Here's the problem, Elaine. I have told you that my "real good" comment reflected an increased level of trust for Leo -- it had nothing to do with whether he was right about what he said (which therefore must mean that it had nothing to do with you). You don't suspect him either, so on that front it sounds to me like we agree that he seemed sincere in his argument regardless of whether it was correct.Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:24 pmNo, Jerry, I suspect you for it. I think your uncle is senile and in need of better eyebrows. You didn't question his presentation of the facts. You accepted what he said as factual even though you could have changed things. There was no certain victim. It was still up in the air! My vote wasn't a throwaway. You took what he said for granted like Newman believing the mailmen would save us from the police.
Yet here you are accusing me for reading something the same way you're reading it. That's nonsense. You're bad.