Yeah, this game state absolutely sucks for me. I don't operate on guts anymore and I put a lot of thought into my reads and won't sort anybody gun to head.
My vote probably stays locked on chardonnay and think you're all wrong.
His scum read of me is dependent on another person flipping town as well as an oog assumption that is easily refuted by my reactions in thread. He does not believe in me flipping scum based off that, so the pursuit of it is not genuine and serves as showing consistency in his reads.
[mention]cassowary[/mention] what do you make of his accusation? Iirc you know each other, he has no opinion on your read of him. Why do you think he did not construe it as you being opportunistic?
Further evidence that I think can show light upon some stuff, although it can be unfortunately construed as confbias, is this read and vote :
chardonnay wrote: ↑Fri Sep 25, 2020 7:26 pm
LC's opener was among the least town looking. So I voted to see how he/others would react since I didn't really have any SRs in the players posting in that moment in time.
Which could be him pushing either a wolf partner or a town that was fairly consensus PoE at that point and he deflected from it by using the same reasoning to accuse me. That accusation doesn't come from town and OOG reasoning that's not backed up by evidence is >rand W. People have a hard time discerning between "wolves couldn't possibly have this thought process, so town" and "actually just a wolf".
He's repping a scum read on me and is acting fairly confident about it when, at the bottom of it, there's literally nothing to the push, just TMI. It's most likely a wolf repping an omgus on what appeared to be the latest and weakest voter although his theory does not match the evidence in thread. Why did he not have anything to say about the reasoning of my post and why did he go to OOG lengths?
Did he not think my reasoning was genuine? Like, why was I sheeping Alison and Mac? My reasoning was unique and nobody said why they voted Chardonnay.
He just skipped my post and did not engage with it and he made a leap of faith to "he must've sheeped them"
A : Ted voted Chardonnay
B: Is he a wolf doing it or town doing it? Why did he vote me?
C: He's a wolf
He basically leaps from A to C even though the B is not present at all. He did not analyse my posts and my vote on him. He went from the premise I'm a wolf and looked for evidence to match the conclusion. That's not how town thinks. Town doesn't skip from A to C, town's B is why they get town read 9/10 times.
But ted, what if Chardonnay is a wrong town? If a town is wrong, they consider B and then hop to C, but in this case, B is non-existent, because he didn't attempt to sort me at all or saying why my vote was bad. (like, actual analysis of why the reasoning for my read on him was opportunistic)
I don't know how I can make this more apparent to you, chardonnay is not town and the reason he's being town read is because we have 4 slots that are basically indiscernible between open wolves and town and I wouldn't be surprised if this was a re-run of Amdibals. Because of that, every read and push from someone you rule out as automatically town.