I am good at reading: Dom, LC, Nut, Speed
Good job on LC, who I should have voted for. New rainbow coming up.
StrexCorp (3)
Politicians (3)
The Man in the Tan Jacket
Long Con -

Long Con
I could vote for LC. I've only got an hour left and then I'm not going to be around consistently for end day.
Reading over an ISO of LC, IMO, points to potential alignment with Dom. That one reason I am a little more okay with voting those two than my other scumreads.
First, LC because I was reading about him most recently. I don't see how anyone can think him as bad quite yet. His posts have been either half-hearted and sober or nonsense and drunken.
Currently outside of the conversation, all i see is having to choose dom or golden. Rico is being, whatever, hex claiming. Perhaps if he provided an understandable reason to vote INH i would accept. and speedchuck voting LC is a gut thing.
Alright i think i see what youre getting at, Golden, and i can see why speedchuck would agree with you on voting LC, even though you already voted dom for, pressure was it? or it was just a gut read that you are okay with but still think LC is a better lynch?
Having watched LC as mafia from Phenon, i can apply what golden said about: "But LCs tunnels are usually well reasoned - even if the theories are out there, they fit with a thoughtful analysis of the facts. This is completely lacking here... " and can agree with it.
I want to give dom a chance to restart during the night phase, so im inclined to Vote LC
StrexCorp (3)
Politicians (3)
The Man in the Tan Jacket
Arrrgh, just got caught up. Seems like the majority of this thread is a pissing match between Golden and Dom, with genuine frustration on both sides. My gut sees it as civ on civ, and I don't have the time or the sobriety to dig deeper than that now.
The most interesting actual case has been Epi's on TSP. Odd vote timing, unexplained vote placement, backpedaling and willingness to throw votes around without true commitment today. Suggesting a Marcus-unveiling strategy that no one would seriously consider. I don't like it. Will likely throw my vote there, especially given Jack's lack of activity today.
I don't get the feels for INH. Other than the weak Made vote, which can be attributed to Day 1 uncertainty, he seems rather innocuous. That last post was reasonable and a (rare) relevant reference to the meta.
I'm going to go ahead and vote TonyStarkPrime. I like Epi's early case and want to see how he responds to the pressure.
I am also not enthusiastic about speedchuck's vote for Long Con, followed up by someone he apparently suspects. I am hoping to hear more from speedchuck before I vote.
I need to reread LC and Dom and see what I'm thinking there.
LC, on the other hand, I can definitely see as bad. I can get behind an LC vote.
For the moment, I'm holding off on my vote. If I'm in a position to be able to save someone who isn't bad, I'll vote in a direction to save them (assuming it isn't a matter of 2 people I think aren't bad). All things being equal, I'd like to vote for LC.
Vote: Long Con
Ack. I hate tie breaking.
StrexCorp (3)
Politicians (3)
The Man in the Tan Jacket
I have a town read on INH. People who refuse to answer questions are usually town.
OrangeYellow: Golden, INH, JOH, LongCon
LC just feels off to me. I can't point to anything, and his interactions look fine on paper.
Okay. I'm feeling a little better about Golden and
willing to believe that Golden and Dom could maybe both be town. I keep getting paranoid about Speed and LC (sorry JOH), both of whom have good interactions but intuitively I don't feel good about. I feel worse about LC and his interactions are worse, but Speed being on it and Golden endorsing it makes me want to vote for one of my other scum reads instead. So for Epi (and others) to maybe think I'm Marcus a little less: today's I will vote for DF, LC, or maybe INH, barring someone says something really stupid.
Sorry, walking on a beach with iffy internet.
InsertNameHere
Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden Golden
Eloquently details why LC is bad.
Ignores my requests for why I am bad for over two days.
Continually floats me as a vote contender.
Wonders why Dom is suspicious of him.
Nice recipe.
(It's because that's bullshit. He knows I can get votes to die today and LC can't. LC is tomorrow's target)
I am okay with an INH lynch.
I have my issues with LC's behavior, yes.
I think Epi might be on to something with Tony's vote, especially given that the vote yesterday was pretty spread out and Marcus could have been narrowed down to only a handful of players had he voted one of the top candidates.
Tony (because Marcus)
Lorab (I don't necessarily think she's bad, but none of her posts have made me feel more civ about her)
LC, on the other hand, definitely looks sketchy now that I did a quick ISO.
The whole thing feels like LC is bending over backwards to continue justifying his Golden suspicion. With that in mind, and given that I don't see the case on INH (and I'm even more convinced that Dom is civ after the recent kerfuffle), I will go ahead and
vote LC
