U-Pick Anything Volume 2 Game Thread (Day 4 )

[Adam_]

You know my role is character related so that's something

that's the idea! :P

[Logic]

I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

Works like a charm.

You are scum and I'm going to destroy you!!!! IM TUNNELING YOU!!!

What works like a charm?
I'm not scum. And I don't mind if you tunnel me. If you're town, you'll come around.

[DaisyCloud]

Theory is just that the live playerlist might not have fit in the poll >____________________________>

Don't waste your time investigating it, it's almost certainly a role or I assume it would've been said

I just have trouble ignoring thoughts until I say 'em

oh, okay. lol, I can see it being that, but I feel like McDonald's would have said so. I think it's something different.

[DaisyCloud]

Mcdougall* what the heck

[ThisIsNotAceMarvel]

I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

Works like a charm.

You are scum and I'm going to destroy you!!!! IM TUNNELING YOU!!!

What works like a charm?
I'm not scum. And I don't mind if you tunnel me. If you're town, you'll come around.

Talking so much about someone to the point they appear
Ok I got the reaction I needed, Logic is town leaning.

[nutella]

My guess is poll cap is 50 so that was part of the reason but wouldnt explain why there were so many people taken off

[Logic]

I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true

Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

[Hyena]

Okay, I'm back again. ♡♡ I'll try to be less lazy this time.

[colonialbob]

i don't know what the fuck i am doing so i will be sheeping maple unless i disagree

Just for the record, shooting me would specifically disagree with Maple as of now.

Also for the record in my one previous game with Punchy he played hyper paranoid about what literally everyone else in the town was reading as our towniest town...and then openwolf vigged said towniest town right in front of us. Much to my shame he fucking got away with it because his stubborn paranoia had seemed so real.

If he insists on going through with this, when I flip green kill him.

interesting indeed

(although idk if you're towniest town at all)

[Logic]

I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

Works like a charm.

You are scum and I'm going to destroy you!!!! IM TUNNELING YOU!!!

What works like a charm?
I'm not scum. And I don't mind if you tunnel me. If you're town, you'll come around.

Talking so much about someone to the point they appear
Ok I got the reaction I needed, Logic is town leaning.

I didn't appear because people were talking about me: I had a busy day and read my mentions as a starting point from which to read my catch-up.
I don't know why I have votes and I don't really care enough to look back right now.

[Hyena]

I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

Works like a charm.

You are scum and I'm going to destroy you!!!! IM TUNNELING YOU!!!

What works like a charm?
I'm not scum. And I don't mind if you tunnel me. If you're town, you'll come around.

I want to give this a shot.
[VOTE: Logic] aubergine

[DaisyCloud]

Alright, I spent most of the day (when I could) ISO'ing people and making a general read on them. I don't know if its useful, but I felt like doing something instead of being eternally confused by the fast-paced nature of this game sometimes. I didn't get to everyone though, and I gotta go to sleep.

Keep in mind none of these are locked reads. Most unusual/atypical reads are Null.

These are also not detailed ISO’s, I just looked through their iso, and judged as best as I could.

“idk” = I haven’t looked at them recently / haven’t ISO’ed yet

Spoiler: show

112 v-lean
Adam_ null
Apogee v
AWESOM-O “lmao” & “lol”
beeboy scum-lean
cayvie null
ColinIsCool scum-lean
Colonialbob null, maybe scum-lean
DaisyCloud v
DDL v
DrWilgy “Hyena is bad”
Ephemeral null
Epignosis exists in baseball.gif land
Hank scum-lean
Hyena v
Iaafr idk
iwan determined by rule number XXX (On a serious note, v-lean)
Jackofhearts2005 null, maybe v-lean
Jumpluff v
Justplayingitcool v-lean
Logic prefers cliff notes over danganronpa sprites
Long Con null
Maple idk, v for now because I heard supposed mech clear
Marcher Jovian v for now
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME stump
Nutella v
Poison Chan v
polypies73 scum-lean
PunchyTheCat idk but v for now
sabie12 null
sheepsaysmeep null
Shizune “I’m at work right now”
Silverkeith Triggers my AdGuard’s Spanish filter (On a more serious note, v)
Sloonei Always has a plan. Always. :FEB: (On a more serious note, v-lean)
speedchuck Goose.
Sprityo v
Tedxtr v
TenThousandCalories “what is going on” (with them)
ThisIsNotAceMarvel v
Timsup2nothin prob v, but idk
Urist v
WerewolfHunter lean-v
xalt v

Unfortunately that was all I could get through today. I think I am among the more passive power roles (though I do have a potentially good circumstantial ability), however I won't be able to use it if you decide to eliminate me today. But perhaps its better for me to be yeeted early on because with my inexperience or incompatibility with this mode I won't be able to do much. Heck, maybe my reads are wrong. These are my final two votes:

[VOTE: polypies73] aubergine
[VOTE: Hank] aubergine

Anyways, good night, and good luck.

Oh, and one final note: I notified Mac much earlier that he hasn't updated p#2 to reflect Rej's death --- and it still hasn't been updated. Is there some sort of revival mechanic or did Rej die in a bastard manner?

Wait polypies isn't voteable, I guess ignore that. I don't have time to think about another vote.

imma have to come back to this, because raisins. you have weird timing btw.

[jumpluff]

I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true

Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

[Logic]

I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

Works like a charm.

You are scum and I'm going to destroy you!!!! IM TUNNELING YOU!!!

What works like a charm?
I'm not scum. And I don't mind if you tunnel me. If you're town, you'll come around.

I want to give this a shot.
[VOTE: Logic] aubergine

Any other reason?

[Marcher Jovian]

Alright, I spent most of the day (when I could) ISO'ing people and making a general read on them. I don't know if its useful, but I felt like doing something instead of being eternally confused by the fast-paced nature of this game sometimes. I didn't get to everyone though, and I gotta go to sleep.

Keep in mind none of these are locked reads. Most unusual/atypical reads are Null.

These are also not detailed ISO’s, I just looked through their iso, and judged as best as I could.

“idk” = I haven’t looked at them recently / haven’t ISO’ed yet

Spoiler: show

112 v-lean
Adam_ null
Apogee v
AWESOM-O “lmao” & “lol”
beeboy scum-lean
cayvie null
ColinIsCool scum-lean
Colonialbob null, maybe scum-lean
DaisyCloud v
DDL v
DrWilgy “Hyena is bad”
Ephemeral null
Epignosis exists in baseball.gif land
Hank scum-lean
Hyena v
Iaafr idk
iwan determined by rule number XXX (On a serious note, v-lean)
Jackofhearts2005 null, maybe v-lean
Jumpluff v
Justplayingitcool v-lean
Logic prefers cliff notes over danganronpa sprites
Long Con null
Maple idk, v for now because I heard supposed mech clear
Marcher Jovian v for now
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME stump
Nutella v
Poison Chan v
polypies73 scum-lean
PunchyTheCat idk but v for now
sabie12 null
sheepsaysmeep null
Shizune “I’m at work right now”
Silverkeith Triggers my AdGuard’s Spanish filter (On a more serious note, v)
Sloonei Always has a plan. Always. :FEB: (On a more serious note, v-lean)
speedchuck Goose.
Sprityo v
Tedxtr v
TenThousandCalories “what is going on” (with them)
ThisIsNotAceMarvel v
Timsup2nothin prob v, but idk
Urist v
WerewolfHunter lean-v
xalt v

Unfortunately that was all I could get through today. I think I am among the more passive power roles (though I do have a potentially good circumstantial ability), however I won't be able to use it if you decide to eliminate me today. But perhaps its better for me to be yeeted early on because with my inexperience or incompatibility with this mode I won't be able to do much. Heck, maybe my reads are wrong. These are my final two votes:

[VOTE: polypies73] aubergine
[VOTE: Hank] aubergine

Anyways, good night, and good luck.

Oh, and one final note: I notified Mac much earlier that he hasn't updated p#2 to reflect Rej's death --- and it still hasn't been updated. Is there some sort of revival mechanic or did Rej die in a bastard manner?

Wait polypies isn't voteable, I guess ignore that. I don't have time to think about another vote.

I want to say this person has too many villagers but I’m also lazy and don’t want to actually count everything

[Marcher Jovian]

Also pls Martin do not try to read the whole game
Just read back like the last page and go realtime in games like this
You miss less that you’d expect

[Logic]

I just noticed @Logic thought he was talking to Sprityo still when he was replying to xalt. :S

Did you not notice the absence of anime boys?

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

I actually think that's rather wolfy for Logic. One of the things I've noticed about Logic is attention to detail. Want the thoughts of Logicreaders though as I find him a bit of a puzzle.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true

Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

I did read the posts.
I don't know why you say "Logic thinks he was talking to spirit"
I know I was talking to xalt. I was talking to xalt about a post I made replying to xalt.
So you saying I confused who I was talking to is simply incorrect.
You made an error, and I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

[jumpluff]

Re. Martin's reads list -

I continue to be in the same place as before

I mean, it's what is generally called busywork, but the distribution of reasons vs. 'v' is baffling to me and can go either way. Like, the awesome thing - awesome said lmao/lol isn't a tell for him any more because he uses it as town to circumvent that, so a) Martin didn't read b) Martin is doing villager sheeping c) Martin invented reasoning in a very strange place as a wolf (tbh I kinda think this is a >rand sort by postcount game, so I wouldn't be surprised if w!Martin didn't get a lot of help there)

I agree with stuff like this 'DrWilgy “Hyena is bad”' but it also just sounds like TMI

The polypies thing is strange and I have an eerie thought Martin just slapped some thoughts down from when he was in thread last (bar the Logic thing), but I don't know what the polypies discourse has been since yesterday

There are no real wolves in it and no real reasoning in it, I don't know if it's villagery or wolfy it doesn't make an attempt to explain itself or persuade; in a vacuum it should be wolfy since that makes it busywork but ?

Like nobody has reads on the entire playerlist so I feel like the exercise that produced this (copypasting the playerlist and putting reads on everyone) would produce a bad looking result as either alignment

[sheepsaysmeep]

for the first time i read some of the posts i missed instead of just skipping to the newest posts


not doing this ever again

[Logic]

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true

Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

I did read the posts.
I don't know why you say "Logic thinks he was talking to spirit"
I know I was talking to xalt. I was talking to xalt about a post I made replying to spirit.
So you saying I confused who I was talking to is simply incorrect.
You made an error, and I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

Minor correction

[Logic]

for the first time i read some of the posts i missed instead of just skipping to the newest posts


not doing this ever again

Should I hold you to that? Is this a promise?

[jumpluff]

Spoiler: show

I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.

Do I know you, and vice versa, well enough to know my meta on alignment? I'm not inclined to say so.

It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true

Me: "I'm lazy. Cliffs?"
Spirit: "Here's the 2% of the game you should read"
Me: "Why those though?"

I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

I did read the posts.
I don't know why you say "Logic thinks he was talking to spirit"
I know I was talking to xalt. I was talking to xalt about a post I made replying to xalt.
So you saying I confused who I was talking to is simply incorrect.
You made an error, and I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

I said initially you did because I misread
You said 'I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.'
I checked your ISO and quoted something in thread that demonstrates you were talking about sprit rather than addressing sprit (because you would generally say 'You' if you were talking to sprit, obviously). I corrected my misread at this point. I also asked about the wording you used towards xalt, where you asked him about the aggression in his accusation.
You misunderstood (or misunderstood earlier, no idea) and thought I was saying you were talking about xalt, rather than talking about sprityo. I was talking about things you said about both of them, separate things.

I feel like if you don't understand this it's going to cloud you so I hope that helps =/ Idk how else to explain

[nutella]

I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

same and sprit is gonna get mad at you for continually spelling his name wrong

[jumpluff]

I genuinely also have a headache now btw

[sheepsaysmeep]

for the first time i read some of the posts i missed instead of just skipping to the newest posts


not doing this ever again

Should I hold you to that? Is this a promise?

ok i lied i may read more of the thread in f3 pls forgive

[colonialbob]

i'd def vote martin

but from punchy or awesome-o hmmmmmm

[Timsup2nothin]

i don't know what the fuck i am doing so i will be sheeping maple unless i disagree

Just for the record, shooting me would specifically disagree with Maple as of now.

Also for the record in my one previous game with Punchy he played hyper paranoid about what literally everyone else in the town was reading as our towniest town...and then openwolf vigged said towniest town right in front of us. Much to my shame he fucking got away with it because his stubborn paranoia had seemed so real.

If he insists on going through with this, when I flip green kill him.

interesting indeed

(although idk if you're towniest town at all)

I'm not. The guy Punchy shot in Catan was.

[jumpluff]

[mention]Adam_[/mention] I'm struggling to find wolfy people I think have a better chance of being a wagon. I do partially blame the thunderdome.

The votes are honest to god terrible and I don't expect them to improve at this time of night

Think you're best off staying on Sloonei and following your heart among Martin/AWESOME/speedchuck, or forming a low poster vanity wagon I guess but half of them are unvotable (gonna have to go through those at some point actually)

Or parking on the thunderdome, but there are too many votes there already.

Not gonna ask cayvie/beeboy when I lack reads there myself

[sheepsaysmeep]

why is the timestamp of my registering to this site being outed

i wouldve waited until 4:20 or something if i had known

[colonialbob]

i don't know what the fuck i am doing so i will be sheeping maple unless i disagree

Just for the record, shooting me would specifically disagree with Maple as of now.

Also for the record in my one previous game with Punchy he played hyper paranoid about what literally everyone else in the town was reading as our towniest town...and then openwolf vigged said towniest town right in front of us. Much to my shame he fucking got away with it because his stubborn paranoia had seemed so real.

If he insists on going through with this, when I flip green kill him.

interesting indeed

(although idk if you're towniest town at all)

I'm not. The guy Punchy shot in Catan was.

right i got that just saying it's no *directly* applicable because you're not towncore. like if this was against Daisy it'd be better. but still an interesting tidbit.

[jumpluff]

Hot take, people that have pointed out the ITA is only day 1 are town

Do you think it is a mafia mechanic ?

assumption: maf knows the mechanics (all it takes is one person to read and post in maf chat)
therefore maf knows ITA is day 1

BUT

maf also wants town talking about ITAs, how best to use them going forward, etc etc
so i think pointing out ITAs are day 1 only is townie behavior

(i also think not knowing they were day 1 only is townie but that wasn't a hot enough take for me)

Intereting thought, most people would default to 'mech talk is wolfy' I think

Obviously I know nothing about Syndicate or bob as a player, I think it's villagery tho

I like bob's iso, not gonna quote lots of it because it's less that I care about the individual pieces and more the overall blend of game/socialisation for the size of it

Hope you had a nice vacation btw

[colonialbob]

@Adam_ I'm struggling to find wolfy people I think have a better chance of being a wagon. I do partially blame the thunderdome.

The votes are honest to god terrible and I don't expect them to improve at this time of night

Think you're best off staying on Sloonei and following your heart among Martin/AWESOME/speedchuck, or forming a low poster vanity wagon I guess but half of them are unvotable (gonna have to go through those at some point actually)

Or parking on the thunderdome, but there are too many votes there already.

Not gonna ask cayvie/beeboy when I lack reads there myself

why sloonei though, this is "i'm good but i don't want to commit my life to this game" sloonei, definitely reading as town to me

[Adam_]

@Adam_ I'm struggling to find wolfy people I think have a better chance of being a wagon. I do partially blame the thunderdome.

The votes are honest to god terrible and I don't expect them to improve at this time of night

Think you're best off staying on Sloonei and following your heart among Martin/AWESOME/speedchuck, or forming a low poster vanity wagon I guess but half of them are unvotable (gonna have to go through those at some point actually)

Or parking on the thunderdome, but there are too many votes there already.

Not gonna ask cayvie/beeboy when I lack reads there myself

[mention]jumpluff[/mention] taking a look now. take a tylenol if you haven't

[sheepsaysmeep]

someone give me a name to iso

hopefully this helps me

[jumpluff]

[mention]colonialbob[/mention] Can you expand on your thoughts on Sloonei wagon?

Majority of Sloonei voters are from off-site (I know Sloonei is a good player but we're not going to have the same attitude towards Sloonei that Syndicate players are, nor has he represented a strong intention to hardcore solve the game)

So I don't think your take that it's an opportunistic attempt to remove the strongest player around is accurate. Syndicate players (or rather, you and DDL that I recall) have generally been like 'gotta give Sloonei a d1 pass', which is stranger to me and even TMI-y given the dissonance between the respect given and Sloonei's investment

Is it normal for Sloonei to take d1s off?

[Logic]

Spoiler: show

It's not your meta, it's an observation of your personality made in absence of interaction

Are there people here who are authorities on your meta? I'm not comfortable with your meta at all so I'd be interested

Anyway this is true



I went back and looked because you said I was wrong

By accusation, did you mean xalt's vote on you?

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

I did read the posts.
I don't know why you say "Logic thinks he was talking to spirit"
I know I was talking to xalt. I was talking to xalt about a post I made replying to xalt.
So you saying I confused who I was talking to is simply incorrect.
You made an error, and I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

I said initially you did because I misread
You said 'I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.'
I checked your ISO and quoted something in thread that demonstrates you were talking about sprit rather than addressing sprit (because you would generally say 'You' if you were talking to sprit, obviously). I corrected my misread at this point. I also asked about the wording you used towards xalt, where you asked him about the aggression in his accusation.
You misunderstood (or misunderstood earlier, no idea) and thought I was saying you were talking about xalt, rather than talking about sprityo. I was talking about things you said about both of them, separate things.

I feel like if you don't understand this it's going to cloud you so I hope that helps =/ Idk how else to explain

Ok, yeah, the misunderstanding is on my end.
I thought you were doubling down on who I said I was talking to and thought it was a scummy frame job.

I'm just being dumb.

[Marcher Jovian]

someone give me a name to iso

hopefully this helps me

112

[Logic]

someone give me a name to iso

hopefully this helps me

You're voting me and I have a dozen posts to my name.

You could start there.

[jumpluff]

@Adam_ I'm struggling to find wolfy people I think have a better chance of being a wagon. I do partially blame the thunderdome.

The votes are honest to god terrible and I don't expect them to improve at this time of night

Think you're best off staying on Sloonei and following your heart among Martin/AWESOME/speedchuck, or forming a low poster vanity wagon I guess but half of them are unvotable (gonna have to go through those at some point actually)

Or parking on the thunderdome, but there are too many votes there already.

Not gonna ask cayvie/beeboy when I lack reads there myself

why sloonei though, this is "i'm good but i don't want to commit my life to this game" sloonei, definitely reading as town to me

x-post

(kinda, knowing you think Sloonei himself is town informs my read on your opinion of Sloonei's wagon, but my concern was more your opinion of the wagon)

Bizarre and anti-consensus reads on his shooters with zero explanation combined with defeated posting and bad ratio of reads:other stuff

I generally ignore 'I'm getting killed because I'm not town leader' stuff because it's not readable to me. No one voting Sloonei expects wallposts from Sloonei here except maybe Hyena(?)

[Timsup2nothin]

someone give me a name to iso

hopefully this helps me

Try Speedchuck...short and sweet, get you some momentum

[Adam_]

[VOTE: TenThousandCalories] aubergine unvoting sheepsaysmeep
i was going to vote speedchuck instead, but. i don't even want to say it really. some people i will never get along with or they're 10YO or something

[jumpluff]

Spoiler: show

What part of that is talking about xalt?

Xalt thought it was scummy for my reaction to spirit's tldr post.
So I explained how I reacted the spirit and why.

I think there is a miscommunication here, because I don't see what you are talking about: at no point did I mistake xalt for spirit or the opposite.

I clarified your statement because it was incorrect. Or, at the very least, drawing incorrect conclusions.

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

I did read the posts.
I don't know why you say "Logic thinks he was talking to spirit"
I know I was talking to xalt. I was talking to xalt about a post I made replying to xalt.
So you saying I confused who I was talking to is simply incorrect.
You made an error, and I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

I said initially you did because I misread
You said 'I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.'
I checked your ISO and quoted something in thread that demonstrates you were talking about sprit rather than addressing sprit (because you would generally say 'You' if you were talking to sprit, obviously). I corrected my misread at this point. I also asked about the wording you used towards xalt, where you asked him about the aggression in his accusation.
You misunderstood (or misunderstood earlier, no idea) and thought I was saying you were talking about xalt, rather than talking about sprityo. I was talking about things you said about both of them, separate things.

I feel like if you don't understand this it's going to cloud you so I hope that helps =/ Idk how else to explain

Ok, yeah, the misunderstanding is on my end.
I thought you were doubling down on who I said I was talking to and thought it was a scummy frame job.

I'm just being dumb.

The initial misunderstanding was mine and I misread a lot of things that day lol

In absence of someone who knows how to read Logic, I am gonna say Logic might just be a villager

[mention]Adam_[/mention] got me vibes from this (as a follow-up)

[jumpluff]

[VOTE: TenThousandCalories] aubergine unvoting sheepsaysmeep
i was going to vote speedchuck instead, but. i don't even want to say it really. some people i will never get along with or they're 10YO or something

He's roleplaying Untitled Goose Game if that helps

Someone (Maple?) asked why he was honking as well

[colonialbob]

colonialbob Can you expand on your thoughts on Sloonei wagon?

Majority of Sloonei voters are from off-site (I know Sloonei is a good player but we're not going to have the same attitude towards Sloonei that Syndicate players are, nor has he represented a strong intention to hardcore solve the game)

So I don't think your take that it's an opportunistic attempt to remove the strongest player around is accurate. Syndicate players (or rather, you and DDL that I recall) have generally been like 'gotta give Sloonei a d1 pass', which is stranger to me and even TMI-y given the dissonance between the respect given and Sloonei's investment

Is it normal for Sloonei to take d1s off?

so Sloonei is a player who's super townleader-y. lots of analysis, pushing and prodding, asking good questions, the lot. so for one thing he's a super strong asset for town if he's town. (even when he tunnels me hardcore )

however, that playstyle is understandably tiring, and I've played in several games with ol' sloondog where he clearly did not want to put forth that effort. he was still helpful, still contributed, and importantly was still town. this game so far reminds me strongly of those games. I can totally see him choosing that style for this giant wacky game.

[Adam_]

someone give me a name to iso

hopefully this helps me

You're voting me and I have a dozen posts to my name.

You could start there.

[mention]jumpluff[/mention] i thought this post was pretty good too. i'm going to have a hard time not judging logic by the team hydra game, but as far as a 10-posting player goes, i don't mind him

[sheepsaysmeep]

someone give me a name to iso

hopefully this helps me

112

uh

if i want to try to force something, the amount of calling nutella wolf vs actually trying to convince other people to join there is wolfily imbalanced

shooting sloonei after seemingly only tunneling nutella for the first part of the day also bothers me

but realistically you could not have chosen someone more dead null

[jumpluff]

someone give me a name to iso

hopefully this helps me

You're voting me and I have a dozen posts to my name.

You could start there.

@jumpluff i thought this post was pretty good too. i'm going to have a hard time not judging logic by the team hydra game, but as far as a 10-posting player goes, i don't mind him

I thought this too and thought that was worth bringing to your attention =)

[Timsup2nothin]

Spoiler: show

Spoiler: show

It's not. It's clearly talking about sprityo, so I was validating that the thing I said was incorrect and you were talking to Xalt properly, because the last time I misread a quote chain, it affected ITAs (I think).

Yes, we're miscommunicating, I asked something about your wording but it doesn't really matter any more since it was just confirming my new interpretation of your ISO

But what?
At the start of the quote chain, you said I was talking to spirit (I was talking to xalt about spirit) and now you are spinning that and saying I was talking to xalt, when I corrected you to that point in my first reply.
So again...
What?

my head hurts can you please reread my posts here and then let me know if I need to answer this

I did read the posts.
I don't know why you say "Logic thinks he was talking to spirit"
I know I was talking to xalt. I was talking to xalt about a post I made replying to xalt.
So you saying I confused who I was talking to is simply incorrect.
You made an error, and I have a compulsive need to correct errors. (It is part of my regular day job.)

I said initially you did because I misread
You said 'I think I was talking to both of them. I was talking to xalt about spirit a couple of times.'
I checked your ISO and quoted something in thread that demonstrates you were talking about sprit rather than addressing sprit (because you would generally say 'You' if you were talking to sprit, obviously). I corrected my misread at this point. I also asked about the wording you used towards xalt, where you asked him about the aggression in his accusation.
You misunderstood (or misunderstood earlier, no idea) and thought I was saying you were talking about xalt, rather than talking about sprityo. I was talking about things you said about both of them, separate things.

I feel like if you don't understand this it's going to cloud you so I hope that helps =/ Idk how else to explain

Ok, yeah, the misunderstanding is on my end.
I thought you were doubling down on who I said I was talking to and thought it was a scummy frame job.

I'm just being dumb.

The initial misunderstanding was mine and I misread a lot of things that day lol

In absence of someone who knows how to read Logic, I am gonna say Logic might just be a villager

@Adam_ got me vibes from this (as a follow-up)

FWIW I have seen Logic get himself early mischopped over very similar differences of opinion...and have also seen w!Logic get chopped properly over very similar differences of opinion. He in my opinion is a tough read.

[sheepsaysmeep]

yeah im unvoting logic ftr his return is villagey

[colonialbob]

@Adam_ I'm struggling to find wolfy people I think have a better chance of being a wagon. I do partially blame the thunderdome.

The votes are honest to god terrible and I don't expect them to improve at this time of night

Think you're best off staying on Sloonei and following your heart among Martin/AWESOME/speedchuck, or forming a low poster vanity wagon I guess but half of them are unvotable (gonna have to go through those at some point actually)

Or parking on the thunderdome, but there are too many votes there already.

Not gonna ask cayvie/beeboy when I lack reads there myself

why sloonei though, this is "i'm good but i don't want to commit my life to this game" sloonei, definitely reading as town to me

x-post

(kinda, knowing you think Sloonei himself is town informs my read on your opinion of Sloonei's wagon, but my concern was more your opinion of the wagon)

Bizarre and anti-consensus reads on his shooters with zero explanation combined with defeated posting and bad ratio of reads:other stuff

I generally ignore 'I'm getting killed because I'm not town leader' stuff because it's not readable to me. No one voting Sloonei expects wallposts from Sloonei here except maybe Hyena(?)

can you give me a quick summary of the shooter stuff, from somebody who missed all of it?

(ps thank you my vacation was quite nice and much needed, although it involved me staying up way too late way too often and now i am paying the price)