Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:24 pmNo, Jerry, I suspect you for it. I think your uncle is senile and in need of better eyebrows. You didn't question his presentation of the facts. You accepted what he said as factual even though you could have changed things. There was no certain victim. It was still up in the air! My vote wasn't a throwaway. You took what he said for granted like Newman believing the mailmen would save us from the police.
Here's the problem, Elaine. I have told you that my "real good" comment reflected an increased level of trust for Leo -- it had nothing to do with whether he was right about what he said (which therefore must mean that it had nothing to do with you). You don't suspect him either, so on that front it sounds to me like we agree that he seemed sincere in his argument regardless of whether it was correct.
Yet here you are accusing me for reading something the same way you're reading it. That's nonsense. You're bad.
Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:24 pmNo, Jerry, I suspect you for it. I think your uncle is senile and in need of better eyebrows. You didn't question his presentation of the facts. You accepted what he said as factual even though you could have changed things. There was no certain victim. It was still up in the air! My vote wasn't a throwaway. You took what he said for granted like Newman believing the mailmen would save us from the police.
Here's the problem, Elaine. I have told you that my "real good" comment reflected an increased level of trust for Leo -- it had nothing to do with whether he was right about what he said (which therefore must mean that it had nothing to do with you). You don't suspect him either, so on that front it sounds to me like we agree that he seemed sincere in his argument regardless of whether it was correct.
Yet here you are accusing me for reading something the same way you're reading it. That's nonsense. You're bad.
No I'm not. I'm the one-shot vigilante, and unless you impress me...oh...a little better than you have in the past, then yadda yadda yadda.
Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:29 pmNo I'm not. I'm the one-shot vigilante, and unless you impress me...oh...a little better than you have in the past, then yadda yadda yadda.
Cool, I believe you. Read me however you read me, but if you do end up shooting me you'll feel like a boob.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:32 pm
by Julinook
If I'm the tracker, Bania didn't do anything on Night 1.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:34 pm
by Chuck
Outrageous. My second best customer - even if he voted out my first best customer, as a total doofus.
A most clear attempt to hurt my business.
I WILL HUNT YOU DOWN, SCUMS.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:34 pm
by Chuck
That witch could have assassinated me, had she actually disposed of a weapon.
Her claim is balderdash.
Lynch her.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:38 pm
by Chuck
*screams you're bad at her for the entire evening*
"Nah I'm one-shot vigilante"
*ok I believe you - the second after*
Are Americans really that naive?
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:41 pm
by Nicol Bolas
Let me tell you, I didn't intentionally bare myself, but now, I wish I had. For it's not me who has been exposed, but you. For I have seen the nipple on your soul.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:41 pm
by Julinook
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:38 pm
*screams you're bad at her for the entire evening*
"Nah I'm one-shot vigilante"
*ok I believe you - the second after*
Are Americans really that naive?
This one makes gut checks in the moment and changes his mind on a dime. It's a strength. I could be wrong obviously, but my initial take is not. There's no good reason for a mafia Elaine to fake claim that in that moment. It would be a very stupid move.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:43 pm
by Julinook
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:34 pm
That witch could have assassinated me, had she actually disposed of a weapon.
Her claim is balderdash.
Lynch her.
"She didn't immediately shoot a vague Day 1 suspect at the first opportunity, she's bad"
Your argument is balderdash. Lynch you.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:45 pm
by Julinook
My girlfriend Angela agrees with me.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:51 pm
by Julinook
Also, my commendations to Spacedaisy for a strong role play performance of a critical character. I laughed out loud twice on Day 1, and she was responsible for one of those.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:57 pm
by Nicol Bolas
STELLA! STELLA!
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 10:06 pm
by Paprika
Re: [NIGHT 1] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:24 pm
by Principal Skinner
RIP Kramer, the only one to know my real name. UNCLE Leo.
Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:10 pmYour uncle said there was a clear victim, but there wasn't. You had the power to pick somebody else. Yet you acted like your uncle gave you the greatest Christmas card in the world, but he didn't. He gave you something besides a Christmas card, and he rubbed your face all in it. And you liked it.
Did you like rubbing your face in your uncle's Christmas card, Jerry?
I had the "power" to pick somebody else, but no actual reason to do that. I had previously stated that I was at peace with a lynch of either Soup Nazi or Newman. Why then would I voluntarily force a coin flip instead of a decisive choice which can more readily be analyzed? I am technically capable of jumping into a bath tub filled with strawberry jam, but I have no particular reason to do that.
I told you that I am judging sincerity and insincerity. That is something different from structural or content validity in an argument. You keep crapping on Uncle Leo's assertion while complaining to me -- do you suspect him for it?
No, Jerry, I suspect you for it. I think your uncle is senile and in need of better eyebrows. You didn't question his presentation of the facts. You accepted what he said as factual even though you could have changed things. There was no certain victim. It was still up in the air! My vote wasn't a throwaway. You took what he said for granted like Newman believing the mailmen would save us from the police.
I need better eyebrows? Are you kidding me?
I’d like to clarify that by “clear victim” I meant that at one particular point in time, nothing needed to change for Newman to be lynched. No more arguing or persuasion from anyone to anyone was required. Anybody could have changed their vote for any reason but the end tally was what it was. (and the result was: Newman was lynched, and Elaine & Soup Nazi, if mafia, were able to provide cover for each other.)
By the way, Elaine, why didn’t I get a Christmas card?
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:38 pm
*screams you're bad at her for the entire evening*
"Nah I'm one-shot vigilante"
*ok I believe you - the second after*
Are Americans really that naive?
This one makes gut checks in the moment and changes his mind on a dime. It's a strength. I could be wrong obviously, but my initial take is not. There's no good reason for a mafia Elaine to fake claim that in that moment. It would be a very stupid move.
Elaborate.
Re: [DAY 1] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:51 pm
by Saito
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:25 pm
Just a pitiful Day 1. I could have spent the evening with my girlfriend Marlene. Jesus.
im catching up and very tired after just getting home from working since the beginning of time
maybe if there was a TAD less role play it'd be easier.
but i'm only on page 3
Re: [DAY 1] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:52 pm
by November
J Peterman wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2017 6:14 pm
These votes are everywhere! Oh, my neck is one gargantuan monkey fist.
What else have we got? Bania, Newman, Puddy, Leo - you haven't had a suspicion this whole meeting. For the love of God, just tell me what the suspicions are! I'll go with Newman unless we get some new ideas. You're all too quiet.
*walks out, groaning*
Peterman, word around the office is you're a mobster. My people tell me you said nothing yourself, but here you are tossing suspicion around at fine folks for saying nothing! If this is an honest mistake, it's time you looked in the mirror. The Yankee organization will not tolerate this kind of hypocrisy and laziness! Not while Big Stein's in charge! You hear me!
Re: [NIGHT 1] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:58 pm
by November
Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:49 pm
Well, sure it's unique, because anybody paying attention knows that what your uncle said wasn't true, including you, since you could have tied it up. If I said I liked men but was a lesbian, that would be providing a unique perspective too, but would it be right? Would it be correct, Jerry?
This Benes woman is giving me fits, and not just because she's a Baltimore fan! Seems like she's picking a fight with Seinfeld just to pick a fight. Her argument has my head spinning. Big Stein's getting dizzy. Like riding on one of those carousels, trying to keep up. I never cared for those rides. Rollercoasters, those are okay. Very exhilarating. But a carousel just goes in circles, over and over and over. You never know when they're going to end. I can't figure out where the end of this argument is or where it's beginning either. She says Seinfeld is suspicious for appreciating input from his uncle, then she says he's bad because he voted for Newman. It's not making sense to me, I don't buy her conviction. But Big Stein doesn't see why a mobster would pick a fight like this either. Big Stein is confused, but he'll keep kicking!
Re: [NIGHT 1] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:03 am
by November
George Costanza wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 5:46 pm
I'm feeling good about you people
Kramer
George Steinbrenner
Uncle Leo
Jerry
Jackie
I got bad feelings about you people
Elaine
The Soup Nazi
Estelle
Dad
I got no feelings about the rest of ya.
Costanza, what's this feud with your folks? Trouble at home, eh Georgey boy? The Yankees are a family organization, and we want to help you work this out. Tell Big Stein about your problems, I'm all ears!
I also saw you interrogating your funny friend, that Seinfeld character, but now I see you're feeling good about him. Care to explain yourself, Costanza?
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:07 am
by November
It's a real shame about this Kramer fella. My people don't know what to make of his death. I thought he looked shady myself, but that wasn't the case. Big Stein's not made of answers. Who has a theory about why he was killed?
Re: [NIGHT 1] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:13 am
by November
David Puddy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:14 pm
I'm just trying to stay in character, man. From my research, puddy was a man of few words.
Yeah, that's right.
I can respect that attitude, Puddy. Keeping the cards close to the vest, I see. Big Stein knows all about that himself. Sometimes it's best to keep your mouth shut, say nothing at all, don't give them anything to work with! But you already tipped your hand by telling us something feels off about the Soup fellow. Now the rest of us are sitting here like chumps waiting for you to finish your thought. What's it gonna be, Puddy? What's got you feeling iffy about this soup? I'm a calzone man myself. Where's Costanza?
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:38 pm
*screams you're bad at her for the entire evening*
"Nah I'm one-shot vigilante"
*ok I believe you - the second after*
Are Americans really that naive?
This one makes gut checks in the moment and changes his mind on a dime. It's a strength. I could be wrong obviously, but my initial take is not. There's no good reason for a mafia Elaine to fake claim that in that moment. It would be a very stupid move.
Elaborate.
The role claim is true if we assume the following:
1) Mafia Elaine would not arbitrarily guess at a power role to fake claim when the role may not even exist. Any true power roles can look at the 14 player table to discern whether a 1-shot vigilante fits with their role.
2) Mafia Elaine would not fake that claim even when having insight about which setup we're in (by virtue of the roles of her team), because that'd imply a real 1-shot vigilante may well exist. The real one immediately knows the claim is a lie.
3) Mafia Elaine would not decide it was necessary to claim a role at all at that moment. The only vocal pressure she was under was coming from me, and she was in no danger of being lynched -- it was still the night phase. She has this entire 48 hour phase to shake suspicion without having to resort to a fake role claim.
There is at least one universe where she could be lying. It's possible and I'm aware of it. I think it's much less likely though than the alternative -- that she wanted to shut my wrong ass up and threatened to shoot me with her real vigilante shot.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:21 am
by Julinook
Mr. Steinbrenner, the Peterman post you highlighted is an example of player salad. And I know women don't respect salad eaters. I agree with you there.
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:38 pm
*screams you're bad at her for the entire evening*
"Nah I'm one-shot vigilante"
*ok I believe you - the second after*
Are Americans really that naive?
This one makes gut checks in the moment and changes his mind on a dime. It's a strength. I could be wrong obviously, but my initial take is not. There's no good reason for a mafia Elaine to fake claim that in that moment. It would be a very stupid move.
Elaborate.
The role claim is true if we assume the following:
1) Mafia Elaine would not arbitrarily guess at a power role to fake claim when the role may not even exist. Any true power roles can look at the 14 player table to discern whether a 1-shot vigilante fits with their role.
2) Mafia Elaine would not fake that claim even when having insight about which setup we're in (by virtue of the roles of her team), because that'd imply a real 1-shot vigilante may well exist. The real one immediately knows the claim is a lie.
3) Mafia Elaine would not decide it was necessary to claim a role at all at that moment. The only vocal pressure she was under was coming from me, and she was in no danger of being lynched -- it was still the night phase. She has this entire 48 hour phase to shake suspicion without having to resort to a fake role claim.
There is at least one universe where she could be lying. It's possible and I'm aware of it. I think it's much less likely though than the alternative -- that she wanted to shut my wrong ass up and threatened to shoot me with her real vigilante shot.
I don't dismiss the possibility that her claim is completely bogus. A mobster could guess that the majority of her opponents don't know what roles they're dealing with. Pretending to wave around a gun is a surefire way to get somebody to back off.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:28 am
by Julinook
It's fitting that my girl Nina had just painted a portrait for Kramer.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:29 am
by Julinook
I hope that image isn't huge. Can't tell on a phone.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:36 am
by Julinook
George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:28 amI don't dismiss the possibility that her claim is completely bogus. A mobster could guess that the majority of her opponents don't know what roles they're dealing with. Pretending to wave around a gun is a surefire way to get somebody to back off.
It could be bogus. I don't care about "could" though. We can sit here all day and talk about what's possible. A lot of things are possible. It's meaningless. The scene you construct here is possible, but I don't think it's probable. Would you do that during a night phase when you can't be lynched and only one person is barking at you when your claim can easily be invalidated by any present power roles? I sure as hell wouldn't. I care about what's probable. Given present information there is no way I support a lynch of Elaine.
George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:28 amI don't dismiss the possibility that her claim is completely bogus. A mobster could guess that the majority of her opponents don't know what roles they're dealing with. Pretending to wave around a gun is a surefire way to get somebody to back off.
It could be bogus. I don't care about "could" though. We can sit here all day and talk about what's possible. A lot of things are possible. It's meaningless. The scene you construct here is possible, but I don't think it's probable. Would you do that during a night phase when you can't be lynched and only one person is barking at you when your claim can easily be invalidated by any present power roles? I sure as hell wouldn't. I care about what's probable. Given present information there is no way I support a lynch of Elaine.
Big Stein just might do that if he felt it could shake the pressure off of him. But I thought we weren't talking about what's possible. If Elaine is the vigilante, she's hung herself out to dry. She's either our only power role, or one of only two, with the other being a tracker. There's no one to save her tonight, so she has to shoot. Who should she shoot?
Re: [DAY 1] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:30 am
by Chuck
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:32 am
by Chuck
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:34 am
by Chuck
Oh, in case you're planning who to remove next and hurt my business, none of you count as my third best customer. You're all awful. Ha-ha! Ha! Ha!
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:42 am
by Chuck
I'm wary of a Seinfeld - Steinbrenner team scenario, in which they're buddying. The latter is a corporate pig, who'd like nothing more than to get my recipes and make water splat out of them for his crowds, plus that failed comedian has been adamant not to pursue any wagon on him previously. And now they're in sync with their leads. At how anemic the rest of the group is, nothing would work better for a scumteam than to take up the reins like so.
David Puddy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:14 pm
I'm just trying to stay in character, man. From my research, puddy was a man of few words.
Yeah, that's right.
I can respect that attitude, Puddy. Keeping the cards close to the vest, I see. Big Stein knows all about that himself. Sometimes it's best to keep your mouth shut, say nothing at all, don't give them anything to work with! But you already tipped your hand by telling us something feels off about the Soup fellow. Now the rest of us are sitting here like chumps waiting for you to finish your thought. What's it gonna be, Puddy? What's got you feeling iffy about this soup? I'm a calzone man myself. Where's Costanza?
I don't know, man. At first it was just a gut feeling. I gotta tell ya, my gut is awesome! High five!!
I can't believe Kramer was killed last night! Even Jerry thought he might get booted from the game as he left us with some inspiring parting words that we ought to lisren to. Mr. Soup seems to be having fun with Jerry around. It could have been Mr. Soup who killed Kramer.
(Still catching up, but poating anyway)
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:28 am
by Julinook
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:42 am
I'm wary of a Seinfeld - Steinbrenner team scenario, in which they're buddying. The latter is a corporate pig, who'd like nothing more than to get my recipes and make water splat out of them for his crowds, plus that failed comedian has been adamant not to pursue any wagon on him previously. And now they're in sync with their leads. At how anemic the rest of the group is, nothing would work better for a scumteam than to take up the reins like so.
Do you have a reason to suspect Steinbrenner independent of "those two guys don't suspect each other"?
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:43 am
by Chuck
He's after my soups.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:59 pm
by November
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:43 am
He's after my soups.
This is ludicrous. Big Stein will not stand for this! This accusation is baseless! I've gone on record as a calzone man. I don't need your soup, I don't care how great your soup is. If it's not a calzone I'm not interested. This is a clear attempt to lash out at Big Stein. You after my money? Want a piece of the Yankees? Talk to my secretary, see if we can get your soups served at Yankee Stadium next season. Big Stein's a business man, I'm willing to put this personal issue behind me.
David Puddy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:14 pm
I'm just trying to stay in character, man. From my research, puddy was a man of few words.
Yeah, that's right.
I can respect that attitude, Puddy. Keeping the cards close to the vest, I see. Big Stein knows all about that himself. Sometimes it's best to keep your mouth shut, say nothing at all, don't give them anything to work with! But you already tipped your hand by telling us something feels off about the Soup fellow. Now the rest of us are sitting here like chumps waiting for you to finish your thought. What's it gonna be, Puddy? What's got you feeling iffy about this soup? I'm a calzone man myself. Where's Costanza?
I don't know, man. At first it was just a gut feeling. I gotta tell ya, my gut is awesome! High five!!
I can't believe Kramer was killed last night! Even Jerry thought he might get booted from the game as he left us with some inspiring parting words that we ought to lisren to. Mr. Soup seems to be having fun with Jerry around. It could have been Mr. Soup who killed Kramer.
(Still catching up, but poating anyway)
You're not answering my question, Puddy. You think Soup Nazi did the K-man. What inspires this belief?
Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:49 pm
Well, sure it's unique, because anybody paying attention knows that what your uncle said wasn't true, including you, since you could have tied it up. If I said I liked men but was a lesbian, that would be providing a unique perspective too, but would it be right? Would it be correct, Jerry?
This Benes woman is giving me fits, and not just because she's a Baltimore fan! Seems like she's picking a fight with Seinfeld just to pick a fight. Her argument has my head spinning. Big Stein's getting dizzy. Like riding on one of those carousels, trying to keep up. I never cared for those rides. Rollercoasters, those are okay. Very exhilarating. But a carousel just goes in circles, over and over and over. You never know when they're going to end. I can't figure out where the end of this argument is or where it's beginning either. She says Seinfeld is suspicious for appreciating input from his uncle, then she says he's bad because he voted for Newman. It's not making sense to me, I don't buy her conviction. But Big Stein doesn't see why a mobster would pick a fight like this either. Big Stein is confused, but he'll keep kicking!
I have to say that I find Mr Seinfeld's points about Ms Benes to far more convincing than this attack. This kind of latching-on to minutiae, accusation, and then hands-in-the-air confusion is the kind of base fearmongering that I expect to see from the Mafia. 5 out of 5 for roleplay though!
My top picks for lynch today: Steinbrenner, Frank Costanza, and... let's go with George as a distant third, because I haven't had a good feeling about that guy yet.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:21 pm
by Julinook
Back from an early dinner with Naomi. Good lord that laugh of hers.
Elaine Benes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:49 pm
Well, sure it's unique, because anybody paying attention knows that what your uncle said wasn't true, including you, since you could have tied it up. If I said I liked men but was a lesbian, that would be providing a unique perspective too, but would it be right? Would it be correct, Jerry?
This Benes woman is giving me fits, and not just because she's a Baltimore fan! Seems like she's picking a fight with Seinfeld just to pick a fight. Her argument has my head spinning. Big Stein's getting dizzy. Like riding on one of those carousels, trying to keep up. I never cared for those rides. Rollercoasters, those are okay. Very exhilarating. But a carousel just goes in circles, over and over and over. You never know when they're going to end. I can't figure out where the end of this argument is or where it's beginning either. She says Seinfeld is suspicious for appreciating input from his uncle, then she says he's bad because he voted for Newman. It's not making sense to me, I don't buy her conviction. But Big Stein doesn't see why a mobster would pick a fight like this either. Big Stein is confused, but he'll keep kicking!
I have to say that I find Mr Seinfeld's points about Ms Benes to far more convincing than this attack. This kind of latching-on to minutiae, accusation, and then hands-in-the-air confusion is the kind of base fearmongering that I expect to see from the Mafia. 5 out of 5 for roleplay though!
My top picks for lynch today: Steinbrenner, Frank Costanza, and... let's go with George as a distant third, because I haven't had a good feeling about that guy yet.
Attack? Who said anything about an attack? Big Stein wants every stone unturned. What do you make of Ms. Benes?
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:43 am
He's after my soups.
This is ludicrous. Big Stein will not stand for this! This accusation is baseless! I've gone on record as a calzone man. I don't need your soup, I don't care how great your soup is. If it's not a calzone I'm not interested. This is a clear attempt to lash out at Big Stein. You after my money? Want a piece of the Yankees? Talk to my secretary, see if we can get your soups served at Yankee Stadium next season. Big Stein's a business man, I'm willing to put this personal issue behind me.
Liar. You know my soup is the best in town and want to get a hold of my recipes and turn it into mass-produced muck for your flag-bickering stadium crowd.
But don't you think for one second I'll allow your secret goons and lackeys any of my soup.
David Puddy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:14 pm
I'm just trying to stay in character, man. From my research, puddy was a man of few words.
Yeah, that's right.
I can respect that attitude, Puddy. Keeping the cards close to the vest, I see. Big Stein knows all about that himself. Sometimes it's best to keep your mouth shut, say nothing at all, don't give them anything to work with! But you already tipped your hand by telling us something feels off about the Soup fellow. Now the rest of us are sitting here like chumps waiting for you to finish your thought. What's it gonna be, Puddy? What's got you feeling iffy about this soup? I'm a calzone man myself. Where's Costanza?
I don't know, man. At first it was just a gut feeling. I gotta tell ya, my gut is awesome! High five!!
I can't believe Kramer was killed last night! Even Jerry thought he might get booted from the game as he left us with some inspiring parting words that we ought to lisren to. Mr. Soup seems to be having fun with Jerry around. It could have been Mr. Soup who killed Kramer.
(Still catching up, but poating anyway)
You're not answering my question, Puddy. You think Soup Nazi did the K-man. What inspires this belief?
I don't know how I can be any more clear.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:18 pm
by Paul Stevens
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:21 pm
Back from an early dinner with Naomi. Good lord that laugh of hers.
I have grievances to air about both Costanza parents. We got nothing all day!
I'm sorry I can't be at your beck and call, Jerry. After Assman kicked the bucket, I've been left to work on the man-ziere all by myself. It's enough to drive a person crazy, I tell you!
George, I'm disappointed you. Why don't you stop crying and fight your father face to face, like aman? Listing Kramer as good on Night 1, then knocking him out, would be an excellent way to establish some civilian cred. Especially when you're also buddying up to that goody-two-shoes Jerry Seinfeld.
I think that Mr. Steinbrenner has a good head on his shoulders. Can't manage his team out of a paper bag, but his heart's in the right place. He's following up on questions, asking the right ones about David Puddy and Elaine. Even if it takes him a few minutes to get there in any given conversation.
Re: [NIGHT 1] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:29 pm
by Julinook
David Puddy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:55 amI can't believe Kramer was killed last night! Even Jerry thought he might get booted from the game as he left us with some inspiring parting words that we ought to lisren to. Mr. Soup seems to be having fun with Jerry around. It could have been Mr. Soup who killed Kramer.
I don't know about this one guys. I'm going to place another Puddy vote.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:40 pm
by Kent Brockman
Whatever, man! You're wrong about me.
I'm voting for Mr. Soup.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:41 pm
by Julinook
David Puddy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:40 pm
Whatever, man! You're wrong about me.
I'm voting for Mr. Soup.
What do you think is Soup Nazi's most suspicious post?
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:47 pm
by Kent Brockman
I'll look through his posts soon and let you know. Overall, he lacks a genuine tone.
