[ENDGAME]: Film Directors.

#3151

Turnip Head wrote:
Dom wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Mongoose wrote:@ TurnipHead - Target the subsequent night.
oh
Hence why I felt my "..." post was on-topic. :P

Eh.

#3152

Turnip Head wrote:
Dom wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Mongoose wrote:@ TurnipHead - Target the subsequent night.
oh
Hence why I felt my "..." post was on-topic. :P

Lulz

#3153

Also, while we're talking about the kosherness of dead players subbing back in, while I agree it can be problematic, I think I was very careful to use things that TH1.0 said and did in the thread only. I don't think I used anything that only TH1.0 would have known in private.

Clearly.

#3154

Turnip Head wrote:Also, while we're talking about the kosherness of dead players subbing back in, while I agree it can be problematic, I think I was very careful to use things that TH1.0 said and did in the thread only. I don't think I used anything that only TH1.0 would have known in private.

Clearly.

I would agree tbh, so kudos.

#3155

Canucklehead wrote:
Mongoose wrote:@ TurnipHead - Target the subsequent night.

I don't understand that sentence.

4

#3156

Turnip Head wrote:Also, while we're talking about the kosherness of dead players subbing back in, while I agree it can be problematic, I think I was very careful to use things that TH1.0 said and did in the thread only. I don't think I used anything that only TH1.0 would have known in private.

Clearly.

Yes! I actually for realzies intended to include in my post a sentence congratulating you on navigating a tricky task INCREDIBLY well, and not taking the easy way out. Super duper apologies for leaving it out in my haste to post!

#3157

My remarks were more meta than directed at this instance, though they were catalyze do by this instance....so I probably should have done it in green, but I wasn't sure.

Again, I really did respect and admire how you handled it, and am kicking myself for failing to follow through on my intentions to make that clear in my post.

#3158

No worries Canuck, and thanks

#3159

LC can you clear up what you're confused about?

#3160

Dom wrote:LC can you clear up what you're confused about?

He's confused about how an easy Canuck lynch in which he could continue t follow along unnoticed was so rapidly turned around, in the process making him look rather opportunistic.

#3161

#3162

Mongoose's answer was worded a little funky, maybe that's what is confusing LC. Can we get it one more time please Mongoose, just so there's no mistaking the answer:

If John Waters targets a player on Night 1, will that player be blocked on Night 1 or on Night 2?

#3163

Canucklehead wrote:
Dom wrote:LC can you clear up what you're confused about?
He's confused about how an easy Canuck lynch in which he could continue t follow along unnoticed was so rapidly turned around, in the process making him look rather opportunistic.

So, you're suspicious of LC?

#3164

TH has it right... I'd just like to see Mongoose say it a little more clearly, that's all.

Canuck

5

#3165

Dom wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Dom wrote:LC can you clear up what you're confused about?
He's confused about how an easy Canuck lynch in which he could continue t follow along unnoticed was so rapidly turned around, in the process making him look rather opportunistic.
So, you're suspicious of LC?

Not any more than I'm suspicious of pretty much everyone at this point. I was mostly just needling him

#3166

Canucklehead wrote:
Dom wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Dom wrote:LC can you clear up what you're confused about?
He's confused about how an easy Canuck lynch in which he could continue t follow along unnoticed was so rapidly turned around, in the process making him look rather opportunistic.
So, you're suspicious of LC?
Not any more than I'm suspicious of pretty much everyone at this point. I was mostly just needling him

Well, that leaves me thinking TH is most likely bad again.

#3167

Yeah, I think TH has done an amazeballs job of turning what (for me, at least) was going to be a certain vote for Roxy in the day or so after she got replaced, into some serious reconsideration.....but in the end, the numbers are too low for me to keep giving him the benefit of the doubt. I think he's bad. I think Made is probably bad. And I'm beginning to worry that Rico is also bad.
I'd like to vote TH or Made today.

7

#3168

Turnip Head wrote:Mongoose's answer was worded a little funky, maybe that's what is confusing LC. Can we get it one more time please Mongoose, just so there's no mistaking the answer:

If John Waters targets a player on Night 1, will that player be blocked on Night 1 or on Night 2?

S/he would be blocked Night 2.

#3169

*vote TH*

#3170

Dom wrote:*vote TH*

If everyone votes early, I'll end the day early.

#3171

Mongoose wrote:
Dom wrote:*vote TH*
If everyone votes early, I'll end the day early.

*votes TH* It's the best possibility I can see. Unloess the baddies have done some excellent killing of each other, we're getting to the point where the game will just end if TH is Civ. The game could even end if TH is bad, and the last baddie on his team. I just hope there's been enough baddies killing baddies to balance out the Civvie slaughter that happens here daily.

#3172

I voted RoxNips, too. Hopefully we're right and not fucked.....

#3173

TurnipHead 2.0
3
Dom (6), Long Con (7), Canucklehead (8) 38%

Ladies and gentlemen, The Brotherhood? They seem awfully quick to get this over with. Maybe they're about to win. Oh well. I don't care anymore. Get me outta here.

#3174

Long Con wrote:Unloess the baddies have done some excellent killing of each other, we're getting to the point where the game will just end if TH is Civ.

Worst reasoning ever tbqh

#3175

Turnip Head wrote:TurnipHead 2.0
3
Dom (6), Long Con (7), Canucklehead (8) 38%

Ladies and gentlemen, The Brotherhood? They seem awfully quick to get this over with. Maybe they're about to win. Oh well. I don't care anymore. Get me outta here.

lol

#3176

Turnip Head wrote:
Long Con wrote:Unloess the baddies have done some excellent killing of each other, we're getting to the point where the game will just end if TH is Civ.
Worst reasoning ever tbqh

Reasoning? That wasn't reasoning, it was dejected pondering.

And I'm not in the Brotherhood. Wait, that means you're on the other baddie team, TH? Sweet.

#3177

Long Con wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Long Con wrote:Unloess the baddies have done some excellent killing of each other, we're getting to the point where the game will just end if TH is Civ.
Worst reasoning ever tbqh
Reasoning? That wasn't reasoning, it was dejected pondering.

And I'm not in the Brotherhood. Wait, that means you're on the other baddie team, TH? Sweet.

^^^

everyone pls vote th

#3178

No, it means I see three players voting together without waiting for discussions, when it's do or die time, and I assume it means they are close to winning. Besides, even if I am a baddie Hack, that's not the team we need to try to take out today. The Brotherhoodlums are likely stronger than the Hacks numbers-wise and are probably close to taking over the game.

So yeah, if you want the game to end and the Brotherhood to win, by all means vote for poor and alone civvie TH.

#3179

That's not how it is, TH. It's hard to judge whether you're a Civvie who feels that way, or a lone Hack. The way your last post reads... it feels a bit Hackish. My main point is, I'm really, truly, not a Brotherhood member. I think, were I a baddie, I wouldn't be saying this now. I have already said it, and I could just say nothing and the point would still be out there. But the reality is that I'm a Civvie, and this is not a Brotherhood ploy. It's becoming more and more likely that Dom and/or Canuck are Brotherhood members as the Civvie numbers dwindle, but I'm just a longtime Chump of this game. I think the longest-lived Civvie in a game like this must be the crappiest one, and that may just be me.

#3180

Turnip Head wrote:No, it means I see three players voting together without waiting for discussions, when it's do or die time, and I assume it means they are close to winning. Besides, even if I am a baddie Hack, that's not the team we need to try to take out today. The Brotherhoodlums are likely stronger than the Hacks numbers-wise and are probably close to taking over the game.

So yeah, if you want the game to end and the Brotherhood to win, by all means vote for poor and alone civvie TH.

Then outline who the baddies are.
I tried to get you to do this more than once. You said Canuck, were proven wrong and have brought literally nothing to the table until you received a vote and called all of your votes bad.

#3181

Yeah, getting a bro would've been nicer (and I actually have you pencilled in as bro not Hack, but I obviously could be wrong) since tonight is a Bro kill night....but I'm happy to end the Hack team, too, if that's what ends up happening when you die.

The Civs are in dire straits, regardless...

#3182

^^ 8? Or 9? Let's go with 8

#3183

My current baddie breakdown is TH as te last Hack, and Made and Rico (?) as the two remaining bros. this is based purely on gut.

#3184

And it's silly to say that there's been no discussion about you. The discussion has literally been going on for days. And, well, we need less and less "evidence" to lynch a person as numbers dwindle, and the use of evidence proves time and time again to be not working out.

7 maybe?

7

#3185

Canucklehead wrote:Yeah, getting a bro would've been nicer (and I actually have you pencilled in as bro not Hack, but I obviously could be wrong) since tonight is a Bro kill night....but I'm happy to end the Hack team, too, if that's what ends up happening when you die.

The Civs are in dire straits, regardless...

Why do you think he is a Brother?

#3186

Would the baddies like to purchase my vote today?

#3187

Ricochet wrote:Would the baddies like to purchase my vote today?

Nice, we have a volunteer for the next lynch! Thanks, Rico, we can have a nice short day.

10!

#3188

Just kidding, that was my ninth post. I'll correct it here, cool as ice.

9

#3189

You can even NK me, with the level of clean-up you're doing so far.

#3190

Ricochet wrote:You can even NK me, with the level of clean-up you're doing so far.

That's fair. Maybe you're all right, Rico!

I think the baddies should come out and buy his vote.

#3191

And that's

how you

do post

number

10

#3192

Dom wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:Yeah, getting a bro would've been nicer (and I actually have you pencilled in as bro not Hack, but I obviously could be wrong) since tonight is a Bro kill night....but I'm happy to end the Hack team, too, if that's what ends up happening when you die.

The Civs are in dire straits, regardless...
Why do you think he is a Brother?

Random guessing that I did last night, plus his recent accusation of us three as bros.

9

#3193

Hello friends, sorry for my absence. School is very quickly becoming "a bitch" as the kid say. That said, I made a commitment to play and i plan to keep it. Starting here:

Turnip Head wrote:TurnipHead 2.0
3
Dom (6), Long Con (7), Canucklehead (8) 38%

Ladies and gentlemen, The Brotherhood? They seem awfully quick to get this over with. Maybe they're about to win. Oh well. I don't care anymore. Get me outta here.

Pretty much where i am at this point. I don't like this little team/possy that seems to be forming, especially this late in the game, especially considering i don't trust any of them, especially since they all voted together. Like let's put i this way: we have yet to lynch a baddie since MM, and you all, especially Canuck and LC, trust each other this much? This does not sit right with me in the slightest. And i feel all other players should look at this also.

and 1

#3194

I voted Turnip so we can maybe end the day early.

1

#3195

Made wrote:Hello friends, sorry for my absence. School is very quickly becoming "a bitch" as the kid say. That said, I made a commitment to play and i plan to keep it. Starting here:
Turnip Head wrote:TurnipHead 2.0
3
Dom (6), Long Con (7), Canucklehead (8) 38%

Ladies and gentlemen, The Brotherhood? They seem awfully quick to get this over with. Maybe they're about to win. Oh well. I don't care anymore. Get me outta here.
Pretty much where i am at this point. I don't like this little team/possy that seems to be forming, especially this late in the game, especially considering i don't trust any of them, especially since they all voted together. Like let's put i this way: we have yet to lynch a baddie since MM, and you all, especially Canuck and LC, trust each other this much? This does not sit right with me in the slightest. And i feel all other players should look at this also.

and 1

Who are you putting this show on for, Made? Rico is probably your teamie, Vomps isn't likely to be swayed by reason other than his own whim, TH is dead meat, and the rest of us have voted. Just setting up for tomorrow? Trying to sow dissension so that we don't lynch you next??

My "trust" for Dom and LC is provisional at best. Currently, they seem the most interested in finding baddies, and the least likely to be baddies. The latter also holds true for Vomps. I am by no means certain of my instincts here, but at this point in the game with the numbers breaking down how they are, one has to choose allies and choose to trust. It's a risk that has to be taken, and I've thrown my lot in with these two.

We'll see how it all plays out.

10!!

#3196

pink responses are pink

Canucklehead wrote:
Made wrote:Hello friends, sorry for my absence. School is very quickly becoming "a bitch" as the kid say. That said, I made a commitment to play and i plan to keep it. Starting here:
Turnip Head wrote:TurnipHead 2.0
3
Dom (6), Long Con (7), Canucklehead (8) 38%

Ladies and gentlemen, The Brotherhood? They seem awfully quick to get this over with. Maybe they're about to win. Oh well. I don't care anymore. Get me outta here.
Pretty much where i am at this point. I don't like this little team/possy that seems to be forming, especially this late in the game, especially considering i don't trust any of them, especially since they all voted together. Like let's put i this way: we have yet to lynch a baddie since MM, and you all, especially Canuck and LC, trust each other this much? This does not sit right with me in the slightest. And i feel all other players should look at this also.

and 1
Who are you putting this show on for, Made? Rico is probably your teamie, Vomps isn't likely to be swayed by reason other than his own whim, TH is dead meat, and the rest of us have voted. Just setting up for tomorrow? Trying to sow dissension so that we don't lynch you next.
What? To start it wasn't hopeless when i sent that message. 3 votes in, 4 we were still waiting for.
Here's the game i'm currently seeing btw
Mongoose wrote: Listen all y'all, it's a sabotage.

Poll ended at Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:57:56 pm

A Person 2.0
5
Dom (6), Long Con (7), Canucklehead (11), Turnip Head (12), Ricochet (13) 36%
Canucklehead
1
Vompatti (10) 7%
Dom
0
No votes
Made 2.0
0
No votes
Long Con
1
Made (14) 7%
Ricochet
0
No votes
TurnipHead 2.0
0
No votes
Vompatti 2.0
0
No votes
By Being John Malkovich (Host/Mod/Deadie/NP/etc)
7
Mongoose (1), Metalmarsh89 (2), MovingPictures07 (3), zeek (4), Epignosis (5), timmer (8), Black Rock (9) 50%
Total votes : 14
and

My "trust" for Dom and LC is provisional at best. Currently, they seem the most interested in finding baddies, and the least likely to be baddies. The latter also holds true for Vomps. I am by no means certain of my instincts here, but at this point in the game with the numbers breaking down how they are, one has to choose allies and choose to trust. It's a risk that has to be taken, and I've thrown my lot in with these two. We'll see how it all plays out. 10!!
Even if the trust is provisional, why would you trust them when you were wrong with them just the night before? No of this seems right to me. Does this make sense to anyone else?

Voting LC.
2

#3197

Couldn't agree more with Made's read on the issue. The level of never bringing each other into discussion or saying "oh, well, she/he is suspicious, but I'm nowhere near voting for him" from LC and Canuck in particular has been stupendous these past days.

Canucklehead wrote:Hmmm....I dunno if I'm prepared to vote LC. Like my views on Dom, I keep flipflopping on LC......but if it gets to a point where I have to vote LC to save myself, I'll obviously do so.....but I'd prefer not to.

Canucklehead wrote: linki: Yeah, LC is not reading baddie to me, either. But maybe he's just that damn good? I'm essentially a coin flip on the baddiness of both LC and Dom, and will vote for either if necessary....but I'd really rather be voting AP.

Canucklehead wrote:
Dom wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Dom wrote:LC can you clear up what you're confused about?
He's confused about how an easy Canuck lynch in which he could continue t follow along unnoticed was so rapidly turned around, in the process making him look rather opportunistic.
So, you're suspicious of LC?
Not any more than I'm suspicious of pretty much everyone at this point. I was mostly just needling him

Long Con wrote:
Dom wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:That sounds like an absolutely insane task, LC What made you think of it? I plan on going through her posts tomorrow.

I believe we can still turn this thing around my friend. What do you make of Canuck defending MM?
Hard times sometimes call for insane measures. I'm still on the fence about Canuck.
I'm feeling Canuck might be bad just because I was on the fence and then SVS died-- idk, man.
What does S~V~S' death have to do with Canuck?

Long Con wrote:Damn, Made... that's cold.

Well, I hope you're a baddie, Canuck. Some of the stuff you were saying earlier really made you look like a baddie to me, but your latest stuff has been very charming, so
I don't know. A lot of what you posted echoed my own feelings, and that makes me feel like you could be Civ. Or an empathetic baddie.

#3198

Also, the lesson Canuck learned from her own AWOL theory, after thinking the most inactive player must be bad and he flipped civ, is that the second most inactive player must be bad. At least I'm getting no other reasoning from her, prior to her nominating TH or Made as possible lynches today, other than a post in which she reacted to Made building a case on her.

Think I'm at 8.

#3199

Long Con wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Would the baddies like to purchase my vote today?
Nice, we have a volunteer for the next lynch! Thanks, Rico, we can have a nice short day.

10!

Also this, what even is this?

And this post

Long Con wrote:Yo Made, sing me a song!

Screams cocky baddie who thinks he's already won.

3

#3200

LC could very well be snowing me. He does it all the time. He could just be feigning agreement with me in order to gain my trust, knowing that I'm much more likely to trust those who carry the same suspicions I do. If so, he's doing a damn fine job of it and deserves the win. But honestly, that seems like a fuckton of work to put into gaining the trust of a single player who only a few days ago was a surefire lynch candidate. It doesn't make a lot of sense from a baddie POV, when abandoning me and getting me lynched would be a WAAAY easier and way faster way to burn through the civs.
I could be wrong about LC, I often am.

But I have chosen to trust him at this late stage in the game, and it may very well be my downfall, but sometimes you gotta take a risk, and at this point I'm more comfortable with the unknown quantity that is LC than the REALLY unknown quantity that is Lizzie/Made.

Dom gets a ticket on my trust wagon, too, because he's been damn consistent and playing a very odd game for a baddie. Also, he's more or less agreed with my main suspicions of late, so yeah. Those are the two I've thrown my lot in with. Vomps gets a pass because I'm 95% sure he's not a Hack, and have a strong feeling he's not a bro.

That means the rest of y'all are likely bad.That's just how the cookie crumbles.

I don't think a win is in the cards for me this game, and that's fine because the civs have really been mostly atrocious (me in particular), but I'm not ready to just give up and hand it to the baddies.

See you in Felt Mafia II: Denim Mafia?