

Return to “Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12”
Well, based on this last lynch, it's definitely looking like Dom = Master. My votes for DF were based on behavior more than logical speculation, so I still think he's bad, but not the Master. Does that make sense?Chris wrote:Just out of curiosity, nijuu... what are your reasons to vote DF? Because before, you were voting for him under the suspicion of being The Master. Is that what you're voting for him for again?
This. This is what happens every single time I come back to read this thread, and honestly why I've have so much trouble keeping up/espousing a strong opinion in this game. I've tried to maintain consistency, but sometimes when I come back in this thread I feel so lost and dumbfounded by people's new speculations, and spreadsheets, and crazy shit that I don't even know where to start. So I often don't. (For the record, I'm not necessarily faulting those who offer speculation - I'm merely irritated that there ISN'T consistency for me to follow in such a large game.)S~V~S wrote:Dom, I STILL suspect Epi, and I will bet anything that end game, he is bad. But no one has listened to that, so I give up. Ever time I have had an opinion, someone pipes in with a *new* Master suspect, or a *new* recruiter, and the ultimate urgency of lynching this person NNNAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOO. I have had to defend on a lot of crap cases built on things like weak searches and not reading the roles correctly, and had to wade through tons of posts, just like everyone else. You have been busy & blendy most of the game, and I did not have an opinion on you, so i did not give one until asked.
I don't recall hearing from YOU either, so don't blame me if we did not interact.
I am not a cyber, sir, but I think you are.DFaraday wrote:Agreed, although I still think Ninjablooper could be Cyber. After Snow Dog it's one of those two.Chris wrote:SVS, for what it's worth, if Snow Dog didn't eliminate the Cybers, I'm pretty sure that Epig is the last one, based on his posts and his votes.
OMG I love Eastbound and Down.Long Con wrote:"Work, drugs!"nijuukyugou wrote:Mmmmm, drugs.Long Con wrote:The night is young!keys56000000000 wrote:And an "of", if we're going to get technical. Unless he wants to cake a stripper's knee in heroin and then have it shot off.nijuukyugou wrote:You forgot an apostrophe.Epignosis wrote:I want to see someone shoot heroin off a strippers knee.
Mmmmm, drugs.Long Con wrote:The night is young!keys56000000000 wrote:And an "of", if we're going to get technical. Unless he wants to cake a stripper's knee in heroin and then have it shot off.nijuukyugou wrote:You forgot an apostrophe.Epignosis wrote:I want to see someone shoot heroin off a strippers knee.
You forgot an apostrophe.Epignosis wrote:I want to see someone shoot heroin off a strippers knee.
Bitch, you don't know me.Epignosis wrote:You're not wild in real life either. Boring ass English teacher who'd rather read Chaucer than shoot heroin off a stripper's knee.nijuukyugou wrote:I find it amusing that I am a "wild card." Immensely amusingBut I'm really not that wild if you think about it. Not in the thread, at least
I have no reason to believe DF is telling the truth. At this point, I will likely vote him.Dom wrote:This post does not point at a single person you are suspicious of.nijuukyugou wrote:I am also curious why people seem so confident in accepting role hints in the thread as canon. First of all, I didn't even know that was allowed, however subtle. Secondly, I trust absolutely no one in mafia, ever, so I don't know why others are keen to do so. I thought I had caught the Ood role hint from DF, but I ignored it because...once again, I trust no one, and I brushed it off as a DW joke because it seemed too...outing. Like, no way he was actually saying that and getting away with it.
As for myself and looking at me, I am not playing under the radar. I am finally able to get back into a game with a reasonable number of people and (almost) reasonable number of posts to read after work (I will probably avoid most large games after this, since I have so much trouble keeping up). You will waste your time and valuable votes on me for being "quiet" and on incorrect speculation. With that being said, I'm willing to offer what I can to the conversation, and whatever is asked of me to defend/explain.
On another note, I find your theory of the recruiter possibly dying early interesting, MP. I'm probably asking a dumb question, but who do people believe the recruiter is playing for? The Cybers? Or a secret role? Or both? God I have a feeling this has been answered and someone's gonna bang their head against the wall...
Linki - Damn, MP, glad that vote is "subject to change!" You'll be a very sad, sad sock if you're followed by others :P
Who do you think should be lynched and why?
I ask because I may vote for you otherwise.
Mostly characterizing others' thoughts on him. That comment specifically came from Epi's post a little while back pointing out DF's opportunistic "Oh, looking at Dom and Blooper" just hours after Epi posted, and after DF said he had no idea about us. Epi used the word.Dom wrote:Can you point me to where people have called DFaraday, specifically, opportunistic? Or are you characterizing other people's thoughts on him?nijuukyugou wrote:
2) Mentions of me (and Dom) have been made by Epi, and then DF. First, I wonder why I was mentioned as a potential candidate for the Master. It wasn't really explained, and the only speculation others have had is my quietness. Soooo...is there something else? But then, like others pointed out, why did DF so suddenly have us on his radar within hours of Epi's non-explained suspicion? The argument that he's been opportunistic, based on this and other instances pointed out, looks sound to me.
Hello, Gotrees! By chance I happened to see you mentioned me last night, and I'm sorry for leaving you hanging (I promise I wasn't ignoring you; I have grandparents visiting from the DR that I only see every few years, so mafia isn't on the top of my do-do list, but I at least try to check in with a semi-relevant post at least. I even took off work to visit, and I never do that). To address what you've said (even if you're not thinking of it anymore, but so you don't think I'm rude) : for the post in question you mentioned, at the time I was catching up (as in, in the process of doing so, and reading), so in my process, I caught bits and pieces of people speculating about Chris and the Master. I won't bother to go through the way I read things because...well, it's not very consistent for one, and two, it usually makes sense to only me. Either way, I happened to catch that and figured I'd mention something about it to join the conversation. In that post, I didn't really "weigh in" on the speculation; rather, I asked about it, and asked someone to give me the tl;dr of it (which, for the record, no one obliged that I saw. Sigh).Gotrees wrote:Some bits trimmed out for relevancy.nijuukyugou wrote: Just so I don't leave you hanging, I'm catching up a bit - I honestly missed the whole case on sabie, so that'll give you an idea of how far behind I am
As far as Epi goes, I really do think he's just burned out. I've said it before and I'll say it again - people say he acts strange/different/like a baddie, but he really just acts like himself, so it's not particularly weird behavior to me. Even though I know I'm a quieter player, I advocate having a look at quieter players, since surely not all of the baddies are out in the open like he is.
Are people saying Chris is the Master? I think I saw that a few pages back, but haven't gotten a chance to see exactly why this is so. I'm begrudgingly willing to glean posts and posts for it, but I'd much appreciate the shortened version if someone can oblige me![]()
Ok, I'm a bit confused by this. You start off by saying you're far behind, and end by saying that you are far behind, but in the second quoted paragraph you feel informed enough to weigh in on a topic which had only been brought up a few hours before your post? And all you have to say about that topic is pretty much that you stand behind Epig and think he is probably a civ? Sounds a bit suspicious. You can take my first official eyeball.![]()
I feel like the topic of Epig (at least the one blooper is referring to) would take more than a brief skim of the posts to understand. I could be wrong. I'd appreciate an explanation.
Dammit, I thought I said "Sporcle break!" Ah well.Chris wrote:He's voted lock step with Sabie and Snow Dog for the most part.nijuukyugou wrote:Most likely Master. What's the actual big deal with Bass? Something about Hedgeowl or some theory he (Bass) came up with? That's all I've gleaned so far.Chris wrote:Just to be clear, what form of badiness do you think I am Ninju?
Voted Hedgie as being the recruiter when it's just about impossible for that to be true.
There was a missing PM on night 6, and Bass was gone that entire time until day 7, and there are far more baddie roles that have to send in PMs vs civ roles. His reasons for votes feel faked.
But those are just my reasons.
But back to this whole The Master deal...
Why did you think that I, as The Master, was defending MM when I was saying that he's essentially harmless?
MM is recruited as far as anyone knows, and The Master would need MM dead just like everyone else. So why would The Master care at all to protect someone who is not on his LMS team?
Snow Dog wrote:I was doing toilet actually.Chris wrote:Snow... what's up? Why are you sitting on that vote? Did you have to go back into your team chat to figure out why I'm asking you to vote for me, and how to handle it?
Most likely Master. What's the actual big deal with Bass? Something about Hedgeowl or some theory he (Bass) came up with? That's all I've gleaned so far.Chris wrote:Just to be clear, what form of badiness do you think I am Ninju?
YESSSSSSS God I think I have an addiction but not a bad enough one to care because I'm a beast at geography nowMetalmarsh89 wrote:I am also a user of the Sporcle.nijuukyugou wrote:Catching up...ugh. I knew I shouldn't have left it to tonight, but I wanted to read Harry Potter and play Sporcle instead last night :PElohcin wrote:I'm voting for Chris today. Niju, I see you haven't voted yet...what are your thoughts?
I ain't changin', hon. I'm just correcting myself before someone else does. It's the English teacher in me.Chris wrote:No NO.. keep that vote on me Ninju.
HAVE SOME FUCKING CONVICTION!
Catching up...ugh. I knew I shouldn't have left it to tonight, but I wanted to read Harry Potter and play Sporcle instead last night :PElohcin wrote:I'm voting for Chris today. Niju, I see you haven't voted yet...what are your thoughts?
Just so I don't leave you hanging, I'm catching up a bit - I honestly missed the whole case on sabie, so that'll give you an idea of how far behind I amjuliets wrote:ninjablooper, glad to see you here. Can you share with us what you think about any of these players being talked about or even someone not being talked about lately? I'm not asking for a big case, just some thoughts.
Yeeeeeep, definitely wasn't expecting that. YikesHedgeowl wrote:Wow, you leave the thread for an hour and come back to dog balls...
But you know what? My gut feeling earlier (and now) is telling me not to vote you (and, after all, you made a good point - if you ARE the Master, we'd be wasting a lynch. Yeah, others have different feelings about that, but I'm in the "well that really is a waste" camp). What's being said about Roxy's insincerity has credence and has been said throughout the game, whereas when I read the suspicions against Chris, they look like nitpicking to make an easy lynch in just this last Day period.Chris wrote:SVS, did you miss the part where I said I was trying to get into the game before it even started?
Why would I review a role and decide whether or not I wanted it? I wanted it. They needed a replacement for rey, I took it.
You have an incorrect assumption on how I would approach a game.
Also, you seem rather fippant about wanting to lynch a civ...
Oh no! And I even had one for real! I just totally forgot to send it in the excitement of this weekendbirdwithteeth11 wrote:To echo bea's sentiments, the lynch post will go up sometime before 11:30 EST probably, but I'm not sure when before that. I just told her to not feel like she's rushed and to take her time.
Also, I would like to add that there were a surprisingly significant lack of entries for our contest today. In fact, well over half of the players didn't submit anything (Okay, fine. It was only two people to give you the actual number). We throw out bones to you guys in the form of contests and prizes, and you all don't seem to care.![]()
You are off the hook this time. And I know that entries these contests are technically voluntary. But if we don't start getting more participation in the future i.e. more than two people, we may have to consider consequences for not doing so.
And really, I have no desire to do such a thing. So just be kind and humor us with this kthx.
The other person she referred to was Snow Dog. So, already drawing attention away from her bad vote for Epi with the ambiguous term "seemed," which could be interpreted as "Hey, I figured out I made a bad vote, so it seemed now like a Civ vs. Civ vote" OR "Oh, I wasn't sure about the vote, he seemed bad at the time I voted, but that's clear now that people are pointing out my behavior." Then, when splints called her out on it, she responded thusly:Dana wrote: I really feel like they were both civ, and we should take a closer look at the people who have been more along the sidelines. I'm not sure exactly who that would be, but I don't think the Epig lynch was a save. It seemed more like two civ options, and for me at least, I went with the person I felt slightly more sure was bad.
Called out again, then she responds thusly:Dana wrote:Correct. It seems now, after Epig's role has been revealed, that they were both civvie. I voted one because I was more sure SD was good than I was was about Epi, so I don't think we should vote SD today because the night post implied that we'd be in big trouble if we lynch another civ.fingersplints wrote:Dana - It seemed like two civvie options, yet you still voted one? I'm a little confused with your wording here.
There are multiple posts defending Snow Dog (I will not quote all of them because they are very easy to find if you search her posts), but all of a sudden this post comes along Day 2:Dana wrote: I didn't feel both options in the last lynch were civ at the time the lynch was happening. I explained already that I feel that way now that Epig's role has been revealed. Meaning I thought SD was civ and I still do even after what happened. I did vote for who I thought was bad, and I was wrong.
She then votes SD out of the blue, after multiple defense posts of him, and then seems surprised:Dana wrote: Snow Dog's recent vote switch really bothered me. I said before how I was slightly suspicious of Snow Dog following MP's vote yesterday(?). The asking who to vote for and just placing his vote on whoever's the most likely to be lynched at that time is not sitting well with me. You're being super fishy, friend.
Surprised at what? The lynch? At the fact that others voted for SD? Because she voted pretty close to the deadline, out of nowhere, so I don't really know why any of that would be a surprise. She never really provided the explanation she promised about him, likely in hopes that people would stop taking notice of her second bad vote. Then, as others have pointed out, she asked if Snow Dog 2.0 could comment on his former self, which by itself is a pretty innocuous question, but thinking of it in the context of "Oh shit, I voted him for no plausible reason and he's back from the dead," I can see where others are coming from now.Dana wrote:Okay, whoa, did not expect that to happen. I was strongly considering voting for Snow Dog back when I made the post saying his vote switched bothered me, but I got distracted with calc homework that was due at 11 and forgot to actually do the vote until the last minute. This was a really surprising turn of events, but hopefully we'll get a good result.
Oi! Just because I'm quieter doesn't mean I haven't voiced suspicions. Honestly, I fell off the Enrique suspicion because I failed to keep up after Day 1 and am attempting to jump back on. It's like trying to catch a moving train, and every time I think I can grab the door, it speeds up. I'm finding I'm much more comfortable in smaller games, but that's beside the point, I suppose. Anyway, not that Enrique is completely off the radar, but he certainly isn't the most suspicious anymore.MovingPictures07 wrote:Other impressions as I re-read some folks:
Interestingly, it seems Enrique votes have come throughout the game from players who are riding really under the radar.
BR missed vote D1, voted Enrique D2, expressed she intends to vote Enrique D3... not much else really
Bass voted Enrique D1 and D2 and essentially everything else he has said was that Epig was acting like his normal self
Ninja Blooper seems to also carry the Enrique suspicion in D1 saying it was the most suspicious thing in the game but she never mentioned it again and hasn't mentioned anything else re: suspicions
Haha I wasn't kidding when I said I was making pumpkin gingerbread (also, it's good for my health to close the mafia screen every once in a while :P)S~V~S wrote:Wow, Blooper was in and out of here fast! And it is possible that the hosts made subject/tense errors. In context your/he makes sense.