Re: Severance [Evening One]
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:40 pm
now i'm pocketedDyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 4:46 pm I should probably objectively be near lock town. Very few people will make this read, while many can.
now i'm pocketedDyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 4:46 pm I should probably objectively be near lock town. Very few people will make this read, while many can.
I could definitely have used a massage on the weekend but I'm fine for now lolrobyn wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:39 pmno but it’ll make your back and shoulders better, maybe lower back tooWindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:38 pmOnly if it's magically gonna help me read Bereftrobyn wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:37 pmshould i give you a massage?WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:36 pmNo, but I think you're townier than Bereft because I literally cannot read him rnrobyn wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:35 pmseems me calling you beautiful has pocketed uWindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:34 pm I feel like I'm talking out of my ass and should probably go to sleep.
[VOTE: Bereft] aubergine
Good night lol.
What makes you feel that? If you have no leads, why post that?WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:42 pm I hate that I feel like one of the players generating lots of discussion or at least contributing to solving must be a wolf
I don't think someone actively contributing HAS to be a wolf every single time
I just have an unsettling feeling that this is the case, with no grounds to back that take
And no, it's not me.
People ask me why I post my thought vomit every single gameleetic wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:43 pmWhat makes you feel that? If you have no leads, why post that?WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:42 pm I hate that I feel like one of the players generating lots of discussion or at least contributing to solving must be a wolf
I don't think someone actively contributing HAS to be a wolf every single time
I just have an unsettling feeling that this is the case, with no grounds to back that take
And no, it's not me.
maybe i should give u a massageWindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:42 pm I hate that I feel like one of the players generating lots of discussion or at least contributing to solving must be a wolf
I don't think someone actively contributing HAS to be a wolf every single time
I just have an unsettling feeling that this is the case, with no grounds to back that take
And no, it's not me.
Wait til Leetic shows up to call this fluffMacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 6:09 pm I also think us seeing Robyn as suspicious is perhaps indicative that they are town. Or perhaps that Robyn is and they are not.
No clueleetic wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 6:34 pmWhat's your read on Mac?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 6:30 pm Mac Towned gira and it’s day one so I’ll be looking to move
watTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:55 pm [VOTE: WWA] aubergine
Convinced myself against the Leetic vote
What do you mean watpyxxy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:55 pmwatTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:55 pm [VOTE: WWA] aubergine
Convinced myself against the Leetic vote
we had a rule, no playing while wastedTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:55 pm [VOTE: WWA] aubergine
Convinced myself against the Leetic vote
ah i was right about u being impaired
give me a full readslist so i can try to imagine what possible sensible worldview you’ve converted yourself into
me/wwa/leetic are townTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:59 pm Mac help people are asking me for reads and or content
where is this wind vote coming fromTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:56 pmWhat do you mean watpyxxy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:55 pmwatTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:55 pm [VOTE: WWA] aubergine
Convinced myself against the Leetic vote
mac's town toorobyn wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:01 pmme/wwa/leetic are townTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:59 pm Mac help people are asking me for reads and or content
solve from here
if you’re unsure of any name i’ve listed, read their iso and all shall become obvious
yes, i am telling you what to think
yes he's townypyxxy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:02 pmmac's town toorobyn wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:01 pmme/wwa/leetic are townTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:59 pm Mac help people are asking me for reads and or content
solve from here
if you’re unsure of any name i’ve listed, read their iso and all shall become obvious
yes, i am telling you what to think
Hey those are my wolf readsrobyn wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:01 pmme/wwa/leetic are townTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:59 pm Mac help people are asking me for reads and or content
solve from here
if you’re unsure of any name i’ve listed, read their iso and all shall become obvious
yes, i am telling you what to think
do tell
i am mean like flesh out your reasoning as best as possible, it's not "duh" somehowTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:07 pmwell duh (?)
leetic has less sauce than i do, if you wanted to knowTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:05 pm Here’s the situation: not all is right. We’re about to limp into the stupidest looking bereft chop I’ve ever seen. It’s probably rand and there are somewhat good reasons not to do that. So then, who’s in this game who should know better? I promise I didn’t just immediately jump to the two voters on Bereft for the record, I think that looks slightly towny. Leetic seems to have lost a bit of the edge, can’t tell why. WWA is posting a lot but has no thread control nor have they attempted to wrest it. I won’t vote for Mac or dizzy day 1. Ted seems alright. Mac’s defending Gira. I won’t vote Rondo D1 for opposite reasons. Ran and Robyn are self resolving.
if you were 50/50 with accuracy you would be one of the best players of all time /pedantryWindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 5:44 pm Everyone else knows that I'm pretty 50/50 with my accuracy, I can townclear myself most of the time when I want to, but my reads are poop even if my reasoning is somewhat logical
A. I feel like I've explained this, at least to the extent I want to, in terms lo signal to noise ratio, posting to seem present but not having many thoughts that come across as solving. posts since they started being pushed haven't moved the needle for me. I know that's probably vague, I don't feel like casing because I would not say that this is an especially confident read still, just the one I feel best about pushing at the moment.Ranmilia wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 7:39 pm @Gira A. y u scumread robyn? Like... not to overreact but I still feel very confident in them from probing into them earlier. They are a poor little meow meow and not doing anything I can identify as scummy. But mac and you are both going at them hard and neither of you are really saying why that I can see, so... someone is big wrong here.
B. What is your philosophy on the act of voting (in mafia)?
two questions really bc i don't think that boise to content ratio is actually something to read me onGira wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:15 pm A. I feel like I've explained this, at least to the extent I want to, in terms lo signal to noise ratio, posting to seem present but not having many thoughts that come across as solving. posts since they started being pushed haven't moved the needle for me. I know that's probably vague, I don't feel like casing because I would not say that this is an especially confident read still, just the one I feel best about pushing at the moment.
i think you provide less content if you can get away with it. i'm not sure what you mean by the second question but i'm not sure what difference it makes.robyn wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:20 pmtwo questions really bc i don't think that boise to content ratio is actually something to read me onGira wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:15 pm A. I feel like I've explained this, at least to the extent I want to, in terms lo signal to noise ratio, posting to seem present but not having many thoughts that come across as solving. posts since they started being pushed haven't moved the needle for me. I know that's probably vague, I don't feel like casing because I would not say that this is an especially confident read still, just the one I feel best about pushing at the moment.
1) do you think i have difficulty in providing content as wolf?
2) do you think i normally around shovel this much shit into a thread?
hum, i thought i'd made that clear as well - because the way you were making that vote felt disproportionate to how you had reacted earlier and it stuck me as possible you were scum responding in an overly defensive manner to an accusation. i asked you about your thought process to get you to elaborate. You provided an explanation I found satisfactory and quelled any paranoia on my part.Ranmilia wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:21 pm Wind is not a good vote in any world. Neither is robyn unless I am a gigantic clown, but I am at a loss of how to further engage on that beyond going "please read d0 where I interrogated them to head off this exact thing where people say they can't read robyn".
Gira- I agree with that philosophy, it is mine as well. But then why did you ask about my vote on dizzy?
you think content to sexual posts is indicative of my alignment
Certainly, but I made that vote literally when the voting opened, and given dizzy's sole contribution at that point was a driveby accusation of me I would think it should be self evident why. I'm not sure like... what you were expecting, overnight I was thinking about Gira scum worlds and wondering if you were serving me up a "have you stopped beating your wife yet" kind of deal trying to will into existence a stronger read than I actually had. This is pretty relevant in dizzy town worlds. But now you have dizzy and I both town which goes against that.Gira wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:28 pm
hum, i thought i'd made that clear as well - because the way you were making that vote felt disproportionate to how you had reacted earlier and it stuck me as possible you were scum responding in an overly defensive manner to an accusation. i asked you about your thought process to get you to elaborate. You provided an explanation I found satisfactory and quelled any paranoia on my part.
i think questioning someone's reasoning on a vote is entirely valid for scumhunting, yeah?