Search found 464 matches
Return to “Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]”
- Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
- Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
I had no clue how to use my role at all and I doubt anyone in the game accepted an order at any point. What did you guys do with it?
- Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
I was hoping you’d kill me
- Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
Then we found out that wasn’t allowed
- Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]
YesSloonei wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:36 pmDid you ask me to target yourself one night?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:23 pmSomeone got it right? I found out on night 2 when you told me I couldn’t keep asking Dom to talk to meLong Con wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 10:57 amAdded the 'No double-targeting' rule to the Rules post.Tranq wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 3:15 am@Long Con @Black Rock what was this?Black Rock wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:28 am Something has been added to a post, the first player who PM's me with the content will receive a prize.
- Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]
Someone got it right? I found out on night 2 when you told me I couldn’t keep asking Dom to talk to meLong Con wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 10:57 amAdded the 'No double-targeting' rule to the Rules post.Tranq wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 3:15 am@Long Con @Black Rock what was this?Black Rock wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:28 am Something has been added to a post, the first player who PM's me with the content will receive a prize.
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
No wonder JJJ couldn’t find one masterful play
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
Juliets didn’t assign a harbinger
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 5:31 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 9:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
That was me and what I realized was completely unrelated to that. I’m voting for Speed right now but I’d kinda bet on Ted / Epi?
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Let me continue, as the day went on and Sig took over the vote count, me and Jack spent the second half of the day trying to convince people to vote for Mac over Sig.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 3]
Initially I pitched for a non-Sig non-Mac lynch. As the day went on and Sig took over the vote count, I just realized somethingspeedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 6:33 pm Thanks Tony, even if it's from you, that insight gives me something to look into.
I didn't see many posts before this in your ISO that strongly argued for a mac lynch. I might be wrong, as a lot of things are out of context, but there were several 'lynch another master instead of Mac because mac is useful' posts.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:39 pm If Mac is scum and is giving up, his team is voting for him or soon will be.
I was not around for those days. Care to speak to the following?
(I have bad looking posts around the time, so I'd like to hear it out.)
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 8:34 pm I’ll vote Radishes over Mac. I think a Mac lynch is wildly random, he’s at least hunting. In multiball or whatever that might be less effective, but I think his insight has been good.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:22 am I think our best option today is to lynch someone who has high equity for being on the master’s team with Mac and also without Mac.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:24 am That sounds stupid so let’s phrase this differently:
If Mac is scum, is there anyone who is surely also scum?
Lynch them instead.
Mac has a very limited range of possibilities and if we lynch him on autopilot and we’re wrong we risk having no leads on what will soon be a fully powered scum team.I think everyone was confused at the time, too, but I wasn't completely around. You did vote on/off for Mac during all this, and Mac self-voted/gave up sometime during it.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:53 amLemme have my science project
Short: I am a contrarian and don’t think we should lynch Mac or G-Man/Sig and am looking for a good other option.
Basically I am confused.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 6:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
I’ll make it easy. I was an AM suspect. I fought hard to get Mac lynched. I’m not the AM. Easy. Town.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 6:21 pm When I say 'toneread' I mean you're reading Tony based on his thought process, approach, logical-ness, etc. Rather than Master's compatibility and vote placement, and posts that specifically happened in this game.
It's not that I don't care about any of that. But it's not exactly something I'd use at this point in the game. "I like the way you play" is not enough. People didn't like the way G-man or Colin played. People liked the way Jay played.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Or at least
Could be
Could be
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Look, if you have an airtight clear, speak now or forever hold your peace. Cause there’s no Town role that isn’t Dedede and that can’t be mechanically cleared that’s worth protecting and moreover because I think you’re wrong.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Jules did for reasons I think completely other than why I did.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:16 pmI thought you and Juliets had cleared tranq not an hour ago.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:14 pmI’m willing to accept Tranq and Epi. That was Jay’s guess as well.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:12 pm You guys are scumreading me without any reason and POE townreading everyone without reason (except for Juliets, I got that one) and it's going to lose town the game.
At least, lose the game for me, Juliets and whoever the one other townsperson is.
Actually his guess was Tranq and Tony but that’s wrong so we’ll go with second option
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
I’m willing to accept Tranq and Epi. That was Jay’s guess as well.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:12 pm You guys are scumreading me without any reason and POE townreading everyone without reason (except for Juliets, I got that one) and it's going to lose town the game.
At least, lose the game for me, Juliets and whoever the one other townsperson is.
Actually his guess was Tranq and Tony but that’s wrong so we’ll go with second option
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
No. He’s played a clean game. I’ll reread his interactions with Sloonei.juliets wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:12 pm Jay was pretty adamant about Epi being bad so I'm going to revisit his posts. One thing I know made me uncomfortable is how hard Epi has fought against the notion that either he or ted is bad because of Inception Day. It seems so logical to me that the baddies would have been spread between levels.
@TonyStarkPrime is there anything you see about Epi right at the moment that causes you concern?
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
I’m Town because of my wonderful personalityspeedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:10 pm I feel like I can't even engage with the thread right now.
My questions are met with 'Tranq is town because reasons' even though there's no town role or item set that clears him from what he's said and when I ask why people townread Tony I get nothing from anyone.
I'll answer your questions later Tranq. I'll be giving everyone a read before the end of this phase.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]
I can spell it out. I have no information that assists in this at all.tedxtr wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:53 pmIs this supposed to mean anything to me? This is a Day 3 read or something.
TSP, how'd you jump from Juliets and possibly tranq to dead to rights on Speed and Epi?
I feel like I'm missing something obvious here but someone's going to have to spell it out for me
SVS is the permanent ghost, so they know the identity of the Monitor. I pinged SVS so they’d tell us who the monitor is, but best guess it’s Juliets. Juliets don’t say anything about this. If it’s wrong revel in your mafia victory to the bank. Juliets then would be positive who the identity of the Harbinger is. I’d already assumed it was Dys. Considering that Juliets keeps thinking that Dizzy is not town because of a lie Dizzy may or may not have told, that follows. That’s been discussed this day.
Also consider that Tranq was tracking on this before I was. That might suggest some extra knowledge or just smart. Tranq might be bluffing one of two other roles but could be anything.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Alright Jules back it up a bit
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:47 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
The thought crossed my mind. Makes sense that you would bring it up.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
This is going to get gritty.
Irrelevant.
Irrelevant. Speed and Epi.
Irrelevant.
Irrelevant. Speed and Epi.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
So that leaves us with Speed and Epi. Final answer.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:40 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Also re the first SVS post, that’s gotta be on the line for role hinting
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
I think it’s Juliets. It could be Tranq but I have something else in mind for Tranq. If it’s Juliets then the lie Juliets has on Dizzy probably has to deal with Harbinger. Which on reread follows but isn’t immediately clear. But it would mean Juliets is right, Dizzy wasn’t town. That’s a huge non town in nature lie.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 3]
So not Epi or tedS~V~S wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 7:20 amHow do you know this is the top layer? Becasue we're still in the main thread? I did not play that one. If this is the case, I am guessing they send us sig. They get the same posts as we do, they know who died and got the Oracle reveal, I hope? Anyone know if, based on the original game, this would be the case?NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 2:28 amWe’re here in the top layer.
There’s at least one more layer, I’d guess just one more based off player count.
Killing someone here kills them. “Killing” someone in the lower layer sends them to the top layer. Eventually the layers will merge back together.
Or that’s how it worked in the Inception game at least![]()
The person I suspect the most is sprityo. Look at his ISO. His Nanook vote was awful, and after that lynch he just dropped his suspicion. He was going to be my reveal, but at the last second I switched it to sig becasue I KNEW DIZZY WAS RIGHT ABOUT HIM!!! I am kinda surprised I was NKed, though. I expected that I would be an easy lynch. Not sad I was NKed, I wasn't looking forward to a lynch fight, and I got to use my power.
Even though he "feels" civ to me, I have some grave reservations about Turnip Head. The whole thing that led me down the awful "Macs Progressions Seems Civ!" garden path was a post of theirs. Again, not a bad ISO to read.
Colin doesn't say much, and he was the person sprit was freaking out that Nanook suspected. BUT if we think sprit could be sigs partner, Colin might just be a red herring. @ColinIsCool , who are your suspects in this thread? I don't (STILL) much remember any of your suspects. Maybe becasue we weren't in the thread together much. This smaller thread should give us better reads on at least this group.
Dom is so angry, I don't see him other than as a civ. Bad Dom is smoother, takes it less personally, his righteous indignation feels more stagey. But Dom fools me all the time.![]()
Epignosis feels pretty town to me, and I am not sure why. I am going to reread his this phase.
Jack I have complex feels about, his feel for me is civ, but his words all feel bad to me, lol. He is also a reread.
Based on how he came back, I would doubt Nanook is bad. The way he came into the thread,swinging, and the way he held onto his suspects, (me, Colin) all felt civ to me. I have not agreed with almost anything he has said all game, but that doesn't mean he's bad.
ted, I have VERY complex feels on. For themost part, he "feels" civ to me, although he has a similar tone to Radishes about how awesome he is at Mafia which I tend to view as bad. But I hate almost everything he has said after the first few (rl) days,look at this:
I could get behind a ted lynch as well. He seems to be falling back on G Man alot, which bizaarely makes me want to back off G Man. I have VERY complex feels on G Man, and am happy he is not in here, so i don't have to think about them, lol.tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 9:33 am After endless debates I have concluded that Dys' slip analysis isn't an actual thing. Also their G-Man read makes little to no sense, although I'd like them to elaborate on how G-man treating their slot was townie. Also, G-man didn't engage with you at all dizzy, he just said "night phase went well except for dys dying" and that's it. @Dyslexicon
People that are claiming sig has to be scum and aren't questioning why he couldn't have just TMI as a town role (which is the only thing dys' case can be even pointed to, but I don't think that's even a viable probability) is weird. Juliets' vote stuck out like a sore thumb. She went hard on him for no reason, just based off this nonsensical case, and her calling sig desperate so early feels really fake. Moreso, claiming she read his ISO but holding him accountable ONLY for this slip thing is wolfy.
Sig's basically saying that a protective role WOULDN'T have targeted mac and thus, he would have other tools at his disposal to survive the night. scummy ones.
Also also, the "what is ted doing on g-man" when I haven't posted in like 24 hours or something is really bad. Especially when I don't remember juliets even saying anything about G-man, so why even say that?
I can follow sig's train of thought actually.
I'll probably look at TH's push on me at some point but it isn't on my priority list.
So my, "Probably Bad" list includes sprit, ted and TH in that order. Maybe Colin, but just maybe.
My i dunno list (bonus about being a dead civ, no one cares if I have null reads) is Dom, Epi, Jack.
I feel OK about Nanook, but that is mainly for mechanical reasons and tone, I could be wrong.
I'm gonna read tonight after work, and will prolly post again in the AM. Good Luck civvies![]()
*Rattle Chains at Ghostie MacDougall*
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]
This is all I gotS~V~S wrote: ↑Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:25 am I'm gonna do a GTH post, not a rainbow. I will only comment on some and expand after work tonight (Saturday is my long, difficult day at work, so it is very unlikely I will post during the day today). Bad is kind of a default position (see: Dragomir) for "no opinion" I should have an opinion by now.
Colin, bad, I have to reread him, but I don't remember much he has said. So bad as a default position.
Dom, civ with caveats: he can fool me, he knows it, I know it. So he makes me paranoid, but so far I see civ Dom. *IF* he is bad, I don't think he's bad with G or Jay. That "queen" thing kinda freaked me a bit, not gonna lie, but it was also sweet and totally a Dom thing to do![]()
Drago: bad (last post asking about host posts, I don't know that anyone ever answered him. This is, like Colin, a default position, I don't know his game, and I know walking into a 30+ page thread is intimidating, but asking a question and leaving it hang seems kinda sketch to me.
Dyslexicon: bad, I have complex feels on this. She was a civ read then I shaded her down. She says and does things that feel/sound civ, but then she also is pushing low level minor shade at me and never giving me anything to work with. Early on, she, along with Radishes, asked the thread more than once, why people were town reading me. Aside from the fact that she was mirroring Radishes who I think is bad bad bad, it, along with all of her "Alas, I want to town read SVS but I am not sure why, someone else tell me what to think about this" hand wringing, it just strikes me as her wanting to find me bad. What she is doing is a play I have in my baddie book, too. Drop a crumb, see if anyone picks it up. Sowing the seeds of suspish. Disclaimer, I would feel this if she were doing it to someone else, too. Plus her Radishes suspish feels like distancing to me, tbh.
Epignosis: Civ. I am not seeing bad Epi, unless his game radically changed since I last played with him. Anyone have recent bad/civ Epi games I can look at? For me, "Bad Epi" is more obvious that "Good Epi", and I have not seen that scary person yet.
G Man: bad, I thought so for days, no change. I don't see a curse role (cursed objects is the closest thing) and doing self imposed posting gimmicks is a G Man thing, it is known. Not buying it. This is probably my first vote today unless I convince myself otherwise later in this post.
Jack: light civ; I thought he was bad bad until he backpedalled on nutella, I see no reason for him to have done that if he was bad. Before that he was close to the top of my bad list, though, so![]()
Jay: civ, I feel like I do on Epi here, he seems civ to me, using my Jay barometer, but the barometer may need calibration.
Juliets: Jules is a civ, fight me if you don't agree.
MacDougall: bad, his play on the nutella lynch felt bad to me, and he has not returned since then. How he spins that situation will aim how I slot him. This is his last post (I am generally not posting posts in this post, but this one kinda counterpoints my thoughts on Dsy, so, breaking my own rules! I'm a rebel!)
It's from Day one, no reaction to the nutella lynch as of yet. Macdougall, come and tellme how you feel about how Day One ended.
Master Radishes: He's bad, he's bad. You know it, he's bad.MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2020 2:33 amWhat? This is a terrible read. What does it even mean?tedxtr wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2020 2:31 amGood readDyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 6:20 pm I don't know why I feel resistance to read S-V-S as town. Cause she probably very well could be.
[VOTE: Master Badishes] aubergine
Michelle: civ but could flip to bad, she gave me good feels early on, and I have seen nothing to change it, and therein lies the problem. I need moar Michelle. Gimme that content.
Nanook: civ, I though Nanook 1 was bad, not gonna lie. I reacted to him not unlike how I reacted to Chuck defending supabad LC in that other game. The way he came into his second life made me see commonality between his games so far, I liked him going right on the attack. I think if he were bad he would have pulled his punches a bit.
S~V~S: She is as civ as they come![]()
sabie: bad, she seems a bit wishy washy so far, but I remember thinking she was bad in the past for that, and she wasn't. Putting bad as a default position.
sig; town, one of my civvier reads. I would actively fight a sigwagon.
Sloonei: civ, of the big three (Jay, Epi, Sloonei) I feel most confident in his civness. In their case I defeulted to civ not so much becasue I have seen their civ game as I haven't seen their bad. With Sloonei, I think I have seen both.
speedchuck: bad, this is more of a default position, I have not seen anything to think he is good, but then I am not a speedchuck reader. He is on my list for a reread tonight.
sprit: bad, I read him yesterday and it was meh. He is the opposite of nutella and epi for me, he has a bit of a mean feel for me when he is civ, maybe mean is the wrong word, maybe "biting"is better. Not gonna lie, I blew him up a few years ago and I try to avoid him since then. He says he is going home, maybe he will have more time. He has not said much topical so far.
tedxtr: civ, I like the cut of his jib so far. I like how he explains himself. He's higher on the list for me.
TonyStarkPrime: civ, I reread him yesterday, and expected to think him bad, but I like his posts, they are consice but get his point across, and I found nothing iffy or opportunistic feeling.
Tranq: civ, someone had said civ Tranq doesn't post much and that is true. Tranq with a chatroom banters more in thread. Tranq is like Dom, though, in that it is easy for him to charm me. Some of his opinions, when he started posting them, surprised me, like his thoughts on TH (see below). Tranq, TH and I all come from the same figurative home town, and I was surprised to see that read on TH.
Turnip Head: civ, this is my waffliest read, town TH can be a mad oracle, but like the words of most oracles, it requires interpretation. I *think* I am interpreting him in the correct way but I would like to see more words, plz, K, TH?
And I gotta go take a shower gonna post this without further ado.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:28 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Alright.
[mention]S~V~S[/mention].
You probably haven’t been tracking much, but can you look at the current player list and give me the name of one person on that list who is town. Or tell me that Juliets was wrong and Dys was town if you would prefer.
[mention]S~V~S[/mention].
You probably haven’t been tracking much, but can you look at the current player list and give me the name of one person on that list who is town. Or tell me that Juliets was wrong and Dys was town if you would prefer.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Tranq, if I recall, spent a large portion of the midgame with a laser like focus on Sloonei. No one really picked up the case, but that’s either strong teammate protection or Tranq isn’t scum
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Maybe it’s Tranq and Juliets
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
[mention]Tranq[/mention]
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
I don’t think it’s Ted so now I’m 50/50 even with my other town reads on the table.
Jay really wanted to clear speed for the AtE thing but I’m not buying it.
Speed and ... Juliets?
Or you but I think focusing on the second kill is really weird and I like it
Jay really wanted to clear speed for the AtE thing but I’m not buying it.
Speed and ... Juliets?
Or you but I think focusing on the second kill is really weird and I like it
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
... and ...Tranq wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:09 pmYes, that's been my assumption aswell.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:04 pmOkay so 3P secrets kill oneTranq wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:03 pmGood thought, but unlikely. TH tried to use the bow again on Night 5 but it was blocked, so he still had it on him when he died Day 6.
Who do you think the 2 remaining mafia members are, @TonyStarkPrime ?
Maybe we’ll stumble into one
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Okay so 3P secrets kill oneTranq wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:03 pmGood thought, but unlikely. TH tried to use the bow again on Night 5 but it was blocked, so he still had it on him when he died Day 6.
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Wagonomics suggests speed and Juliets from the obvious side, though I assume someone on the team was voting for Mac
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:00 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 7]
JJJ has to have brought this post up. Not sure how to read it.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:01 pmFrom most to least suspicious:Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:56 pmWho are the wolves on Jay’s wagon?Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:50 pmAll it takes is one or two vocal civilians promoting a case and the wolves can start circling.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:47 pm This is only even a contest because Jay has teammates.
If GMan has teammates, they’re bussing. Yet there are five votes for town Jay?
No way that’s happening. Just look at the vote count and tell me Jay can even be town here.
Speedchuck
Epi
Tranq
Tony
You
- Sat Mar 21, 2020 11:55 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
- Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 2]
Well Mac said sometjing, this was probably what I was thinking of.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 7:55 amI keep noticing you earnestly replying to drivel you should be ignoring or eviscerating and I think I've caught you this way before.
- Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
I can’t find it. I know me and Sloonei left it at that for a while, but someone quoted that post later or mentioned it.
- Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 2]
We did. Talk about it more.Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:40 pmThis is specific as hell. Why pick Sloonei to talk about Mac's view of two other people?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:35 am Sloonei what do you think about Mac’s view of Jack//Radishes?
I don't understand your answer here. Sloonei asked about something rather specific and your answer doesn't make sense to me. There's an avenue for you to drill deeper and press Dom and Sloonei to talk more about this, but you didn't. Why not?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:35 amI was on board to agree with you and Dom about it — I think Mac was going off little. But the weird mind meld in specifically this post seems to be hedging in a way that I don’t like.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:33 amtell me about your tinglies, tony
- Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:47 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
- Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:16 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 9]
Okay I can’t trust any of you potato heads but I’m pinning it as Jules Epi Me. If you are town and you are not in this group, please wave your hand wildly.
- Fri Mar 20, 2020 8:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
- Fri Mar 20, 2020 8:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 8]
Lying can be town
- Fri Mar 20, 2020 8:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 361331
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 8]
Lying can be scum