Search found 34 matches
- Thu Mar 11, 2021 11:01 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 6)
It played out more like the movie Saw than a game of mafia.
- Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
- Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 6)
But, but, that's what you did in Bread Mafia.tutuu wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:56 pmI wouldnt! :PMarmot wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:55 pmI think she meant you would have prepared it during the game and posted it post-game.

- Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:55 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 6)
- Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 6)
I mean, I was still scratching my head as to why the hell I died Night 1 up until game end, and kept checking in just to figure out who the mafia was that would have done that. That would never happen... in a normal mafia game.
- Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 6)
Wow!!! I can't think of a better game to get evicted Night 1.
WTF G-Man! Also, kudos to you for trolling every single one of your players.

WTF G-Man! Also, kudos to you for trolling every single one of your players.

- Tue Mar 09, 2021 1:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (NIGHT 1)
What I was doing was posting a werewolf in response to your case on me, which concludes that I'm wolf. Anyway, I appreciate the effort, although that amount at this point in the game does seem like busy work, as someone else pointed out. The thing I don't understand is why you didn't factor Alison's roleclaim into your reads, but you did for Epi. Can you talk about that one?
How did you conclude that I was most likely wolf?
How did you conclude that I was most likely wolf?
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 4:20 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (NIGHT 1)
Fancy new term for a thing that existed already.
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 4:19 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (NIGHT 1)
Process of Elimination.
Rather then specifically looking for the scummiest player among all players in the game to vote, it's a process to eliminate players from your POE pool that look townie and vote among those who are left. So POE just refers to that smaller subset of players.
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 2:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (NIGHT 1)
Yeah, I see you changed your mind later.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:44 pmAs of that post he wasn’t. That was the immediate aftermath of Nanook’s flip. Why should Epignosis have been a confident civilian read at that moment?
He is one now after going into his token confirmation bias routine last night.
At this point, Epi had claimed, so yeah I would've expected that to be factored in.
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 12:20 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 12:18 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (NIGHT 1)
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:08 am I slept on it and my top suspect is Marmot. I’ll continue trying to squeeze out interactions later.
I hope you ask for consent before you start squeezing people

- Tue Mar 02, 2021 12:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (NIGHT 1)
I fixed the issue, you should be able to see them now.
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 12:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (NIGHT 1)
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:18 pm Okay then.
I don't really know what to do with this game at the moment. People I would call confident civilian reads:
Scirrus
Poison
Less confident, but civilian reads:
Long Con
fingersplints
That's where I stand for now. I will see if I can squeeze any kind of analytic meaning out of this thread during the night. I'd like to try blind interactions to see who fits together and who doesn't -- it's manageable with a small roster, but I also expect difficulty with lack of content.
Epi's not a confident civilian read right now? Is he still... nothing?
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 12:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 1)
Apologies that I couldn't be around at EOD. I left a sort of legacy when I did because I had the most votes at the time, and didn't anticipate being able to be active very much after that point.
Catching up now.
* * * * *
I don't know why you want to protect me so badly, but I can live with this pocket. For now!!!
* * * * *
You sheeped chard yes, but I liked the manner in which you did it tone-wise
I liked less the manner that JJJ did it. Considering the thoughts he'd put into players to that point, he'd not put much into my slot.
Per Nanook, maybe slightly, but I voted Epi over him because I did expect Epignosis to be more involved, but obviously I'm wrong on Nanook, and probably wrong on Epi
* * * * *
As evidenced by your read of me, I don't need to claim VT to avoid an NK.
* * * * *
I think there were three wagons on Day 1, and JJJ was involved in all of them, to different extents. This is just an observation. I expect this from him at either alignment. Downside is, it does look like all three of us are town, so if JJJ's town too, he's got some re-reading to do.
Catching up now.
* * * * *

I don't know why you want to protect me so badly, but I can live with this pocket. For now!!!
* * * * *
Scirrus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 7:54 pmWhat reasonable conclusions are these? I just sheeped Chard bc I had no read on you and was bored.Marmot wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 3:46 am chard and Scirrus came to reasonable conclusions with their votes for me. I townread them.
Epignosis is trying to solve JJJ. I'll give him a townread for that. I want this to happen.
JJJ is posting in a manner he previously stated was uncomfortable. Not sure if that was a joke or a real feeling. He can surely explain. His vote for me is leaves a bit to be desired. Mild annoyance, he followed chardonnay's vote despite chard being listed in his "nothing" section.
Nanook shaded Jay for talking about game mechanics. No other reads. Big meh.
Nothing noteworthy from other players in my eyes as of yet (except for Grogu's TownWatch LLC, which I'm in the midst of applying for).
Why is JJJ's vote on you scummier than mine?
Would you have suspected Nanook to have be more involved in the game by now?
You sheeped chard yes, but I liked the manner in which you did it tone-wise
I liked less the manner that JJJ did it. Considering the thoughts he'd put into players to that point, he'd not put much into my slot.
Per Nanook, maybe slightly, but I voted Epi over him because I did expect Epignosis to be more involved, but obviously I'm wrong on Nanook, and probably wrong on Epi
* * * * *
Scirrus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:56 pmOk so I don't find Marmots focus and questions towny at all and I have no idea why he townreads meJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:48 pm Does anyone have a reason that Epignosis should not be chopped today?
@Scirrus where are you at on Marmot at this point?
@Long Con what's up bruddaman
*exasperated shrug*
I'm glad we have open nights.
But I'm trying to think about the claim thing bc I missed upon my first readthrough. Do you find it unlikely that the vanilla claim could be some sort of gambit? Idk if that's something people do here. I've seen vanilla town fakeclaim PR's to get out of a yeet but would this be a good strategy the other way around? Like, say Marmot was mafia and claims later on that he's a PR and just fakeclaimed vanilla to avoid getting NK'd or something. Is that a tactic that you don't really see flying?
I'm mostly entertaining this bc I don't find most of his play towny
As evidenced by your read of me, I don't need to claim VT to avoid an NK.

* * * * *
I think there were three wagons on Day 1, and JJJ was involved in all of them, to different extents. This is just an observation. I expect this from him at either alignment. Downside is, it does look like all three of us are town, so if JJJ's town too, he's got some re-reading to do.
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:38 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (NIGHT 1)
I'm sorry to hear that splints.fingersplints wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:34 am I lost a close friend today and my head isn’t in a place for any mafia. I’ll try and come around if I feel up for it later but I likely won’t be posting until tomorrow.

- Tue Mar 02, 2021 2:57 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (NIGHT 1)
Did Nanook really get CFD'd twice in one day?
I'll read up tomorrow and hopefully find answers to the questions I have.
I'll read up tomorrow and hopefully find answers to the questions I have.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 1)
Referencing JJJ's attitude as "The attitude" rather than "Your attitude" is not a direct address to another player, but a comment on the idea. Yes it looked like a response to JJJ's post, but to me, it looked like an umbrella statement of that idea that did not specifically mention JJJ, and thus, an attempt at shade JJJ as a byproduct.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 1)
Actually, I'm putting my vote there.
[VOTE: Epignosis] aubergine
[VOTE: Epignosis] aubergine
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 1)
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:41 pm A little WIFOM to indulge: Marmot claimed vanilla about 8 hours before EOD under only superficial pressure.
I believe him. If he’s mafia he’s already robbed himself of the ability to fake claim later, and for what benefit? For me to make this read as a result? That’s the kind of WIFOM I tend to find weak. I don’t think Marmot should be today’s chop.
Separate notes:
Epignosis shitting in my corn flakes indicates little about his alignment. We’ve gotten into Day 1 fights many times before in just about every alignment permutation: c/c, c/m, m/c (don’t believe we’ve ever been m/m). So at face value: whatever. From a more nuanced view: his suspicion of me is based on junk. If he holds onto it all day then murder him.
Between these two, I'd rather murder Nanook. They've said similar things in their discussion on the topic of "solving players vs solving mech stuff", but Nanook has done so in far fewer, less stance-taking words.
That said, looking at Epignosis's ISO, I'm a lot less excited about it now. He's made 6 posts, 5 of them are interactions with JJJ, and the other was fluff.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 1)
I was confused yes, but the votes came before that, not after. So you're not technically right, but I suppose that scenario could play out, and you'd be right.
I think I misread the intention in your post, and thought the reason you were avoiding voting for me was because of your statement that I'm a common mischop.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 1)
@NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME who was this post directed at? It looked like shading to me.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:25 pm Gaming mechanics IS playing mafia and the attitude that mechanics are somehow separate from the “real” game is continually baffling to me
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 5:22 amWhat were their conclusions about you? Did they write those conclusions into posts?
Eh? What did I say I was uncomfortable about? Are you referring to my opener thing about post count? It’s not uncomfortable to make 20 postsMarmot wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 3:46 amJJJ is posting in a manner he previously stated was uncomfortable. Not sure if that was a joke or a real feeling. He can surely explain. His vote for me is leaves a bit to be desired. Mild annoyance, he followed chardonnay's vote despite chard being listed in his "nothing" section.
Your takes on the votes on you confuse me. I don’t think any of the three of us explained much of anything; we just threw votes down because why not.
But chardonnay and Scirrus came to reasonable “conclusions” while I “leave something to be desired”. I’m going to need you to expand if you could.
I don’t really care that chardonnay was in my “nothings”. So what.
Why was chard in your nothings is my question, and why did you follow his vote?
You started the game off with the statement that 10 posts feels like too much. Maybe it was a joke, maybe it wasn't, you tell me. Then here you are taking on a leader-like role in the game. My problem is that I don't trust your intentions. I know I'm town (and I'm vanilla, so Idc if I'm chopped today either), but I don't read your posts and see an intention to figure out if I'm town or not.
* * * * *
I don't have a strong reason to townread Grogu, but I will shield them for shielding me.

* * * * *
Enrique wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:45 pm Civilians need to be careful with their... OUR wording too!![]()
Gonna be real though, I hate to see Marmot go on Day 1 so often, and if his weird understanding of the early votes for him is the thing that cements the wagon around him, I would like to avoid that lynch. I don’t see it as a scum maneuver, just a casual confusion.
To elaborate based on my own gameplay: my first post yesterday was going to talk about how at my first superficial read I didn’t get what chardonnay was doing/saying. So I re-read his posts and I thought, yeah, this makes sense, it’s actually fine, and decided to drop it from my own post. Maybe I wouldn’t word it as his vote deriving from “reasonable conclusions” but I think this is what Marmot means... the thread char spins isn’t hard to follow. Marmot does not share that view about Jay.
[3]
You and I haven't played together in a while, but I am not a common early misyeet like I used to be.

That said, I'd prefer if you opted to read me for my content instead of shielding me for being a common misyeet. There's no read involved there.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 3:46 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 1)
chard and Scirrus came to reasonable conclusions with their votes for me. I townread them.
Epignosis is trying to solve JJJ. I'll give him a townread for that. I want this to happen.
JJJ is posting in a manner he previously stated was uncomfortable. Not sure if that was a joke or a real feeling. He can surely explain. His vote for me is leaves a bit to be desired. Mild annoyance, he followed chardonnay's vote despite chard being listed in his "nothing" section.
Nanook shaded Jay for talking about game mechanics. No other reads. Big meh.
Nothing noteworthy from other players in my eyes as of yet (except for Grogu's TownWatch LLC, which I'm in the midst of applying for).
Epignosis is trying to solve JJJ. I'll give him a townread for that. I want this to happen.
JJJ is posting in a manner he previously stated was uncomfortable. Not sure if that was a joke or a real feeling. He can surely explain. His vote for me is leaves a bit to be desired. Mild annoyance, he followed chardonnay's vote despite chard being listed in his "nothing" section.
Nanook shaded Jay for talking about game mechanics. No other reads. Big meh.
Nothing noteworthy from other players in my eyes as of yet (except for Grogu's TownWatch LLC, which I'm in the midst of applying for).
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 3:34 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 1)
Oh word, I get the early wagon. Good stuff everyone.
Now let's try actually catching scum.

Now let's try actually catching scum.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 3:32 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 1)
What's my gripe?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:27 amI have no compelling reason to call Marmot a civilian. I wouldn't say I have much reason to call him mafia either. If I reach enough I could gripe about:chardonnay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:21 amhmmm, yes, yes i do.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:41 amDo you town read LC for not caring about town blocs and stuff?
dont think epi is scummy btw, i forgot to mention that in my catch up quote post. Dont really have a read there yet.
how do you feel about marmot?
It'd be a nice way to ingratiate oneself to a developing "core" without actually doing anything. I am not terribly compelled by that; it's a gripe Marmot can talk about. As I build (build? deconstruct? unbuild?) my process of elimination pool, he remains in it.
Yes, as far as I care.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 3:26 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 0)
I'm establishing my own towncore of players not in a traditional towncore.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 11:35 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 0)
What is new to you right now and what hasn't changed?fingersplints wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:06 am Hello all, glad to see the game has started. I haven’t had a chance to read everything yet, but have done some quick skimming. A lot is how I remember, but some will take a little getting used to.
@Enrique SR = scumread
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 3:18 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:53 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 0)
You've left a crater in my heart. A crater-sized impact
Poison wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:46 amouch.Marmot wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:42 amI look forward to the day when you can make a single post each day, and still manage to convey more than nutella does in 300 posts.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Feb 27, 2021 11:39 pm I must be going through changes, because somehow ten posts sounds like a lot right now.
Hi Mafia people. Hello. Let's do good and be real good and have a good time doing good.
#300posterslivesmatter
Good luck making it to 300 posts this game!!!

- Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:42 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 0)
I look forward to the day when you can make a single post each day, and still manage to convey more than nutella does in 300 posts.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Feb 27, 2021 11:39 pm I must be going through changes, because somehow ten posts sounds like a lot right now.
Hi Mafia people. Hello. Let's do good and be real good and have a good time doing good.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:05 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Mafia (GAME OVER)
- Replies: 1196
- Views: 35445
Re: Mafia (DAY 0)
This is a post that exists in a game of mafia. It takes up exactly one of the many posts that are yet to come. No more. No less.