I don't think this works. At least in my mind, a lie detector shouldn't be able to respond to things the speaker isn't aware of himself.

But if scum were to say it

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:44 pm I’m a little sketched by the protests here. Like, obviously it’s not going to win the game on D1 and if you don’t give a shit then don’t do it, but this is almost anti-town.

Slight scum read on timmer. Participates while discouraging the whole thing to minimise the chance he'll have his post checked.

So if someone's getting veritaserum, let it be timmer.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 1:51 pm
Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 1:44 pm Also, what's a Player Salad? This terminology is new to me.
It's new to everyone.

A few games ago, we found a new scumtell. Scum players, in order to look productive, throw out some reads on other players. Not everyone, but also nobody specific. Nothing substantial, and little to follow up on. Just some light poking at some of the names in the thread, in a way that looks like it's generating content.

Something similar to that. I haven't seen it defined that well, but we've caught scum with it.

The smattering of player reads without substance was coined as 'player salad' by someone.

I also think we've forgotten the definition of player salad over time.

Like, ?Owner? threw those names out saying she felt she had a good meta-read on them. Player salad is when you threw out a bunch of names with no tangible connection to each other.

Bullzeye wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 4:29 pm
Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:29 am
I think I associate Dark Arts with Deathly Hallows as they are relatively both dark things. Or in my mind, both relate to the one who isn't to be named. The Deathly Hallows wouldn't exist without the dark arts I think.

It's like when I say scum. When I think of scum, I think both mafia and 3p (third party) are scum. Some sites like NF have taught me sometimes indies aren't scum.
This strikes me as odd because the Hallows themselves aren't evil. They're associated with Death, and trying to cheat Death in various ways. Good people don't want to die either. The Resurrection Stone was also just supposed to bring back people's loved ones, nothing remotely bad about that. We have seven books worth of the Invisibility Cloak being used for good, and the Elder Wand just obeys power. Those two could be used for evil or for good, depending on who had them. Voldemort wanted them as weapons because he was evil, not because they were.

um, actually voldemort only wanted the wand which had surfaced under various names as it's own legend. he didn't know nor care about the hallows

as the resident harry potter fanatic it's my sworn duty to correct you ignorant motherfuckers

Bullzeye wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:00 pm Should we not just lynch all the Slytherins first since they'll probably end up evil if they aren't already?

shit you're right

"There's no witch or wizard who went bad that wasn't in Slytherin"

SIKE

meet peter pettigrew, noobs.

Bullzeye wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 6:11 pm
Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:37 pm
Bullzeye wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:21 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:17 pm "Not all Slytherin's are Dark Wizards, but every Dark Wizard has been a Slytherin"
Wormtail was a Gryffindor.
Even the dark wizards refused to accept Wormtail
Still betrayed all his closest friends for the Dark Lord's cause and played a crucial role in restoring Voldy to full power. Seems pretty Dark to me. The man was a coward, motivated only by fear and self-preservation. I always saw him as being the opposite end of the scale from Snape.

sure but let's not forget that his love for lily aside snape was an asshole through and through

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:45 pm
Turnip Head wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:42 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:30 pm
Turnip Head wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:27 pmmeh
Your assertion about my meta “worry” is completely silly. You delighted in an easy ass reason to wagon someone who said he wasn’t paying attention (I lied)
okey dokey
I don’t think you just oopsied and forgot this entire universe:

“JJJ is reputed for being the hardest worker as a civilian, and that reputation will be jeopardized if he dies in this game having barely tried — as a civilian”

You all but said you weren't able to give 100% 3J though.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 10:09 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 6:04 pm Hey gang! I have two votes now, LOL.

HAH HAH.

LOL.

Anyway I have no time to read or do anything; I’m at a Pittsburgh conference. Did I already say that? Dunno.

RIP my meta 5ever

Someone tag me and give me a convincing argument for a vote and I may follow you, assuming I get a chance to check in.
If I posted this, Jay would vote for me.

Would that vote be justified?

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 6:25 am
Quin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 5:01 ammint
If that is your defence, Quin, I fear it is somewhat lacking...

Do I need a defence for sounding like an asshole?

juliets wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 8:23 am good morning everyone -

There's been a lot about Jay posted over the evening/night and after reading it all I'm less inclined to vote for him today. He mentions a "breakdown" and I don't know if that is true but when I couple it with the fact he said supatown Jay is dead it puts me off voting for him. I know from discord how busy he is and how he is immersed in his studies and barely comes up for air. Maybe these things are why he does not appear to be the civ Jay I know. I'm still not wild about his logic for voting Quin but willing to overlook that at this point in the game in the hopes we have a town Jay - maybe not supatown, but at least town.

Glorf I think mentioned Quin as being off (a little disagreeable or something like that) but that has recently been indicative of his town game. Also I think his sense of humor can sometimes be misconstrued (sp?). Someone described his town behavior perfectly in a past game and I'll try and find it.

I don't know at this point who I'll be voting for. I have some analysis to do.

hi yes this is me plz 4give

B I G L O V E

speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 10:31 am
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:14 pm Like, ?Owner? threw those names out saying she felt she had a good meta-read on them. Player salad is when you threw out a bunch of names with no tangible connection to each other.
A meta-read from one game?
Meta reads that are mostly worthless because we were all being ship-mates and stuff?
Meta reads that are the rest of the way worthless because it was only one game, and there's no way of telling what traits carry over from game to game?
Meta reads that would be worthless anyway because they're meta?

PLAYA SA LAD

point taken.

also i [VOTE: timmer] aubergine

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 11:49 am
Quin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 11:42 am also i [VOTE: timmer] aubergine
Why?

Took a dump on truth-gate while contributing to it.

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 12:04 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 12:00 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 11:49 am
Quin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 11:42 am also i [VOTE: timmer] aubergine
Why?
Took a dump on truth-gate while contributing to it.
Oh yeah. I read that earlier and forgot. Thanks.

How would you compare that to Speed’s reaction to the same exercise?

Didn't really think about it. It's also 2:30am and I'm going to bed, so he gets a pass for sheer dumb luck.

linki: haha yikes

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 5:46 pm Hey neat! That's really neat! That's like, well, it's just so neat!

https://media1.tenor.com/images/6410fce ... /tenor.gif

i was gonna come in and talk summore about speedchuck ie truthgate but like now i guess i've got to find something else to do with my time

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 5:28 pm EBWOPing this since I butchered the code.

juliets wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 3:27 pm Jay is this the post you are talking about re: Quin? You think that me thinking his question was a natural follow-up was a poor reason? I don't understand that at all. And what TMI are you talking about? Please point that out in my post.
I attacked Quin, because attacking Quin is a nice way to make things happen early in a thread. Quin is responsive, and it is something likely to become A Thing in general thread dialogue -- and from that, a Mafia game may be born. Your response to that is one that bugs me, because your defense of Quin was as empty as my attack. If Quin's accusation really was that of a "slip", then it was quite silly -- you called it "natural", and I find that dubious.

juliets wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 3:27 pmAs to me contributing to the negative thread climate about you, did you miss this post?

Spoiler: show
juliets wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 8:23 am good morning everyone -

There's been a lot about Jay posted over the evening/night and after reading it all I'm less inclined to vote for him today. He mentions a "breakdown" and I don't know if that is true but when I couple it with the fact he said supatown Jay is dead it puts me off voting for him. I know from discord how busy he is and how he is immersed in his studies and barely comes up for air. Maybe these things are why he does not appear to be the civ Jay I know. I'm still not wild about his logic for voting Quin but willing to overlook that at this point in the game in the hopes we have a town Jay - maybe not supatown, but at least town.
How is that in the least bit negative? I posted it after reviewing what you and others said as of the end of the first day of the phase.
I did see it yes, though I admit that I had previously thought it came later in the phase. It was early in the EST morning, so it wasn't as close to the EOD region as I'd thought (when the general climate of suspicion was shifting or had shifted to the TH and Owner split). So that's a bit better than the alternative, as in backing away from suspicion when the climate wasn't ideal for its being pushed. You must understand though that in that post your assessment of me was still negative. I didn't appear to be the civ Jay you know. You weren't wild about my logic. My transgressions had to be overlooked to give me a break. You didn't call for my destruction, but that's not a positive assessment of my play in this game.

Also note that I have highlighted in blue some of the components of your post here. There's a tone of assertiveness and even combativeness that I am simply not used to seeing in juliets posts. I won't pretend that these are hyper-suspicious things, but you are a very difficult player to read. If you're a mafioso, then I believe it's little things like this that will get you caught. You're too careful for big mistakes. So scrutiny is extremely important in your case.

My perspective that you were contributing to the negative climate surrounding me stems from your approach to my treatment of Quin, beyond that discussed in this post. example / example

Generally your 'getting the ball rolling' accusations have substance. There's a clear difference here.

As far as I was aware the laws of the universe didn't allow for a scum juliets. I'll make time to read up on her today.

juliets wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:12 pm Now that you're here Quin I think everyone is off doing trick or treat things.

That's cool. I spent all last night hiding with the lights off.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:15 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:10 pm Generally your 'getting the ball rolling' accusations have substance. There's a clear difference here.
No, they really don't. People may think so, but I'm always full of shit.

My impression was that whether you believed in an accusation or not, there was always some reasoning behind it on Day 1. Wanna throw me a couple of games to show me otherwise?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:19 pm i had a dream last night where speedchuck was killed at and he was mafia

that's almost exactly what happened last night

yeah but not quite

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:21 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:18 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:15 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:10 pm Generally your 'getting the ball rolling' accusations have substance. There's a clear difference here.
No, they really don't. People may think so, but I'm always full of shit.
My impression was that whether you believed in an accusation or not, there was always some reasoning behind it on Day 1. Wanna throw me a couple of games to show me otherwise?
Oh there is a reason. I don't merely say "Quin is bad!". I say "Quin is bad because X!"

X might absolutely be stupid as hell, but I don't care about that. It provides something that demands a specific response beyond "No, JJJ, I am not bad!". I don't have time right now to go on an archaeological dig through my old games, but I can think of one example that you could look for on your own if you like -- Fiddler on the Roof, when I completely made up a "tell" that revealed Kyle as a mafioso just so it'd be something to talk about.

luckily kyle has just now arrived to verify this so i don't have to

Anyway, on juliets:

Tonally, I don't see an alignment. Her politeness is making it hard to tell. One observation I have very little opinion on but I'll post nonetheless:

juliets wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:01 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:24 pm Oh, by the way, I checked Turnip Head and he is bad.

Voting Turnip Head.

Epi aren't the abilities used at night? We haven't had a game night yet. Or am I missing something (there were A LOT of things to digest in game Set-Up).

juliets wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 3:46 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 3:41 pm Owner's suspicion of DH reads ingenuine
Her defense of the Deathly Hallows/Dark Arts thing wasn't even needed, but she overexplained it in a way that looked nervous

Are there any other facets to the case there?
I'd like to see what was behind her "I have my reasons" about DH just in case it's something tangible that happened in this game that I overlooked.

juliets made two "what's going on?" posts on Day 1. The second kind of contradicts the first since I'd expect she go through at least the effort to figure out if things can happen on Day 1 and realise that there isn't anything "tangible" out there at this point.

in simple terms the possibility that juliets is feigning ignorance about the setup is not 0.

nutella wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:31 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:12 pm As far as I was aware the laws of the universe didn't allow for a scum juliets. I'll make time to read up on her today.
Quin:juliets::Glorf:Jay ?

not today, satan.

Search found 261 matches