S~V~S wrote:I wasn't being snarky
I must have misread your tone then, apologies. I do realize I've been more than vocal regarding my thoughts (and llama, specifically), but so have you, so it struck me as a snarky comment. I also did not intend to irritate you with my theory that you are baddie, but it's how I was reading the thread.
I have to admit to being a bit more receptive to negativity because this mundane preparation for this test is at times depressing and draining, especially in the weekend before, and what little social interaction I do get is purely through playing these games because I don't have time for anything else (not that I'm the type to do much of anything else anyway). Being able to check in here during my quick (or not so quick, lol) breaks keeps me sane.
That being said, I realize I can at times monopolize the thread, and it's not in an attempt to be a controlling a-hole or anything, but I'll try to be conscious of that. I just always voice my thoughts whenever I have them, I hardly hold anything back. It's one of the reasons I often don't make it until endgame, whether as civvie or baddie, but in my mind, especially as civvie, the game has to run on discussion -- otherwise, it's near impossible to win because you can't sift out the baddies. I must say this game has been awesome in terms of discussion so far, like others have mentioned already.
S~V~S wrote:Also calling peoples opinions "ridiculous" is not very open minded, lol.
What makes me leery is you trying to advocate quiet death in the night for someone whose death will give us all knowledge and a direction. If you are right that she was bad, that gives us a place to look. I would think you would want her exposed as a baddie, since her being bad is something that gives us a starting point for the next lynch. I am not 100% on Snow Dog, not even close. I would be willing to vote for Elo, though.
It is ridiculous; why would you be leery of me when I was lynched and you saw my role? That has nothing to do with being open-minded, all due respect of course!
How does it give us any more direction than we already have? Again, I stand by my thoughts on the matter, but I really don't care, I'll lynch Elohcin gladly because I am
incredibly confident she is baddie. It's a numbers game to me. The sooner we can get rid of the baddies, the better, and if it is nearly absolutely certain Elohcin is baddie anyway, why waste a lynch on her, especially when Stevie is very likely still alive at this point and has not just 1 but 3 NK attempts? That's just my viewpoint, and you and others are allowed to disagree. I totally see your point and I don't completely disagree with it. That being said, I'm done voicing my thoughts on it now though because there's no reason for me to go on about it.
I am not near 100% on Snow Dog either. In fact, a part of me thinks we could have two civvies in Snow Dog and llama. But... looking at the player list, I don't know if there would be two others that would make more sense; I would logically have to think at least one of those is bad. But I don't know. I suppose looking at the very beginning when Epig was just being eyed by He-Man might help. I'm curious to see if reywaS is still reading his llama and Epig theory.
Seemingly random question for you, what do you think of Rox?
Flyin' High wrote:I wanted to chime in with some Minecraft knowledge about how the wolves work in the game because it might help us understand their potential nature in this game. In Minecraft, wolves are neutral mobs. The player character (Stevie) can feed bones collected from killing skeletons to wolves to tame them and make them into loyal followers who will attack aggro mobs (zombie, skeleton, spider, creeper) on sight. I think the only way they will attack the player character (Stevie) in the game is if you attack them first.
So that being said, I'm leaning towards the wolves being more on the side of neutral indies with the possibility of becoming civvie-friendly.
Wow, that does help. I would like to think you're onto something here. Let's hope so and let's hope we don't "attack them first", if that makes sense.