The Syndicate

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:17 pm Logic: "Idfk: make me Skeletor or some other dumb shit"

Fuck this guy.

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Aug 07, 2020 7:38 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Fri Aug 07, 2020 7:29 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Aug 07, 2020 7:27 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Fri Aug 07, 2020 7:25 pm Good afternoon!
I see "we're yeeting maple" as if that's an inevitable conclusion, and I don't know why. (I did find him a tad scummy from my skin and interactions, but both mg I'd stake my cred on.)

HK claimed a miller piercing green check on maple. Then died and his flip was janitored.

Xalt flipped any time janitored vig that had to shoot a partner for his first shot.

Making it likely that HK was shot by xalt.

Add in that maple spent a good deal of time defending xalt and trying to keep him alive.


So Occam’s razor suggests that maple is also scum and they were trying to do something fancy.

That does sound complicated;
Did maple claim Miller at any point? Because why bother claiming your cop scan peeks Millers at all?

Yeah he did

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Aug 07, 2020 7:27 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Fri Aug 07, 2020 7:25 pm Good afternoon!
I see "we're yeeting maple" as if that's an inevitable conclusion, and I don't know why. (I did find him a tad scummy from my skin and interactions, but both mg I'd stake my cred on.)

HK claimed a miller piercing green check on maple. Then died and his flip was janitored.

Xalt flipped any time janitored vig that had to shoot a partner for his first shot.

Making it likely that HK was shot by xalt.

Add in that maple spent a good deal of time defending xalt and trying to keep him alive.


So Occam’s razor suggests that maple is also scum and they were trying to do something fancy.

colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:57 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:55 pm

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:47 pm SHOOTING LIST IS:

Beeboy
DrWigly
Iwan
TenThousandCalories

IF AND ONLY IF THOSE FOUR ARE ALL DEAD:

Spoiler: show

Colin
ColonialBob

IF THOSE TWO ARE ALSO DEAD AND BY SOME MIRACLE YOU STILL HAVE BULLETS YOU CAN SHOOT:

Spoiler: show

Logic
Sheep

DO NOT SHOOT OFF THE LIST

HOLDING YOUR FIRE WILL BE FROWNED UPON

Frown upon me all you want: I fully intend to hold my fire.

Y tho

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:47 pm SHOOTING LIST IS:

Beeboy
DrWigly
Iwan
TenThousandCalories

IF AND ONLY IF THOSE FOUR ARE ALL DEAD:

Spoiler: show

Colin
ColonialBob

IF THOSE TWO ARE ALSO DEAD AND BY SOME MIRACLE YOU STILL HAVE BULLETS YOU CAN SHOOT:

Spoiler: show

Logic
Sheep

DO NOT SHOOT OFF THE LIST

HOLDING YOUR FIRE WILL BE FROWNED UPON

Logic wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:52 pm

WerewolfHunter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:50 pm

Iwan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:44 pm I'm 10 pages behind but I don't remember any post from beeboy so imma shot there.

Im going there as well so maybe one of us actually get him
Btw is there some specific button i need to press or i just red bold "ita=xxxx

How do we get the color red?

I guess noparse code doesn't work here
{Color=ff0000}example name{/color}

WerewolfHunter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:50 pm

Iwan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:44 pm I'm 10 pages behind but I don't remember any post from beeboy so imma shot there.

Im going there as well so maybe one of us actually get him
Btw is there some specific button i need to press or i just red bold "ita=xxxx

How do we get the color red?

WerewolfHunter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:50 pm

Iwan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:44 pm I'm 10 pages behind but I don't remember any post from beeboy so imma shot there.

Im going there as well so maybe one of us actually get him
Btw is there some specific button i need to press or i just red bold "ita=xxxx

How do we get the color red?

iaafr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:35 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:34 pm

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:23 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:19 pm

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:17 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:13 pm

Spoiler: show

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:15 pm

Before ITAs is highly recommended.

I received an alignment peek of Unknown source.
It gave me a redpeek regarding sheepsaysmeep.

I hardclaim almost VT

This is disturbing. It is also short notice.

@NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME my inclination is to add Sheep into that final window, assume Logic and Sheep will both survive, and we can sort this out after. Opinion?

I believe the claim

Don’t think it necessarily makes sheep mafia tho, “from an unknown source” sounds uh

Not super reliable?

Yeah it's all sketchy as shit. Why hold a red check, even if the source is sketch? Put it out there and let everyone work through it...NOT with an ITA session bearing down, but like...when you get it...

I'm pretty sure that shooting window doesn't open so we can work this out after.

I dunno about you, but I sit on a redcheck as long as possible to see if spew happens.

I didn't see a lot to implicate sheep is scum or potential partners.

As for the source of the check: I was up front about it and did not claim to have a cop check myself.

i have mechanical information that points to your message very likely being fake and from mafia

which is a good look for you and sheep

please dont ita sheep

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:23 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:19 pm

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:17 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:13 pm

Spoiler: show

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:15 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:09 pm

Spoiler: show

iaafr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 3:11 pm

logics guntohead town for me because not sure he'd post this as wolf + his attitude in general is on the villagery side (kind of abrasive/demanding)

@Logic come play

decent chance he forgot this game existed too lol

I didn't forget; I'm at my second job that has less time for mafia throughout the day.

I have a claim to make. Not sure how to reveal it.

Before ITAs is highly recommended.

I received an alignment peek of Unknown source.
It gave me a redpeek regarding sheepsaysmeep.

I hardclaim almost VT

This is disturbing. It is also short notice.

@NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME my inclination is to add Sheep into that final window, assume Logic and Sheep will both survive, and we can sort this out after. Opinion?

I believe the claim

Don’t think it necessarily makes sheep mafia tho, “from an unknown source” sounds uh

Not super reliable?

Yeah it's all sketchy as shit. Why hold a red check, even if the source is sketch? Put it out there and let everyone work through it...NOT with an ITA session bearing down, but like...when you get it...

I'm pretty sure that shooting window doesn't open so we can work this out after.

Maple wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:14 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:13 pm

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:15 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:09 pm

Spoiler: show

iaafr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 3:11 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:44 pm

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:11 pm

FWIW I have seen Logic get himself early mischopped over very similar differences of opinion...and have also seen w!Logic get chopped properly over very similar differences of opinion. He in my opinion is a tough read.

I happen to think that Logic fellow is a really easy read.
He's either free dead wolf or innocent child.

logics guntohead town for me because not sure he'd post this as wolf + his attitude in general is on the villagery side (kind of abrasive/demanding)

@Logic come play

decent chance he forgot this game existed too lol

I didn't forget; I'm at my second job that has less time for mafia throughout the day.

I have a claim to make. Not sure how to reveal it.

Before ITAs is highly recommended.

I received an alignment peek of Unknown source.
It gave me a redpeek regarding sheepsaysmeep.

I hardclaim almost VT

Sounds fake to me

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:15 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:09 pm

Spoiler: show

iaafr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 3:11 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:44 pm

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:11 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:07 pm

Spoiler: show

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:03 pm

Ok, yeah, the misunderstanding is on my end.
I thought you were doubling down on who I said I was talking to and thought it was a scummy frame job.

I'm just being dumb.

The initial misunderstanding was mine and I misread a lot of things that day lol

In absence of someone who knows how to read Logic, I am gonna say Logic might just be a villager

@Adam_ got me vibes from this (as a follow-up)

FWIW I have seen Logic get himself early mischopped over very similar differences of opinion...and have also seen w!Logic get chopped properly over very similar differences of opinion. He in my opinion is a tough read.

I happen to think that Logic fellow is a really easy read.
He's either free dead wolf or innocent child.

logics guntohead town for me because not sure he'd post this as wolf + his attitude in general is on the villagery side (kind of abrasive/demanding)

@Logic come play

decent chance he forgot this game existed too lol

I didn't forget; I'm at my second job that has less time for mafia throughout the day.

I have a claim to make. Not sure how to reveal it.

Before ITAs is highly recommended.

iaafr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 3:11 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:44 pm

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:11 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:07 pm

Spoiler: show

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:03 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:47 pm

Spoiler: show

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:43 pm

I did read the posts.
I don't know why you say "Logic thinks he was talking to spirit"
I know I was talking to xalt. I was talking to xalt about a post I made replying to xalt.
So you saying I confused who I was talking to is simply incorrect.
You made an error, and I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

I said initially you did because I misread
You said 'I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.'
I checked your ISO and quoted something in thread that demonstrates you were talking about sprit rather than addressing sprit (because you would generally say 'You' if you were talking to sprit, obviously). I corrected my misread at this point. I also asked about the wording you used towards xalt, where you asked him about the aggression in his accusation.
You misunderstood (or misunderstood earlier, no idea) and thought I was saying you were talking about xalt, rather than talking about sprityo. I was talking about things you said about both of them, separate things.

I feel like if you don't understand this it's going to cloud you so I hope that helps =/ Idk how else to explain

Ok, yeah, the misunderstanding is on my end.
I thought you were doubling down on who I said I was talking to and thought it was a scummy frame job.

I'm just being dumb.

The initial misunderstanding was mine and I misread a lot of things that day lol

In absence of someone who knows how to read Logic, I am gonna say Logic might just be a villager

@Adam_ got me vibes from this (as a follow-up)

FWIW I have seen Logic get himself early mischopped over very similar differences of opinion...and have also seen w!Logic get chopped properly over very similar differences of opinion. He in my opinion is a tough read.

I happen to think that Logic fellow is a really easy read.
He's either free dead wolf or innocent child.

logics guntohead town for me because not sure he'd post this as wolf + his attitude in general is on the villagery side (kind of abrasive/demanding)

@Logic come play

decent chance he forgot this game existed too lol

Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:11 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:07 pm

Spoiler: show

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:03 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:47 pm

Spoiler: show

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:43 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:37 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:33 pm

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

I did read the posts.
I don't know why you say "Logic thinks he was talking to spirit"
I know I was talking to xalt. I was talking to xalt about a post I made replying to xalt.
So you saying I confused who I was talking to is simply incorrect.
You made an error, and I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

I said initially you did because I misread
You said 'I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.'
I checked your ISO and quoted something in thread that demonstrates you were talking about sprit rather than addressing sprit (because you would generally say 'You' if you were talking to sprit, obviously). I corrected my misread at this point. I also asked about the wording you used towards xalt, where you asked him about the aggression in his accusation.
You misunderstood (or misunderstood earlier, no idea) and thought I was saying you were talking about xalt, rather than talking about sprityo. I was talking about things you said about both of them, separate things.

I feel like if you don't understand this it's going to cloud you so I hope that helps =/ Idk how else to explain

Ok, yeah, the misunderstanding is on my end.
I thought you were doubling down on who I said I was talking to and thought it was a scummy frame job.

I'm just being dumb.

The initial misunderstanding was mine and I misread a lot of things that day lol

In absence of someone who knows how to read Logic, I am gonna say Logic might just be a villager

@Adam_ got me vibes from this (as a follow-up)

FWIW I have seen Logic get himself early mischopped over very similar differences of opinion...and have also seen w!Logic get chopped properly over very similar differences of opinion. He in my opinion is a tough read.

sheepsaysmeep wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:02 pm someone give me a name to iso

hopefully this helps me

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:47 pm

Spoiler: show

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:43 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:37 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:33 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:27 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:25 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:17 pm
It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true



I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

I did read the posts.
I don't know why you say "Logic thinks he was talking to spirit"
I know I was talking to xalt. I was talking to xalt about a post I made replying to xalt.
So you saying I confused who I was talking to is simply incorrect.
You made an error, and I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

I said initially you did because I misread
You said 'I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.'
I checked your ISO and quoted something in thread that demonstrates you were talking about sprit rather than addressing sprit (because you would generally say 'You' if you were talking to sprit, obviously). I corrected my misread at this point. I also asked about the wording you used towards xalt, where you asked him about the aggression in his accusation.
You misunderstood (or misunderstood earlier, no idea) and thought I was saying you were talking about xalt, rather than talking about sprityo. I was talking about things you said about both of them, separate things.

I feel like if you don't understand this it's going to cloud you so I hope that helps =/ Idk how else to explain

sheepsaysmeep wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:43 pm for the first time i read some of the posts i missed instead of just skipping to the newest posts


not doing this ever again

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:43 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:37 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:33 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:27 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:25 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:17 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:14 pm

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true

Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

I did read the posts.
I don't know why you say "Logic thinks he was talking to spirit"
I know I was talking to xalt. I was talking to xalt about a post I made replying to spirit.
So you saying I confused who I was talking to is simply incorrect.
You made an error, and I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:37 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:33 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:27 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:25 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:17 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:14 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:04 am I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:05 am I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true

Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

Hyena wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:36 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:30 pm

ThisIsNotAceMarvel wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:17 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:14 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:04 am I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:05 am I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

Works like a charm.

You are scum and I'm going to destroy you!!!! IM TUNNELING YOU!!!

What works like a charm?
I'm not scum. And I don't mind if you tunnel me. If you're town, you'll come around.

I want to give this a shot.
[VOTE: Logic] aubergine

ThisIsNotAceMarvel wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:31 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:30 pm

ThisIsNotAceMarvel wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:17 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:14 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:04 am I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:05 am I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

Works like a charm.

You are scum and I'm going to destroy you!!!! IM TUNNELING YOU!!!

What works like a charm?
I'm not scum. And I don't mind if you tunnel me. If you're town, you'll come around.

Talking so much about someone to the point they appear
Ok I got the reaction I needed, Logic is town leaning.

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:27 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:25 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:17 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:14 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:04 am I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:05 am I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true

Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

ThisIsNotAceMarvel wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:17 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:14 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:04 am I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:05 am I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

Works like a charm.

You are scum and I'm going to destroy you!!!! IM TUNNELING YOU!!!

Marcher Jovian wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:22 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:21 pm I may or may not be back for EOD. Hopefully won’t be I’d like to actually be asleep kek


Please don’t kill these people:

Jump/marcher/daisy/maple/hyena/sheep/poison/sabie/ted/Urist/DDL/Adam

Preferred kills are something like cayvie/Beeboy/Eph/Martin

Idk maybe sloonei too I don’t have a good read there rn.

Maple didn’t want to get sheeped so sheeping Nanook
[VOTE: MartinGG99] aubergine

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:17 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 10:14 pm

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:04 am I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:05 am I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true

Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:04 am I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

jumpluff wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:05 am I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

xalt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:50 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:48 pm Are you saying I came across as agressive in my questioning, or you are admitting you were too agressive in your accusation?

your questioning yes

why?

xalt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:43 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:35 pm

xalt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:32 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:30 pm

xalt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:25 pm

sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:23 pm



If you're feeling lazy, this is something i spent 3 hours doing so you wont have to:

Define "significant"
And why should I trust your word over anyone else?

this is a very strange reaction to someone giving you their pov of whats happened thus far

[VOTE: Logic] aubergine

i mean the stuff like jumpluff's summary is way more the kind of thing he's looking for, it's a more objective summary of events

that doesnt make the reaction more sensible?

Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

came off as too aggressive to read that way imo but sure

also might just be a difference within the definition of cliffs

sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:43 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:39 pm

Urist wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:36 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:35 pm Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

if you're just going to complain why did you even ask lol

What part is complaining? Lol

I asked for cliff notes. That's not a sseries of selected pages to read: it's a summary.

When I didn't get what specifically I asked for, I asked for more context and background: they "why"

Spirit can and should answer why he thinks those are significant: it's why I asked for clarification in my follow-up.

I've already answered what the content of these posts are. You can check my ISO for that. I also already explained to you that you didnt have to read them or trust me if you didnt want to. If you really dont want to go look for yourself I can always oblige.

I am here for the town afterall

Urist wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:36 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:35 pm Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

if you're just going to complain why did you even ask lol

xalt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:32 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:30 pm

xalt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:25 pm

sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:23 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:21 pm I don't think I am going to read 3k posts.

Is anyone kind enough to give me the Cliff's notes of whatever is going on?

If you're feeling lazy, this is something i spent 3 hours doing so you wont have to:

sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:41 pm

Spoiler: show

So how I see things, and having spent 3 hours+ reading EVERYTHING. this is everyone by post, from Day1 forward until now with posts that are significant in some way to the game.

Define "significant"
And why should I trust your word over anyone else?

this is a very strange reaction to someone giving you their pov of whats happened thus far

[VOTE: Logic] aubergine

i mean the stuff like jumpluff's summary is way more the kind of thing he's looking for, it's a more objective summary of events

that doesnt make the reaction more sensible?

xalt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:25 pm

sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:23 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:21 pm I don't think I am going to read 3k posts.

Is anyone kind enough to give me the Cliff's notes of whatever is going on?

If you're feeling lazy, this is something i spent 3 hours doing so you wont have to:

sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:41 pm

Spoiler: show

So how I see things, and having spent 3 hours+ reading EVERYTHING. this is everyone by post, from Day1 forward until now with posts that are significant in some way to the game.

Define "significant"
And why should I trust your word over anyone else?

this is a very strange reaction to someone giving you their pov of whats happened thus far

[VOTE: Logic] aubergine

sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:23 pm

Logic wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:21 pm I don't think I am going to read 3k posts.

Is anyone kind enough to give me the Cliff's notes of whatever is going on?

If you're feeling lazy, this is something i spent 3 hours doing so you wont have to:

sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:41 pm

Spoiler: show

So how I see things, and having spent 3 hours+ reading EVERYTHING. this is everyone by post, from Day1 forward until now with posts that are significant in some way to the game.