D1 - no idea if he was able to make the deal as soon as N0 and if so, allowed to role check already, but simply by playing this assumption game
-- nothing stands out --
-- for all I did on N0, he could have well checked me, but it doesn't strike me that he did
-- maybe he checked llama or he was just pinged by him with no info; doesn't suit us now, even if he did
-- maybe he checked Mac and later seeded some distrust in him, then again his
"I was reading you as civ until this post" strike me as simply disliking/being pinged by Mac's comment or viewpoint; to be noted, however, that the debate between them does slightly
aggravate later on
D2 - assuming he made the Deal on N1 at the latest and was allowed to check as well
-- nothing stands out --
only one or two posts, in which he:
-- focuses on LC building suss on JJJ
-- in reply to Ninja, comments on Mac reminding him of AWR (...is that good? I don't remember what Mac was in AWR)
-- clears Tranq's gameplay as recurrent from AWR
-- votes sig for no other suspicion other than his speculation on seemers
overall, no recurrent suss's, making me think he either found nothing conclusive or didn't have anything yet (no checks / no Eye Deal); having checked and cleared Tranq would make no sense, since he voted him on D5
D3.0 - assuming he made the Deal on N2 at the latest and was allowed to check as well/could already check
-- asks LC for summary on JJJ
-- asks Llama for suspects
-- votes JJJ
-- doesn't think Golden is guilty, based on Sorsha's suss on him
-- questions Golden instead if Sorsha might be bad
-- berates FZ on a vote of hers
-- more reactions to other replies
-- nothing stands out -- his early onset tunneling on JJJ would make no sense alongside having any info; no recurrent suss's, nothing that doesn't seem like things he expressed based on own judgment
then again this was a two-Day affair, so hold on
D3.5 - still assuming
-- "I'm leaning civ" on LC moment
-- further suss on JJJ
-- makes suspish comment, reveals himself as mafia ... (derp)
-- defends DH when Llama suss him
-- agree with Rico that Tranq being GTH'd as good is whack
-- questions JJJ on defending FZ.
-- votes JJJ
-- comments on a FZ. rebuttal feeling like "you suspect me for the wrong reasons"
-- questions FZ. ever expressing suspicion on him before
hmm. oscillating between "he checked LC and came out alright" and that ping on him not liking what FZ. posts starting to tingle. nothing else strikes me as hidden read
-- alternative to this: still no Eye Deal/worthy checks --
N3 interlude notes
-- some screwed-up rebuttal to JJJ I am not going to bother untangling; it's part of him sussing JJJ anyway, which is inconclusive to this research
-- jumps at Mac calling him confirmed baddie
-- rebuttals to HB; doesn't matter to this research
-- calls Tranq into action
D4 - well...?
--
doesn't like Draconus post
-- skeptical that HB hid behind Boomslang, due to Boom not being high on HB's rainbow
-- in reply to JJJ, reiterates that Draconus' tone doesn't feel right
-- tells FZ. he still feels votes are great, but doesn't suspect her as much after her vote for LoRab
--- votes Llama
well, not much development, except Draconus could be an actual check, with Dom opting for a sudden, yet not earthquake-like hint drop; suss on FZ. recedes a bit, at least by taking his post at face value; he also comfortably went with his old llama suspicions, which turned out ok;
D5 - starts claiming his civvieness hard and that any vote would hurt (I wrote heart the first time and almost left it, just because) him, so this is the official cue that, at the very latest, he took the Deal and began checking on N4
-- questions bea for suspects
--
states being "neutral" on Sorsha and wary of discussion about her fading; comments on Matt being "quiet", positing he may try "something new"
-- questions why Ninja's vote on LoRab looks good for LoRab
-- further questions Matt's rebuttal by studying the chronology of THM and AWR
-- asks for case on MM
-- in reply to Sorsha, says he's "testing LC" and that he's wary of him for "intuitively trusting him"
-- votes Tranq and holds off on JJJ
-- in reply to LC, says "he passed" the inquiry test
-- asks again for case on MM
-- dislikes Mac's tie ideas and contributions as of late, "if he's civ"
-- openly claims his vote curse
(sorry, Dom, I was yapping so much about not seeing any Death Note roles yet revealed, I forgot to think of the actual Death Note roles and what they could retain...)
-- switches vote to MM, cautions civs to reads his claim again
-- switches back to Tranq after things cool down
-- distraught by MM never telling him why he thinks he's bad
ok, so from the first confirmed Day of activity, we have this: I don't think he checked MM at that point, otherwise he's attempt to grasp at a case against him would be a weak attempt for a cop to start planting seeds; sussing Mac, but with the "if you're civ, stop doing it" caveat, doesn't inspire me to believe he checked him; he tunnelled on Tranq, so he didn't force any change of perspective or vote direction...
the two noticeable things for me are Sorsha being deemed neutral and inquiring about Matt's previous game mentality; the second could potentially be a way to slip into gradually questioning and suspecting Matt
N5 interlude posts
-- calls Ninja shifty
-- getting sick of the being-suspected-with-no-reasoning bullshit
D6
-- tags MM, Ninja and Wilgy as "players who suspect him without any reasoning"
-- pissed off at FZ. questioning his demands to get reasoning and calling him bad for it; also, "doesn't trust MM, doesn't trust Matt, doesn't trust Mac"
statement
--
doesn't trust FZ statement
--
statement about a baddie being among the people who suspect him with no reason: FZ, MM, Tranq, Wilgy
-- questions Wilgy's apologetic posts being genuine, due to meta
-- continues to challenge MM's intentions and ideas
-- inquires LC on Mac's "subdued game"
-- jumps at Mac suddenly calling him bad, adds him to The List
-- [url=http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=818&p=220874#p220874]quotes Mac on potentially manipulating players to think he [Dom] is bad
-- flips to Boom GHT'ing him as mafia
--
updates the List of Voters-sans-reasoning: Wilgy, MM, Mac, Boom
--
applauds LC's case on FZ
-- criticises Wilgy for focusing on trivial stuff, but not reasoning his goddamn suspicion on him
--
reiterates suspects: Mac, MM, Matt + Wilgy for his last post
--
calls MM "baddie in search of easy lynches"
-- jumps on Draconus for trusting FZ, distrusting Boom despite voting for his case
well this one's a doozie, but probably the key. his suspicions suddenly are very open, intense and constant. I wouldn't be surprised if he mostly coated his checks inside the "people-who-hate-me-without-reasoning" List. MM, Mac and Matt are his most recurrent names. His interaction with FZ. is still most interesting. I'm also picking up reacting to a parrot vote from Draconus, a player he suspected a long time ago in a sudden, but not major way
N6 interlude posts
--
openly distrusting MM's neutral claim
-- calls Boom's apology for screw up BS and
stern faces everything about something Matt wrote
-- questions Sorsha's dismissal of HB's legacy
--
well, technically whatever he checked on this Night is irrelevant, but Sorsha comes up again, after a long time, as a wary name in his book. doesn't accept any rationale from Matt about Boom's actions, which makes me think he's either signaling Matt is not to be trusted (which he did in the past) or that Boom is not to be defended, because he is bad deep down
PLEASE DISCUSS