Salt:
Spoiler: show
sprityo wrote:ummmm. okay. let's take a step back here for a second:Spacedaisy wrote:As of right now, my vote will not be going to JoH, Soneji, DDL, LC, or Zebra.
I can't say who might have been lurking without posting at all, but the people who posted without commenting on any of the various playstyle arguments that were going on hot and heavy during Day 0. But I can say that Quin posted without participating, as did Glorf and sprityo.
sprityo wrote:What I'm getting at is the situation isn't this huge conflict. It's a statement, a joke, and it's only purpose as of now is generating content that we can't even use, it's more so being used to setup boundaries/groups of people for whatever reasonQuin wrote:Off the topic of my head:sprityo wrote:Quin wrote:Why do you think we can't use it? I've taken quite a lot out of the discussion so far.sprityo wrote:What I'm getting at is the situation isn't this huge conflict. It's a statement, a joke, and it's only purpose as of now is generating content that we can't even use, it's more so being used to setup boundaries/groups of people for whatever reason
What have you taken away, since I just see it as filler
- I don't trust DDL. I'll probably vote for him today.
- I recall Epi pulling up the names of people who took part in the discussion that also played Monkey Island, so I can analyse their content to see if it's compatible with that.
- Epi put some blind trust for Day 1 in Jack and (someone else), so that's something we can look at in hindsight if one of them flips bad later on.the comments were there, albeit small.sprityo wrote:-what about DXL makes him untrustworthy. Is it his playstyle, or something he's said or done thus far?
-I personally don't trust cross analysis of past games since a new game is opportunity for change every single time. Habits are there sure, but nothing can stop a person from changing
-I'm following what you're saying, and I suppose that's about the extent that you can go outside of role claiming day 0.
So if my views were the similar to sig, then where was the suspicion on him, Daisy?sig wrote:I've read the thread and am all caught up which is good news, the bad news is I have no mafia reads. Golden, SD, Jack, and Glorf are looking good, I didn't get much from DDL and Snow dog and Zebra arguing. I've also read the thread again and see like nothing. Like plenty happened, just nothing stuck out.
However, I'm also leaning to DDL since the main thing I disliked is a policy lynch I despise these and it seems like it is a more mafiaish thing to do, but I'm still unsure, I feel like that's an easy vote for people who aren''t caught up and mafia.
---------------------------------------
here's where stuff gets rolling im assuming. I thought you more of a no-poster lyncher guy scotty. tsk tsk. I mean, i generally play safe, although i dont know what being NOT-safe is. If you mean pitch in my 2 cents on a post i dont deem worthy of discussion and generate a line to which i will divide players to either side to be town or naw, then i mean i guess i was playing safe.Scotty wrote:Cool. Not much to catch up on. I see MM and LC want to join me in voting low posters.
How about sprityo? I've played with him before and my initial impression of him this game is...safe. Not really getting into anything thick.
and please tell me the tone since i'm not following. I'm also still about as salty as those pretzels.Scotty wrote:I voted sprityo. Gotta go but his tone so far is calllllling to me like that bag of mustard and onion pretzels in the pantryyyyy
----------------------------------------------
I mean, INH had the exact same response. I stick by my guns by saying nothing discussed/argued about a joke post, aside from what we talked about earlier Quin, is of any use, it just detracts attention from people later in game. also:Quin wrote:That's not a vote I'd oppose. I don't feel fantastic about how he managed to read through everything that had happened and come to the conclusion that none of the content he read through is valuable.Scotty wrote:I voted sprityo. Gotta go but his tone so far is calllllling to me like that bag of mustard and onion pretzels in the pantryyyyyEpignosis wrote:I don't care what you can personally use.sprityo wrote:Well that was a wonderful catch-up read.
What I take away from it:
Nothing I personally can use at any point once the game starts.
But I was ever so "glad" to see zebra making text walls for me to read
But uh yeah, aside from that, there's enough opinions in the pot about joke posts in a pregame setting to flavor my stew very nicely. It smells like flesh beef for all you cannibals players interested
You read it. What are your opinions on what you read?sprityo wrote:Currently: nadaoh yea, this too-insertnamehere wrote:I concur with spirityo's findings.sprityo wrote:Currently: nada
So by no suspicions "right now" you mean, out of the whole game, youLong Con wrote:Lemme go look at sprityo...
Mmm. not a lot there, even within the few posts he has. Ok, sorry sprityo, but it's follow this, or kinda randomly go elsewhere. I'm going to just vote sprityo, and basically cross my fingers. I really have no suspicions right now.at that moment you voted? hm.Quin wrote:managed to read through everything that had happened and come to the conclusion that none of the content [you] read through is valuable.
--------------------------------------
i suppose.Sorsha wrote:Would voting spirityo be a policy lynch since it's because he's usually a low poster?
Scotty wrote:Is he?Sorsha wrote:Would voting spirityo be a policy lynch since it's because he's usually a low poster?
I'm not exclusively voting for him for being a low poster. I just literally can't remember a thing he has said, because he hasn't really said anything in the 14 posts he has.
insertnamehere wrote:voting Spirityo, because ties are fun.
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Soirityo
Scotty wrote:Oh.
Oh no
Long Con wrote:Hope we got a scummy scum in sprityo!
Linki: Oh. RIP Sprit, sorry.
Looks up Hal again: fuck fuck fuck fuck