Unless we have secret factions then one of them is aligned with the paradox police. No?
Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
Moderator: Community Team
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I am responding to you to let you know that I am going to ignore this question.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I'd assume unaligned means they have no alignment, not they aren't aligned with each other.Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:20 amUnless we have secret factions then one of them is aligned with the paradox police. No?
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
So that would make them independent, but the host post doesn't confirm their existence.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:22 amI'd assume unaligned means they have no alignment, not they aren't aligned with each other.Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:20 amUnless we have secret factions then one of them is aligned with the paradox police. No?
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I think ignoring this is a bad look. It's pretty much the most fundamental question.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
- insertnamehere
- Made Man
- Posts in topic: 35
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
- Location: Twin Peaks, Washington
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Well, didn't you say that you checked his role, and that he was a civilian last night?
So, now Quin gets to pressure me to roleclaim, and threatens me with a lynch if I don't.
What Quin's doing to me now qualifies as "blackmail" waaaaay more than what I did to Scotty.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Why should I care about your role? Scum gets fakeclaims.insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:33 amWell, didn't you say that you checked his role, and that he was a civilian last night?
So, now Quin gets to pressure me to roleclaim, and threatens me with a lynch if I don't.
What Quin's doing to me now qualifies as "blackmail" waaaaay more than what I did to Scotty.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I'm currently thinking about a sig/Golden team.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
[mention]Kylemii[/mention] stop playing rimworld and come talk to me
- insertnamehere
- Made Man
- Posts in topic: 35
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
- Location: Twin Peaks, Washington
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I thought Scotty's D1 voting pattern was weird and suspicious enough for me to vote for him, however, if he later went against what made me suspicious, I was open to changing it to someone else.
Quin is trying to put me in a situation where I either post the details of my role, proving that I'm not a threat to the civilians, or he's gonna make me look like a confirmed baddie, and serve my head on a platter.
But apparently the first is malevolent blackmail, and the second is okay, kosher civ behavior.
Linki:
Well, what the fuck do you want from me, Quin? If literally nothing I can say about myself or my role could change anything, fuck it.
Might as well ignore you then.
Quin is trying to put me in a situation where I either post the details of my role, proving that I'm not a threat to the civilians, or he's gonna make me look like a confirmed baddie, and serve my head on a platter.
But apparently the first is malevolent blackmail, and the second is okay, kosher civ behavior.
Linki:
What? I thought fake-claims were more character based. Like, if everyone said the name of their role, and three of the names were obvious bad guys in time-travel related tales, then fakeclaims would allow them to at least appear as simpatico, non-enemy sounding roles. That's how I used them in the games I've hosted. I'm not familiar with fake-claims including fake abilities.
Well, what the fuck do you want from me, Quin? If literally nothing I can say about myself or my role could change anything, fuck it.
Might as well ignore you then.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
What do you mean I 'lynch quin instead'.
You could be a baddie making shit up for all I know. You could be a cop.
I'm asking you if your sources are good and you won't even answer so far as to say 'yes, I can't see how my sources could go wrong'.
To me, that's disturbing. If I got the PM you claim you got, the first question I'd be asking is 'is this reliable information'. Have you asked that question?
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
SCOTTY is town.insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:33 amWell, didn't you say that you checked his role, and that he was a civilian last night?
So, now Quin gets to pressure me to roleclaim, and threatens me with a lynch if I don't.
What Quin's doing to me now qualifies as "blackmail" waaaaay more than what I did to Scotty.
I dunno what sig is. But I came into today with a townish read on both you and sig. GTH though, I'd say you were bad before sig.
I did beseech people to give the quill to scotty instead of sig though. Because I know scotty is good.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
What specifically did he do to pressure you to roleclaim? I missed this.insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:33 amWell, didn't you say that you checked his role, and that he was a civilian last night?
So, now Quin gets to pressure me to roleclaim, and threatens me with a lynch if I don't.
What Quin's doing to me now qualifies as "blackmail" waaaaay more than what I did to Scotty.
- Kylemii
- Bodice of Reason
- Posts in topic: 353
- Posts: 11433
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:50 pm
- Gender: male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/him
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
ok so what are the proposed facts involved here?
quin says mechanically that sig and inh are not teammates
golden says mechanically or (spiritually?) that sig is not mafia
also inh is claiming that quin is pressuring him into roleclaiming, for some reason?
is this much correct?
quin says mechanically that sig and inh are not teammates
golden says mechanically or (spiritually?) that sig is not mafia
also inh is claiming that quin is pressuring him into roleclaiming, for some reason?
is this much correct?
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
How do you suppose I qualify it?Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:43 amWhat do you mean I 'lynch quin instead'.
You could be a baddie making shit up for all I know. You could be a cop.
I'm asking you if your sources are good and you won't even answer so far as to say 'yes, I can't see how my sources could go wrong'.
To me, that's disturbing. If I got the PM you claim you got, the first question I'd be asking is 'is this reliable information'. Have you asked that question?
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I HAVE NEVER SAID MECHANICALLY THAT SIG IS NOT MAFIA
SCOTTY
SCOTTY
SCOTTY
SCOTTY
SCOTTY
SCOTTY
SCOTTY
SCOTTY
SCOTTY
SCOTTY
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I'm only talking about the "blackmail" bit. I don't want a role claim, and I'm not sold on lynching you.insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:42 am I thought Scotty's D1 voting pattern was weird and suspicious enough for me to vote for him, however, if he later went against what made me suspicious, I was open to changing it to someone else.
Quin is trying to put me in a situation where I either post the details of my role, proving that I'm not a threat to the civilians, or he's gonna make me look like a confirmed baddie, and serve my head on a platter.
But apparently the first is malevolent blackmail, and the second is okay, kosher civ behavior.
Linki:What? I thought fake-claims were more character based. Like, if everyone said the name of their role, and three of the names were obvious bad guys in time-travel related tales, then fakeclaims would allow them to at least appear as simpatico, non-enemy sounding roles. That's how I used them in the games I've hosted. I'm not familiar with fake-claims including fake abilities.
Well, what the fuck do you want from me, Quin? If literally nothing I can say about myself or my role could change anything, fuck it.
Might as well ignore you then.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I mean, it seems to me at this point that essentially what you're saying is 'I got this through exercise of my role power so it's reliable, but I don't want to say that'.Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:51 amHow do you suppose I qualify it?Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:43 amWhat do you mean I 'lynch quin instead'.
You could be a baddie making shit up for all I know. You could be a cop.
I'm asking you if your sources are good and you won't even answer so far as to say 'yes, I can't see how my sources could go wrong'.
To me, that's disturbing. If I got the PM you claim you got, the first question I'd be asking is 'is this reliable information'. Have you asked that question?
But if you got it as the result of someone elses night power or you don't know why you got it, you should be honest about it's fallibility. If it's infallible, then say so. I got something that I don't know why I got it, although it's far more useless.
Put some kind of measure of your own certainty around this.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
tbh i thought you were talking about sig too but i don't know who you voted last night

- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I voted myself in the end

- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Okay. It's a Quin 100%.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:53 amI mean, it seems to me at this point that essentially what you're saying is 'I got this through exercise of my role power so it's reliable, but I don't want to say that'.Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:51 amHow do you suppose I qualify it?Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:43 amWhat do you mean I 'lynch quin instead'.
You could be a baddie making shit up for all I know. You could be a cop.
I'm asking you if your sources are good and you won't even answer so far as to say 'yes, I can't see how my sources could go wrong'.
To me, that's disturbing. If I got the PM you claim you got, the first question I'd be asking is 'is this reliable information'. Have you asked that question?
But if you got it as the result of someone elses night power or you don't know why you got it, you should be honest about it's fallibility. If it's infallible, then say so. I got something that I don't know why I got it, although it's far more useless.
Put some kind of measure of your own certainty around this.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
this is why i asked you about your read on sig as well actually lmao
- insertnamehere
- Made Man
- Posts in topic: 35
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
- Location: Twin Peaks, Washington
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I made the same mistake as Kyle and Quin, and thought you were talking about Sig instead of Scotty.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:45 amWhat specifically did he do to pressure you to roleclaim? I missed this.insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:33 amWell, didn't you say that you checked his role, and that he was a civilian last night?
So, now Quin gets to pressure me to roleclaim, and threatens me with a lynch if I don't.
What Quin's doing to me now qualifies as "blackmail" waaaaay more than what I did to Scotty.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
OK. And you are certain that is does not mean 'they have no alignment'?
In that case, there are a couple of practical problems here.
1) Because we don't get flips, we won't know if we are right the first time. The end result if we follow this to your logical conclusion is that we would be forced to lynch both of them, even if we get the baddie first. I don't love this, because it gives whichever would be good no path out, and that's just kind of sucky. Thoughts?
2) I'm not convinced that we know that this game has no independents.
In that case, there are a couple of practical problems here.
1) Because we don't get flips, we won't know if we are right the first time. The end result if we follow this to your logical conclusion is that we would be forced to lynch both of them, even if we get the baddie first. I don't love this, because it gives whichever would be good no path out, and that's just kind of sucky. Thoughts?
2) I'm not convinced that we know that this game has no independents.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
It's not that hard to tell them apart
Scotty is the one with all the autocorrect fails
Dog is the one who always gets lynched
Scotty is the one with all the autocorrect fails
Dog is the one who always gets lynched
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I believe that we have no independents right now. Fair point on the course of action. Maybe we have a mortician-type role or something that could help with that.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:00 am OK. And you are certain that is does not mean 'they have no alignment'?
In that case, there are a couple of practical problems here.
1) Because we don't get flips, we won't know if we are right the first time. The end result if we follow this to your logical conclusion is that we would be forced to lynch both of them, even if we get the baddie first. I don't love this, because it gives whichever would be good no path out, and that's just kind of sucky. Thoughts?
2) I'm not convinced that we know that this game has no independents.
- Kylemii
- Bodice of Reason
- Posts in topic: 353
- Posts: 11433
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:50 pm
- Gender: male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/him
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
i think we might have indies in the mix but im curious about ur thoughts on the matter
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
What in the rules suggests there isn't?
Independent isn't exactly a 'faction' and there's no reason to presume they'd be called out expressly. The role guarantees specifically exclude 'cults', a specific form of independent role, but not independents generally.
I don't know there is, either, but I just have no good reason to rule it out.
- Kylemii
- Bodice of Reason
- Posts in topic: 353
- Posts: 11433
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:50 pm
- Gender: male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/him
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
yeah I'm thinking there's probably some rogues.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:20 amWhat in the rules suggests there isn't?
Independent isn't exactly a 'faction' and there's no reason to presume they'd be called out expressly. The role guarantees specifically exclude 'cults', a specific form of independent role, but not independents generally.
I don't know there is, either, but I just have no good reason to rule it out.
a wildboy like speeedchuck isn't gonna make a big convoluted game about time travel and think to himself "yes this is good, let's keep all of the alignments nice and traditional"
- Scotty
- Jeff Probst
- Posts in topic: 267
- Posts: 17925
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:29 pm
- Location: New York City
- Gender: Male
- Preferred Pronouns: He/him
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Too tired to do stuff. Sorry I never voted, I caught up but an going to bed cuz I’m a tired bear
Gonna drop a [VOTE: Colin] aubergine before I do, will have more input tkmorrow
Gonna drop a [VOTE: Colin] aubergine before I do, will have more input tkmorrow
When I die, I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather;
not screaming like the people in his car
not screaming like the people in his car
Spoiler: show
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
chucky lists the factions on the OP. It's possible that there's a secret faction of some sort in the game but I have no reason to believe in it.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Why is independent a "faction"? Why do you think those faction names are listed when we already know there is town and mafia?
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Independents are always a faction. An "independent" faction. I've always seen them that way, personally.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:36 amWhy is independent a "faction"? Why do you think those faction names are listed when we already know there is town and mafia?
I think we just have incompatible opinions on the matter.
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Still betting on being right about sig. You will find INH ajd sig were on opposite ends of my last read list. It would be strange for me to be double incorrect in 180 degrees.
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
wow mac i always knew you were good at mafia but i never knew you were this goodMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:37 amStill betting on being right about sig. You will find INH ajd sig were on opposite ends of my last read list. It would be strange for me to be double incorrect in 180 degrees.
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
You and I should form the Alliance of the Uninformed with Spacedaisy. What say you?Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:50 am ok so what are the proposed facts involved here?
quin says mechanically that sig and inh are not teammates
golden says mechanically or (spiritually?) that sig is not mafia
also inh is claiming that quin is pressuring him into roleclaiming, for some reason?
is this much correct?
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Lol ouchQuin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:39 amwow mac i always knew you were good at mafia but i never knew you were this goodMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:37 amStill betting on being right about sig. You will find INH ajd sig were on opposite ends of my last read list. It would be strange for me to be double incorrect in 180 degrees.
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Golden is lawyering hard on page 20 y'all. All about that interpretation and clause, no room for creativity, what do the words say.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I think you'll find Quin is lawyering a clear answer and I'm the one leaving open the possibility that the words don't tell us everything.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:42 am Golden is lawyering hard on page 20 y'all. All about that interpretation and clause, no room for creativity, what do the words say.
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I think given Quin has apparently got some role that allows him to check if two players are aligned, and he saw fit to infodump it on day 2, that he is pretty confident it won't result in his demise which as per my reaction what Golden did confuses me greatly and makes me feel even more uninformed, but given one is the person day one me was most confident was bad and the other is the person day one me was most confident was town I'm going to be leaving my vote on sig all damn day and nobody is going to tell me otherwise.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I think you want me to be wrong.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:44 amI think you'll find Quin is lawyering a clear answer and I'm the one leaving open the possibility that the words don't tell us everything.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:42 am Golden is lawyering hard on page 20 y'all. All about that interpretation and clause, no room for creativity, what do the words say.
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I am referring to the fact that he said he received a PM and you are presuming that means he received a random PM and he wasn't just describing the act of receiving a PM from the mod as a result of his night action request.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:44 amI think you'll find Quin is lawyering a clear answer and I'm the one leaving open the possibility that the words don't tell us everything.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:42 am Golden is lawyering hard on page 20 y'all. All about that interpretation and clause, no room for creativity, what do the words say.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Losing is worse than having a demise.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:44 am I think given Quin has apparently got some role that allows him to check if two players are aligned, and he saw fit to infodump it on day 2, that he is pretty confident it won't result in his demise which as per my reaction what Golden did confuses me greatly and makes me feel even more uninformed, but given one is the person day one me was most confident was bad and the other is the person day one me was most confident was town I'm going to be leaving my vote on sig all damn day and nobody is going to tell me otherwise.
There's nothing about what I did that you are uninformed about. You have all the same information as me, I think I even told you exactly what my role was called (that was 'searcher' if I didn't).
I don't understand your aversion to being open about information that can help the town win.