[ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Moderator: Community Team
- Canucklehead
- Drug Dealer
- Posts in topic: 228
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Ya know, I'm starting to get tempted to see LC as a baddie, taking good advantage of the WIFOM possibilities of llama's death and the "No! It's way too obvious!" thing...but what's hiding me back from that is exactly the aloofness that is causing MM to suspect him. Baddie LC is full of plots and evil, and while he is obviously excellent at "playing civ" even when a baddie, I don't think aloofness is in his baddie repertoire, since engaging in the thread and doing "good civ work" are (at least from what I remember) essential elements to move his baddie plots along...
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.
Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.
Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
If he's a baddie, then our lynch track record is proof enough that his plan is going smoothly. I understand what you mean though, but this is not a recent development. I mentioned it earlier, and he has been doing this all game.Canucklehead wrote:Ya know, I'm starting to get tempted to see LC as a baddie, taking good advantage of the WIFOM possibilities of llama's death and the "No! It's way too obvious!" thing...but what's hiding me back from that is exactly the aloofness that is causing MM to suspect him. Baddie LC is full of plots and evil, and while he is obviously excellent at "playing civ" even when a baddie, I don't think aloofness is in his baddie repertoire, since engaging in the thread and doing "good civ work" are (at least from what I remember) essential elements to move his baddie plots along...
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.
Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- S~V~S
- Captain Obvious
- Posts in topic: 278
- Posts: 21291
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:56 am
- Location: Lawn Guyland
- Gender: Female
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
- Made
- Hitman
- Posts in topic: 124
- Posts: 5999
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Vaugely New York
- Gender: Who/Dat/Boy
- Preferred Pronouns: He/Him/His
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Reread Canuck, she's off the list DF is on. I need to reread LC and SVS...
Canuck (and LC), I want to bring this to your attention, because I caught it, but forgot to mention it immediately when it was brought up then saw that you and LC brought it up in reference to DF.
LC suggested DF is doing what MM is saying that LC is doing.
Check it.
linki- And now i'm really fucking lost. going to check who brought up the WIFOM possibilities of Llama's lynch first, and imo more importantly second.
Canuck (and LC), I want to bring this to your attention, because I caught it, but forgot to mention it immediately when it was brought up then saw that you and LC brought it up in reference to DF.
And now the irony of this is starting to hit.Metalmarsh89 wrote:In regards to LC: his behavior has been aloof all game, and now he doesn't want to take responsibility for his votes. Llama was killed the same night he called LC out.
@Made, I noticed that you immediately defend DF upon your return, and your top 3 suspects line up with this recent post from Ricochet here. What do you think of DF and Ricochet?
LC suggested DF is doing what MM is saying that LC is doing.
Check it.
Where the hell does this leave us?Canucklehead wrote:I like this. A lot.Long Con wrote:I cast my vote for DFaraday, who now has tried to introduce thread actions resulting from baddie moves (the Llama kill, the Uwe Boll thing)... I think he's a baddie who wants certain results from those actions.
linki- And now i'm really fucking lost. going to check who brought up the WIFOM possibilities of Llama's lynch first, and imo more importantly second.
Spoiler: show
- Canucklehead
- Drug Dealer
- Posts in topic: 228
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:If he's a baddie, then our lynch track record is proof enough that his plan is going smoothly. I understand what you mean though, but this is not a recent development. I mentioned it earlier, and he has been doing this all game.Canucklehead wrote:Ya know, I'm starting to get tempted to see LC as a baddie, taking good advantage of the WIFOM possibilities of llama's death and the "No! It's way too obvious!" thing...but what's hiding me back from that is exactly the aloofness that is causing MM to suspect him. Baddie LC is full of plots and evil, and while he is obviously excellent at "playing civ" even when a baddie, I don't think aloofness is in his baddie repertoire, since engaging in the thread and doing "good civ work" are (at least from what I remember) essential elements to move his baddie plots along...
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.
Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.
???
I don't know what you're talking about. What is not a recent development? And why does it matter that you mentioned it earlier?
- Canucklehead
- Drug Dealer
- Posts in topic: 228
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
No, I don't agree with DF. Like I said, I think LC is civ.S~V~S wrote:So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
His 'floundering' as you call it. I'm saying it's not a result of lynching civvies 7 times in a row, because his playstyle hasn't changed during that time.Canucklehead wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:If he's a baddie, then our lynch track record is proof enough that his plan is going smoothly. I understand what you mean though, but this is not a recent development. I mentioned it earlier, and he has been doing this all game.Canucklehead wrote:Ya know, I'm starting to get tempted to see LC as a baddie, taking good advantage of the WIFOM possibilities of llama's death and the "No! It's way too obvious!" thing...but what's hiding me back from that is exactly the aloofness that is causing MM to suspect him. Baddie LC is full of plots and evil, and while he is obviously excellent at "playing civ" even when a baddie, I don't think aloofness is in his baddie repertoire, since engaging in the thread and doing "good civ work" are (at least from what I remember) essential elements to move his baddie plots along...
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.
Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.
???
I don't know what you're talking about. What is not a recent development? And why does it matter that you mentioned it earlier?
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Made
- Hitman
- Posts in topic: 124
- Posts: 5999
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Vaugely New York
- Gender: Who/Dat/Boy
- Preferred Pronouns: He/Him/His
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
SVS was the first to sort of hint at it, but no one touched it, as BWT immediately dropped his case after she pointed it out. I'd double argue that SVS is in the clear here because of this postS~V~S wrote:Wow, how obvious and heavy handed. I congratulate you baddies for your total lack of subtlety
No reference to the obvious set up, but solid defense of LC.S~V~S wrote:When LC is bad, he has this faux hearty, hail fellow well met kinda feel to his posts, which is totally absent here.
I think of it as LOST Season 1 baddie Sawyer vs. Season 5 upstanding Sawyer. They sound different because they have different motivations. Even if they are saying the same thing. Does that make sense to you?
So with her out of the way, the next reference to LC and Llama being
Which honestly sets off a mariette of alarm bell in my head. To doubt that LC would be that subtle, then to double take on that and say it strengthens arguments against him just seems off.DFaraday wrote:I haven't gone over the case on TH just yet (I'm about to), but is everyone just ignoring that Llama said he intended to vote for LC today and then gets killed that very night? I doubt LC would be that unsubtle, but I think it strengthens the need to look into his posts/votes more closely.
Posted immediately after was this
Again, if this were LC setting himself up, this would be incredibly heavy handed to say immediately after someone brings it up.Long Con wrote:So you're the one.DFaraday wrote:I haven't gone over the case on TH just yet (I'm about to), but is everyone just ignoring that Llama said he intended to vote for LC today and then gets killed that very night? I doubt LC would be that unsubtle, but I think it strengthens the need to look into his posts/votes more closely.
Then it kinda crashindos from there
Ricochet wrote: Not ignoring, but it's something to be careful about, since we've been fooled before the same way (FZ's night kill).
Except if you intentionally want us to pursue this.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Certainly not. And I'm glad I didn't discuss it last night because that may well have been why llama met his fate. I know this doesn't clear llama as civ, but the odds are much higher, even than before.
I also don't trust you one bit DF. You were speculating on whether we should trust BWT several days ago for dying and coming back twice, and now I get the feeling you are diverting attention from his case on TH. You also never answered my question from a couple days ago.
I feel this interaction is also interesting
DFaraday wrote:His posts feel sincere to me, and the more I think about the thing with Dom, the more it feels like just a random squabble than something shady.Metalmarsh89 wrote:You may have concluded that, but I could find no such statement that said what you thought of him. Your post that you mention was a summary of his gameplay up until now. Thanks for answering. What changed your mind from indifferent to civ?
Here's how i'm feeling (having not yet gone back, and read DF)
I think we should either throw out LC and Llama as WIFOM or pursue one of the above mentioned. Personally I'm leaning DF as it stands with everything laid out in front of us, but throwing it out might be a wiser decision.
Linki- MM, Canuck, thoughts on the mudslinging surrounding Llama's NK?
Spoiler: show
- S~V~S
- Captain Obvious
- Posts in topic: 278
- Posts: 21291
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:56 am
- Location: Lawn Guyland
- Gender: Female
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Sorry, I misunderstood you obvs.Canucklehead wrote:No, I don't agree with DF. Like I said, I think LC is civ.S~V~S wrote:So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
- Canucklehead
- Drug Dealer
- Posts in topic: 228
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Gotcha. Thanks for clarifying.Metalmarsh89 wrote:His 'floundering' as you call it. I'm saying it's not a result of lynching civvies 7 times in a row, because his playstyle hasn't changed during that time.Canucklehead wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:If he's a baddie, then our lynch track record is proof enough that his plan is going smoothly. I understand what you mean though, but this is not a recent development. I mentioned it earlier, and he has been doing this all game.Canucklehead wrote:Ya know, I'm starting to get tempted to see LC as a baddie, taking good advantage of the WIFOM possibilities of llama's death and the "No! It's way too obvious!" thing...but what's hiding me back from that is exactly the aloofness that is causing MM to suspect him. Baddie LC is full of plots and evil, and while he is obviously excellent at "playing civ" even when a baddie, I don't think aloofness is in his baddie repertoire, since engaging in the thread and doing "good civ work" are (at least from what I remember) essential elements to move his baddie plots along...
So I think, personally, that the aloofness you're seeing is LC as a civ who has practically no information to work with and is therefore floundering as much as the rest of us are.
Linki: like I said this morning, I am currently planning to vote for DF, Bass, SD, or possibly Dom.
???
I don't know what you're talking about. What is not a recent development? And why does it matter that you mentioned it earlier?
(I don't agree, btw....I know I'm a civ and have felt pretty damn floundery all game. Lynching 7 civvies has merely exacerbated it )
Linki: no worries, SVS. Starting my "I don't suspect so-and-so" posts with phrases like "I'm tempted to
suspect so-and-so" is not exactly a recipe for successfully expressing my opinions with maximum clarity :blush2:
- Canucklehead
- Drug Dealer
- Posts in topic: 228
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Made: yeah, I could very easily see myself voting DF for te reasons LC describes and that you've just fleshed out...but I really am quite hesitant to go for the easy case or the obvious case (which this seems to be) b/c I've done that pretty much every lynch and we have nothing but poop to show for it. So I'm biding my time and hoping something will click, or someone will slip, or some miracle will descend from the heavens and tell us what the fuck to do.
Fingers crossed!
Fingers crossed!
- Roxy
- Hitman
- Posts in topic: 64
- Posts: 5143
- Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 6:02 pm
- Location: In a Glass Onion
- Gender: YaYa
- Preferred Pronouns: She, Her, Whore if ya know me
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I voted MM. It seems he has escaped being lynched more than anyone. He is constantly discussed but never followed through. Seems like some saving happening where he is concerned.
- Canucklehead
- Drug Dealer
- Posts in topic: 228
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:59 pm
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 259
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
:hmm:Made wrote:
And re Canuck: List of 3 are nice and stuff. Where do you plan on going today?
^^S~V~S wrote:So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
This post prompted the following thought-- has anyone noticed a player who has consistently suspected MM, but never voted for him?Roxy wrote:I voted MM. It seems he has escaped being lynched more than anyone. He is constantly discussed but never followed through. Seems like some saving happening where he is concerned.
Spoiler: show
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 259
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Though, he's been on a lot of radars over the past few days... :/
Spoiler: show
- S~V~S
- Captain Obvious
- Posts in topic: 278
- Posts: 21291
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:56 am
- Location: Lawn Guyland
- Gender: Female
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Me
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
- Bass_the_Clever
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 74
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:33 pm
- Location: DMV
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
MeatalMarsh I would also be with Roxy and Rico in that order.Dom wrote:MetalMarsh, and you?Bass_the_Clever wrote:Dom who are you thinking about voting?
Spoiler: show
- Canucklehead
- Drug Dealer
- Posts in topic: 228
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Dom, what do you mean to convey by your :hmm: and ^^ above? You went to the trouble of pulling quote and "commenting" on them, but I'm at a loss to decipher your intentions or meaning here.Dom wrote::hmm:Made wrote:
And re Canuck: List of 3 are nice and stuff. Where do you plan on going today?
^^S~V~S wrote:So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
Decode for the sake of a dense Canucklegoose, please!
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 259
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I thought Made sounded a bit shady there, and that I agreed with SVS's assessment of LC. That kill has me thinking he isn't on that team.Canucklehead wrote:Dom, what do you mean to convey by your :hmm: and ^^ above? You went to the trouble of pulling quote and "commenting" on them, but I'm at a loss to decipher your intentions or meaning here.Dom wrote::hmm:Made wrote:
And re Canuck: List of 3 are nice and stuff. Where do you plan on going today?
^^S~V~S wrote:So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
Decode for the sake of a dense Canucklegoose, please!
Spoiler: show
- Mongoose
- Your Neighborhood Friendly Mongoose
- Posts in topic: 205
- Posts: 6079
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2013 8:52 pm
- Location: Murder Park
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/her/hers
- Aka: Alison
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Hi sweet players!
I'm having a fun time down in Orlando for work. Are you all having nice Mondays?
Why not take a break with a nice film from the Criterion Collection? Many are available for your viewing on Hulu.
I'll be around for about an hour if you need me, lovelies.
I'm having a fun time down in Orlando for work. Are you all having nice Mondays?
Why not take a break with a nice film from the Criterion Collection? Many are available for your viewing on Hulu.
I'll be around for about an hour if you need me, lovelies.
Spoiler: show
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I watched The Passion of Joan of Arc today already, it was fairly decent.Mongoose wrote:Hi sweet players!
I'm having a fun time down in Orlando for work. Are you all having nice Mondays?
Why not take a break with a nice film from the Criterion Collection? Many are available for your viewing on Hulu.
I'll be around for about an hour if you need me, lovelies.
- Mongoose
- Your Neighborhood Friendly Mongoose
- Posts in topic: 205
- Posts: 6079
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2013 8:52 pm
- Location: Murder Park
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/her/hers
- Aka: Alison
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Fairly decent he says.A Person wrote:I watched The Passion of Joan of Arc today already, it was fairly decent.Mongoose wrote:Hi sweet players!
I'm having a fun time down in Orlando for work. Are you all having nice Mondays?
Why not take a break with a nice film from the Criterion Collection? Many are available for your viewing on Hulu.
I'll be around for about an hour if you need me, lovelies.
Spoiler: show
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I was understating a bit.Mongoose wrote:Fairly decent he says.A Person wrote:I watched The Passion of Joan of Arc today already, it was fairly decent.Mongoose wrote:Hi sweet players!
I'm having a fun time down in Orlando for work. Are you all having nice Mondays?
Why not take a break with a nice film from the Criterion Collection? Many are available for your viewing on Hulu.
I'll be around for about an hour if you need me, lovelies.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Canucklehead wrote:Dom, what do you mean to convey by your :hmm: and ^^ above? You went to the trouble of pulling quote and "commenting" on them, but I'm at a loss to decipher your intentions or meaning here.Dom wrote::hmm:Made wrote:
And re Canuck: List of 3 are nice and stuff. Where do you plan on going today?
^^S~V~S wrote:So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
Decode for the sake of a dense Canucklegoose, please!
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 259
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Is this intentionally ironic?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Canucklehead wrote:Dom, what do you mean to convey by your :hmm: and ^^ above? You went to the trouble of pulling quote and "commenting" on them, but I'm at a loss to decipher your intentions or meaning here.Dom wrote::hmm:Made wrote:
And re Canuck: List of 3 are nice and stuff. Where do you plan on going today?
^^S~V~S wrote:So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
Decode for the sake of a dense Canucklegoose, please!
Spoiler: show
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
No. I asked if I could call her Canucklegoose in the Interrogation Room, and she's carried that nickname over.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I'm pretty sure that's what I said. I just want to explore all possibilities.Canucklehead wrote:No, I don't agree with DF. Like I said, I think LC is civ.S~V~S wrote:So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
Speaking of, looking over Night 4/Day 5, it seems that MM, Dom, and Roxy were all gathering suspicion shortly before the locked thread. I feel pretty good about Dom and Roxy, not sure about MM (he has a lot of posts to look over).
Spoiler: show
-
- Uomini D'onore (Man of Honor)
- Posts in topic: 322
- Posts: 11660
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 11:12 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Bass, you are very consistent in naming your suspects, but not so much in reasoning for it. MM aside, I read back your posts and noticed just one instance of saying something about why you think Roxy and I are, on our own, suspicions. In my case, it's the ever-recurrent underestimating of my playing abilities in this game ("ooh he can't possibly have adapted this way / played this good without btsc"). So, would you please elaborate?Bass_the_Clever wrote:MeatalMarsh I would also be with Roxy and Rico in that order.Dom wrote:MetalMarsh, and you?Bass_the_Clever wrote:Dom who are you thinking about voting?
I'll be back later with thoughts on the rest of the discussion. Death Note has consumed my entire morning and I'm having overall difficulties balancing the two games, right now.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
But why do you want to keep drawing attention back to the NK of llama, and specifically the fact that he called LC out, but you still think LC is civ? You went from this post.DFaraday wrote:I'm pretty sure that's what I said. I just want to explore all possibilities.Canucklehead wrote:No, I don't agree with DF. Like I said, I think LC is civ.S~V~S wrote:So you agree with Faraday, Canuck?
I see that kind of thing as more of a baddie frame up than as something LC would actually do. I have played lots of games with LC over the years, and I do not ever recall him to make a move so lacking in finesse.
Speaking of, looking over Night 4/Day 5, it seems that MM, Dom, and Roxy were all gathering suspicion shortly before the locked thread. I feel pretty good about Dom and Roxy, not sure about MM (he has a lot of posts to look over).
to this post.DFaraday wrote:I haven't gone over the case on TH just yet (I'm about to), but is everyone just ignoring that Llama said he intended to vote for LC today and then gets killed that very night? I doubt LC would be that unsubtle, but I think it strengthens the need to look into his posts/votes more closely.
Where you suggest LC as a lynch option because of a 'brazen baddie move'. Then you finish withDFaraday wrote:Having a suspicion is diverting attention? Don't you want to explore every possible avenue? Having looked over it, I actually think BWT's case is pretty good, and I'm more inclined to vote TH than LC. I just don't want people to ignore what could be a brazen baddie move.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Certainly not. And I'm glad I didn't discuss it last night because that may well have been why llama met his fate. I know this doesn't clear llama as civ, but the odds are much higher, even than before.DFaraday wrote:I haven't gone over the case on TH just yet (I'm about to), but is everyone just ignoring that Llama said he intended to vote for LC today and then gets killed that very night? I doubt LC would be that unsubtle, but I think it strengthens the need to look into his posts/votes more closely.
I also don't trust you one bit DF. You were speculating on whether we should trust BWT several days ago for dying and coming back twice, and now I get the feeling you are diverting attention from his case on TH. You also never answered my question from a couple days ago.
And I did post re: Rico, wherein I concluded that I had no particular read on him. I'm feeling more civ than not on him now.
I agree with LC on this one. You are looking for reactions from this, rather than actually having any interest yourself. Why else would you want us to look at LC when you don't think he is bad?DFaraday wrote:*Votes TH* That felt like more than just idle speculation on a role.
For pointing out the obvious? I don't even particularly think you're bad.Long Con wrote:No, wait, I mean DFaraday! DFaraday is the one that will probably get my vote today. He knows why.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I wish SD would come explain her vote.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
-
- Uomini D'onore (Man of Honor)
- Posts in topic: 322
- Posts: 11660
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 11:12 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I'm slightly unsettled as well by the Llama kill subject recurrence, but not necessarily because of DF right now - although, I have to say, reading back his posts, he has had the mighty misfortune to have doubted / questioned in some way all the kills, failed or otherwise, that the Bros have chosen (Sabie, BWT, Llama) - but because I can't grasp the level of subtlelty with which we're supposed to interpret Llama's kill. Its timing was no doubt ripe: his row with several members after Vomps & Blooper's lynches (LC, Dom, Made 1.0 from what I can recall), his intentions to lynch LC after D6 (so LC remained in constant conflict) and then his kill. After which we have several levels of interpretation:
L0 - LC is a Bro and killed (with his team, I mean) Llama to silence him
L1 - LC is not a Bro (i.e. Hack or civ), but the Bros seized the moment and killed Llama to make it look like LC is involved [I believe this is the reasonable level on which most, if not all, agree upon i.e. that it's a frame]
L2 - LC was not involved in any way with Llama's kill, but DF is trying to push for it
L3 - LC is trying to frame DF as pushing it
and the Inception-like Level 4 of subtleness would be that the baddies are a completely different faction and they're trying to frame the both of them in some way for this.
Where (on what level, even) does everyone sit on this, more exactly?
I have to focus on studying during the next few hours, but I promise to return with enough time to reflect more on this, revisit MM and ... well, are there any other suspicions right now?...with enough time ahead of the vote.
L0 - LC is a Bro and killed (with his team, I mean) Llama to silence him
L1 - LC is not a Bro (i.e. Hack or civ), but the Bros seized the moment and killed Llama to make it look like LC is involved [I believe this is the reasonable level on which most, if not all, agree upon i.e. that it's a frame]
L2 - LC was not involved in any way with Llama's kill, but DF is trying to push for it
L3 - LC is trying to frame DF as pushing it
and the Inception-like Level 4 of subtleness would be that the baddies are a completely different faction and they're trying to frame the both of them in some way for this.
Where (on what level, even) does everyone sit on this, more exactly?
I have to focus on studying during the next few hours, but I promise to return with enough time to reflect more on this, revisit MM and ... well, are there any other suspicions right now?...with enough time ahead of the vote.
- Black Rock
- Loan Shark
- Posts in topic: 66
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:40 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
That's how I have been doing it. It's not very successful and it's hard to explain so it puts you on the suspect list for sure.DFaraday wrote:How would you rather I play? Just vote people based on intuition?Long Con wrote:I cast my vote for DFaraday, who now has tried to introduce thread actions resulting from baddie moves (the Llama kill, the Uwe Boll thing)... I think he's a baddie who wants certain results from those actions.
I'm voting MM again today cause I think he is bad news.
- Canucklehead
- Drug Dealer
- Posts in topic: 228
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I think I'm vacillating between levels 2 & 4, Rico, and am planning to vote DF on the chance that Level 2 is the correct interpretation....because if level 4 is the correct interpretation, then we're still as bloody clueless as we've ever been, and that's not very empowering.
....and on a semi-related note, I just have to say, that whether you're civ or baddie, coached or not, Rico, you are really fucking great at this game and an awesome addition to the forum. Thanks for coming to play with us!
....and on a semi-related note, I just have to say, that whether you're civ or baddie, coached or not, Rico, you are really fucking great at this game and an awesome addition to the forum. Thanks for coming to play with us!
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I'm voting DF for various reasons.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I'm thinking it's level 1.
And as I've explained before, even though I'm leaning civ on LC, I'm not positive, and I just didn't think that possibility should be ignored all around.
Anyway, *voting MM* mainly for self-defense, but also because I think he's the shadiest of the people I've been looking at.
And as I've explained before, even though I'm leaning civ on LC, I'm not positive, and I just didn't think that possibility should be ignored all around.
Anyway, *voting MM* mainly for self-defense, but also because I think he's the shadiest of the people I've been looking at.
Spoiler: show
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Night 5]: Film Directors.
Way to justify your vote with something that contradicts your last read on me.DFaraday wrote:That was my thinking as well. Although I wouldn't necessarily say that the three who were tied were civvie, simply that they are not Hacks. I am leaning civ on MM at this point, though.Black Rock wrote: RIP Made. I am certain the baddies locked the thread when three civvies were tied at one vote each, giving them a free lynch. I would have probably voted Made if I could have just because the other two I am certain are civvie and I had no idea if he was or not.
Guys, I really think we should lynch DF today, not me.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Re: [Night 5]: Film Directors.
That was before you seemed dead set on discrediting everything I try to look into. It feels like you don't want anyone to examine the events going on the game for some reason.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Way to justify your vote with something that contradicts your last read on me.DFaraday wrote:That was my thinking as well. Although I wouldn't necessarily say that the three who were tied were civvie, simply that they are not Hacks. I am leaning civ on MM at this point, though.Black Rock wrote: RIP Made. I am certain the baddies locked the thread when three civvies were tied at one vote each, giving them a free lynch. I would have probably voted Made if I could have just because the other two I am certain are civvie and I had no idea if he was or not.
Guys, I really think we should lynch DF today, not me.
Spoiler: show
- Canucklehead
- Drug Dealer
- Posts in topic: 228
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Yeah, I have a feeling MM is a done deal at this point, but I'm going to vote for DF, too. I think he's trying waaaay to hard to stir shit up ("Hey guys! Isn't this thing weird? We should totally look closer at it because it's likely baddie behaviour but I'm being very careful not to say anything definitive or come down hard on one side or the other so that I can always backpedal if my pot stirring doesn't work out. I'm also not interested in providing thoughts on anything else that's going on or conversations that are happening, I really just want everyone to notice that I'm here and pointing out really suspicious things but not things that I'm personally willing to vote based on"....is totally how virtually all his posts read to me this game).
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Night 5]: Film Directors.
Actually, I have tried various times. I think LC could be bad.DFaraday wrote:That was before you seemed dead set on discrediting everything I try to look into. It feels like you don't want anyone to examine the events going on the game for some reason.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Way to justify your vote with something that contradicts your last read on me.DFaraday wrote:That was my thinking as well. Although I wouldn't necessarily say that the three who were tied were civvie, simply that they are not Hacks. I am leaning civ on MM at this point, though.Black Rock wrote: RIP Made. I am certain the baddies locked the thread when three civvies were tied at one vote each, giving them a free lynch. I would have probably voted Made if I could have just because the other two I am certain are civvie and I had no idea if he was or not.
Guys, I really think we should lynch DF today, not me.
But I think that your intentions are different than mine. I don't understand how I am suddenly shady after I have suspected and voted for you. You have brought forth things to discuss, but not in a civvie-like manner. You offered a nice summation of a Rico post the other day, but shared no opinions until you were asked. You brought forth the idea that LC could have NK'd llama while maintaining that you think the LC is civ. This is the subject I find most inconsistent.
Linki: My thoughts exactly.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Canucklehead wrote:Yeah, I have a feeling MM is a done deal at this point, but I'm going to vote for DF, too. I think he's trying waaaay to hard to stir shit up ("Hey guys! Isn't this thing weird? We should totally look closer at it because it's likely baddie behaviour but I'm being very careful not to say anything definitive or come down hard on one side or the other so that I can always backpedal if my pot stirring doesn't work out. I'm also not interested in providing thoughts on anything else that's going on or conversations that are happening, I really just want everyone to notice that I'm here and pointing out really suspicious things but not things that I'm personally willing to vote based on"....is totally how virtually all his posts read to me this game).
I voted MM, didn't I? Yes, in part to save myself, but I am more and more convinced that he is a Hack.
And yes, I'm not very committal. I never am. You two don't play much with me, but I'm not Llama or MP or Epig. I never just throw myself in 100% to something unless I'm absolutely positive I'm right.
Spoiler: show
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Why a Hack and not a Brother?
I am very interested to hear your reasons there.
I am very interested to hear your reasons there.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Bass_the_Clever
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 74
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:33 pm
- Location: DMV
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Hi everyone I going to be a the hospital all day with my family so I really can't post so I'm going to good ahead a vote MM.
Spoiler: show
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Because when I tried to investigate the circumstances surrounding the Boll thread lock, you reacted as if that was a shady thing to do. I wonder if you don't want anyone looking into it.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why a Hack and not a Brother?
I am very interested to hear your reasons there.
I'll keep you and your family in prayer Bass!
Spoiler: show
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Take care you two!Bass_the_Clever wrote:Hi everyone I going to be a the hospital all day with my family so I really can't post so I'm going to good ahead a vote MM.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I did? Where did I do that?DFaraday wrote:Because when I tried to investigate the circumstances surrounding the Boll thread lock, you reacted as if that was a shady thing to do. I wonder if you don't want anyone looking into it.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why a Hack and not a Brother?
I am very interested to hear your reasons there.
I'll keep you and your family in prayer Bass!
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Ugh, my mistake, that was Canuck, not you. I was conflating both of your suspicions of me into one amorphous mass, apparently. I retract my Hack statement, but nothing else.
Spoiler: show
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 366
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
Well I'm only one vote away from being being out of luck. I appreciate the Bass hasn't actually voted for me though.
I don't take anything back. I think you're bad DF, and everyone would do well in lynching you tomorrow.
I don't take anything back. I think you're bad DF, and everyone would do well in lynching you tomorrow.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Canucklehead
- Drug Dealer
- Posts in topic: 228
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
I did? When did I do that?DFaraday wrote:Ugh, my mistake, that was Canuck, not you. I was conflating both of your suspicions of me into one amorphous mass, apparently. I retract my Hack statement, but nothing else.
- S~V~S
- Captain Obvious
- Posts in topic: 278
- Posts: 21291
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:56 am
- Location: Lawn Guyland
- Gender: Female
Re: [Day 7]: Film Directors.
You seemed kinda upset that people were voting when the thread was accidentally unlocked iirc
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell