Which poll? The lynch poll? The result was Bea = baddie.Boogs wrote:Didn't expect that to happen to Bea wow. And I missed the result of the poll and see it wasn't posted yet.
I chose Kraft Dinner because that's what I say when I speak of it.
Moderator: Community Team
Which poll? The lynch poll? The result was Bea = baddie.Boogs wrote:Didn't expect that to happen to Bea wow. And I missed the result of the poll and see it wasn't posted yet.
Great job Dana, I did not have much suspicion of Bea. She was just a better choice than Boogs or myself, so I went for it.Dana wrote:I knew you were too trustworthy, Bea! Maybe I'll stick with this strategy for the rest of the game.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
bea wrote:I keep thinking "this time for sure LC is civ!" and I keep being wrong. Is this the time I'm right? I'm unsure of lorab so IDK what to make of her vouch for him, but I've had good feels about [canuck] and bullz.
But she also doesn't want to lynch LoRab:bea wrote: I've had pretty good feels about cancuk, but lorab has been a ? for me for a long time.
bea wrote:I can look at a case against lorab or canuck or anyone else, but I need a case you know? not just "they kissed up to me."
bea wrote:I can see a hedge vote more than a lorab vote. so that's where I'm going to vote as theres like 4 minutes left.
Also Canuck's been showing up around in these posts a lot, but I kind of distrusted Canuck so I think she actually might be good.bea wrote:I'm voting for hedge. The case on lorab is just too weak for me at this point.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Well, she can't post on topic if she's dead (a big mafia no-no) so that makes me a little leery of her post meaning anything suspicious. I believe bea was the one who did that once (posted on topic when she was dead) and there was a big hullabaloo, I'm just finding it hard to believe she would do it again. Stranger things have happened though and you could be right.Dana wrote:Hmm, thanks Juliets. It makes me feel a bit better to know that's something she usually says/does. Bea's most recent post is really making me rethink Boogs, though. She has no reason to lie if she's dead, right? I trust Boogs the most right now because I know he started the game out good, but that doesn't mean that he still is.
She did vote for Boogs but she didn't really try to convince others to vote for him. Maybe it was a distancing thing? Because I'm pretty sure it was the lynch where Boogs was supposed to die but didn't, so if he did die and turned out bad, she'd look good for voting for him? Though if he were on her team, then she'd have known that the lynch wouldn't have worked because Boogs did say he knew how he survived, right? I feel like this could point towards him being good.juliets wrote:I would feel better if the hosts told us it was just jibber jabber so until then I don't totally want to forget it. Did she argue for people to vote boogs? I'll have to take another look at her posts and see. I feel like I've forgotten the whole game.
I am not sure on boogs. He correctly identified me as civ so he's got that going for him but we don't know about the bullz situation. And he was definitely wrong about bea, though a lot of us were. I will say his posts are a little on the crazy edge but I see more of that from him when he is civ.
How many times do I have to prove Boogs is a liar? I'm tired of doing it tbh so if you seriously want to trust the guy who hasn't spoken a true word all game and is proven to have lied and tried to misdirect the thread time and again then go for it.Dana wrote:Aaaaaah I'm so confused. Statistically, one of you are (is?) probably bad but I have no idea which. Thank you for your response LoRab, and you don't have to change your playong style if it's something you do every game. I'm pretty sure I've never played with you before so it just seemed odd to me. Also your smiley is one of the best on this site! I guess now that I think about it, you wouldn't really want to vote with your teammate every time, would you? That would make things too easy for us. I would consider looking at Bullz if only because of the Boogs information. Did we ever come to a conclusion if that was real or not? Why is this game so hard?!
It was indeed jibber-jabberjuliets wrote:I would feel better if the hosts told us it was just jibber jabber so until then I don't totally want to forget it. Did she argue for people to vote boogs? I'll have to take another look at her posts and see. I feel like I've forgotten the whole game.
I am not sure on boogs. He correctly identified me as civ so he's got that going for him but we don't know about the bullz situation. And he was definitely wrong about bea, though a lot of us were. I will say his posts are a little on the crazy edge but I see more of that from him when he is civ.
Thanks Roxy for clearing that up!Roxy wrote:It was indeed jibber-jabberjuliets wrote:I would feel better if the hosts told us it was just jibber jabber so until then I don't totally want to forget it. Did she argue for people to vote boogs? I'll have to take another look at her posts and see. I feel like I've forgotten the whole game.
I am not sure on boogs. He correctly identified me as civ so he's got that going for him but we don't know about the bullz situation. And he was definitely wrong about bea, though a lot of us were. I will say his posts are a little on the crazy edge but I see more of that from him when he is civ.
So Boogs said that he trusted Bea, and you voted her to prove that Boogs was wrong. How did you know she wasn't going to be good? You could say you were suspicious of her, but then you say after the lynch that you weren't.Long Con wrote:Voted Bea, if only to prove to Boogs that he is wrong.
Long Con wrote: Great job Dana, I did not have much suspicion of Bea. She was just a better choice than Boogs or myself, so I went for it.
Also this seemed very odd to me. Boogs had just said he was suspicious of you, but then after Bea was lynched, you said this to him. I'm very undecided on whether this was sincere or not.Long Con wrote:Boogs, let's take the rest of them down.
It was sincere. I assumed that when Boogs saw that his assumptions about the game were wrong, and that I'm one of the only players that has killed a baddie with his bare vote, he might be willing to listen to me. The fact that he just continued coming after me like none of that had happened is what's making me say "Okay, that's enough, something is seriously fishy here."Dana wrote:Also this seemed very odd to me. Boogs had just said he was suspicious of you, but then after Bea was lynched, you said this to him. I'm very undecided on whether this was sincere or not.Long Con wrote:Boogs, let's take the rest of them down.
Seriously stop acting like you have info. If you did have it, you'd be an epic cheater who shouldn't be allowed to play again from the amount you've infodumped. Not only is it outright cheating but it shows a total lack of respect for every other player as well as the hosts. Since you don't, you're just adding to your laundry list of lies and proving we shouldn't listen to you because you're blatantly not civ.Boogs wrote:Dana i do think it needs to be LC today. He's def not Civ but he is either Indy or Baddie. Again i feel he and Bullz are bad and/or teammates. My feelings on Bea were wrong, but i know JC is Civ so we do not want her to be lynched.
Again, Boogs has lied about everything this game. He's faked info and faked curses and been generally misleading and untrustworthy. Even if you 'know' he's civ, why the hell do you want to follow him so badly? If he actually is a civ, he's terrible at being one and should be ignored completely.Dana wrote:Awesome. I'll definitely look into LC and Bullz today, then.