indiglo wrote:
SVS, there is NO connection between me, Timmer, Bullz or CBK. That was a good thought - going back and looking at MP's posts, and I hadn't thought of it yet. It was like "oh duh, of course I should have been looking there." You can be paranoid, but again, it doesn't make you right. If this tunnel vision continues you are going to get yourself (and possibly the thread) way off course. You are barking up the wrong tree here. I didn't vote to "save" Timmer, and that just doesn't strike me as logical. After I voted SVS he wasn't "saved", he still had more votes than SVS.
I know I already kinda responded to this, but it has been eating at me a bit.
Since when is one suspicion for one day "tunnel vision"? That would make ALL suspicions "tunnel vision". First "No U", now "tunnelvision"; will you accuse me of switcheroo next? Do you think Borok & his consistent votes for Dom are gonna derail the thread? Did I miss where you accused him of Tunnelvision?
When CBK, you & Bullz all voted within about an hour of each other, there were still 8 people to go, I believe. Bullz tied it, but you voted right before him, 5 minutes before him, if I recall. And Timmer tried to vote for me, he would have lynched me. I don't think everyone who voted for me (or intended to vote for me) is bad, I do think Bullz is most likely, though, and you as well. Possibly CBK.
Do you have an opinion on CBK & Bullz?
Although I am fairly sure I have seen Bullz around here today, he has not posted, and I promised I would not vote for him if he is not here, and I won't. You had posted earlier that how someone reacted to suspicion is a big part of your opinion of them. I agree 100%. I would feel better voting for you than CBK, and likely will. I think you made a weak vote for a weak reason, and coming when it did, I think you are Timmers teammate. Your implication that this opinion is just tactics (with cute names) as usual on my part does not make me feel better about you, tbh.