Golden wrote:Well, you see, the thing about multiple teams is that if you are bad, this cuts both ways.
You can say 'maybe they jumped on the bandwagon to get townie points thinking he was clearly on the other baddie team'
And I can say 'a baddie can defend him believing he was probably not bad to get townie points'.
Ultimately it isn't about the choice of tactic, it's about how genuine it seems.
Sure, not saying that I'm going to just start voting for everyone that voted for Ricochet yesterday, just that it's an angle worth looking at. For me, that's especially the case with the quieter/less argumentative, similar to how on A World Reborn, two of three anti-town players had jumped onto the sig wagon one after the other.
MacDougall wrote:I don't believe as scum you knew he was town. I also didn't scum read him. That isn't why you are reading mafia. You are reading mafia because you went out of your way to invent the concept that he was actually trying and that he posts were of value, when they were not. Arguing that he provoked Zebra into posts as a defense is revisionist and strawman.
It's not revisionist, it's
exactly what I said yesterday.
HamburgerBoy wrote:Didn't RYM only pick up the RVS concept after Jimmy and Sloonei made their first pilgrimage to the Syndicate? So why can't Rico's case about you and bcornett24 being scumbuddies because of timing be a case of a silly little day 1 (correction, day 0) theory rather than deliberate evil? Dumb cases at least usually generate content, which is better than just lurking or bandwagoning.