[END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Moderator: Community Team
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Black Rock said nothing about Fuzz before he was lynched, and didn't appear to be present as the CFD developed (she left just before it started to rev up). Her earlier focus seemed to be more on Turnip Head and to a lesser degree Epignosis. I do like the way she responded to the results of the CFD/Fuzz flip though, at least in that her perspectives align well with my own other than the same sig read I've disagreed with nearly everyone else on. I don't get overwhelmingly good vibes in the absence of interactions with the dead mafioso, but I wouldn't call her a suspect either. Leaning slightly townward.
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
DDL came out of the gate and voted gleam again.
This is an empty defense of Scotty, since DDL doesn't name who he does think would kill Tranq (i.e., he rules out Scotty by name while ruling out everyone by default):
DDL says I'm weird and absent (but later says he feels better about me because I voted Nerolunar), that ika could be "scummy" in general, so lynching him is a bad idea, and then DDL backs off of gleam. In general, this is a fence-sitting kind of post.
He says gleam's posts "aren't as bad" in the beginning, but maintains suspicion in the end, saying "The guy is all over the place and it's not a civ place." We know gleam was indeed a civilian, so him being "all over the place" was genuine for him.
The morning of the lynch, DDL casts a vote against RadicalFuzz, saying:
This is where DDL responds to Fuzz's "reads." Apparently satisfied with the response, DDL goes back to gleam.
Here, DDL calls Sloonei the "civ captain" and "pretty rational and professional-like." That's a bold declaration for Day 2.
He suggests, jokingly or not, a three-way tie, but then says:
DDL insists that its the PERFECT opportunity for cops to save themselves. That proved not to be the case.
But that last line is the worst. It paralyzes independent thinking on the part of the civilians. "Choose among the options available to you, and wait your turn." Furthermore, aren't three-way ties just as good of an opportunity for cops to save their own? ika even had more visible votes than Fuzz.
DDL's vote for Fuzz is one of capitulation rather than being in agreement with the (new) points raised against Fuzz. He doesn't raise his earlier points against Fuzz when he voted for, and makes it seem like voting for gleam would still be the better choice.
Someone asked about this, but I don't know what "Turbo Mafia" is.
That's Day 2: A highly reluctant lynch of Fuzz, when Fuzz was never a strong suspect of his in the first place.
This is an empty defense of Scotty, since DDL doesn't name who he does think would kill Tranq (i.e., he rules out Scotty by name while ruling out everyone by default):
This falls into the category of teammates discussing mechanics in the thread to give the appearance of no BTSC.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I don't see the link between Scotty suspecting Tranq and Tranq being NK'd. That is now how mafia usually operates.Quin wrote:But I still have my reservations about Tranq's arrest. I wonder how feasible it is to arrest one of the most inactive players over the 20 or so other players who have likely got a firm grip on at least one police by now. If I was scum there is no way Tranq would be my first choice. I see nobody else who benefits from his arrest than you, Scotty. Being wrong about your suspicion of a player who was killed would, in most cases, come across as a town tell. You were able to express your suspicion of a player, while preventing Tranq from following it up and making your suspicion into a bigger deal than it was. Or that daisy thing, yeah.
Also, could you explain your day 1 vote? I understand that you voted based on inactivity, which I personally agree with, but why did you not change your vote from chaindeath to Tranq since you decided that he was the most suspicious?
From my experience mafia usually wants to get rid of:
1- Someone who is unlikely to be lynched at any time (because they have to eliminate every player in the game somehow).
2- Someone who has a strong indication of having a power role (i. e. cop).
3- Someone who is just way good at the game and is a threat to the existance of mafia.
There could be others, like incriminating people and such, but those are the most logical imo. Killing someone because you've suspected them ITT isn't really logical, it creates a link between you and that person that is unnecessary.
Based on what Golden said, it's probably 3, with maybe some shades of 1 or 2. Though I don't know how at that point of the game anyone could deduce Tranq is hard to lynch. The guy had like 2 posts.
DDL says I'm weird and absent (but later says he feels better about me because I voted Nerolunar), that ika could be "scummy" in general, so lynching him is a bad idea, and then DDL backs off of gleam. In general, this is a fence-sitting kind of post.
He says gleam's posts "aren't as bad" in the beginning, but maintains suspicion in the end, saying "The guy is all over the place and it's not a civ place." We know gleam was indeed a civilian, so him being "all over the place" was genuine for him.
The morning of the lynch, DDL casts a vote against RadicalFuzz, saying:
But:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:RadicalFuzz is fishy. He is just staying in the sidelines asking people random questions and commenting on what is currently going on, but he hasn't actually posted any suspicions of his own. He is aware of what's going on, but is not actually participating. Feels like blending.
DDL says he might go back to gleam if it's between him and ika. Note that he specifically mentions not wanting to lynch ika, but the implication of "if it's still between him and ika" is that DDL doesn't really want to lynch Fuzz either.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Might come back to gleam at the end of the day if it's still between him and ika (I don't want to lynch ika), but for now I wanna stop tunneling for a while.
This is where DDL responds to Fuzz's "reads." Apparently satisfied with the response, DDL goes back to gleam.
Here, DDL calls Sloonei the "civ captain" and "pretty rational and professional-like." That's a bold declaration for Day 2.
He suggests, jokingly or not, a three-way tie, but then says:
First, he doesn't like the idea of a fourth wagon. At the time, the three wagons were gleam, ika, and me. agleaminranks wasn't a cop, and I'm not a cop. And ika so far still exists in the gloomy realm of Vompattiland. However, the sudden fourth wagon was a successful cop lynch.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I don't like the idea of starting another wagon, when we already have 3, with less than an hour for the phase to end.
This is the PERFECT opportunity for scum to save each other if they need to.
If you don't like the current wagons then tough luck. Try to push another one earlier next day.
DDL insists that its the PERFECT opportunity for cops to save themselves. That proved not to be the case.
But that last line is the worst. It paralyzes independent thinking on the part of the civilians. "Choose among the options available to you, and wait your turn." Furthermore, aren't three-way ties just as good of an opportunity for cops to save their own? ika even had more visible votes than Fuzz.
DDL's vote for Fuzz is one of capitulation rather than being in agreement with the (new) points raised against Fuzz. He doesn't raise his earlier points against Fuzz when he voted for, and makes it seem like voting for gleam would still be the better choice.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Yeah sorry Fuzz. My suspicion on you is not strong, but I'm not wasting my vote. You are still the guy who only posted reads when people asked you to.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I still support a gleam lynch if you guys wanna go back to that though.

Someone asked about this, but I don't know what "Turbo Mafia" is.
That's Day 2: A highly reluctant lynch of Fuzz, when Fuzz was never a strong suspect of his in the first place.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Even if her votes are, so far, three times Turnip two times Quin? Haven't read the posts, but slightly tunnelly, just by looking at the stats.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Black Rock said nothing about Fuzz before he was lynched, and didn't appear to be present as the CFD developed (she left just before it started to rev up). Her earlier focus seemed to be more on Turnip Head and to a lesser degree Epignosis. I do like the way she responded to the results of the CFD/Fuzz flip though, at least in that her perspectives align well with my own other than the same sig read I've disagreed with nearly everyone else on. I don't get overwhelmingly good vibes in the absence of interactions with the dead mafioso, but I wouldn't call her a suspect either. Leaning slightly townward.
Fractal
sprityo
sprityo
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I'm really tired of being logged out after typing up my responses. I'm sorry, I did have a response for you but I have to come back later.Prisoner 509378 wrote:When you're available, please answer one question: what changed? This was yesterday, still on Day 5:Draconus wrote:Also, I think I'm seeing the case on DDL now. I believe there's been enough said there to warrant a vote for now. This could change, though.
Draconus wrote:I had a comment on DDL because he's being brought up as a lynch candidate: I feel good about him because of his actions surrounding the Fuzz situation.







"Modular forms and elliptic curves! Infinite fire revolving around infinite parallels fractals of infinite reality, each cascading, gliding in an infinite wheel. Tell me the true nature of my reality!"
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I grant actually that I forgot to look at her votes. Thanks.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Even if her votes are, so far, three times Turnip two times Quin? Haven't read the posts, but slightly tunnelly, just by looking at the stats.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Black Rock said nothing about Fuzz before he was lynched, and didn't appear to be present as the CFD developed (she left just before it started to rev up). Her earlier focus seemed to be more on Turnip Head and to a lesser degree Epignosis. I do like the way she responded to the results of the CFD/Fuzz flip though, at least in that her perspectives align well with my own other than the same sig read I've disagreed with nearly everyone else on. I don't get overwhelmingly good vibes in the absence of interactions with the dead mafioso, but I wouldn't call her a suspect either. Leaning slightly townward.

The TH votes don't really bother me at face value. On Day 1 the wagons were all relatively small, and the lynch was quite close. Her vote was planted on TH and he finished with only two, but the eventual lynchee only had 4 votes. The Day 2 vote came before the development of the CFD drama, and she didn't return until after it had fully transpired. It's a bit uninspiring that she went for someone who seemed like an unlikely lynch, but that's just how some people prefer to vote.
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I don't want Epi's expanded case against DDL getting paged and drowned out by my continued reads, so here's a link.
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I gave you a truthful reply, not a dissertation. I'm not going to spend the limited time I have repeating what I've already said.Prisoner 920077 wrote:He basically gave me a pat reply and then has kind of stayed out of the way, none of which have changed my mind. But, you've got to fight the battles people are willing to fight, and no one is biting, so I've moved on... I'm assuming we're heading back to the slammer soon, anyway, so it's not like it's my problem!Prisoner 413022 wrote:
I for one, look forward to hearing what Blondy has to say about this one.
Do you even know what a dissertation is, Chronos?
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I reckon homie41 will bring it back to the surface eventually.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I don't want Epi's expanded case against DDL getting paged and drowned out by my continued reads, so here's a link.

Fractal
sprityo
sprityo
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Looking at Mongoose/Draconus (Mongconus):
I'm only highlighting this to indicate the technical difficulties Mongoose was having prior to her requesting replacement. She said nothing about Fuzz, and indeed seemed to be out of the thread for the most part after the pre-game phase. I don't read into that either way. She voted for TH on Day 1 and missed the vote on Day 2.
It appears Draconus was insanified on Day 4. I don't see a role to attribute this too other than "SECRET ROLE". If that's the cause, then it says nothing about Drac's alignment.
Otherwise there's not much here. He missed the vote on Day 3 and self-voted on Day 4, so who knows what to do with that nonsense. I really don't have much of a read at all on Mongconus -- he could be town or mafia and it wouldn't surprise me. He needs to get more involved ASAP or his eventual lynch might be inevitable with this kind of post history.
Spoiler: show
It appears Draconus was insanified on Day 4. I don't see a role to attribute this too other than "SECRET ROLE". If that's the cause, then it says nothing about Drac's alignment.
Otherwise there's not much here. He missed the vote on Day 3 and self-voted on Day 4, so who knows what to do with that nonsense. I really don't have much of a read at all on Mongconus -- he could be town or mafia and it wouldn't surprise me. He needs to get more involved ASAP or his eventual lynch might be inevitable with this kind of post history.
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Let's catch up with The Second Matthew and his predecessor sprityo:
The latter was unavailable to play and didn't do anything. Moving on.
Matt 2.0's earliest work after taking over was mostly to go after Metal (?????) Marsh89 after an abrupt reversal in his perspective of Golden. This kind of attack is exactly what I'm used to seeing with Matt -- a very specific moment in discussion which pings him that he grips hard and doesn't let go of (especially when it's one based on his own content, or this case Matt 1.0's content). From a meta standpoint, I like this.
I think Marmot is a bad Marmot. And going through his ISO, I saw you and him were agreeing on some things. Doesn't give me a good vibe.
Also, Long Con is a Golden light green read and his train was picking up steam, and I trust Golden.[/quote]
Matt switched his vote to sig though, and gave the this as an explanation. I don't think it makes any sense to vote for sig because of his dealings with the top suspect instead of merely voting for the top suspect. I do, however, see townies make this [as I see it] mistake constantly in Mafia games. As the day continued he engaged in a sort of showdown with Metalmarsh, and ended up leaving his final vote on sig. It's consistent with his suspicions even if I don't agree with it.
Ever since then he's been focused on lynching ika over a perceived slip. That's also very Matt.
What's this though?
----------
Without Fuzz-relevant content I won't jump in bed with Matt, but I wouldn't say I find him especially suspicious. The last vote needs an explanation though, because it seems like intentional nonsense.
The latter was unavailable to play and didn't do anything. Moving on.
Spoiler: show
Spoiler: show
Also, Long Con is a Golden light green read and his train was picking up steam, and I trust Golden.[/quote]
Matt switched his vote to sig though, and gave the this as an explanation. I don't think it makes any sense to vote for sig because of his dealings with the top suspect instead of merely voting for the top suspect. I do, however, see townies make this [as I see it] mistake constantly in Mafia games. As the day continued he engaged in a sort of showdown with Metalmarsh, and ended up leaving his final vote on sig. It's consistent with his suspicions even if I don't agree with it.
Ever since then he's been focused on lynching ika over a perceived slip. That's also very Matt.
Spoiler: show
----------
Without Fuzz-relevant content I won't jump in bed with Matt, but I wouldn't say I find him especially suspicious. The last vote needs an explanation though, because it seems like intentional nonsense.
-
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 52
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Who is Chronos? Honest question. And why be snarky?Epignosis wrote:I gave you a truthful reply, not a dissertation. I'm not going to spend the limited time I have repeating what I've already said.Prisoner 920077 wrote:He basically gave me a pat reply and then has kind of stayed out of the way, none of which have changed my mind. But, you've got to fight the battles people are willing to fight, and no one is biting, so I've moved on... I'm assuming we're heading back to the slammer soon, anyway, so it's not like it's my problem!Prisoner 413022 wrote:
I for one, look forward to hearing what Blondy has to say about this one.
Do you even know what a dissertation is, Chronos?
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Hi Serge. I'm going to stare at your posts now.
His presence prior to the Fuzz lynch was limited primarily to Day 2, but he missed the actual CFD sequence. He primarily seemed to be trying to catch up with the game however he could. The above post was his most substantive contribution.
The highlighted bit confuses me. Earlier, Serge had pooh-poohed llama's commentary on DDL's "this game is hard to win for cops" thing. In this post he endorses llama for his DDL case but doesn't agree with it -- suggesting it would have been stronger if it was just limited to that earliest commentary. This doesn't make sense. I could see this as a discombobulated effort to avoid voting for DDL so he could jump aboard the easier ika wagon, which would be a telling thing if DDL is indeed a baddie. We'll see on that front.
Serge seems to be all over the place in these two posts. The highlighted portions don't align logically as far as I can see. In the second post he exonerates SVS based on the same premise essentially that he used to cast suspicion on other people in the first post. Perhaps he's giving SVS a great deal more credit for having "started" the CFD, but it's quite a jump still to suggest that the ones who followed it should be seen as the biggest suspects to emerge from the scenario. It doesn't add up.
I don't understand this either. He exonerated SVS for starting the CFD, acknowledged TH placed the first vote (without taking a stance), but still called Golden the "instigator" in a negative tone to describe his suspicion of him. I don't follow this thought process at all. Serge I really need you to drop by and tell me what was going on in your head.
-------------
Of the UTR group, Serge looks like the most viable suspect so far to me.
Spoiler: show
The highlighted bit confuses me. Earlier, Serge had pooh-poohed llama's commentary on DDL's "this game is hard to win for cops" thing. In this post he endorses llama for his DDL case but doesn't agree with it -- suggesting it would have been stronger if it was just limited to that earliest commentary. This doesn't make sense. I could see this as a discombobulated effort to avoid voting for DDL so he could jump aboard the easier ika wagon, which would be a telling thing if DDL is indeed a baddie. We'll see on that front.
Spoiler: show
Spoiler: show
-------------
Of the UTR group, Serge looks like the most viable suspect so far to me.
- indiglo
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 384
- Posts: 1768
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:43 pm
- Location: U.S.S. Tempest
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Prisoner 509378 wrote:Looking at Mongoose/Draconus (Mongconus):
I'm only highlighting this to indicate the technical difficulties Mongoose was having prior to her requesting replacement. She said nothing about Fuzz, and indeed seemed to be out of the thread for the most part after the pre-game phase. I don't read into that either way. She voted for TH on Day 1 and missed the vote on Day 2.Spoiler: show
It appears Draconus was insanified on Day 4. I don't see a role to attribute this too other than "SECRET ROLE". If that's the cause, then it says nothing about Drac's alignment.
Otherwise there's not much here. He missed the vote on Day 3 and self-voted on Day 4, so who knows what to do with that nonsense. I really don't have much of a read at all on Mongconus -- he could be town or mafia and it wouldn't surprise me. He needs to get more involved ASAP or his eventual lynch might be inevitable with this kind of post history.
Yes, Draconus self-voted that day, the insanification was a punishment for that from the hosts. Still doesn't say anything about alignment, but you seem like a fellow who likes to know details and context.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Why does intentional nonsense need explaining? Derp.
Let's catch some bad guys!
Let's catch some bad guys!





- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
soneji's turn:
He's been present very inconsistently, so it's hard to draw a ton from it.
Big catch-up post on Day 3
I like this post, at least from the standpoint of getting any kind of read on soneji. I don't think he put his vote in the best place, but I understand his mindset and I think a lot of the points he made in this thing were sound and valid. It looks to me like a time-starved townie doing his absolute best to make himself useful somehow. I get the same impression from this post.
TH challenged soneji for one of his larger posts and this was his response. I like the tone. I don't agree with a lot of his reads or how they progressed, but I think I can understand them which is more important.
His posts continue as such until the current phase. He voted for DDL on Day 1, ika on Day 2, Golden on Day 3, and Mongconus on Day 4. He was not present during the Day 2 CFD to Fuzz. If there's anything disconcerting, it's that he hasn't missed any votes despite his availability being so sporadic -- that could suggest he's paying closer attention than he lets on. That's a reach though.
-------------
For a guy with only 13 posts, I feel pretty decently about soneji as a civilian read.
He's been present very inconsistently, so it's hard to draw a ton from it.
Big catch-up post on Day 3
I like this post, at least from the standpoint of getting any kind of read on soneji. I don't think he put his vote in the best place, but I understand his mindset and I think a lot of the points he made in this thing were sound and valid. It looks to me like a time-starved townie doing his absolute best to make himself useful somehow. I get the same impression from this post.
Spoiler: show
His posts continue as such until the current phase. He voted for DDL on Day 1, ika on Day 2, Golden on Day 3, and Mongconus on Day 4. He was not present during the Day 2 CFD to Fuzz. If there's anything disconcerting, it's that he hasn't missed any votes despite his availability being so sporadic -- that could suggest he's paying closer attention than he lets on. That's a reach though.
-------------
For a guy with only 13 posts, I feel pretty decently about soneji as a civilian read.
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I definitely do, thank you for the clarification.indiglo wrote:Yes, Draconus self-voted that day, the insanification was a punishment for that from the hosts. Still doesn't say anything about alignment, but you seem like a fellow who likes to know details and context.
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
If I don't understand something, I'd prefer to change that and understand it. Understanding things > not understanding thingsMatt wrote:Why does intentional nonsense need explaining? Derp.
Let's catch some bad guys!
So please do me a solid and gimme that explanation.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Funsies.Prisoner 509378 wrote:If I don't understand something, I'd prefer to change that and understand it. Understanding things > not understanding thingsMatt wrote:Why does intentional nonsense need explaining? Derp.
Let's catch some bad guys!
So please do me a solid and gimme that explanation.
Tbh, I was a crybaby wreck once Wilgy and his dastardly Daisy crew destroyed 1.0, and since I've come back in, just havin' some fun.
But I also think DDL is a good possibility of being bad. Someone brought up how he usually invites sussing, but in this game, he said "fine lynch me" or whatever and how that wasn't like him. I don't know DDL well enough to know if that's true, but if that's what most are saying, I'll take their word for it.
But yeah, I think ika made a slippy slip slip and I hope he's gone soon too.
My current scumdar says their team consists of...
Fuzz
ika
DDL
Golden
Scotty
..........either Epig or Silverwolf





Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Oh, and IF Golden is bad, then I suppose you can replace one of those others with da sloonei. 






- thellama73
- Supatown
- Posts in topic: 140
- Posts: 12623
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:29 pm
- Location: Murder Park
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I want to remake my point that when I made my initial case on Dragon, Serge was notable for saying how good my case was and then promptly changing the subject, voting elsewhere. If DDL flips bad, I bet Serge is on his team.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Hi Serge. I'm going to stare at your posts now.
His presence prior to the Fuzz lynch was limited primarily to Day 2, but he missed the actual CFD sequence. He primarily seemed to be trying to catch up with the game however he could. The above post was his most substantive contribution.Spoiler: show
The highlighted bit confuses me. Earlier, Serge had pooh-poohed llama's commentary on DDL's "this game is hard to win for cops" thing. In this post he endorses llama for his DDL case but doesn't agree with it -- suggesting it would have been stronger if it was just limited to that earliest commentary. This doesn't make sense. I could see this as a discombobulated effort to avoid voting for DDL so he could jump aboard the easier ika wagon, which would be a telling thing if DDL is indeed a baddie. We'll see on that front.
Serge seems to be all over the place in these two posts. The highlighted portions don't align logically as far as I can see. In the second post he exonerates SVS based on the same premise essentially that he used to cast suspicion on other people in the first post. Perhaps he's giving SVS a great deal more credit for having "started" the CFD, but it's quite a jump still to suggest that the ones who followed it should be seen as the biggest suspects to emerge from the scenario. It doesn't add up.Spoiler: show
I don't understand this either. He exonerated SVS for starting the CFD, acknowledged TH placed the first vote (without taking a stance), but still called Golden the "instigator" in a negative tone to describe his suspicion of him. I don't follow this thought process at all. Serge I really need you to drop by and tell me what was going on in your head.Spoiler: show
-------------
Of the UTR group, Serge looks like the most viable suspect so far to me.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Spoiler: show
-
- Stool Pigeon
- Posts in topic: 80
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 12:24 am
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I've had good vibes about llama purely from my gut, so I'll check my intuition against thread data:
Assertively rejects a semi-question from Fuzz about typical tied lynch rules.
Fuzz asked llama to expand on his suspicion of DDL, and this was his response. This is obviously more about DDL than it is about Fuzz, but that Fuzz felt the need to prompt this might mean there's a connection to be drawn between he, llama, and/or DDL. As of right now I would lean towards DDL being the suspicious one from this, but this might be worth returning to later either way.
llama wasn't around during the CFD at the end of Day 2. His vote that day went to DDL (it was the 2nd final vote placed of the phase). This could perhaps be seen as slightly contradictory given his more recent dejection over pursuing a DDL lynch that he didn't feel would take hold with other players. I am not concerned though because this vote was placed so early, and he was indeed absent from the thread when the vote switching started to envelop discussion.
This is surprising. I thought llama was opposed to people broadcasting town reads. I think this post is strategically fine and dandy, but I wouldn't have anticipated it coming from this guy. Perhaps a buddying scenario can be drawn out.
He spent most of Days 3 and 4 trying to mount support for a DDL lynch, but it seems that support didn't really materialize (or that other players were the focus instead). Actually that has continued into this day phase too.
-----------------------
I think the content in the thread mostly supports my gut read. I have no beefs with llama.
Spoiler: show
Spoiler: show
llama wasn't around during the CFD at the end of Day 2. His vote that day went to DDL (it was the 2nd final vote placed of the phase). This could perhaps be seen as slightly contradictory given his more recent dejection over pursuing a DDL lynch that he didn't feel would take hold with other players. I am not concerned though because this vote was placed so early, and he was indeed absent from the thread when the vote switching started to envelop discussion.
Spoiler: show
He spent most of Days 3 and 4 trying to mount support for a DDL lynch, but it seems that support didn't really materialize (or that other players were the focus instead). Actually that has continued into this day phase too.
-----------------------
I think the content in the thread mostly supports my gut read. I have no beefs with llama.
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
chaindeath is the last ISO I'm doing tonight.
He did exactly one thing on Day 1, and that was vote for Long Con.
One curious note about chain is that he was present during the CFD and cast a vote (for DDL). He said nothing though, and Sloonei prodded him about that. I find chain's response strategically dubious but not necessarily suspicious. I can believe that he wanted to read the entire thread before joining the current conversation (even though I think that is often a bad idea when one is really far behind). Some people play this way. He stayed true to his bad read on DDL through Day 3, but his final vote fell on Nerolunar. He explained why [url="http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 38#p243938]here[/url].
He responded to a number of points made against him here. It's a little difficult to follow given the formatting, but I appreciate the effort and the tone he conveyed.
His votes: Day 1 - LC, 2 - DDL, 3 - Nero, 4 - N/A
---------------
I see no glaring issues with chaindeath. I'm not super confident in him as a town read, but I think he'd be a poor lynch today at least.
He did exactly one thing on Day 1, and that was vote for Long Con.

Spoiler: show
He responded to a number of points made against him here. It's a little difficult to follow given the formatting, but I appreciate the effort and the tone he conveyed.
His votes: Day 1 - LC, 2 - DDL, 3 - Nero, 4 - N/A
---------------
I see no glaring issues with chaindeath. I'm not super confident in him as a town read, but I think he'd be a poor lynch today at least.
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
This warrants explanation though.chaindeath wrote:Matt 2.0
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
EBWOP to fix the link.
Prisoner 509378 wrote:One curious note about chain is that he was present during the CFD and cast a vote (for DDL). He said nothing though, and Sloonei prodded him about that. I find chain's response strategically dubious but not necessarily suspicious. I can believe that he wanted to read the entire thread before joining the current conversation (even though I think that is often a bad idea when one is really far behind). Some people play this way. He stayed true to his bad read on DDL through Day 3, but his final vote fell on Nerolunar. He explained why here.
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Since there are no ties for me to break, I will toss my vote in to DDL. 

- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I think the last player I need to look at is Turnip Head. Hopefully I have time. For now I have to step away; I should be available as the deadline approaches.
- thellama73
- Supatown
- Posts in topic: 140
- Posts: 12623
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:29 pm
- Location: Murder Park
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I really only have a problem with it when there are multiple mafia teams, since it gives them a way not to hit each other by mistake. In a game like this, the police know who the civs are, so announcing it doesn't change anything.Prisoner 509378 wrote: This is surprising. I thought llama was opposed to people broadcasting town reads. I think this post is strategically fine and dandy, but I wouldn't have anticipated it coming from this guy. Perhaps a buddying scenario can be drawn out.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Spoiler: show
- Turnip Head
- Root Vegetable
- Posts in topic: 257
- Posts: 11432
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:37 am
- Preferred Pronouns: they/their
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I'm down with a DDL lynch. He's been a slight ping on me all game, though I've found that I can't really explain why. I am surprised that he's gotten so many votes on a Day where sig still lives and breathes, but I attribute that to the stellar participation of our prison gang and the persistence of Llama
I'm glad to see so many of the prisoners have taken their jobs seriously, they have reintegrated into society with aplomb.
Sorry for not being around much this phase, I've been battling a sickness for over a week now and didn't feel like playing mafia all that much.
Dragon. D Luffy

Sorry for not being around much this phase, I've been battling a sickness for over a week now and didn't feel like playing mafia all that much.
Dragon. D Luffy
- Turnip Head
- Root Vegetable
- Posts in topic: 257
- Posts: 11432
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:37 am
- Preferred Pronouns: they/their
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Dat Warden vote for sig... lol.
I'd also be okay with Boomslang receiving more scrutiny. He's been a non-entity since replacing into Enrique's meltdown.
I'd also be okay with Boomslang receiving more scrutiny. He's been a non-entity since replacing into Enrique's meltdown.
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Care to do any gunt-to-head reads at this time, Mr. 509?
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 580
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
It's not a dangerous road, but besides you are complaining about something I haven't done at all since last time you complained about it, so whats your point?Prisoner 413022 wrote:If I could accomplish one thing, lynching the Warden would be glorious. That jerk put us through hell.Prisoner 740359 wrote:I have to go, I have to visit my family and my mistress. Looks like homie50's got this, he'll share his results with us homies later and then we can contribute to lynchin' some good ol' scum. Hopefully the Warden.
Golden is le annoying.
Golden should maybe quit trying to assign prisoners to specific people? Even if he's sure they are who he thinks they are. I can see where Golden might think that his naming of people should be seen as his way of saying hi, but a) some of us are pretty good mimics and b) others of us are pretty sure smart people will figure things out soon enough anyway and c) the temptation to break the rules and confirm or deny might be too great for some of the prisoners. None of the prisoners want another LC type shooting to happen. Our host isHelp us help you. and finally d) since prisoners can neither confirm nor deny AND stay alive (see point c) not talking about prisoner identy when someone names us, leaves us in the position where others are reading us as x player whether we are or not. We can not confirm. We can not deny. And that impression could be false. That prisoner could be manipulating you. And now the thread is going to read prisoner y as player x just because it was suggested. That prisoner you name could be a different prisoner and can't tell you you are wrong. This is a very dangerous road.
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
You know, Golden, just zip it.Golden wrote:It's not a dangerous road, but besides you are complaining about something I haven't done at all since last time you complained about it, so whats your point?Prisoner 413022 wrote:If I could accomplish one thing, lynching the Warden would be glorious. That jerk put us through hell.Prisoner 740359 wrote:I have to go, I have to visit my family and my mistress. Looks like homie50's got this, he'll share his results with us homies later and then we can contribute to lynchin' some good ol' scum. Hopefully the Warden.
Golden is le annoying.
Golden should maybe quit trying to assign prisoners to specific people? Even if he's sure they are who he thinks they are. I can see where Golden might think that his naming of people should be seen as his way of saying hi, but a) some of us are pretty good mimics and b) others of us are pretty sure smart people will figure things out soon enough anyway and c) the temptation to break the rules and confirm or deny might be too great for some of the prisoners. None of the prisoners want another LC type shooting to happen. Our host isHelp us help you. and finally d) since prisoners can neither confirm nor deny AND stay alive (see point c) not talking about prisoner identy when someone names us, leaves us in the position where others are reading us as x player whether we are or not. We can not confirm. We can not deny. And that impression could be false. That prisoner could be manipulating you. And now the thread is going to read prisoner y as player x just because it was suggested. That prisoner you name could be a different prisoner and can't tell you you are wrong. This is a very dangerous road.
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
If we have enough people present and willing to make it worth our while. We'd have to make it quick though, because we have about two hours remaining and I wouldn't want GTH reads devouring the EOD sequence.Prisoner 813142 wrote:Care to do any gunt-to-head reads at this time, Mr. 509?
- indiglo
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 384
- Posts: 1768
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:43 pm
- Location: U.S.S. Tempest
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Golden's pants were unzipped??Prisoner 813142 wrote: You know, Golden, just zip it.


Anyhoo, here's where I'm at lynch-wise. I am ok with DDL. My strongest 2nd place would be Enrique/Boom. I keep coming back to one thing, and the more I stew on it, the more it seems to mean to me. I shall post this, then go find the thing I keep coming back to.
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Shoot. I was hoping Golden would engage in a tussle with me. Perhaps he knew where I was going with that. *puts pinkie to his mouth*
Seriously though, let's do some gun-to-frickin'-head reads yo. They don't let us have guns in the "slammer," so let's get our kicks in while we can, okay?
Seriously though, let's do some gun-to-frickin'-head reads yo. They don't let us have guns in the "slammer," so let's get our kicks in while we can, okay?
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 580
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Like this particular iso, especially if DDL is lynched and comes back bad.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Of the UTR group, Serge looks like the most viable suspect so far to me.
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I have a better idea.
CFD Golden the Warden.
CFD Golden the Warden.
Fractal
sprityo
sprityo
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 580
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Llama knows that I don't believe in target painting, so he can freely do it to me, even if it is simultaneously a friendly dig. I find that consistent with llama's personality.Prisoner 509378 wrote:This is surprising. I thought llama was opposed to people broadcasting town reads. I think this post is strategically fine and dandy, but I wouldn't have anticipated it coming from this guy. Perhaps a buddying scenario can be drawn out.
- Prisoner 509378
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 1123
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I'd love to lynch the Warden, but I really don't know who he/she is. I honestly don't know why Golden should be considered a top suspect for that role, or even a suspect at all.Prisoner 740359 wrote:I have a better idea.
CFD Golden the Warden.
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Golden, I told you to zip it. Now shh!
- indiglo
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 384
- Posts: 1768
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:43 pm
- Location: U.S.S. Tempest
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
At first when I read over Enrique's posts in the other game, I didn't make the correlation. But this post from that other game:Prisoner 509378 wrote:Enrique in Tree Mafia
He was lynched as the cop. It made him angry. I don't think this individual likes receiving votes in general, and this makes twice that he essentially calls everyone who suspects him stupid directly or indirectly. I'm not here to criticize, I'm only drawing the meta comparison. In this case he really didn't provide a good reason that I can readily identify to town read him. My mind keeps returning to this post, which I think can be read at face value to decide whether he's a candidate:
Was he, in his frustrated state, waving his WIFOM around in plain sight? Or was this sarcasm indicative of his playing trait which shows him treating everyone who suspects him like idiots?Spoiler: show
I don't struggle to lean toward the former.
It didn't strike me much at first, because he was civ in that game. But the more I think about it, I still see a correlation, because he mad & frustrated and info dumped. And I think it's possible he did that in this game too, then took his ball and went home.Enrique wrote:I'm dead and I was the cop and all of you suck.
So for me it is down to DDL or Enrique/Boom. GTH
Linkapalooza~
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 580
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
I am essentially ignoring all the prisoners who think I am the warden, since I am taking the view that none of them genuinely believe it, given its obvious bollocks. What's the value in getting involved in a tussle with someone who will apparently be gone tomorrow? I'm only interested in engaging with the ones who are of use to me in figuring out who the baddies are.Prisoner 813142 wrote:Shoot. I was hoping Golden would engage in a tussle with me. Perhaps he knew where I was going with that. *puts pinkie to his mouth*
Seriously though, let's do some gun-to-frickin'-head reads yo. They don't let us have guns in the "slammer," so let's get our kicks in while we can, okay?
- indiglo
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 384
- Posts: 1768
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:43 pm
- Location: U.S.S. Tempest
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Yes. These are things I also think.Golden wrote:Like this particular iso, especially if DDL is lynched and comes back bad.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Of the UTR group, Serge looks like the most viable suspect so far to me.
Also I left out the word *did* in my last post. Oops. Please to insert *did* in the proper place in there. Thank you.

- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 580
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
@indi - one difference is that in tree info dumping was a legal rule and he was one of many people claiming to be the cop (but simply the truthful one). Enrique had good reason to be aggrieved at that particular lynch.
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Talk to the hand, 'cause the face don't wanna hear it anymore, Mr. I'm Too Good To Talk To Prisoners. You ain't all that and a bag of potato chips. Don't go there, girlfriend. Mmhmm.Golden wrote:I am essentially ignoring all the prisoners who think I am the warden, since I am taking the view that none of them genuinely believe it, given its obvious bollocks. What's the value in getting involved in a tussle with someone who will apparently be gone tomorrow? I'm only interested in engaging with the ones who are of use to me in figuring out who the baddies are.Prisoner 813142 wrote:Shoot. I was hoping Golden would engage in a tussle with me. Perhaps he knew where I was going with that. *puts pinkie to his mouth*
Seriously though, let's do some gun-to-frickin'-head reads yo. They don't let us have guns in the "slammer," so let's get our kicks in while we can, okay?
- indiglo
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 384
- Posts: 1768
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:43 pm
- Location: U.S.S. Tempest
Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Wrong again, it was the word *got*, not did. So now take out the *did* you inserted, and exchange it for *got*. 
Link @ Golden ~ Ah, thank you. That helps. In that case, I'm not entirely sure what to take away out of that read.

Link @ Golden ~ Ah, thank you. That helps. In that case, I'm not entirely sure what to take away out of that read.

- Sloonei
- Cap'n Sloonbeard
- Posts in topic: 1158
- Posts: 26594
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:05 pm
- Location: Buffalo
- Gender: Male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
This sounds a lot like my reason for suspecting Quin.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I understand your trepidation, but I don't agree. The basic premise of DDL's content at that point in the game wasn't "don't lynch Fuzz", but rather "don't CFD". This means to me that when Sloonei presented another alternative option (Matt), a baddie DDL would have had no choice but to stick to his prior strategic stance: that moving votes around is inherently a bad idea. Also, imagine the crap he'd be taking now if he had taken Sloonei up on this. The progression would have [potentially, from his mindset] been:indiglo wrote:Ok, so I found the post of Luffy's that gave me pause on suspecting him. I would love to get some more input on this.
During the CFD of Fuzz, Luffy put up some resistance. Gleam was his first choice (no judgment there), but after a bit of time he decided to join us in the Fuzz lynch. I went back to read that whole section to get context. At this point, I believe Fuzz and ika were tied. Sloon offered up the option of switching to Matt 1.0. Then, Luffy responded like this:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:No.Sloonei wrote:because he needed to vote, and maybe all three of them are townies and he just wanted to send any one of them to jail.sig wrote:Why would mafia Fuzz pop in at endgame and vote Ike unless he was saving Gleam/Epi if this was the case why ditch both those wagons? This is the scummiest CFD since the one I lead to stop me from getting lynched when I was almost confirmed mafia
@Epi he didn't
also i put my vote on Matt. How do we all feel about that?
Godanmit guys, this isn't turbo mafia.
Which is where I'd like interpretations from others. (Maybe even those who have played with him before.) I liked this. Were he a teammate of Fuzz's... would he be more likely to try to get off the wagon and get folks to go elsewhere? Or would he ride it out and risk losing a teammate?
For further context, remember, Fuzz & ika were tied at this point, and when the poll ended (like 20 or 25 minutes after this comment from Luffy) ika actually had MORE votes than Fuzz.
Linkapalooza~
~ Sloonei and numerous others CFD to Fuzz
~ DDL protests the CFD movement of votes
~ Sloonei moves his vote to Matt and asks for feedback
~ DDL suddenly supports that vote movement, away from Fuzz (who was still at real risk of being lynched)
~ Fuzz is lynched and flips bad
This would mean that DDL's strategic stances were inconsistent, and that the only variable in existence to define the inconsistency would be whether or not Fuzz was the target of the moving votes. That would be a bright blinking neon sign that screams in capital letters "I'M FUZZ'S TEAM MATE". I think a baddie DDL is capable enough to grasp that problem and consciously avoid it -- as he would have done by opposing Sloonei's Matt vote. I think it was strategically necessary.
My banners:
Spoiler: show