That's why I wanted you to be a Witch this gameMacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 9:35 pm 2019 leaderboard is now Mac 7, Nova 6 and Speedchuck/Nutella 5.
Let's go @novaselinenever. Bring it on fiend.

Return to “Vault Hunt [Game Over]”
That's why I wanted you to be a Witch this gameMacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 9:35 pm 2019 leaderboard is now Mac 7, Nova 6 and Speedchuck/Nutella 5.
Let's go @novaselinenever. Bring it on fiend.
Led by Mac and NovaMacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 9:33 pm So that's like several civilian wins in a row btw. The era of Mafia dominance is over.
We don't mislynch around these parts. If she got lynched, she was a baddie.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 1:52 amBut we don’t know that Sabie was do we? I’m confused.
The streak is still alivenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:18 am I'll just assume we got a baddie to keep the D1 streak alive![]()
Fair remarks. I'd have to disagree though.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 10:17 pmJackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:53 pm @Sloonei
Since you’re here, who do you suspect that isn’t me.![]()
It's preceded by "no flips", which is basically the main thing that the game revolves around.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:17 pmYou put forth a hypothetical where a counterclaim got soupkilled.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:15 pmThat's if there is one. There might no be one with the night kills being janitored. And even if there is one, there are so many variables due to the no flip that makes not a 1-1 trade.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:06 pmIf there is a counter claim, one is a wolf. That’s not optimistic. It’s a fact.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:22 pmOptimistic.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 10:21 amI'll trade one townie for one wolf all day every day.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:59 pmWhat's stopping a witch from fake-claiming an info? No flips, counter-claim get soup-killed.
Labelling witches incentives for fake claims as something one would take every day (twice on sunday?) is optimistic.
That's if there is one. There might no be one with the night kills being janitored. And even if there is one, there are so many variables due to the no flip that makes not a 1-1 trade.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:06 pmIf there is a counter claim, one is a wolf. That’s not optimistic. It’s a fact.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:22 pmOptimistic.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 10:21 amI'll trade one townie for one wolf all day every day.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:59 pmWhat's stopping a witch from fake-claiming an info? No flips, counter-claim get soup-killed.Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:53 pmOr we can trust you and lynch your suspect without having you claim. That you’re prepared to claim at all might be enough for me.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:49 pmI asked for it though. I perceive it as a critical moment for the civilian win con and want a discussion.
It was 3 for Sabie against 2 for Jack, I believe.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 8:09 pmThis doesn't make a damn lick of sense. sabie had four votes and Jack one or none when I looked.Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:39 pmI'm in a different timezone, so I am running out of time for a vote. It's almost midnight here, so I need to vote now. Out of the two players who seemed to be getting votes, Jack and Sabie, I picked Jack because I'm not totally sure about Sabies guilt and I was suspicious of a few people choosing to vote for her. Since we need a majority, Jack made the most sense. It wouldn't make sense for me to put one vote on someone else and fuck up the majority. Unfortunately, I can't be more helpful than that because my sleep is more important.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:30 pmI don't think you're understanding Mac's info correctly. Mac has no info on Jack, nor Sabie. He has info on Luna being a Witch, so I'm not sure why would you justify your vote as trusting his info and what he's saying.Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:28 pmI've given my opinion on who I'm feeling slightly scummish on, I've also made it clear that I am interested in what Mac is saying. He's pretty convinved that he will be killed tonight for claiming a role, and I've liked what he's had to say today, if what he says doesn't happen tonight then he's outed himself and we lynch him tomorrow.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:20 pmWhy?Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:06 pm I was holding out to see if more players would check in and make their votes before I went to bed because we need that majority vote. Like I said in my other posts, I'm going to go on Mac with this one and see if he comes through.
Vote Jack of Hearts.
Linki - Lol
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 8:10 pmYou talked yourself into nothing. You are her teammate.Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:47 pmHonestly, Sabie has posted very little, so there's not much to go on. She's just had it out from Mac, which I'm not 100% sure I get seeing as it' pretty much the start of the game and there has been so little to go on. He/she hasn't even mentioned anyone else, scum or otherwise.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:40 pmWhat makes you hesitant about Sabies guilt?Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:39 pmI'm in a different timezone, so I am running out of time for a vote. It's almost midnight here, so I need to vote now. Out of the two players who seemed to be getting votes, Jack and Sabie, I picked Jack because I'm not totally sure about Sabies guilt and I was suspicious of a few people choosing to vote for her. Since we need a majority, Jack made the most sense. It wouldn't make sense for me to put one vote on someone else and fuck up the majority. Unfortunately, I can't be more helpful than that because my sleep is more important.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:30 pmI don't think you're understanding Mac's info correctly. Mac has no info on Jack, nor Sabie. He has info on Luna being a Witch, so I'm not sure why would you justify your vote as trusting his info and what he's saying.Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:28 pmI've given my opinion on who I'm feeling slightly scummish on, I've also made it clear that I am interested in what Mac is saying. He's pretty convinved that he will be killed tonight for claiming a role, and I've liked what he's had to say today, if what he says doesn't happen tonight then he's outed himself and we lynch him tomorrow.
Linki - Lol
Doing another read, I suppose the only other thing Sabie did do is try to lead us away from Luna yesterday, and I suppose Mac was being difficult, so he was an easy target. Damn it, now I've confused myself again. I've actually talked myself into Sabie being scum, which means I need to re-evaluate other people as that was the only reason I didn't put a vote there.
Curse you, I shall never sleep. >.<
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:37 pmThere are no flips in this game.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:32 pmIn her iso reads post, the Sprit read is extremely tame when she has ammunition to fake a scum read there and dig on him. She isn't taking a stance there and just narrating what he has said so far. He was also present during d1 and I don't think he commented on the suspicions on her and the wagon (she was a popular scum read). He avoided it unless I'm remembering wrong.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:22 pmExplain why you think this?novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:21 pm Sprit and Epi are front-runners for scum compatibility with a potential witch Luna.
Epi had a little interaction with her that stroke me as contrived. Same as her calling him lazy and her read on him, and that's actually what led to the interaction. He seemed to shade her for it and he ended up calling her a witch for one of her posts in my interaction with her. He ended up voting Mac.
I repeat, there are no flips in this game.
Let you think on how my strategy as a witch would change knowing that.
The no flip making most indicators obsolete.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:25 pmI don’t know a more straightforward way to ask that question.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:19 pmWhat do you mean?Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:18 pmWhat is this in reference to?novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:16 pm Except those awkward in thread exchanges "Oh we're definitely not a private chat together *evil laugh*"
The post I quoted, what were you talking about?
What do you mean?Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:18 pmWhat is this in reference to?novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:16 pm Except those awkward in thread exchanges "Oh we're definitely not a private chat together *evil laugh*"
Basically everything should be thrown out of the window for this setupSloonei wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:14 pmI would expect timid voting patterns to be less likely as a scum tell in this game compared to standard setups.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:12 pm 2 straight days and Spacedaisy hasn't voted. Unfortunate or...![]()
What makes you hesitant about Sabies guilt?Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:39 pmI'm in a different timezone, so I am running out of time for a vote. It's almost midnight here, so I need to vote now. Out of the two players who seemed to be getting votes, Jack and Sabie, I picked Jack because I'm not totally sure about Sabies guilt and I was suspicious of a few people choosing to vote for her. Since we need a majority, Jack made the most sense. It wouldn't make sense for me to put one vote on someone else and fuck up the majority. Unfortunately, I can't be more helpful than that because my sleep is more important.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:30 pmI don't think you're understanding Mac's info correctly. Mac has no info on Jack, nor Sabie. He has info on Luna being a Witch, so I'm not sure why would you justify your vote as trusting his info and what he's saying.Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:28 pmI've given my opinion on who I'm feeling slightly scummish on, I've also made it clear that I am interested in what Mac is saying. He's pretty convinved that he will be killed tonight for claiming a role, and I've liked what he's had to say today, if what he says doesn't happen tonight then he's outed himself and we lynch him tomorrow.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:20 pmWhy?Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:06 pm I was holding out to see if more players would check in and make their votes before I went to bed because we need that majority vote. Like I said in my other posts, I'm going to go on Mac with this one and see if he comes through.
Vote Jack of Hearts.
Linki - Lol
"The most full of poop" implies a presence of poop elsewhere.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:37 pmI don’t have such a listnovaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:32 pmIs he on your compatibility list?Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:27 pmOh the handful of players that I’ve interacted with directly, he seems the most full of poop. Plus he’s on Mac’s compatibility list.
He moved the goal posts on his shading of me in just a couple of posts, and it felt as though he was more concerned with painting me in a negative light than actually developing a read.
Who else is full of poop?
I’ve interacted with like 4 people. Jack was the only one whose presence suggested poop to me.
Is he on your compatibility list?Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:27 pmOh the handful of players that I’ve interacted with directly, he seems the most full of poop. Plus he’s on Mac’s compatibility list.
He moved the goal posts on his shading of me in just a couple of posts, and it felt as though he was more concerned with painting me in a negative light than actually developing a read.
I don't think you're understanding Mac's info correctly. Mac has no info on Jack, nor Sabie. He has info on Luna being a Witch, so I'm not sure why would you justify your vote as trusting his info and what he's saying.Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:28 pmI've given my opinion on who I'm feeling slightly scummish on, I've also made it clear that I am interested in what Mac is saying. He's pretty convinved that he will be killed tonight for claiming a role, and I've liked what he's had to say today, if what he says doesn't happen tonight then he's outed himself and we lynch him tomorrow.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:20 pmWhy?Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:06 pm I was holding out to see if more players would check in and make their votes before I went to bed because we need that majority vote. Like I said in my other posts, I'm going to go on Mac with this one and see if he comes through.
Vote Jack of Hearts.
All your contribution so far is centered around Mac. Mac being weird, Mac suspecting you, you suspecting Mac, Mac claiming. Do you have any other thoughts?sabie12 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:53 am Actually during the poll I was considering between Luna and mac and at the time thought mac seemed more sketchy. If hes being truthful about his claim all it says is that I didn't vote for one of the witches, which is not really a case against me. Other people also have thought mac was suspicious besides me.
I mean is it possible that the person who had that role check role was killed off then anyone could claim it without a counter claim?
Also epi had kind of claimed to be the one who role checks earlier but no one had really responded to it that I can recall.
Do you actually want the answer to this? If you were, you'd know that the answer would probably be somewhere down and probably quote that one. Seems to me that you're just flooding the thread with questions and quick remarks going off others posts to generate contribution. Doesn't feel like the genuine posting while catching upJackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 10:31 amWhy?novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:21 pm Sprit and Epi are front-runners for scum compatibility with a potential witch Luna.
Optimistic.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 10:21 amI'll trade one townie for one wolf all day every day.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:59 pmWhat's stopping a witch from fake-claiming an info? No flips, counter-claim get soup-killed.Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:53 pmOr we can trust you and lynch your suspect without having you claim. That you’re prepared to claim at all might be enough for me.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:49 pmI asked for it though. I perceive it as a critical moment for the civilian win con and want a discussion.Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:48 pmI don’t know what you’re going through and I’ve put minimal thought into this game or its setup. Do what you think is best. You don’t need my input.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:47 pmChoosing to be unhelpful at this juncture is a very bad look.
Why?Neverwhere wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:06 pm I was holding out to see if more players would check in and make their votes before I went to bed because we need that majority vote. Like I said in my other posts, I'm going to go on Mac with this one and see if he comes through.
Vote Jack of Hearts.
I remember this. It was weird, and his explanation was a joke I think.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:34 pm Jack had his vote on me without suspecting me. Luna was the counterwagon. Jack stayed off her wagon entirely when he could have caused her lynch in earnest. Then Luna "scumread" him out of nowhere.
That's a teammate.
I don't think we should ignore it, however I don't think it warranted that observation. Felt like an observation that is the fruit of an analysis and you have reason to believe it's the case shading him.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:29 pmSo you want to ignore a possibility? That’s seems incredibly shortsighted to menovaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:25 pmOf course, they "could" be compatible. That's like default compatibility.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:21 pmMac has revealed Luna was a witch. So now we can look at who Luna is compatible with. Muriel was replaced by Sloonei because Muriel was absent. With no interaction to judge from Alina could conceivably had been teammates with Muriel/Sloonei.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:19 pmLol what?Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:18 pm Sloonei could also be compatible withluna, since Muriel was absent.
Unless I’m mixed up bad missing something I thought this was straightforward. Am I confused?
It's similar to scum-reading someone that hasn't posted. They could be scum lol
In her iso reads post, the Sprit read is extremely tame when she has ammunition to fake a scum read there and dig on him. She isn't taking a stance there and just narrating what he has said so far. He was also present during d1 and I don't think he commented on the suspicions on her and the wagon (she was a popular scum read). He avoided it unless I'm remembering wrong.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:22 pmExplain why you think this?novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:21 pm Sprit and Epi are front-runners for scum compatibility with a potential witch Luna.
Of course, they "could" be compatible. That's like default compatibility.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:21 pmMac has revealed Luna was a witch. So now we can look at who Luna is compatible with. Muriel was replaced by Sloonei because Muriel was absent. With no interaction to judge from Alina could conceivably had been teammates with Muriel/Sloonei.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:19 pmLol what?Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:18 pm Sloonei could also be compatible withluna, since Muriel was absent.
Unless I’m mixed up bad missing something I thought this was straightforward. Am I confused?
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:18 am I'll just assume we got a baddie to keep the D1 streak alive![]()
Lol what?Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:18 pm Sloonei could also be compatible withluna, since Muriel was absent.
What's stopping a witch from fake-claiming an info? No flips, counter-claim get soup-killed.Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:53 pmOr we can trust you and lynch your suspect without having you claim. That you’re prepared to claim at all might be enough for me.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:49 pmI asked for it though. I perceive it as a critical moment for the civilian win con and want a discussion.Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:48 pmI don’t know what you’re going through and I’ve put minimal thought into this game or its setup. Do what you think is best. You don’t need my input.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:47 pmChoosing to be unhelpful at this juncture is a very bad look.
The hurry is that there's going to be a lot to discuss post revelation. With no flip and the soup kill being a thing, there is nothing stopping witches from claiming a role and a guilty check on anyone. You could be one.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:49 pmWhat's the hurry? The day is young. I don't want to do it and then have someone make a really logical argument as to why I shouldn't have.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:46 pm Yo spill it out. The number of roles that could have information is low, you're a dead man walking if you're truthful.
Linki
You witch.
There was typo in it lol, but still it's meaning was obvious