Matahari wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:03 am
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 1:56 am
And I guess you did clear it up in the previous post in response to Jay, but the original post just sounded so enthusiastic about it. Idk it was weird.
That’s okay, I don’t mind getting voted. It’s been a long time since I played, but you might remember me as someone who never explains things well, that hasn’t changed lol.
I remember you as someone who was always on the offense early in games, and it was never indicative of being town or mafia.
Can you tell me what you think about JJJ? His making snap decisions, and naming off a variety of players, is that a diversionary tactic that mafia would use? Or is it him just being silly?
I can talk to this if you don't mind. I think Jay likes to stir the pot and see what kind of responses he gets. It helps him come to conclusions on his thoughts of people.
juliets wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 9:15 am
Good morning @Elohcin , I checked the votes and was surprised to see you voted for Mac. I also checked your ISO but didn't see a reason. Can you explain your thoughts there?
And good morning @Owner of a Lonely Heart I also don't mind your small posts. It's easier for me to digest someone's thoughts when they are given a bit at a time.
I feel like he is hiding behind his words and I like the way mongoose called him out about perhaps something he didn't say in the thread but in btsc.
indiglo wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 1:31 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 1:00 pm
I suspect indiglo but I don't wanna lynch her in her first game back in a long time.
What is your exact reason for suspecting me? Because I make jokes?
He is just poking you to see what kind of reaction he can get out of you. This reaction doesn't make me think good of you.
However, your next post eases my mind a bit.
Mongoose wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:03 pm
For the good of the group: don’t you think such unbridled frustration tends to read/skew more civ? When someone believes something about you that is so patently untrue, the frustration becomes palpable.
Apologies for the leading question, but I really want to know the veracity of my (foregone?) conclusion.
A warning. The syndicate and how people play has changed immensely since you last played. It's a whole new vibe that will take some getting used to, I'm sure.
Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 3:46 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 3:34 pm
Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 3:32 pmAnd yes, I do suspect you Jay.
k, y
I don't like your empty day 0 reads. They seem baseless, and just throw suspicion on random people. Why?
I've come to accept that nutella is a a hound at sniffing out scum. Also, her back-and-forth with you leaves her looking a bit better than you in my opinion.
I might understand throwing out reads like you did on day 0 to get people talking. But you actually stuck with them into day 1. You say you suspect Indiglo and myself, then later on day 1, you still suspect us but "feel bad" lynching either of us. Day 1 is a time to build a case on those suspects if you were serious about them, or drop them if you weren't. Instead you're trying to look like you're staying "consistent," but you still just have no real reason for the suspicions.
I respect Jay and his playstyle. I think it gets people talking and I understand his point of view. But Luna, here, hits the nail on the head. If Jay still suspects indiglo and Luna, he should not "feel bad" lynching them whatsoever. And then, I see he actually did vote indiglo and then Luna. I am not used to this wishy washy Jay. But I have a hard time saying I think he is bad still b/c I respect his process. And I feel like I am seeing Jay's civ process here. @Jay - explain your wishywashyness
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 6:00 pm
Masculine maleness flows through my male body and into my male genitals.
I just want to say that I think you are funny even if no one else does. I feel like you may be intimidated by all these women playing. It's okay to actually PLAY the game.
okay, I may not catch up before the end of the day. So, I think I am going to change my vote to Luna. I will continue to read, however in case I can change my mind beofre the end. Luna has made some posts I agree with, but mafia is not that black and white. Of course, we are either civ or bad, but that doesn't mean even a baddie can't help catch another baddie (for example when there are two baddie teams) and it doesn't mean that a civ can't ever agree with something a baddie says. So...even though Luna says some things that I want to say, "you go girl!" to, I still see her as a bit off and probably bad, especially in her conversations with Jay.
And....I am calling it now, Mata sounds town. I don't usually feel strong enough about a player so early in the game.
Also, I am going to go out on a limb and say Juliets is good. I can never read her, but I am seeing civ here.
oh my goodness the link. and for the record, I still suspect Mac. But my vote there will do nothing so I feel weird keeping it there.