Creature wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 12:22 pm
Wisdom wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 11:51 am
Creature wrote: ↑Thu Jun 03, 2021 11:48 am
Town only has to lose selfvoting themselves into exile to get lynched the next phase and get closer to traitor parity. Traitors, on the other hand, benefit from getting exiled even if it means their death afterwards as they only need a couple more traitor exiles.
I mean yes, sure, but town should still self vote if they can use it to get exile.
Thus should no one ever be yeeted on the sole premise that "they selfvoted to get exile"
No, town should discuss a consensus exile and follow with that consensus. Anyone doing otherwise is being massively antitown and probably needs to be policy lynched otherwise traitors can get away doing this shit.
I vastly disagree but I see where you're coming from. But had 112 self voted to secure the exile, would you have doubted him? In that case, why? It doesn't make him more or less town compared to if he didn't do it, his alignment wouldn't change and the way you read him shouldn't either.
Of course, if I wasn't relevant in the getting exile talk, I wouldn't have self voted. And I think 112 is likely town so I wouldn't have minded voting him. But since the only one I know is town, is myself, it is pro town to do everything that I can to get exiled. Including self voting. Don't you get it? ---Both alignments has to do what they can to get exiled---
Also how can you use "X is anti town" and "X needs to be policy yeeted" in the same sentence xD If it's something that's anti town, it's policy yeeting, lol.