The Syndicate

Ricochet wrote:That was very easy for me to keep track off. :P Who killed you, on the other hand...

Epig killed me, and apparently BR was his BTSC partner at the time.

I was Tamsen Donner and I died on Night 1.

thellama73 wrote:I am just happy three of our original four Donner's won. I think it took some skill to make that happen, regardless of what Rico says.

Good job team. I thought the strategy was brilliant, and it pretty much worked out. I just wish I could have gotten the chance to employ it.

Thanks for the game Roxy, and for putting up with ZombieMarmot.

Epignosis wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Interesting...the longer you lasted, the more roles you could step into and thus increase your chance of winning.

Not me, I knew my goose was cooked as soon as the BTSC groups all excluded me. I knew that if I didn't get killed Night 1 (which I was), I would be lynched Day 2. So I ran with it.
I remember saying something about being excited to play with you again. I rescind that statement.
I asked Black Rock who she wanted to die.

Everything makes sense now.

Epignosis wrote:Interesting...the longer you lasted, the more roles you could step into and thus increase your chance of winning.

Not me, I knew my goose was cooked as soon as the BTSC groups all excluded me. I knew that if I didn't get killed Night 1 (which I was), I would be lynched Day 2. So I ran with it.

I remember saying something about being excited to play with you again. I rescind that statement.

thellama73 wrote:I can't believe you betrayed our pact yesterday, SVS! Oh well, we still won. Not Snowman, though!

Thanks for the game, Roxy! Sorry you are having a tough time.

This.

Too bad your teammate had to go and die so early.

What happened to all the living players?

Rezz please.

Black Rock wrote:Well this makes me nervous. I hope we are right about Ty, because if we aren't the game is lost.

I wanted to at least survive this game.

Me too.

S~V~S wrote:

This

Rezz please.

Zomberella12 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Well, Russ may well be bad, but my gut is still saying Zombrella, so I'm placing my vote there.
You and your guy need to just take it easy! I'm willing to bet money on Russ' evility.

Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Winter is coming.

Wait, no it's not.
It's pretty damn here in Ontario.

Some people don't know how to die.

Rezz please.

Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Roxy wrote:The Long Walk
Good book.
My favourite by Mr King/Bachman!

Likewise.

Roxy wrote:The Long Walk

Good book.

Zomberella12 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rezz please.
Okay but are you fine with being a Zombie Marmot?

Perhaps.

Rezz please.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Can we not lynch Epi? I wanted to play mafia with him.

My dream was rather short-lived.

That's unfortunate.

It's a new day!

Who's got some meat on their bones?

Just so I know, do secret secrets mean something that nobody but the host knows about or is even aware? Or does the player with said role also know?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
FZ. wrote:I just want to address the info dumping issue. The only thing that I said that could be considered as something of the sort is saying that Epi wasn't on my team. Had I just said that the probability of him being a baddie was higher for me because he wasn't a Donner, and then voted for him, would you not know he's not on my team?
The only way people would vote for someone on their team, is if they were baddies and then they'd probably move that vote before the actual deadline. So I am now convinced I didn't info dump, and I take my apology back.
And people voting for those who allegedly info dumped are not looking very civvie like in my eyes. *eyes* llama
The rules indicate that normal mafia rules apply. Role-outing is always against the rules, but some hosts don't state that infodumping is against the rules (ie. see GoC rules), so it is unclear if that is considered normal mafia rules or not.

So to solve that problem, Roxy, is infodumping permitted?

Hey Roxy, could I get an answer here pretty please?

FZ. wrote:I just want to address the info dumping issue. The only thing that I said that could be considered as something of the sort is saying that Epi wasn't on my team. Had I just said that the probability of him being a baddie was higher for me because he wasn't a Donner, and then voted for him, would you not know he's not on my team?
The only way people would vote for someone on their team, is if they were baddies and then they'd probably move that vote before the actual deadline. So I am now convinced I didn't info dump, and I take my apology back.
And people voting for those who allegedly info dumped are not looking very civvie like in my eyes. *eyes* llama

The rules indicate that normal mafia rules apply. Role-outing is always against the rules, but some hosts don't state that infodumping is against the rules (ie. see GoC rules), so it is unclear if that is considered normal mafia rules or not.

So to solve that problem, Roxy, is infodumping permitted?

nijuukyugou wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Actually, I'm starting to get a hankering for some fried calamari.

*Looks at ninjablooops

Don't be alarmed! I won't eat your fourth tentacle.

Actually, I'm starting to get a hankering for some fried calamari.

*Looks at ninjablooops

Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:First person to vote 3 after me gets my lunchvote tomorrow.
Voted 3. Hopefully I'll be a baddie tomorrow and this can work out.

Ooh, yay. I get to vote you again.

First person to vote 3 after me gets my lunchvote tomorrow.

Epignosis wrote:Dang auto correct.

I meant, "Helping you understand what's going on."

You're not very consistent. My spelling is far more consestant.

Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Long Con wrote:How about a self-vote?
I already did that this game though.
How about a copycat?

Done that too.

Any other ideas?

Long Con wrote:How about a self-vote?

I already did that this game though.

S~V~S wrote:It was a changeable vote and I changed it after it got some reaction. I thought it was a baddie thing to say, though.

I was lynched when I did a similar thing on Day 1.

thellama73 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
Epignosis wrote:She danced around a vote for me.

She easily voted for you when she had elsewhere expressed a distaste for voting for new people (welcome by the way).

She criticized my methods but didn't vote for me.

All of this is antithetical to what I believe a good S~V~S would do.
Nah, I am good. And I think you know it. We can change votes here unlike in Film. But I totally dislike her analysis on Snowman, whom I believe to be good.

So this reaction makes me feel OK about switching my vote to you. Thanks for giving me a clear reaction so quickly

I'm curious: Do people believe this or not?

Not saying whether I do or not, but I want to see what everyone thinks. All I have to say is that I've never seen S~V~S vote for a newbie, EVER, without acknowledging it.
This is such a weird game. Everyone has BTSC. No one knows what team we will be on at end game. I don't think odd behavior is all that odd, given the circumstances. I doubt a baddie SVS would be so careless as to act contrary to her stated forum philosophy.

I disagree; odd behavior is certainly odd. Otherwise it would just be behavior.

But I agree with the rest.

I'm hopping on the Long Con bandwagon.

Can we not lynch Epi? I wanted to play mafia with him.

MovingPictures07 wrote:- MM has also self-voted (apparently to check whether votes were changeable, though this isn't out of character by any means) and Snowman has voted for Epi.

I will be around later, so my vote won't stay.

I was also doing out of spite just a little bit, but thank you for taking the joke in stride MP.

thellama73 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Also MP, I noticed llama is not on the poll which is why I was teasing you. :P
Oh wait, I'm not? Cool. Take that, MP :P

I may nibble on your toes if I am bored. Consider it a sign of affection.

Roxy - Are Making Things Impossible also categorized under Unforeseen Forces?

Ricochet wrote:Oh, wait, we have a poll after all.

Roxy isn't making a poll thread, so end-of-day polls won't be archived somewhere unless we save a record ourselves.

Also MP, I noticed llama is not on the poll which is why I was teasing you. :P

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Since we're on our own tracking votes, should we make a rule about being clear in our posts what our final vote will be?
This is a good point, and I believe that would be helpful, yes. Also, if someone can take a screenshot of the poll if possible right as it ends, that'd be great, but I know that's a lot to ask, so at the least, everyone should bold their final votes.

On that note, I don't recall if this was asked...

Rox: Are votes changeable this game or final upon casting? Thanks.

I just voted and they appear to be changeable.

MovingPictures07 wrote:The TL;DR version: Please defend your teammates before you lynch them. And please devise mechanisms to catch baddies in lies, if you are indeed civilian.

I see no reason Russ would propose not doing either of these things unless he had not considered the correct perspective or he is a baddie.

That said, I have no substantial reason to believe Russ is bad at the moment. I do wonder, but I am not sure either way.

I was, however, definitely pinged at Llama's "Oh snap, Russ is right" comment. Seems like a way to push a faulty agenda without being the one contributing the original thoughts. In addition, I have not yet seen the civilian aggressiveness I come to expect of him. Not enough for me to lynch him at this point, but a very solid in his direction, that's for sure.

And it seems it is now Day 1. Let the lunch begin.

I dare you to lynch llama.

Roxy wrote:Epi has won by a landslide in a solo victory!
Congrats Epi!

I'm glad you're okay Epi. I don't know what you were doing near a landslide.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Snowman wrote:Why indeed, and why is Epignosis trying so hard to stir the pot? Guilty much?
Haha, love it.

But I wouldn't say this is atypical of Epi; he and Llama are perhaps the most notorious for stirring up the pot early on in games, regardless of alignment.
What am I, chopped liver?
Chopped marmot liver...yum
Alex invited some strange people to play with us already strange folk.

I think we should sacrifice a newbie for the Day 1 lunch.
Man, you're just trying everything to get my vote on D1, aren't you?

Or we could have Spacedaisy for lunch.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:that statement somehow seems that much worse with my avatar

Zomberella12 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Snowman wrote:Why indeed, and why is Epignosis trying so hard to stir the pot? Guilty much?
Haha, love it.

But I wouldn't say this is atypical of Epi; he and Llama are perhaps the most notorious for stirring up the pot early on in games, regardless of alignment.
What am I, chopped liver?
Chopped marmot liver...yum

Alex invited some strange people to play with us already strange folk.

I think we should sacrifice a newbie for the Day 1 lunch.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Snowman wrote:Why indeed, and why is Epignosis trying so hard to stir the pot? Guilty much?
Haha, love it.

But I wouldn't say this is atypical of Epi; he and Llama are perhaps the most notorious for stirring up the pot early on in games, regardless of alignment.

What am I, chopped liver?

Search found 60 matches