Persephone wrote:Ceres wrote:I looked into the Fortuna case and she has 8 posts and missed Night 1 and Day 2 votes. On Day 1 she voted for Atlas because Atlas voted for her - not necessarily a baddie move, but the only situation of its kind so far - please correct me if I am wrong, then jumping on a potential bandwagon against Artemis and lastly not even trying to address the accusations made against her. Apollo might have a point about her being protected.
About low posters - I really don't think they should be ignored.
1. Aphrodite - 3 posts, 1 vote D0 and 1 vote N2 - no lynching votes.
2. Ares - 1 post, 1 vote D0.
3. Electra - 3 posts, 1 vote D0 and 1 vote N1 - no lynching votes.
4. Helios - 3 posts, 1 vote D0 and 1 vote N2 - no lynching votes.
5. Pandora - 3 posts, 1 vote D0 and 1 vote D2 for Prom.
6. Poseidon - 8 posts, 1 vote D0 and 1 vote D1 for Herpes.
and some special* cases of low posters who have been insanified, but have managed to vote on a regular basis.
1. Mars - 5 posts, missed only N1 vote
2. Herc - 7 posts, missed N1 vote
3. Phoenix - 9 posts, missed D2 vote
*Note that I have not included the insanified posts. These are all players that have less than 10 posts.
If you spot any mistake or if I missed someone, let me know.
At the other end of the spectrum, I think Apollo is the most talkative.:P
Thanks mom for doing this I was going to link up Fortuna`s posts but you have put it very well. I agree with your assesments of low posters. I agree just because they are low posters does not make them non contributors.
How do you feel about Apollo - I know we both voted him - are you still feeling the same way?
Eros wrote:Apollo wrote:WHo do you think Pluto should have voted for, Eros? You haven't exactly made a case for any alternatives.
I mentioned
something on Artemis that no one said anything about, but I'm under the impression that no one will vote for a bewitched individual anyway.
Perseophone's going after Fortuna seems awfully
opportunistic and Medusa's
echoingof it is just ironic.
And somehow even though you are not Fortuna this feels like a no u.
How is it opportunistic to try and find baddies?
Why do you think she is civ?
Why just because I find her suspicious am I bad?
If not Fortuna who you so blatantly defend then who should we be discussing? (and you are right so early in a game I will not vote for someone cursed but later yes I would consider it)
You and Mars have put yourselves front and center with your open defense of Fortuna. It is something that needs explanation imo. I mean why isn`t she defending herself?
And I shouldn`t be suspicious lol!
Look at me all you want I am trying to find baddies I am not infallible. I am a God but I still can make mistakes. Right now I don`t feel I have, but you have given me pause.
I also worry when others jump on a case I have made without adding any of their own thoughts. Like Fortuna did with Athena. Thats oppotunistic imo.
Linky Apollo - thats what I have been saying minus the Hinzelman angle.

That's an awfully long post you are expecting me to respond to, but I will do so.
And somehow even though you are not Fortuna this feels like a no u.
If that's how you like it. NO U. There ya go.
How is it opportunistic to try and find baddies?
If Fortuna isn't one, then you aren't "find[ing] baddies."
Why do you think she is civ?
None of posts seem team-oriented to me. Nor votes. Day 1 she voted Atlas with me-
before poor Hermes took on a barrage of votes. Day 2, Fortuna missed the vote. Some are arguing that since there was no kill, that means Fortuna could have lost the power to kill, but that's 1) awfully circumstantial (FIVE people missed the Day 2 vote) and 2) would it make sense for a last man standing person to miss the vote? Considering the serial killer can self-protect instead of kill, these are terrible odds.
Why just because I find her suspicious am I bad?
Because expressing agreement with Athena is a lousy reason to suspect someone. Others have expressed an agreement without adding anything else to a given subject. It's just a poor reason.
[/quote]
If not Fortuna who you so blatantly defend then who should we be discussing? (and you are right so early in a game I will not vote for someone cursed but later yes I would consider it)[/quote]
I have already answered this. Your parenthetical comment indicates that you did indeed read the post where I named you, Medusa, and Artemis.
You and Mars have put yourselves front and center with your open defense of Fortuna. It is something that needs explanation imo. I mean why isn`t she defending herself?
Defend herself against
what exactly? Not defending herself?
And I shouldn`t be suspicious lol!
Why not?
Look at me all you want I am trying to find baddies I am not infallible. I am a God but I still can make mistakes. Right now I don`t feel I have, but you have given me pause.
Okay.
I also worry when others jump on a case I have made without adding any of their own thoughts. Like Fortuna did with Athena. Thats oppotunistic imo.
Fortuna didn't jump on a case. She agreed with an observation. That is all.