The Syndicate

Thanks for the game Drac! Looking forward to that promised role madness version of this. :P

In fact INH Is the only living player I actually trust from my ISO of him. Also does anyone have a reason for voting right now? I can't recall seeing any this is why we're loosing since civs are giving cover for the mafia to vote without thinking.

We shouldn't lynch Insertnamehere after ISO him I see NO scenario in which he could be mafia none at all.

I'm tempted to vote for Quin 2.0 His lack of contribution and focusing only on lynching me makes no sense, I could also vote for Wilgy he hasn't done much except when he was under pressure.

and neither have you? Also I did I built a case on Serge and true it was wrong, but I'm trying. Your'e tunneling on me since your salty I voted for you. :P

Ask me the questions and I'll answer I've made it no secret I've had RL things, but still have contributed more then some players and if I missed a question reask or requote it and I'll answer.

Wilgy has also been kind off fluffy, he does get more serious when someone leans on him though which might be good, but could also be a scummy move. I agree with whoever said we should watch him.

I have to go and do some college stuff, but I should be back on before the deadline.I'll finish my skims tomorrow when I don't have so much to do.

MM hasn't really done anything this game, he should be watched and maybe lynched.

Zebra wants to lynch MM for not posting I assume.

I must go eat, but I'll be back with more soon for now I'm voting Serge.

what a sec that isn;t my ISO. I lost it somehow, so I'll just do it real quick.

Nothing wrong with his Ika/Sw interaction and vote slight civ cred for it.
I liked him trying to get activity and game solving/reads
I disliked his vote for Bass and not voting for Serge even though he thought he was more pingy. I might vote for INH, but I doubt it since he is a civ lean.

insertnamehere wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey INH, unless I missed it (if so, I apologize), you haven't yet addressed this and I'd be interested to hear a response:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:Can we address the fact that the baddies are probably sitting back and laughing their asses off right now?
Alright, so let's move the conversation in a more productive direction. I'm tired of being upset over the current discussion myself, and I'm accomplishing nothing.

If you think this statement is true, then it can be surmised that you're tentatively town-reading the active members of discussion (you, me, Silverwolf, and ika), yeah? That means you potentially have already narrowed a d1 voting window. Do any of the players currently sitting back warrant specific attention? If so, who?
Thanks!
The problem with 5 people getting involved in an intense, heated discussion is that it means there are 10 people all on the down low. That's 2/3rds of the group. I'll have to go back and re-read some of the low post players, but most of what they've posted is standard Day 0 stuff without a whole lot of content to pick apart. I want to hear more from the silent majority is what I really meant, because as you said yourself, I am tentatively town-reading most of the people heavily involved in the Day 0 fracas.

RIP leetic sorry to see you go.

Maybe the mafia targeted our bulletproof civ last night and that is why there was no kill.

I won't be around much today since I'll be out.

gasp Sig has a social life

I need to reassess again, I really have no idea who to lynch at this point. My gut is telling me Serge, but my gut hasn't been all that helpful lately.

I don't see why Zebra is voting for MM and she doesn't explain her reasoning either I dislike this.

I can't shake my current gut read of leetic. He is posting a good amount however, I'm not sure he is a civ. I need to stew on this.

leetic wrote:Yeah, Sig really only joined the wagon when he thought I would defend him, and provided no proper content or analysis to defend his opinions. His late D2 was very scummy.

So, Serge/MP/BtC wasn't a reality... Imma gonna go with Serge/MP/sig then, although sig doesn't really have as many scummy interactions with Serge and MP as BtC did. Rechecking thread to evaluate suspicions.

This is false I never thought you'd defend me and I don't see where you get that idea from I provided my reasoning for breaking the tie and voting for Bass over the other three wagons, one of which was mine.

Is there a reason to lynch MM?

I'll address the ISO of me tomorrow, however I can't do so tonight. I think there is a good chance Serge or Leetic or both are mafia.

I also can say while we will all miss rabbit Jean was super annoying and nobody will really miss him that much, not as annoying as Armin or Annie sure, but still an annoying character.

Yum Rabbit.

And I'm not mafia.

Lets lynch Quin 2.0 Dizzy was super scummy before Quin subbed in. :P

I wanted to push someone ahead of me, I thought leetic looked good and didn't see the case on Gleam so I voted for Bass who looked the scummiest simply.

There is no good reason to town read me yet, but also no reason to scum read me.

Rabbit's post are nonsensical since they make no sense, he doesn't explain why he thinks I'm mafia at all and says I'm just talking in gibberish.

leetic wrote:
sig wrote:Zebra I'm making perfect sense Rabbit isn't making any sense.
Care to provide reasons?

On what?

And no I don't think I do. :P

I'm feeling good about Leetic right now, so I'll switch on over to Bass

linki: No U.

Zebra I'm making perfect sense Rabbit isn't making any sense.

However, I do agree Bull's voting for MP does seem a little weird.

I was under the assumption you thought it was scummy of MP to want to policy lynch from your post?

That makes no sense what so ever rabbit.

@Zebra why did you vote for Bulls, when you're also agaisnt MP's idea.

Draconus wrote:
sig wrote:
Draconus wrote:Important Notice
Unfortunately, I am feeling really under the weather right and don't feel much like doing a lynch post. Also, I'm kind of surprised there are only five votes on the board. It is an AmErica holiday, though. Those 2 things being said, I'm considering pushing Day 2 back another 24 hours. Would anyone be apposed to this?
I'm good with that
the poll says the 31 anyway.
Yeah... I messed up and didn't actually put the poll up for a whole day.

Ah okay and no problem at all either way.

However, if we're already at the deadline and you don't want to move it back I'm fine with that also.

Draconus wrote:Important Notice
Unfortunately, I am feeling really under the weather right and don't feel much like doing a lynch post. Also, I'm kind of surprised there are only five votes on the board. It is an AmErica holiday, though. Those 2 things being said, I'm considering pushing Day 2 back another 24 hours. Would anyone be apposed to this?

I'm good with that
the poll says the 31 anyway.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't understand why I'm getting votes. How else do you all propose we figure out Dizzy's alignment then? Anyone?

Also I'd consider switching to Leetic but, I'd want to ISO him and don't have the time right now.

Good point while Epi did vote Serge his suspicion mainly stemmed from Leetic's defense of Serge. I'm operating under the assumption that Leetic and Serge are both mafia, since Leetic came in and defended Serge. However, I don't know Leetic's meta so he might just' have been defending Serge for the reasons he stated. So I'd rather at this point vote for Serge and if/when Serge flip mafia go for Leetic.

Though Leetic's vote for MP.

Bulls what do you think of MP wanting to policy lynch Dizzy and him voting for me?

SO Some good ole NKA (night kill analysis), Epi is a strong player which alone could explain his death, however he replaced into a weak situation he could've been mislynched at some point. So why kill him night 1?

He suspected Serge and leetic and spent a large portion of the day going back and forth with leetic. So I'm eyeing Leetic and Serge.

I'll be placing a vote for Serge now.
Also yes I know people will say it is scummy for me to build a case around someone being NK'd but that plus what Epi said about Serge and Serge's actions are enough for me to lay a vote out.

Hello, so not much to go on tbh. I'm surprised Eke Epi+Ike = Eke was killed. I'm also kinda surprised SilverQuin didn't flip mafia, I noticed MP voted for me and wants to policy lynch someone that is a little odd?

rabbit8 wrote:
sig wrote:Only titans play tag.
You got the role PM, not me.

No sir I do believe you got a titan role PM, with Quin as your buddy.

Only titans play tag.

Why am I bad.

rabbit8 wrote:
sig wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:
sig wrote:
Quin wrote:Points of interest - pardon me for not drawing quotes, I can't be assed with that right now.

There's some fluff conversation between sig and wilgy early on. Wilgy joking about being scum isn't surprising, but I haven't seen that sort of thing from sig before. ika (Epi) picked up on sig too, but his reasoning just comes down to guts so it's credibility is something to be desired. Although, if sig ever flipped bad I think that would favour Epi somewhat.

Placing a resting vote on sig, because why not.

This all goes up to about page 5, but I've got to stop for a minute. I'll come back.
NO U
Quin

On a more serious note, I've joked around about being bad before. It was very early day 0 fluff there was no meaning behind it what so ever. I find it strange you're trying to give it a meaning when it was clearly fluffyness.
Is this a serious accusation? Or just bullshit NO U voted me, I'm voting you?

It's hard to tell since you guys, girls (some gender neutral nonsense here) just throw your votes around like their meaningless.
Semi serious, I doubt I'll leave it on Quin, but him picking at my fluff is pingy.

This never happened?

Yes it did.

Quin wrote:Points of interest - pardon me for not drawing quotes, I can't be assed with that right now.

There's some fluff conversation between sig and wilgy early on. Wilgy joking about being scum isn't surprising, but I haven't seen that sort of thing from sig before. ika (Epi) picked up on sig too, but his reasoning just comes down to guts so it's credibility is something to be desired. Although, if sig ever flipped bad I think that would favour Epi somewhat.

Placing a resting vote on sig, because why not.

This all goes up to about page 5, but I've got to stop for a minute. I'll come back.

I'm not liking Rabbits defense of Quin.

rabbit8 wrote:I'm voting sig. I didn't like her no u post.

I'd have moved my vote if Quin had answered my point, but he hasn't yet. Why though are you voting for me based on that, but never reneged me or mentioned me until this post?

leetic wrote:
Draconus wrote: Participation
The following behavior constitutes non-participation:

- If you do not post for more than 96 consecutive hours.
- If you do not cast a vote in 2 or more lynches.
Therefore unless he prodges Serge will be subbed out soon.

He might not be subbed out or mod killed right away though, his participation score might just take a hit.

rabbit8 wrote:
sig wrote:
Quin wrote:Points of interest - pardon me for not drawing quotes, I can't be assed with that right now.

There's some fluff conversation between sig and wilgy early on. Wilgy joking about being scum isn't surprising, but I haven't seen that sort of thing from sig before. ika (Epi) picked up on sig too, but his reasoning just comes down to guts so it's credibility is something to be desired. Although, if sig ever flipped bad I think that would favour Epi somewhat.

Placing a resting vote on sig, because why not.

This all goes up to about page 5, but I've got to stop for a minute. I'll come back.
NO U
Quin

On a more serious note, I've joked around about being bad before. It was very early day 0 fluff there was no meaning behind it what so ever. I find it strange you're trying to give it a meaning when it was clearly fluffyness.
Is this a serious accusation? Or just bullshit NO U voted me, I'm voting you?

It's hard to tell since you guys, girls (some gender neutral nonsense here) just throw your votes around like their meaningless.

Semi serious, I doubt I'll leave it on Quin, but him picking at my fluff is pingy.

Also before I forget I'm getting my Wisdom teeth out tomorrow afternoon, so I probably won't be online much if at all Friday afternoon and Saturday.

Quin wrote:Points of interest - pardon me for not drawing quotes, I can't be assed with that right now.

There's some fluff conversation between sig and wilgy early on. Wilgy joking about being scum isn't surprising, but I haven't seen that sort of thing from sig before. ika (Epi) picked up on sig too, but his reasoning just comes down to guts so it's credibility is something to be desired. Although, if sig ever flipped bad I think that would favour Epi somewhat.

Placing a resting vote on sig, because why not.

This all goes up to about page 5, but I've got to stop for a minute. I'll come back.

NO U
Quin

On a more serious note, I've joked around about being bad before. It was very early day 0 fluff there was no meaning behind it what so ever. I find it strange you're trying to give it a meaning when it was clearly fluffyness.

That MP vs Ika/SW clash was fun to read /sarc :P

I still subscribe to my Ika/MP theory, but it is more of a tinfoil idea right now.

There is a very strong chance the mafia are lying low as the civs squabbled so early in the game.

Goldy wrote:Yo! I'm in front line.
Fighting in frontline is better than any other option I think if it really helps to kill a titan, while doing nothing is most scummy thing but on other side helping to evacuate people is much likely neutral thing.

I've slight scum read on insertnamehere but I don't know what's up with sig? Though this is my first time here so I don't know much about everyone play style or regular things.
I'll try to help as much I can.

What do you mean?

@Leetic I feel your pain four pages and only day 0, though I helped that lol.

I don't like how serious we're getting so soon, but it seems we've left the happy shiny fluff platform and are on the train headed to the valley of lynching,

I've got a gut civ lean on SW and pings on Ika/MP. Seeing how both players acted in the scrimmage as mafia I wouldn't be surprised if they were doing the same thing here. So I'm watching them both.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Draconus wrote:It's a basic game with basic rules, but I already see a lot of rule breakers... I think I'll let it go this time

Linki:
Rules schmules.

Tatakai

Psh typical conformists

DrWilgy wrote:
sig wrote:

You bad this game Wilgy?
Yee! hbu?

Let me check my role card brb..........

quick question though, the Titans they're the civs right?

You bad this game Wilgy?

rabbit8 wrote:Because I'm interested, and failed miserably. If you haven't posted, read the rules, carefully, if you're a civvie of course.

Tatakai!

Woot Woot frontline here we come, pack your weapons and some sun screen.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I voted for the good of myself.

But, we can't evacuate anyone if the TITANS ARE KILLLLLLING THEM ALLLL.

insertnamehere wrote:Excited to get crackin'! So, who here has seen the original show, and based on it, what is the smart move to take here?

I've seen the show frankly you're damning if you do and damning if you don't no way to avoid getting eaten. The safest option might be to help evacuate, however then you might need to worry about the citizens rioting or you getting killed in the chaos.

Hiding isn't very good you can/will get eaten, commit suicide, or get smushed by buildings.

Fighting on the front lines well that is dangerous since you're fighting giant man eating titans, however I think it is the best bet to pick right now. Dangerous yes, but I think it is better then the alternatives. Especially since we should be helping to destroy the titans.

Search found 52 matches