The Syndicate

Lunatella

I can't believe I'm being lynched before Uzziah but I hope you'll finally lynch that bastard and his scum buddy Rachel the next two days.

I voted for Rachel.

Lunatella

@Jeph, my point is.. what was all that effort of going out of her way to disprove my statement to prove? She could have used 3,4 quotes and proved her point. She posted 20.

Honestly re: the idea of baddies killing annoying people, if she were good I'd think she'd be dead by now. If Paul and Martha were annoying, which they weren't IMO, she's 100 times so.

Linki w/ Balaam - dude, you're reading too far into it. Cupid didn't shoot an anti-arrow at me. Uzziah is scummy and I want to lynch him. Ever heard of occams razor? Cute theory but not what is happening.

Lunatella

Here's my thoughts on Rachel's post.

#1. I didn't try and convince you to stop suspecting me at all by trying to equate our situations. If that is genuinely what you think happened, it is because you really are convinced I am trying to manipulate you. I have better things to do with my time. I'm not out to manipulate anyone because I'm not bad. If I wanted you to stop suspecting me, I would have been present in the thread arguing with you days ago. But lets face it, when I have a choice between logging into this website to banter with you and do something at home with my family, I'm going to choose my family. I actually loathe playing this game because I'm tired of listening to you. RE: why I didn't even bother catching up after my vacation.

#2. If Uzziah is bad like I believe, you are the most likely teammate. End of story. You have subtly defended him all game and it hasn't gone unnoticed. Ok - you did not vote for Cain. But you still voted for a civvies that day. Sorry sister.

#3. If I had time to do research, I would have used it on researching Uzziah. Sorry if I didn't get my facts straight, but I'm not sure what you were trying to prove. That I have a poor memory? That I didn't catch up last weekend?

#4. Sharing my thoughts on anyone besides the person I suspect is pointless. No one is listening to me about the person I'm most confident about, so I don't see what good speculating on another non-lynch candidate will do.

Though you are starting to convince me to break my oath to only vote Uzziah. I may vote for you instead. Congratulations!

Lunatella

Jephthah wrote:
Rachel wrote:
Job wrote: Let's see... You complain about me hounding on no one but uzziah. But then all you've been talking about for days is me. Then you express the same frustration I am facing, that literally no one is listening and will vote someone else in the end because no one is invested or cares. But yet you don't understand what you're experiencing is exactly what I am facing.

Wisdom about other players? I think Rachel is bad. I think it is ridiculous the ruse she is fronting. But honestly she's right, I just don't care enough. I fought my heart out for a solid day to convince people to vote uzziah and you numbskulls lynch a silenced person.
LOL Job. You're gonna be embarrassed by how wrong you are.

First, let's tackle the idea that I have only talked about you. Here is a list of posts I have made that have NOT addressed you since I announced my suspicion of you on Day 2:
1. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 27#p139927
2. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 90#p140190
3. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 21#p140221
4. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 49#p140349
5. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 51#p140351
6. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 52#p140352
7. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 63#p140363
8. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 66#p140366
9. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 72#p140872
10. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 87#p140887
11. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 32#p140932
12. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 46#p140946
13. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 50#p140950
14. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 43#p141143
15. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 48#p141148
16. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 53#p141153
17. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 52#p141252
18. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 01#p141301
19. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 03#p141303
20. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 72#p141372
That was after a quick skim of my own posts. I found 20 posts where I talk about something other than you, Job. That's more than what some people have posted the entire game. But let's compare that to your own record, eh?
1. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 87#p140287
2. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 14#p140314
Going back to a similar point in the game, you have made TWO posts where you don't mention Uzziah. One is saying RIP Paul and the other is saying you'll be away. But Hey! We're doing the same thing, right?

Now you try and convince me to stop suspecting you by trying to equate our experiences in pursuing our suspects. Except... I actively posted for the entire game (minus real time ONE day where I was extremely ill) while you have not. Whatever your reasons may be, you have not. You are trying to get me to empathize with you to avoid suspicion. However, this doesn't work because in the very next bit, you suddenly suspect me. You have yet to express suspicion of me, but suddenly "Rachel is bad." Reason given:"The ruse am fronting". Bull.
Now Job says he really doesn't care because on the day HE wanted to lynch Uzziah (for reasons that are so superficial and banal they don't even deserve mention) "we" lynched Cain. Many people did not vote Cain-- I did not. I voted for Job.

So, please, Job, if you're going to make a post against me, do some basic research because that was a load of malarkey.

BUT WAIT! THERE'S MORE:
Job wrote:
Rachel wrote:I think at least Job is bad and I have a neutral read on Uzz.

Why have you changed your opinion on him? Why, if you previously thought him to be bad, have you continually found reason not to vote him?

What do you even mean?
I have not suspected Uzziah all game.

I guess I was wrong about Rachel focusing mostly on Job.

Yeah me too, but she went a long way to prove a point eh?

Lunatella

Jephthah wrote:
Isaac wrote:The difference is that Uzziah's focus on Job is revenge, for lack of a better term.
Uzziah was first to go after Job. He went as far as to tell Paul on the first day that he caught a baddie for him, or even 2-3, and the first one was Job. So why would he revenge Job?

But I agree that focusing on Uzziah alone makes me doubt Job more. I get that he's still pushing for Uzziah's lynch, especially after watching him escape every lynch and being sure he should be lynched. But you can both do that, and still say what you think of other players as well.

Job, can you please come in and give us some thoughts other than Uzziah?

Ballam, sorry to hear about your allergies. I know how you feel, so I hope the pills help, because they never help me

Fwiw this is a lie. I went after uzziah first and he tried to act like he was fishing for reactions with his rooting for scum post.

Lunatella

Rachel wrote:I think at least Job is bad and I have a neutral read on Uzz.

Why have you changed your opinion on him? Why, if you previously thought him to be bad, have you continually found reason not to vote him?

Lunatella

Rachel wrote:
Jephthah wrote:Sorry for coming in late. And RIP Gideon and Hagar.

Rachel, if I were a baddie, I'd make sure to post enough to not be considered laying low, so Job not being here yet, means nothing. He can come in at any minute.
That said, can you state again the reasons you think Job is bad, other then the fact he's focusing on Uzziah? Uzziah is only focusing on Job, how is that different?

I'm still pinged by Lazarus' vote for Absalom last day.
Also, what are people's thoughts on Deborah. Just went to look at her reasons for voting Cain (twice) and Mary. Enough to not look bandwagoning, but something feels off to me there.
Here's my problem. The is the THIRD time I've resummarized the case. Third time. People either don't care or don't remember. Job is probably laying low enough that people just forget. I'm getting annoyed because I am trying to garner discussion on someone I think is bad and everyone else seems more concerned with voting out "weird" players like Mary Magdeline and Pilate.

If you want my original words, go through the posts yourself. There's a handy page for that at the front of the thread.
Rachel wrote:
Isaac wrote:Can you quote it for me? Idk if I'm allowed to say this but I'm technically Isaac2.0
I can resummarize it.

Job perseverated on the fact that Paul was not posting on Day 2. This read to me as a baddie who really wanted to draw attention to their work. However, in retrospect, I think Job may have been trying to seem civvie by being completely irrelevant in this post. He also has not let go of the extremely weak Uzzaiah suspicion based on zany Day 1 Antics. He repeats he does not have tunnel vision, but has done literally nothing but discuss Uzzaiah. I can pull Paul's case too, if you'd like.

Rachel wrote:
Paul wrote:
Job wrote:Belshazar also suss for that reason, lean scum on him and Ruth. Townreading paul
you said this right before d1 but you have made no real effort to pursue either of these suspects

speaking of Ruth tons of people found her suspicious early on but she fell off everyone's radar what's with that

Paul wrote:
Job wrote:I won't cry over a dead horseman either, but to be fair, they will only unleash plagues upon heathens because the sovereign are raptured before their coming.

I don't have a good impression of Lot, I think he is trying to intimidate Paul and squash discussion. As well as find out people's identities, let people be.

I still don't like belshazar in particular for that reason and to a lesser extent Ruth.
oh look another person you said is bad but haven't pursued

Paul wrote:
Job wrote:
Paul wrote:
Balaam wrote:Holy early vote! Got any proof there Paul?
you should read his posts there are only two

the first post is like how cute everyone else is look how awesome and tough I am bitches I am totally scum
This one is pointing out how totally fluff and void of any real content Samuels first two points are. I'm not convinced like Paul seemed to be that he's scum but it was an OK observation.
you seem like you're buddying up to me here just to be buddying since i was not being serious in my initial suspicion of Samuel

Paul wrote:
Job wrote:If I had to vote now it would be for belshazar.

I lean scum on Ruth, Martha and Lot. I've felt a little better about Lot recently though.

Townreading Paul and Jonah.
you never voted any of these four people

instead, you jump on uzziah here

Job wrote:
Uzziah wrote:
Rahab wrote:
Uzziah wrote:I'm rooting for the scum.
Oh yeah?
Yeah.
Wifom. No one knows your meta so there's no reason to do it. Which means you have something to hide. I wouldn't mind lynching uzziah. Plus, as someone pointed out, maybe the horsemen voted apocalypse. Uzziah voted that way and I wouldn't be sad to see one leave if that were the case.
which I don't disagree with but you have pursued it over and over and over and over while not really pursuing the suspects you say you suspect

Paul wrote:
Job wrote:I saw uzziah worshiping the devil and associating with heathens, so I'm voting there.

Linki, the wifom is the statement he's rooting for the heathens to win.
see? how is this actually scum hunting

Paul wrote:then all throughout d2 you did almost nothing but pursue uzziah aggressively

while uzziah is really f***ing annoying i agree he is not helping solve the game at all, you seem like you are overly concerned with solving the game but you are not actually pulling the trigger on any of your suspects

its a lot like mr. capps in the champions game for any of you who have followed the current game, but i wont say more than that since it hasn't ended
This was Paul's case.
I think it is quite good.

Now, I am really frustrated that people are STILL giving Job the BOTD when this was one of his more recent posts:
Job wrote:
Balaam wrote:
Rachel wrote:
Job wrote:Catch up is tl,dr.

Great job everyone, can we lynch Uzziah now?
What about all your other suspects?
Indeed. My note-taking fell apart Day 2, but on Day 1, you expressed the following:

Suspicious of:
Belshazzar
Ruth
Lot
Nicodemus
Martha
Uzziah

Trusting of:
Paul
Jonah

Where do you stand on them now?
Who cares? Uzziah is bad.
Like... no he is not about to come in and give you wisdom about other players. He literally doesn't care.

Let's see... You complain about me hounding on no one but uzziah. But then all you've been talking about for days is me. Then you express the same frustration I am facing, that literally no one is listening and will vote someone else in the end because no one is invested or cares. But yet you don't understand what you're experiencing is exactly what I am facing.

Wisdom about other players? I think Rachel is bad. I think it is ridiculous the ruse she is fronting. But honestly she's right, I just don't care enough. I fought my heart out for a solid day to convince people to vote uzziah and you numbskulls lynch a silenced person.

Lunatella

Isaac wrote:Proof Job?

Here's my proof broski, a knuckle sandwich

Lunatella

Balaam wrote:
Uzziah wrote:
Balaam wrote:
Job wrote:Catch up is tl,dr.

Great job everyone, can we lynch Uzziah now?
Can we lynch you if he's neither Heathen nor Horseman?
I'm fine with that.
What if I propose it the other way around? If we lynch Job Day 4 and he is neither Heathen nor Horseman, can we lynch you next?

Yes and yes. If you have to lynch me to be convinced so be it.

Lunatella

Balaam wrote:
Rachel wrote:
Job wrote:Catch up is tl,dr.

Great job everyone, can we lynch Uzziah now?
What about all your other suspects?
Indeed. My note-taking fell apart Day 2, but on Day 1, you expressed the following:

Suspicious of:
Belshazzar
Ruth
Lot
Nicodemus
Martha
Uzziah

Trusting of:
Paul
Jonah

Where do you stand on them now?

Who cares? Uzziah is bad.

Lunatella

Catch up is tl,dr.

Great job everyone, can we lynch Uzziah now?

Lunatella

Everyone, I am on V/LA today thru Monday. I'll have really limited access to the thread but I'll try to pop in. Please try not to lynch a third civ and invoke divine judgment while I'm gone.

Lunatella

Uzziah wrote:Yay!

I'm voting you until one of us is dead.

Lunatella

RIP Paul.

Lunatella

Paul wrote:then all throughout d2 you did almost nothing but pursue uzziah aggressively

while uzziah is really f***ing annoying i agree he is not helping solve the game at all, you seem like you are overly concerned with solving the game but you are not actually pulling the trigger on any of your suspects

its a lot like mr. capps in the champions game for any of you who have followed the current game, but i wont say more than that since it hasn't ended

How is aggressively pursuing Uzziah not pulling the trigger on one of my suspects? He is my largest suspect. I don't understand this.

Lunatella

Paul wrote:like i said i hate actually suspecting you b/c you have been one of the most fun and game-solving players so far, but it is odd to me that you did not attempt to start discussion on anything yesterday despite heavily suspecting many players since even before d1

I did attempt to start discussion. People were nervous that the only case was on Uzziah. I suggested people actually discuss other options then. I wasn't going to do the legwork, I had other matters to attend near the end. But I thought and still do think Uzziah is the best lynch option. Though people here seem to be deaf, so I'm not sure that discussing him any further will be productive whatsoever

Lunatella

Paul wrote:
Job wrote:If I had to vote now it would be for belshazar.

I lean scum on Ruth, Martha and Lot. I've felt a little better about Lot recently though.

Townreading Paul and Jonah.
you never voted any of these four people

instead, you jump on uzziah here

Job wrote:
Uzziah wrote:
Rahab wrote:
Uzziah wrote:I'm rooting for the scum.
Oh yeah?
Yeah.
Wifom. No one knows your meta so there's no reason to do it. Which means you have something to hide. I wouldn't mind lynching uzziah. Plus, as someone pointed out, maybe the horsemen voted apocalypse. Uzziah voted that way and I wouldn't be sad to see one leave if that were the case.
which I don't disagree with but you have pursued it over and over and over and over while not really pursuing the suspects you say you suspect

Sorry, but he is the person I'm most convinced of.

I know I've mentioned I'm still wary of Lot and Belshazzar. But I'm not sure why you'd expect me to keep the same reads as I had on day 0? Reads evolve over time.

Lunatella

Paul wrote:
Job wrote:I saw uzziah worshiping the devil and associating with heathens, so I'm voting there.

Linki, the wifom is the statement he's rooting for the heathens to win.
see? how is this actually scum hunting

That wasn't scum hunting, it was a vote.

Lunatella

Paul wrote:and as much as i hate to say it b/c job is one of the players most trying to solve this game, but i am starting to think job may be scum

Why do you think that?

Lunatella

Rip Cain

Lunatella

I'm likely going to be absent from the thread the rest of the day. In case things go sour and I'm lynched ironically, I urge you to lynch Uzziah. Possible teammates include Rachel and Lot. I think Jonah is trustworthy. I also like Paul but I'm not sure of his hunting methods, but I think it comes from good intentions. I am still very wary of Belshazzar.

Lunatella

At Rachel, saying I've dismissed your points is not a good reason to stop talking about them. I may disagree with you, but you shouldn't stop pursuing shit because of me. I am not the boss, so don't use me as an excuse.

Lunatella

I'll help you narrow down your list of options to numbers 1 through 3

Lunatella

Mordecai wrote:I very much dislike being ignored. I asked you a question Job. I expect an answer.

If uzziah isn't setting up Meta for a future game, why would he be so obviously bad? What do you think the probability of him being a horseman with a death activated ability is? Your initial non response to my question makes me wonder if you know that its true, and that you're trying to push his lynch for specifically that reason. Which would explain why you ignored that part of my post to avoid the issue.

I apologize if you answered me earlier and I missed it.

I don't think you were ignored, you just aren't answered directly. The meta aspect of my arguments is flawed per my discussion with lot. I can't believe you're making me repeat this again but He is bad IMO because he voted likely horseman option day 0, did a no u to my suspicion of him, has not contributed to conversation positively, voted early and the away his vote, refused to discuss thoughts on other players when directly asked to do so.. Is this making sense?

Re your question about likelihood of horseman shenanigans, I personally doubt this is the case, because I doubt he expected to get so much flak from me for his statement. Believe it or not there are even more obnoxious things you could do than that to attract unwanted attention

Lunatella

I agree its odd we don't have additional options were really discussing. At the same time neither of you are offering to do the legwork yourselves. Are you afraid to stick your neck out? What do you think of Paul /absalom re: martha? Or Rachels theory about mentioning Paul while possibly silenced? If this really concerns you, you should be discussing things like this at greater length..

Lunatella

Also I'd like your input on how saying I have tunnel vision over and over again isn't trying to make people believe something. It isn't true, so stop saying it. I would have given Uzziah a little BOTD if he did anything at all to ease my suspicion.

Lunatella

No I don't believe that all his teammates are coming into the thread to call it lazy. But there are quite a few people who expressed opinions like this, enough to quirk my brow. If uzziah is bad, I wouldn't be surprised if at least one of these people are scum. No, I still disagree it is a lazy vote. There are many more reasons that he appears scummy than his initial rooting post, as I've been trying to outline.

As for future wifom, you may have a point, but part of it in a typical game is being able to point to your identity and how you've done it in past games. I agree that maybe I didn't consider the roles being matched up at game end, but I still think it made no sense to do.

Regardless, I feel like a broken record, but I couldn't care less about his initial rooting post and why it is wifom etc, he's done nothing to steer opinion of himself positively IMO, you decide for yourself but it's the best I have to go on.

Lunatella

Lot wrote:Why wouldn't Uzziah be doing it for future game set up? All will be revealed at the end... you think he can't say in a future game 'When I was Uzziah in Biblical mafia I did that'?

I hate that I'm defending this guy, but a lot of the stuff being said about him just doesn't make any sense. Job has tunnel vision, but no his reasoning is not good. The only thing about it that is true is that Uzziah is refusing to be helpful in the thread, but mostly I think Job has tunnel vision because the person Uzziah has been looking at for a lynch is Job.

Quite frankly I am remembering why I had my eye on you day 1.

Lunatella

Uzziah wrote:If Job was good, he would have backed down on pursuing me.

I don't have tunnel vision as your friend Lot is trying to make everyone believe. I was absolutely open minded, but absolutely nothing you have said in this game has made me feel better about your alignment whatsoever. You voted the sketchiest option d0, you have the sketchiest post of the game, you pulled a no u on my suspicion of you, you replied to me snark I'll and refused to post thoughts on other players upon my request, the list goes on and on. If you had done 3 of those gazillion things and made some progress towards doing something remotely town, perhaps I could look the other way. But combined with your scumminess, others are voucher for you and it only makes me more suspicious.

I will be voting Uzziah now and I hope others will follow.

Lunatella

Consider in addition to what I've already pointed out, how many people are subtly defending Uzziah comment by calling suspicion of him dumb or lazy. This makes me wary tbqh. I disagree that it is easy. If you want an example take a look at how difficult it is to convince the players in this very game.

People make valid points when they say 'but why would you do that if you're bad?' to which I respond, stop using that as the sum of the case. Yes it is the basis point for why I am suspicious of him, but he has done scummiest things since then, like refusing to be helpful and responding snarkily, voting early, etc.

But if you're still hung up on the rooting statement, I'll say again. The reason you would say 'I am bad' when good is so that you get lynched and everyone discovers OMG he did it as town. It only takes a few times of that happening before eventually you're dealt a scum role and now you are free to say things that are bat sit crazy without suspicion. My point being, no one knows for certain who Uzziah is, so there is no point in setting up for a future game. He's doing it for the wifom.

Lunatella

Nicodemus wrote:"Rooting for" versus "Rooting out" would seem to be the deciding factor on the Uzzie front. When you say "rooting for" you mean cheering on, when you say "rooting out" you mean the weeding definition that was given. Thhough I would think it would be too foolhardy to openly admit to "rooting for" mafia.

You be surprised. I witnessed someone claim they were mafia day after day and never get lynched in a recent game. People think it's so obvious it couldn't be true. But what purpose does it have in a sock game?

Lunatella

Deborah wrote:
Job wrote:RIP darlin.

Public enemy number one is obviously uzziah. He point out blank said he's rooting for the scum.

I also suspect absalom. Why else would Martha be dead? She gained more than her fair share of suspicion day 1 IMO.
Judging Uzziah's rooting post would be a lot easier if I could know who the player is. Without that knowledge, it could just be a stupid early game comment meant to stir the pot. As it is, I don't think a Uzziah lynch would be a bad idea, but it would be lazy. Lynching someone for a post that could have been a joke is lazy, but it is fine if nothing more concrete emerges. I hope that makes sense. Off for lunch now, will continue to catch up later.

Yes it might be ridiculous to lynch him solely for that comment, but don't you think his behaviour since has been anything but town? He refuses to comment on anyone but three people. He responds curtly, he throws a tantrum and he acts like it's ridiculous to even entertain the thought that root could be interpreted as "cheer". He votes early for no reason without explaining and did a huge no u on my suspicions him. His entire existence is wifom and there is no reason for it if you have nothing to hide. You don't need to know his identity. The reason people wifom is to make people less suspicious of them in future games when they do the same behaviour.

Lunatella

Rachel wrote:I don't think it matters.

I think JOB is bad and this is just a reason why.

This is ridiculous and you know it. Calling attention to Paul's silence is like saying "OMG guys the sun is shining in the sky". I didn't have to say it to bring attention to it. Anyone who can read noticed, because a lot of people were complaining how much he was talking on Day 1. I'd be willing to bet he's easily within the top three posters as of the time he left day 1.

Lunatella

Speaking of Paul.. Why you so quiet?

Lunatella

Too bad, was hoping you'd help me narrow down your scum buddies. Oh well

Lunatella

Uzziah wrote:I admit I may have been somewjat ambiguous on purpous. I'm just zany and fun like that! The above is the root meaning though, is it not?

So are you going to share any thoughts on anyone besides myself, Paul and Cain or are you going to continue to be unhelpful and further verify that you're bad? I don't believe you used that definition of the word for even a second.

Lunatella

I think that is a stretch. Those definitions of the word are far less commonly used in the context of his sentence.

Lunatella

Uzziah wrote:
Job wrote:
Uzziah wrote:I'm rooting for the scum.
Duh
Just as I thought. *votes Job*

You make no sense.

Lunatella

Uzziah wrote:I'm rooting for the scum.

Duh

Lunatella

Uzziah wrote:
Job wrote:
Uzziah wrote:
Job wrote:But more importantly beyond martha/absalom, why aren't more people suspicious of the person who admitted to being bad?
Who might that be?
You?
Not sure if trolling

I beg everyone to read uzziahs posts. The first five are fluff and claiming to be bad and then he does a huge no u. Now he is throwing a tantrum. The wifom is unbelievable. I think he's mentioned a total of three or four people altogether if that.

Lunatella

Uzziah wrote:
Job wrote:RIP darlin.

Public enemy number one is obviously uzziah. He point out blank said he's rooting for the scum.

I also suspect absalom. Why else would Martha be dead? She gained more than her fair share of suspicion day 1 IMO.
Why weren't you attacking me this bad until I figured out your plot? I can't say I'm surprised that Martha is dead either.

I would strongly advise the civilians to take my imminent demise as evidence against Job and Paul.

Not sure if trolling

Lunatella

Uzziah wrote:
Job wrote:But more importantly beyond martha/absalom, why aren't more people suspicious of the person who admitted to being bad?
Who might that be?

You?

Lunatella

But more importantly beyond martha/absalom, why aren't more people suspicious of the person who admitted to being bad?

Lunatella

Sorry but I'm not buying it. She was starting to get people's eyes. Scum love to keep suspicious people around so they can be mislynched. She wouldn't have lasted past day 4 if she kept it up.

Lunatella

Scum don't kill you because you're annoying, the reasoning is always thought out.

Lunatella

RIP darlin.

Public enemy number one is obviously uzziah. He point out blank said he's rooting for the scum.

I also suspect absalom. Why else would Martha be dead? She gained more than her fair share of suspicion day 1 IMO.

Lunatella

Judas, not mass

Lunatella

Btw, just because no one has mentioned it yet, I wanted to make sure people are aware of the possibility of mass getting recruited, since he betrayed Jesus and all. His role has an additional secrets section.

Lunatella

Deborah wrote:You guys need t p learn to read. I said I was going to look at both those who had votes AND THOSE WHO HAD VOTED. Cain was on the list and seemed scummiest.

Yes but how was spreading the vote further helping?

RIP Samson.

side note, I am really enjoying the host posts, very well done.

Lunatella

Jephthah wrote:I think the votes for Samson are lame. I agree that it's the easiest scapegoat. A baddie would have to be a complete idiot to just vote like that and not explain it, and then go and say he doesn't think the one he voted for is bad. And no, this is not WIFOM because it's a stupid WIFOM, just look at the votes he's getting.

I'm probably going to pick one of Samsons' voters. I still need to read back a little

Or you could vote the clear baddie uzziah

Search found 83 matches