Golden wrote:Ricochet wrote:Zebra's role isn't a seemer. She would have framed a player to show up bad on checks. That's just manipulation. A seemer would show up as good when lynched.
The speculation plausibile would be if Zebra's killer would mess with zebra's role reveal, turning it into a bad flip.
Yeah, but think it through.
1) The basis for sig's suspicion is that 'Roger Rabbit was a civ role last time' - coming from the fact that I was a civ as Roger Rabbit and said so.
2) So, is the idea that Zebra's role is true, but his role powers and affiliation are not?
3) Surely either only the affiliation would change and everything else would stay the same (in which case, the powers look bad and so I think there is no change to zebra's affiliation)... OR
Everything has changed.
Sig's theory doesn't check through, if you consider the fact his starting point was 'last time Roger Rabbit was civ'.
1) I'd need a second baddie flip to see if former civ roles can be redesigned as bad or if is, indeed, an dubious instance.
2) Not sure what you mean...?
3) The character I have was role transformed (powers), but not allignment transformed. Roger Rabbit's seems to have suffered it both ways (unless I'm mistaken and some of his powers were the same in the original game; my memory is danish bae, tbh). Also, the powers themselves seem very corruptive, no matter what name (character) you give to it. So either zebra was a) bad with a former civ name; b) bad with a name that her killer changed it to a civ reference (...which would prove...what?) or c) entirely good (with a name worthy of that, from original game), but transformed via alignment and powers to look bad...
...is that what you're trying to imply?