
Dearborn.
Moderator: Community Team
I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
Exactly. There doesn't seem to be a logical reason for this tbh.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
I don't think he was either. Rereading him was though, and there were reasons for me rereading him which I won't share yet.S~V~S wrote:I didn't think he was tedious
Dearborn.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Or Dom is one of the Celestials and he is trying to play the civves...Metalmarsh89 wrote:I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
But even if he is a celestial, and even if the celestials really did put that item up for sale (which I seriously doubt) there is no way the baddies can promise not to target a celestial. They don't know who is celestial and who is civ. I truly don't believe Dom is just trying to pull the wool over our eyes because the whole thing just doesn't make sense.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Or Dom is one of the Celestials and he is trying to play the civves...Metalmarsh89 wrote:I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
Dom is not a Celestial, I can almost guarantee you that.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Or Dom is one of the Celestials and he is trying to play the civves...Metalmarsh89 wrote:I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
this.juliets wrote:But even if he is a celestial, and even if the celestials really did put that item up for sale (which I seriously doubt) there is no way the baddies can promise not to target a celestial. They don't know who is celestial and who is civ. I truly don't believe Dom is just trying to pull the wool over our eyes because the whole thing just doesn't make sense.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Or Dom is one of the Celestials and he is trying to play the civves...Metalmarsh89 wrote:I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
that's a bold move.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Dom is not a Celestial, I can almost guarantee you that.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Or Dom is one of the Celestials and he is trying to play the civves...Metalmarsh89 wrote:I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
tbhBullzeye wrote:Two deaths tonight? That's new... and unnerving.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Canuck where are your thoughts right now?Canucklehead wrote:I think there's a doctor on the baddie team that does vaguely worded baddie things.....which I would be very willing to interpret as poisoning and the like, given recent events.
Dom wrote:Canuck where are your thoughts right now?Canucklehead wrote:I think there's a doctor on the baddie team that does vaguely worded baddie things.....which I would be very willing to interpret as poisoning and the like, given recent events.
I really like this idea. I didn't think of it. It could explain it... frankly I thought DF was a weird person for the baddies to target so this would make sense.juliets wrote:I have another idea. Remember how Sandringham takes on different roles and uses their powers? Could he have taken on the millionaire's power last night and killed DF thinking he was a baddie?
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
I'm going to reread Canuck and Elo when I get home. They are two players who I usually have some sort of opinion on by now, and both of them have evaded my radar so far. I thought that Elo's reactions during Epi's lynch felt a little out of character so I'm going to start my search there.Dom wrote:I guess we'll find out at the end of the game.
TH-- where you at?
Eh?Long Con wrote:AAAAA
EEEEE
IIIII
OOOOO
UUUUU
YYYYY
I don't suspect Bass because LC was right that it's unlikely that if they switched roles that MM and Bass are on different alliances.Turnip Head wrote:I'm going to reread Canuck and Elo when I get home. They are two players who I usually have some sort of opinion on by now, and both of them have evaded my radar so far. I thought that Elo's reactions during Epi's lynch felt a little out of character so I'm going to start my search there.Dom wrote:I guess we'll find out at the end of the game.
TH-- where you at?
I had also planned to look into DF but that's moot now. I was also worried about Bass but MM said something re: Bass that made me take pause. Id'd like to know where Bass is looking for this lynch.
Where you at Dom?
Canuck said she would get more talkative as the game went on, but the opposite has actually been true. In my estimation, Canuck had more posts and meatier posts during the first half of the game, and she has gradually dropped off since then. She posted four times on Day 5 and only once on Day 6.Canucklehead wrote:Sorry for not being around, my participation will increase as the game goes on and once RR is done...but you know me. I'm useless until I get my bearings and get drawn in to a game.
Does that mean something to you though? I used to know Canuck's game much better than I do at this point.Turnip Head wrote:I've reread early-game Canuck, and this is the only post that sticks out to me atm:
Canuck said she would get more talkative as the game went on, but the opposite has actually been true. In my estimation, Canuck had more posts and meatier posts during the first half of the game, and she has gradually dropped off since then. She posted four times on Day 5 and only once on Day 6.Canucklehead wrote:Sorry for not being around, my participation will increase as the game goes on and once RR is done...but you know me. I'm useless until I get my bearings and get drawn in to a game.
That's not to say that Canuck hasn't made her opinions clearly known... I think that she has. She just doesn't seem as involved as I might expect her to be by now.
Hilarious, yes....but...rabbit8 wrote:I'm all for voting Canuck and SVS.
Or Dom and TH. .........
Dom wrote:Hilarious, yes....but...rabbit8 wrote:I'm all for voting Canuck and SVS.
Or Dom and TH. .........
Why group me and TH?