Here's my Dom case. It's a mess written over the course of a night while I watch my shows, but hopefully you can keep up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quin wrote:Sloonei wrote:Epi, who you gonna vote for now that Mr Mac is dead?
Quin, who's your supposed 3 person scum team?
Glorfindel, Dom and Wilgy.
Mac didn't like the first two very much. I'm partial to your argument against Wilgy. They all need ISO's.
What's yours?
Dom began his 'Quin lied' thing here. The lie entails that I knowingly tried to go for an easy lynch against him based on the incorrect fact that Mac scum-read him. It's a case that could have been and was easily proven incorrect within a very small time-frame, and even if it weren't, it would hardly have been the thing that 'set him up' for the lynch, which is something he painted earlier here:
Dom wrote:Quin wrote:Dom wrote:Quin wrote:Dom wrote:Quin have you seen me lynched before?
I don't remember if I have.
So you had no idea how hard I fight back for survival.
You tried to set me up for an easy lynch because you saw me as low hanging fruit.
Answer my question. What is the advantage of lying that Mac scum-read you when I was able to be proven wrong so easily?
You didn't think I'd prove you wrong.
You thought I'd be an easy lynch.
Again, I've spelled this out. Just because you choose to ignore my pertinent posts doesn't mean that I didn't make them.
He's twisted a mistake into a case that assumes that I (and by extension, anyone) would be so sloppy a baddie that I would make up patently false cases just because I don't know the track record of the person I was 'setting up'. He also tried to push the case to suggest that I'm suspicious because I didn't research reads made in a GTH scenario:
Dom wrote:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Dom wrote:Quin lied about me tho
Is there no possible reality apart from "Quin
deliberately promoted falsehoods about me"?
i think he could have just not researched it at all bc he thought it'd be an easy lynch
------------------------------------------------------------------
I questioned Dom about the contradiction that he saw within Sloonei's decision to withhold more scum-reads than he had. He responded by flinging poop at both me and Sloonei for performing a coordinated attack on him when neither of us had expressed suspicion for his thoughts on the matter.
Dom wrote:Quin wrote:Dom wrote:Quin wrote:I do not understand why Dom is connecting open-mindedness with lack of scum hunting.
Because he is literally contradicting himself?!?!?!
No one is listening to me at all. If you're really interested in hearing me out, you'd read my damn posts and NOT suddenly decide it's lynch Dom day and ignore half the things I've said. How many people keep saying they're going to "give me a read"? I've yet to see one ISO.
Please show me the contradiction.
1) you never answered my question
2) you did not vote for Glorfindel
Sloonei wrote:Dom wrote:Quin wrote:I do not understand why Dom is connecting open-mindedness with lack of scum hunting.
Because he is literally contradicting himself?!?!?!
Citation needed.
^
This is all so blatantly coordinated.
In hindsight, this dialogue is suspicious given that Glorfindel was bad. I can interpret this dialogue as though Dom was trying to get Sloonei to give more names so that he could push against someone who wasn't his teammate.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also noted a trend in Dom's posts in that he would lash out when:
1) He was pressed for
ill-explained answers
2) He received answers to questions that he
didn't like
Occurences of that happening are in
this post
His only response to this was to discredit it by suggesting that his dialogue with LoRab was 'not comparable', even though the themes were identical:
Dom wrote:Quin wrote:Here's that ISO Dom was itching for. Every occurrence of one of the two codes I mentioned earlier in his posts:
<<SNIP FOR BREVITY>>
I voted for Dom. I would like him to talk about his case against me.
I don't really think the LoRab case is comparable in any fashion.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other not-really-part-of-the-major-case-against-him-but-are-still-of-note include:
This post is suspicious on its own, for the reasons I've underlined.
Dom wrote:I do not suspect Elohcin.
Dom wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:Dom wrote:Sorry folks, I forgot this game had started!
Glorf, I hope your mum feels better soon.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Ricochet wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!
I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the
policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?
Shits and giggles.

You are bad.
Reason?
You have no logical or rational inner gameplay personality here. You are doing what you believe will get people to stop suspecting you, not what you think will catch baddies.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Dom wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:Ricochet wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:
Eh? I don't think we're seeing eye to eye here. I was merely expressing agreement that it seemed like you were trying to generate content.
...
Yes, that's the hypothesis. Based on the implication that all I'd need to do to hunt Mac is just that, given a good history of "reading him well". But that implication is false.
So how can you merely express agreement at something not backed up by its logic?
Rico, this isn't some kind of in-depth investigation. You were correct about Mac in the most recent game you two played together. You seemed to be, to me anyway, inevitably fixating on him to an unhealthy degree. It appeared very possible to me that you were generating content for the sake of it. I now believe that explanation to be less likely given your hyperfocus on this.
This is mafia. I appreciate hard evidence, but I don't need to go back and visit other games to see whether the premise is true or not. I just made a gut assessment on what I thought was happening in the moment.
....who tf is this guy????
I doubt that you are sincerely formulating an opinion based around someone's ability to read someone with a data set of 1 game. This is not logical, rational MP talking.
You're right, it isn't logical, rational MP. I killed him.
Joke MP. Zero logic. Not taking allegations seriously.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Elohcin wrote:going for self preservation here...
We have 24 hours (or had as of the time of your post) in this game. Why self-preservation so early?
Logical MP. Out to take an easy target out.
No coherent personality, doing whatever is most expedient in the moment.
MovingPictures07 wrote:a2thezebra
Dom
MacDougall
LoRab
Neil Hartley
Ricochet
Sloonei
S~V~S
birdwithteeth11
DrWilgy
sanmateo
Elohcin
Epignosis
Glorfindel
insertnamehere
motel room
Scotty
sprityo
Straight out of his Romance Playbook-- buddying up to me.
Dom wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dom wrote:jjj i can see your perspective, but you're wrong.

i'm civ.
Why did you have so little to say about Glorf on Days 1-5?
idk tbh
Honestly, because I found nothing of note. It's not a good answer, or a helpful one, but it's a true one.