Moderator: Community Team
So half the players are afk and there's no time left to prevent the disaster?Golden wrote:But at one and a half hours out from the lynch, you have no idea how close things will be, but you are scaring people into the idea that it will be close a long way out. How about you wait until much closer to deadline to bemoan its closeness?
Regardless, I think Nero should be lynched on grounds that he's my partner, your partner, Enrique's partner, the Joker, the Riddler, the Gingerbread Man, and Toto.
So this is Llama school of baddie catching, but Nero didn't say no either. We also see a pressure vote on Ika throughtout phase one he prodded Ika/Silver.Nerolunar wrote:If you mean mafia as in one of the crime families, then yeah, I did get mafiasig wrote:See I disagree with this, she was inactive in Zodiac and I don't think it has anything to do with alignment. Can you explain to me why you think she is showing this meta a bit more?DrWilgy wrote:@SVS Zodiac meta reasons
@Nero did you role mafia again? I mean 3/3 would be a bit odd.
chaindeath Current thoughts?
The only person im reading as slightly scum is Ika. Im waiting for him to talk some more and answer my question from earlier. He has been acting strange in my opinion, though it may just be a meta thing as he claims.
Im going to pressure vote for Ika. Come talk with us buddy.
This is the first time he brought up chaindeath, he ended the day with a vote on Chain, because Chain voted for LC. So I always found this strange even with LC flipping civ. However, I can think of one good reason he thinks LC is civ, could he have some inside knowledge LC is civ? If so this kills my cop theory and nero lynch. Something came up with father so I need to help Mom cook and can't be around sorry about that. DON'T lynch nero I believe he had inside knowledge that LC was civ. Go for Gleam.Nerolunar wrote:This looks somewhat sheepish to me.chaindeath wrote:He is so good at typing.... He didn't do it properly and he offers his sincerest apologies. Long Con
Why does typing mistakes and then apologising for it indicate baddie alignment? Chain I would like you to explain too. I see nothing scummy in LC´s behavior so far.
Oh, another repeat of day 2. Go after me. Yay.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Also I'm puzzled how the guy who literally said he'd eat a camel if Sig was bad wants to back down from his lynch now.
Put your vote where your mouth is, Golden.
There's no stupid shit going on. I've counted the number of people who have said they would vote gleam if everyone else does in the thread. I've looked and thought about who is going to place their vote where, and what the numbers will look like afterwards.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:So half the players are afk and there's no time left to prevent the disaster?Golden wrote:But at one and a half hours out from the lynch, you have no idea how close things will be, but you are scaring people into the idea that it will be close a long way out. How about you wait until much closer to deadline to bemoan its closeness?
I don't like the sound of that.
I will scare people out of doing stupid shit if I feel like. I think I said that back in day 1.
Two opposing behaviors can still be equally malicious.Golden wrote:What happened to you being annoyed with my black and white reads, DDL?
I wouldn't mind it.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Okay who else said it?
Not to say this is exactly an implication of DDL, I just found it amusingly noteworthy.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Also I like how the votes are utterly and completely scattered.
Let's scatter them a little more.
Tranq
chaindeath wrote:Chaindeath walks into the forum after listing from afar, half torn between his loved ones and his need to participate. He is not entirely sure who is a good candidate to vote for, however he is sure that the voting for everyone strategy is not a good way to go. Based on his gut feeling, he respectfully votes for Long Con as the one who feels off. No hate, no animosity, just business babe
He was home with his family this weekend which is why he haven't posted, just trying to keep up on the posts quite hard when his family is being loving and fun and junk
Sloonei wrote:Hey chaindeath, thanks for joining us. And also thanks in advance for sharing those reasons for why you voted Long Con.
This was a peculiar interaction to me. Going with a straight gut vote after saying hes not sure whose a good candidate to vote for, Sloonei thanking chaindeath in advance for sharing the reasons for his LC vote, then CD making a strangle worded post because he didn't bold+underline LC's name. I understand that its considered proper to announce who you are voting for but the poll is whats official and his previous post made it clear LC was his vote even if he didn't format it the standard way.chaindeath wrote:He is so good at typing.... He didn't do it properly and he offers his sincerest apologies. Long Con
I tried to find these non-fluff posts of Mongoose and they amount to a post commenting on the traitor issue(without any significant changes from what she posted about it above):Mongoose wrote:I'm a little confused that I'm being seen already as an inactive player because I feel like I've posted several times, and not just fluff. This isn't being defensive by the way, I'm just trying to talk out loud in case it helps a bit. I just don't have the time anymore to check in multiple times a day, especially when I absolutely cannot check in on the site during work hours (vaguely between 8am and 8pm -- I'm an attorney and I've got a pretty big caseload, which honestly is the only reason I don't play anymore).
THat said, I certainly don't take offense or it to heart that someone votes me on day 1 for not making dozens of posts. Just letting y'all know that I'm doing the best I can, and warning you it's not likely going to get much better (in terms of quantity -- I'll always aim for quality).
I read through the arguments to and for finding the traitors, which I found pretty intriguing at first. But then I was glad that discussion more or less ceased. Basically the way I feel about Jurassic World. I'm going to continue to catch up in the limited time I can (I've got company coming tonight and staying most of the week), so there's a bit of a time pressure situation.
linki x 15 (seriously)
along with thinking it transcendent that there was talk of lynching inactives and that she enjoys the tactic(she makes sure to include a preemptive defense on the possibility of more concrete lynch cases):Mongoose wrote:I hate ploys like that because there's always one alpaca that won't fall in line. Great in theory though. I feel like it's worked before though. A la Minimalism Mafia. Who could forget that great hit from 2014?Scotty wrote:I will bet my [hopefully] unborn child that the 30 person coordinated vote will not work out. There will be too many no-shows. There always is in these games.
I'll think about this traitor activation issue. Any more opinions on downsides?
It's good to be back around all y'all.
Mongoose wrote:agleaminranks wrote:Hiii, I'm trying to catch up on the posts so far. I didn't get a chance to read through it yet because I just started my new job today as an afterschool math and physics tutor. I'll have something solid to go on in the next few hours hopefully~Epignosis wrote:I'm taking my vote off Long Con. I wouldn't want anyone to think that I suspect him.
agleaminranks, come say something.
Oh wow, imagine seeing you in these parts!
In other news, I think it's transcendent that we are having the Voting a Non-Participant discussion again, and on my first day back!. Historically, I am very fond of this tactic (that is, in the absence of anything meatier -we've certainly had meat in the room on day 1, so to speak).
This post stands out to me since it seems like Mongoose is trying to confirm whether or not behavior she is stating is odd is scummy in the eyes of others.Mongoose wrote:Before I vote ika for the odd post on Silverwolf, is that something we do around here now? Vote for people to get their attention?
Sloonei - no worries, I saw -- I always try to respond directly to anyone who's made a comment or query my way. Thanks to the ole handy Ctrl+F
If I'm as stubborn as fuck, why did I just change my vote.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Two opposing behaviors can still be equally malicious.Golden wrote:What happened to you being annoyed with my black and white reads, DDL?
But either way, I'm not accusing you yet. I'm working with the idea that you might just be stubborn as fuck.
Of those who aren't already on, at minimum indiglo and TH, plus I gotta believe if its close sig gets on.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Okay who else said it?
Lynch Dragon?Golden wrote:I don't like this post at all. The second time you have posted an oppositional post in the face of a changing vote towards end of day. If Gleam ends up lynched and comes back bad, expect my eyes tomorrow.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:2 vote difference. Chances of cops buying a vote and using it to off a civ are increasing as we speak.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I am, but I'm afraid we might not get enough gleam lynchers to pull it off.Golden wrote:I was counting you too, DDL, since you had indicated that you were happy to.
He called me a hack, assuming that counts.Turnip Head wrote:I don't like that Gleamsicle hasn't responded to any of the recent pressure on him. He was around when he started to get indiglo's attention (and mine), but then he disappeared, and I don't know what to make of that. But I wish we had some sort of response from him.
Turnip Head wrote:This shit is bananas.
B-A-N-A-N-A-S
Golden wrote:Yep, basically.Epignosis wrote:As opposed to sig, who has named everybody in the phone book twice?Golden wrote:I just feel I have far less in the way of a sense that gleam is trying to catch bad guys.
Don't forget I'm trying to rank who I think looks worse, not who I think looks great.
I know, right? This has been a funny game that way. See I didn't feel great about that Soneji post. And looking at his 7 post ISO he seems to pick a different target every day. Odd.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Somehow I managed to skip a large post by Soneji.
He makes a good point on Mongoose, though in the last quote, I have to say the fact she is asking about how mafia is played here is because she is back after a long hiatus, during which a lot of people from different communities came here and change the usual playstyle.
Golden wrote:Of those who aren't already on, at minimum indiglo and TH, plus I gotta believe if its close sig gets on.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Okay who else said it?
Ditto that. I saw he was around too. Well, it looked like he was around, I'll say that.Turnip Head wrote:I don't like that Gleamsicle hasn't responded to any of the recent pressure on him. He was around when he started to get indiglo's attention (and mine), but then he disappeared, and I don't know what to make of that. But I wish we had some sort of response from him.
Too many tabs open with replies pulled up! 
I would like to lynch Soneji and Draconus next in whatever order.Turnip Head wrote:See I didn't feel great about that Soneji post. And looking at his 7 post ISO he seems to pick a different target every day. Odd.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Somehow I managed to skip a large post by Soneji.
He makes a good point on Mongoose, though in the last quote, I have to say the fact she is asking about how mafia is played here is because she is back after a long hiatus, during which a lot of people from different communities came here and change the usual playstyle.
Awww, can't a guy have some fun at EoD? If it makes you feel better, I believe you and sig are either good or baddie btsc, and based on how strongly you've been defending him in thread, I'm guessing the former.a2thezebra wrote:Your behavior during the previous lynch...Matt wrote: Btw, way to be Zeebs! Let's get that ika! Also, don't like that I'm orange on your list.
I agree with this assessment. It feels like he's attempting to iso people that have no traction so as to appear involved while not actually commenting on the big events of the past few days.Turnip Head wrote:See I didn't feel great about that Soneji post. And looking at his 7 post ISO he seems to pick a different target every day. Odd.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Somehow I managed to skip a large post by Soneji.
He makes a good point on Mongoose, though in the last quote, I have to say the fact she is asking about how mafia is played here is because she is back after a long hiatus, during which a lot of people from different communities came here and change the usual playstyle.
I'm always afraid. Let's Thelma & Louise the shit outta this! And then cross all our fingers and toes.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I am, but I'm afraid we might not get enough gleam lynchers to pull it off.Golden wrote:I was counting you too, DDL, since you had indicated that you were happy to.
I don't think its btsc. He rejected the letter C and replaced it with the letter M.Matt wrote:Awww, can't a guy have some fun at EoD? If it makes you feel better, I believe you and sig are either good or baddie btsc, and based on how strongly you've been defending him in thread, I'm guessing the former.a2thezebra wrote:Your behavior during the previous lynch...Matt wrote: Btw, way to be Zeebs! Let's get that ika! Also, don't like that I'm orange on your list.
Y'know, if I had come into this thread confirming that Sloonei was a failed arrest, I think I'd be leading the lynch poll right now. My mind is blown that nobody wants to vote ika today.
I understood the context of how she was trying to come across(as naive of possible new habits), its just that the context in which the question was asked(as a prerequisite to a stated desire to vote lynch Ika) is rather scummy. If the question about voting people to get their attention came prior to a vote on Ika/stated desire to vote Ika, I likely wouldn't find the behavior suspicious. Lack of confidence in your own reads is also more indicative of scum, who don't want to be seen as going after the wrong people or having weak reasoning. If Ika's behavior was in any way normal in the community as it is now, people wouldn't have been suspecting him for it as much as they did D1, which should have clued Mongoose in. Even so, she felt the need to be sure that her reasoning was sound in the eyes of others.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Somehow I managed to skip a large post by Soneji.
He makes a good point on Mongoose, though in the last quote, I have to say the fact she is asking about how mafia is played here is because she is back after a long hiatus, during which a lot of people from different communities came here and change the usual playstyle.
That's pretty sound logic. But I don't know Mongoose at all to know if meta can be overlayed.Soneji wrote:I understood the context of how she was trying to come across(as naive of possible new habits), its just that the context in which the question was asked(as a prerequisite to a stated desire to vote lynch Ika) is rather scummy. If the question about voting people to get their attention came prior to a vote on Ika/stated desire to vote Ika, I likely wouldn't find the behavior suspicious. Lack of confidence in your own reads is also more indicative of scum, who don't want to be seen as going after the wrong people or having weak reasoning. If Ika's behavior was in any way normal in the community as it is now, people wouldn't have been suspecting him for it as much as they did D1, which should have clued Mongoose in. Even so, she felt the need to be sure that her reasoning was sound in the eyes of others.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Somehow I managed to skip a large post by Soneji.
He makes a good point on Mongoose, though in the last quote, I have to say the fact she is asking about how mafia is played here is because she is back after a long hiatus, during which a lot of people from different communities came here and change the usual playstyle.
How pleased are you about it?Epignosis wrote:Well gleam isn't going to be too pleased about this, I can tell you.
Have you ever met Mongoose before?Soneji wrote:I understood the context of how she was trying to come across(as naive of possible new habits), its just that the context in which the question was asked(as a prerequisite to a stated desire to vote lynch Ika) is rather scummy. If the question about voting people to get their attention came prior to a vote on Ika/stated desire to vote Ika, I likely wouldn't find the behavior suspicious. Lack of confidence in your own reads is also more indicative of scum, who don't want to be seen as going after the wrong people or having weak reasoning. If Ika's behavior was in any way normal in the community as it is now, people wouldn't have been suspecting him for it as much as they did D1, which should have clued Mongoose in. Even so, she felt the need to be sure that her reasoning was sound in the eyes of others.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Somehow I managed to skip a large post by Soneji.
He makes a good point on Mongoose, though in the last quote, I have to say the fact she is asking about how mafia is played here is because she is back after a long hiatus, during which a lot of people from different communities came here and change the usual playstyle.
Linki ~ That first one was to TH.indiglo wrote:I thought I just saw his name at the bottom of the page as being in the thread. Maybe it was a fly by, but I'd still like to hear from him too.
Epi, I am sure you are not wrong about that.
ISO my last few posts, if you're low on time. The case is in there. Then you can think about it as you catch up.Quin wrote:I just got up and I'm seeing all the gleam votes - what happened?
Well, I'll figure it out.
None too. I'd rather lynch sig.Golden wrote:How pleased are you about it?Epignosis wrote:Well gleam isn't going to be too pleased about this, I can tell you.
