[ENDGAME]: Film Directors.

[Canucklehead]

Ya know, I'm starting to get tempted to see LC as a baddie, taking good advantage of the WIFOM possibilities of llama's death and the "No! It's way too obvious!" thing...but what's hiding me back from that is exactly the aloofness that is causing MM to suspect him. Baddie LC is full of plots and evil, and while he is obviously excellent at "playing civ" even when a baddie, I don't think aloofness is in his baddie repertoire, since engaging in the thread and doing "good civ work" are (at least from what I remember) essential elements to move his baddie plots along...
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.


Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.

[Marmot]

Ya know, I'm starting to get tempted to see LC as a baddie, taking good advantage of the WIFOM possibilities of llama's death and the "No! It's way too obvious!" thing...but what's hiding me back from that is exactly the aloofness that is causing MM to suspect him. Baddie LC is full of plots and evil, and while he is obviously excellent at "playing civ" even when a baddie, I don't think aloofness is in his baddie repertoire, since engaging in the thread and doing "good civ work" are (at least from what I remember) essential elements to move his baddie plots along...
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.


Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.

If he's a baddie, then our lynch track record is proof enough that his plan is going smoothly. I understand what you mean though, but this is not a recent development. I mentioned it earlier, and he has been doing this all game.

[S~V~S]

So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?

I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.

[Made]

Reread Canuck, she's off the list DF is on. I need to reread LC and SVS...

Canuck (and LC), I want to bring this to your attention, because I caught it, but forgot to mention it immediately when it was brought up then saw that you and LC brought it up in reference to DF.

In regards to LC: his behavior has been aloof all game, and now he doesn't want to take responsibility for his votes. Llama was killed the same night he called LC out.

@Made, I noticed that you immediately defend DF upon your return, and your top 3 suspects line up with this recent post from Ricochet here. What do you think of DF and Ricochet?

And now the irony of this is starting to hit.
LC suggested DF is doing what MM is saying that LC is doing.
Check it.

I cast my vote for DFaraday, who now has tried to introduce thread actions resulting from baddie moves (the Llama kill, the Uwe Boll thing)... I think he's a baddie who wants certain results from those actions.

I like this. A lot.

Where the hell does this leave us?
linki- And now i'm really fucking lost. going to check who brought up the WIFOM possibilities of Llama's lynch first, and imo more importantly second.

[Canucklehead]

Ya know, I'm starting to get tempted to see LC as a baddie, taking good advantage of the WIFOM possibilities of llama's death and the "No! It's way too obvious!" thing...but what's hiding me back from that is exactly the aloofness that is causing MM to suspect him. Baddie LC is full of plots and evil, and while he is obviously excellent at "playing civ" even when a baddie, I don't think aloofness is in his baddie repertoire, since engaging in the thread and doing "good civ work" are (at least from what I remember) essential elements to move his baddie plots along...
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.


Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.

If he's a baddie, then our lynch track record is proof enough that his plan is going smoothly. I understand what you mean though, but this is not a recent development. I mentioned it earlier, and he has been doing this all game.

???
I don't know what you're talking about. What is not a recent development? And why does it matter that you mentioned it earlier?

[Canucklehead]

So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?

I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.

No, I don't agree with DF. Like I said, I think LC is civ.

[Marmot]

Ya know, I'm starting to get tempted to see LC as a baddie, taking good advantage of the WIFOM possibilities of llama's death and the "No! It's way too obvious!" thing...but what's hiding me back from that is exactly the aloofness that is causing MM to suspect him. Baddie LC is full of plots and evil, and while he is obviously excellent at "playing civ" even when a baddie, I don't think aloofness is in his baddie repertoire, since engaging in the thread and doing "good civ work" are (at least from what I remember) essential elements to move his baddie plots along...
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.


Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.

If he's a baddie, then our lynch track record is proof enough that his plan is going smoothly. I understand what you mean though, but this is not a recent development. I mentioned it earlier, and he has been doing this all game.

???
I don't know what you're talking about. What is not a recent development? And why does it matter that you mentioned it earlier?

His 'floundering' as you call it. I'm saying it's not a result of lynching civvies 7 times in a row, because his playstyle hasn't changed during that time.

[Made]

Wow, how obvious and heavy handed. I congratulate you baddies for your total lack of subtlety

SVS was the first to sort of hint at it, but no one touched it, as BWT immediately dropped his case after she pointed it out. I'd double argue that SVS is in the clear here because of this post

When LC is bad, he has this faux hearty, hail fellow well met kinda feel to his posts, which is totally absent here.

I think of it as LOST Season 1 baddie Sawyer vs. Season 5 upstanding Sawyer. They sound different because they have different motivations. Even if they are saying the same thing. Does that make sense to you?

No reference to the obvious set up, but solid defense of LC.
So with her out of the way, the next reference to LC and Llama being

I haven't gone over the case on TH just yet (I'm about to), but is everyone just ignoring that Llama said he intended to vote for LC today and then gets killed that very night? I doubt LC would be that unsubtle, but I think it strengthens the need to look into his posts/votes more closely.

Which honestly sets off a mariette of alarm bell in my head. To doubt that LC would be that subtle, then to double take on that and say it strengthens arguments against him just seems off.
Posted immediately after was this

I haven't gone over the case on TH just yet (I'm about to), but is everyone just ignoring that Llama said he intended to vote for LC today and then gets killed that very night? I doubt LC would be that unsubtle, but I think it strengthens the need to look into his posts/votes more closely.

So you're the one.

Again, if this were LC setting himself up, this would be incredibly heavy handed to say immediately after someone brings it up.
Then it kinda crashindos from there

Not ignoring, but it's something to be careful about, since we've been fooled before the same way (FZ's night kill).

Except if you intentionally want us to pursue this.

Certainly not. And I'm glad I didn't discuss it last night because that may well have been why llama met his fate. I know this doesn't clear llama as civ, but the odds are much higher, even than before.

I also don't trust you one bit DF. You were speculating on whether we should trust BWT several days ago for dying and coming back twice, and now I get the feeling you are diverting attention from his case on TH. You also never answered my question from a couple days ago.

I feel this interaction is also interesting

You may have concluded that, but I could find no such statement that said what you thought of him. Your post that you mention was a summary of his gameplay up until now. Thanks for answering. What changed your mind from indifferent to civ?

His posts feel sincere to me, and the more I think about the thing with Dom, the more it feels like just a random squabble than something shady.

Here's how i'm feeling (having not yet gone back, and read DF)
I think we should either throw out LC and Llama as WIFOM or pursue one of the above mentioned. Personally I'm leaning DF as it stands with everything laid out in front of us, but throwing it out might be a wiser decision.

Linki- MM, Canuck, thoughts on the mudslinging surrounding Llama's NK?

[S~V~S]

So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?

I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.

No, I don't agree with DF. Like I said, I think LC is civ.

Sorry, I misunderstood you obvs.

[Canucklehead]

Ya know, I'm starting to get tempted to see LC as a baddie, taking good advantage of the WIFOM possibilities of llama's death and the "No! It's way too obvious!" thing...but what's hiding me back from that is exactly the aloofness that is causing MM to suspect him. Baddie LC is full of plots and evil, and while he is obviously excellent at "playing civ" even when a baddie, I don't think aloofness is in his baddie repertoire, since engaging in the thread and doing "good civ work" are (at least from what I remember) essential elements to move his baddie plots along...
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.


Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.

If he's a baddie, then our lynch track record is proof enough that his plan is going smoothly. I understand what you mean though, but this is not a recent development. I mentioned it earlier, and he has been doing this all game.

???
I don't know what you're talking about. What is not a recent development? And why does it matter that you mentioned it earlier?

His 'floundering' as you call it. I'm saying it's not a result of lynching civvies 7 times in a row, because his playstyle hasn't changed during that time.

Gotcha. Thanks for clarifying.
(I don't agree, btw....I know I'm a civ and have felt pretty damn floundery all game. Lynching 7 civvies has merely exacerbated it )

Linki: no worries, SVS. Starting my "I don't suspect so-and-so" posts with phrases like "I'm tempted to
suspect so-and-so" is not exactly a recipe for successfully expressing my opinions with maximum clarity :blush2:

[Canucklehead]

Made: yeah, I could very easily see myself voting DF for te reasons LC describes and that you've just fleshed out...but I really am quite hesitant to go for the easy case or the obvious case (which this seems to be) b/c I've done that pretty much every lynch and we have nothing but poop to show for it. So I'm biding my time and hoping something will click, or someone will slip, or some miracle will descend from the heavens and tell us what the fuck to do.
Fingers crossed!

[Roxy]

I voted MM. It seems he has escaped being lynched more than anyone. He is constantly discussed but never followed through. Seems like some saving happening where he is concerned.

[Canucklehead]

Who has been saving him, Roxy?

[Dom]

And re Canuck: List of 3 are nice and stuff. Where do you plan on going today?

:hmm:

So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?

I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.

^^

I voted MM. It seems he has escaped being lynched more than anyone. He is constantly discussed but never followed through. Seems like some saving happening where he is concerned.

This post prompted the following thought-- has anyone noticed a player who has consistently suspected MM, but never voted for him?

[Dom]

Though, he's been on a lot of radars over the past few days... :/

[S~V~S]

Me

[Bass_the_Clever]

Dom who are you thinking about voting?

MetalMarsh, and you?

MeatalMarsh I would also be with Roxy and Rico in that order.

[Canucklehead]

And re Canuck: List of 3 are nice and stuff. Where do you plan on going today?

:hmm:

So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?

I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.

^^

Dom, what do you mean to convey by your :hmm: and ^^ above? You went to the trouble of pulling quote and "commenting" on them, but I'm at a loss to decipher your intentions or meaning here.
Decode for the sake of a dense Canucklegoose, please!

[Dom]

And re Canuck: List of 3 are nice and stuff. Where do you plan on going today?

:hmm:

So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?

I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.

^^

Dom, what do you mean to convey by your :hmm: and ^^ above? You went to the trouble of pulling quote and "commenting" on them, but I'm at a loss to decipher your intentions or meaning here.
Decode for the sake of a dense Canucklegoose, please!

I thought Made sounded a bit shady there, and that I agreed with SVS's assessment of LC. That kill has me thinking he isn't on that team.

[Mongoose]

Hi sweet players!

I'm having a fun time down in Orlando for work. Are you all having nice Mondays?

Why not take a break with a nice film from the Criterion Collection? Many are available for your viewing on Hulu.

I'll be around for about an hour if you need me, lovelies.

[A Person]

Hi sweet players!

I'm having a fun time down in Orlando for work. Are you all having nice Mondays?

Why not take a break with a nice film from the Criterion Collection? Many are available for your viewing on Hulu.

I'll be around for about an hour if you need me, lovelies.

I watched The Passion of Joan of Arc today already, it was fairly decent.

[Mongoose]

Hi sweet players!

I'm having a fun time down in Orlando for work. Are you all having nice Mondays?

Why not take a break with a nice film from the Criterion Collection? Many are available for your viewing on Hulu.

I'll be around for about an hour if you need me, lovelies.

I watched The Passion of Joan of Arc today already, it was fairly decent.

Fairly decent he says.

[A Person]

Hi sweet players!

I'm having a fun time down in Orlando for work. Are you all having nice Mondays?

Why not take a break with a nice film from the Criterion Collection? Many are available for your viewing on Hulu.

I'll be around for about an hour if you need me, lovelies.

I watched The Passion of Joan of Arc today already, it was fairly decent.

Fairly decent he says.

I was understating a bit.

[Marmot]

And re Canuck: List of 3 are nice and stuff. Where do you plan on going today?

:hmm:

So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?

I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.

^^

Dom, what do you mean to convey by your :hmm: and ^^ above? You went to the trouble of pulling quote and "commenting" on them, but I'm at a loss to decipher your intentions or meaning here.
Decode for the sake of a dense Canucklegoose, please!

[Dom]

And re Canuck: List of 3 are nice and stuff. Where do you plan on going today?

:hmm:

So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?

I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.

^^

Dom, what do you mean to convey by your :hmm: and ^^ above? You went to the trouble of pulling quote and "commenting" on them, but I'm at a loss to decipher your intentions or meaning here.
Decode for the sake of a dense Canucklegoose, please!

Is this intentionally ironic?

[Marmot]

No. I asked if I could call her Canucklegoose in the Interrogation Room, and she's carried that nickname over.

[Dom]

<_<
>_>

[DFaraday]

So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?

I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.

No, I don't agree with DF. Like I said, I think LC is civ.

I'm pretty sure that's what I said. I just want to explore all possibilities.

Speaking of, looking over Night 4/Day 5, it seems that MM, Dom, and Roxy were all gathering suspicion shortly before the locked thread. I feel pretty good about Dom and Roxy, not sure about MM (he has a lot of posts to look over).

[Ricochet]

Dom who are you thinking about voting?

MetalMarsh, and you?

MeatalMarsh I would also be with Roxy and Rico in that order.

Bass, you are very consistent in naming your suspects, but not so much in reasoning for it. MM aside, I read back your posts and noticed just one instance of saying something about why you think Roxy and I are, on our own, suspicions. In my case, it's the ever-recurrent underestimating of my playing abilities in this game ("ooh he can't possibly have adapted this way / played this good without btsc"). So, would you please elaborate?

I'll be back later with thoughts on the rest of the discussion. Death Note has consumed my entire morning and I'm having overall difficulties balancing the two games, right now.

[Marmot]

So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?

I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.

No, I don't agree with DF. Like I said, I think LC is civ.

I'm pretty sure that's what I said. I just want to explore all possibilities.

Speaking of, looking over Night 4/Day 5, it seems that MM, Dom, and Roxy were all gathering suspicion shortly before the locked thread. I feel pretty good about Dom and Roxy, not sure about MM (he has a lot of posts to look over).

But why do you want to keep drawing attention back to the NK of llama, and specifically the fact that he called LC out, but you still think LC is civ? You went from this post.

I haven't gone over the case on TH just yet (I'm about to), but is everyone just ignoring that Llama said he intended to vote for LC today and then gets killed that very night? I doubt LC would be that unsubtle, but I think it strengthens the need to look into his posts/votes more closely.

to this post.

I haven't gone over the case on TH just yet (I'm about to), but is everyone just ignoring that Llama said he intended to vote for LC today and then gets killed that very night? I doubt LC would be that unsubtle, but I think it strengthens the need to look into his posts/votes more closely.

Certainly not. And I'm glad I didn't discuss it last night because that may well have been why llama met his fate. I know this doesn't clear llama as civ, but the odds are much higher, even than before.

I also don't trust you one bit DF. You were speculating on whether we should trust BWT several days ago for dying and coming back twice, and now I get the feeling you are diverting attention from his case on TH. You also never answered my question from a couple days ago.

Having a suspicion is diverting attention? Don't you want to explore every possible avenue? Having looked over it, I actually think BWT's case is pretty good, and I'm more inclined to vote TH than LC. I just don't want people to ignore what could be a brazen baddie move.

And I did post re: Rico, wherein I concluded that I had no particular read on him. I'm feeling more civ than not on him now.

Where you suggest LC as a lynch option because of a 'brazen baddie move'. Then you finish with

*Votes TH* That felt like more than just idle speculation on a role.

No, wait, I mean DFaraday! DFaraday is the one that will probably get my vote today. He knows why.

For pointing out the obvious? I don't even particularly think you're bad.

I agree with LC on this one. You are looking for reactions from this, rather than actually having any interest yourself. Why else would you want us to look at LC when you don't think he is bad?

[Marmot]

I wish SD would come explain her vote.

[Ricochet]

I'm slightly unsettled as well by the Llama kill subject recurrence, but not necessarily because of DF right now - although, I have to say, reading back his posts, he has had the mighty misfortune to have doubted / questioned in some way all the kills, failed or otherwise, that the Bros have chosen (Sabie, BWT, Llama) - but because I can't grasp the level of subtlelty with which we're supposed to interpret Llama's kill. Its timing was no doubt ripe: his row with several members after Vomps & Blooper's lynches (LC, Dom, Made 1.0 from what I can recall), his intentions to lynch LC after D6 (so LC remained in constant conflict) and then his kill. After which we have several levels of interpretation:

L0 - LC is a Bro and killed (with his team, I mean) Llama to silence him
L1 - LC is not a Bro (i.e. Hack or civ), but the Bros seized the moment and killed Llama to make it look like LC is involved [I believe this is the reasonable level on which most, if not all, agree upon i.e. that it's a frame]
L2 - LC was not involved in any way with Llama's kill, but DF is trying to push for it
L3 - LC is trying to frame DF as pushing it

and the Inception-like Level 4 of subtleness would be that the baddies are a completely different faction and they're trying to frame the both of them in some way for this.

Where (on what level, even) does everyone sit on this, more exactly?

I have to focus on studying during the next few hours, but I promise to return with enough time to reflect more on this, revisit MM and ... well, are there any other suspicions right now?...with enough time ahead of the vote.

[Black Rock]

I cast my vote for DFaraday, who now has tried to introduce thread actions resulting from baddie moves (the Llama kill, the Uwe Boll thing)... I think he's a baddie who wants certain results from those actions.

How would you rather I play? Just vote people based on intuition?

That's how I have been doing it. It's not very successful and it's hard to explain so it puts you on the suspect list for sure.

I'm voting MM again today cause I think he is bad news.

[Canucklehead]

I think I'm vacillating between levels 2 & 4, Rico, and am planning to vote DF on the chance that Level 2 is the correct interpretation....because if level 4 is the correct interpretation, then we're still as bloody clueless as we've ever been, and that's not very empowering.


....and on a semi-related note, I just have to say, that whether you're civ or baddie, coached or not, Rico, you are really fucking great at this game and an awesome addition to the forum. Thanks for coming to play with us!

[Marmot]

I'm voting DF for various reasons.

[DFaraday]

I'm thinking it's level 1.

And as I've explained before, even though I'm leaning civ on LC, I'm not positive, and I just didn't think that possibility should be ignored all around.

Anyway, *voting MM* mainly for self-defense, but also because I think he's the shadiest of the people I've been looking at.

[Marmot]

RIP Made. I am certain the baddies locked the thread when three civvies were tied at one vote each, giving them a free lynch. I would have probably voted Made if I could have just because the other two I am certain are civvie and I had no idea if he was or not.

That was my thinking as well. Although I wouldn't necessarily say that the three who were tied were civvie, simply that they are not Hacks. I am leaning civ on MM at this point, though.

Way to justify your vote with something that contradicts your last read on me.

Guys, I really think we should lynch DF today, not me.

[DFaraday]

RIP Made. I am certain the baddies locked the thread when three civvies were tied at one vote each, giving them a free lynch. I would have probably voted Made if I could have just because the other two I am certain are civvie and I had no idea if he was or not.

That was my thinking as well. Although I wouldn't necessarily say that the three who were tied were civvie, simply that they are not Hacks. I am leaning civ on MM at this point, though.

Way to justify your vote with something that contradicts your last read on me.

Guys, I really think we should lynch DF today, not me.

That was before you seemed dead set on discrediting everything I try to look into. It feels like you don't want anyone to examine the events going on the game for some reason.

[Canucklehead]

Yeah, I have a feeling MM is a done deal at this point, but I'm going to vote for DF, too. I think he's trying waaaay to hard to stir shit up ("Hey guys! Isn't this thing weird? We should totally look closer at it because it's likely baddie behaviour but I'm being very careful not to say anything definitive or come down hard on one side or the other so that I can always backpedal if my pot stirring doesn't work out. I'm also not interested in providing thoughts on anything else that's going on or conversations that are happening, I really just want everyone to notice that I'm here and pointing out really suspicious things but not things that I'm personally willing to vote based on"....is totally how virtually all his posts read to me this game).

[Marmot]

RIP Made. I am certain the baddies locked the thread when three civvies were tied at one vote each, giving them a free lynch. I would have probably voted Made if I could have just because the other two I am certain are civvie and I had no idea if he was or not.

That was my thinking as well. Although I wouldn't necessarily say that the three who were tied were civvie, simply that they are not Hacks. I am leaning civ on MM at this point, though.

Way to justify your vote with something that contradicts your last read on me.

Guys, I really think we should lynch DF today, not me.

That was before you seemed dead set on discrediting everything I try to look into. It feels like you don't want anyone to examine the events going on the game for some reason.

Actually, I have tried various times. I think LC could be bad.

But I think that your intentions are different than mine. I don't understand how I am suddenly shady after I have suspected and voted for you. You have brought forth things to discuss, but not in a civvie-like manner. You offered a nice summation of a Rico post the other day, but shared no opinions until you were asked. You brought forth the idea that LC could have NK'd llama while maintaining that you think the LC is civ. This is the subject I find most inconsistent.

Linki: My thoughts exactly.

[DFaraday]

Yeah, I have a feeling MM is a done deal at this point, but I'm going to vote for DF, too. I think he's trying waaaay to hard to stir shit up ("Hey guys! Isn't this thing weird? We should totally look closer at it because it's likely baddie behaviour but I'm being very careful not to say anything definitive or come down hard on one side or the other so that I can always backpedal if my pot stirring doesn't work out. I'm also not interested in providing thoughts on anything else that's going on or conversations that are happening, I really just want everyone to notice that I'm here and pointing out really suspicious things but not things that I'm personally willing to vote based on"....is totally how virtually all his posts read to me this game).

I voted MM, didn't I? Yes, in part to save myself, but I am more and more convinced that he is a Hack.

And yes, I'm not very committal. I never am. You two don't play much with me, but I'm not Llama or MP or Epig. I never just throw myself in 100% to something unless I'm absolutely positive I'm right.

[Marmot]

Why a Hack and not a Brother?

I am very interested to hear your reasons there.

[Bass_the_Clever]

Hi everyone I going to be a the hospital all day with my family so I really can't post so I'm going to good ahead a vote MM.

[DFaraday]

Why a Hack and not a Brother?

I am very interested to hear your reasons there.

Because when I tried to investigate the circumstances surrounding the Boll thread lock, you reacted as if that was a shady thing to do. I wonder if you don't want anyone looking into it.

I'll keep you and your family in prayer Bass!

[Marmot]

Hi everyone I going to be a the hospital all day with my family so I really can't post so I'm going to good ahead a vote MM.

Take care you two!

[Marmot]

Why a Hack and not a Brother?

I am very interested to hear your reasons there.

Because when I tried to investigate the circumstances surrounding the Boll thread lock, you reacted as if that was a shady thing to do. I wonder if you don't want anyone looking into it.

I'll keep you and your family in prayer Bass!

I did? Where did I do that?

[DFaraday]

Ugh, my mistake, that was Canuck, not you. I was conflating both of your suspicions of me into one amorphous mass, apparently. I retract my Hack statement, but nothing else.

[Marmot]

Well I'm only one vote away from being being out of luck. I appreciate the Bass hasn't actually voted for me though.

I don't take anything back. I think you're bad DF, and everyone would do well in lynching you tomorrow.

[Canucklehead]

Ugh, my mistake, that was Canuck, not you. I was conflating both of your suspicions of me into one amorphous mass, apparently. I retract my Hack statement, but nothing else.

I did? When did I do that?

[S~V~S]

You seemed kinda upset that people were voting when the thread was accidentally unlocked iirc