Epignosis wrote:triceratopzeuhl wrote:Epignosis wrote:
Way to Characterize My Contributions
in a 50 page game you can only point to 3 counterexamples, my characterization stands completely
I Have Accurately Pegged Three Civilians in Three Days And Pleaded Against Their Deaths: How Are You Doing?
No, you voted to lynch a civilian on day 2. Boomslang is also not necessarily civvie, AND your only reason was that you think it would have been a misplay to do what he did (which rules out nothing)
Boomslang wrote:triceratopzeuhl wrote:Epignosis wrote:
Way to Characterize My Contributions
in a 50 page game you can only point to 3 counterexamples, my characterization stands completely
How many successful examples would convince you? Five? Ten? This doesn't change the fact that he was right. Also, trying to assess post value by density in this game is ridiculous given the ballooning that occurred in the first couple of days.
Also, literally laughed at loud at the (0:23) tag on Epi's last post.
It's not the number, it's the fact that most of his claims of who's a civilian were without any reason (like I said earlier).
Epignosis wrote:If You Think I'm Gloating Here, I'm Not- I'm Pissed That People Are Running Lynches on People For Stupid Reasons (Like to Punish Them for Saying High Posters Should be Killed or For Having a Snarky Change of Tone), But I Suppose You Could Lynch Me Next to Punish Me for Being Right and Not Doing Enough to Stop People From Making Poor Decisions
Offer an alternative theory then, you haven't done so in the last 2 lynches. Of course, if you were bad you would know who is good and bad, so you could do what you've been doing for civvie cred without ever threatening your teammates.
Epignosis wrote:The Tricycle Could Interact With Me in One of Several Ways- He Could Ask Me to Clarify Something, Expound Upon Something, Offer Alternative Explanations for My Observations, or Disagree With Me for His Own Reasons...Instead His Activity is to Outright Discredit Me, and if He's a Civilian, There is No Good Reason for Him to Do That Unless He's Convinced I'm Bad
But I have several times, you ignore most of them because it would require acting like a good player
triceratopzeuhl wrote:
I did explicitly ask if you were going to start writing serious posts in that style and you didn't answer
triceratopzeuhl wrote:Epignosis wrote:
A Person Complained About Volume...He Could Have Killed the Source of the Volume (But He Didn't)
Hypothetical, if he's a baddie but not the one with the nk, and he's as inactive in BTSC as he is in thread, his teammates probably wouldn't pick the kill based on his opinion
triceratopzeuhl wrote:epi - what do you think the reason behind boomslang's vote today is then?
triceratopzeuhl wrote:epi - why are you going to keep it to yourself?
triceratopzeuhl wrote:Epi, re-reading sloonei just now I see very little content directed at JJJ. Sloonei has posted about (starting from most recently) Lorab, Scotty, metalmarsh (sort of, retracted later), dom, INH, whilgy. Why specifically did you mention JJJ there? besides that you're convinced for some reason he's faking his curse
triceratopzeuhl wrote:
If you think "people sloonei suspected" is a good line of thought, any of the ones listed could be worth examining
triceratopzeuhl wrote:
Offer an alternative for once then
I also had to correct you being purposely obtuse with sig (who could well be bad but if he is it's not related to his day 2 posting):
sig wrote:
So I don't see a good case for Boomslang or Wilgy or A person. However,
^ so transparent I don't believe for a second you of all people wouldn't understand this post and yet:
triceratopzeuhl wrote:Epignosis wrote:
But...You Don't See the Case on Boomslang............................Your Words
what he actually said was that he didn't agree with the case on boomslang, OR the case on wilgy, OR the case on a person.
He also decided to vote to try to save somebody he thought was good, which you could have done day 3 if you were interested in playing like a civ at all
While I'm quote mining, here was that exchange with dom I mentioned before but forgot to post, when he was throwing out rapid fire suspicions in the hope anything would stick & not acknowledging responses to them:
triceratopzeuhl wrote:Dom wrote:triceratopzeuhl wrote:Dom wrote:
go through each of epi's posts and show me the useless ones.
At the time I voted for him, this was 100% of his posts:
Epignosis wrote:All My Posts Will Be Potential Titles for Post-Rock Songs
Epignosis wrote:We Are Closing on the Mint House on the Cul-de-Sac in December
Epignosis wrote:POE is Rolling Around in His Grave (Which is in Baltimore, 515 W Fayette Street, in Case You Wanted to Go There)
Epignosis wrote:Townie is Such a Pussy Word
Epignosis wrote:You are Preaching to the Choir, Which is Wearing Robes Made by Unchristian Foreigners
Epignosis wrote:This is Boring, but at Least The Children Are Asleep
Epignosis wrote:Some People Just Like Big Numbers Under Their Names
Epignosis wrote:This is Not a Rainbow; It is Green Snot and Gray Snot
Epignosis wrote:LoRab is Not a Cold Dead Person
Epignosis wrote:Jesus Christ, Six Pages
Epignosis wrote:This Includes Content
Epignosis wrote:It's a Sin to Kill a Bird With Teeth on the First Day.
The third one could potentially be interpreted as him saying he doesn't like MP's POE strategy, and the last one is saying he thinks BWT is good. The rest? compost
OK
But that isn't his current posting. Why are you still deeming him useless?
Show me where I've said that since day 1
triceratopzeuhl wrote:
At the time I voted for him,