The Syndicate

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:40 am MP provided a reason someone else might think something he would have no knowledge of.

why?

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:39 am

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:38 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:37 am I also would like to say that if any of you all think I'm distancing with LC, then I have no idea what to say to that. My behavior surrounding him is not indicative of the way I would handle a teammate, but I suppose I can understand why the conclusion would arise.

"This is not how I would distance with a teammate. But this is exactly what distancing with a teammate looks like"

I mean, if MP7 is civilian, what would you expect him to say here?

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:40 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:39 am

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:38 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:37 am I also would like to say that if any of you all think I'm distancing with LC, then I have no idea what to say to that. My behavior surrounding him is not indicative of the way I would handle a teammate, but I suppose I can understand why the conclusion would arise.

"This is not how I would distance with a teammate. But this is exactly what distancing with a teammate looks like"

Pretty much, yeah. I don't distance like this. It's sloppy.

Is it?
I'm the only one who noticed it.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:40 am I can see all the logic in your explanation MP and totally missed the posts you quoted.

Now my question is why LC didn't actually do what you just did?

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:41 am

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:39 am

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:38 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:37 am I also would like to say that if any of you all think I'm distancing with LC, then I have no idea what to say to that. My behavior surrounding him is not indicative of the way I would handle a teammate, but I suppose I can understand why the conclusion would arise.

"This is not how I would distance with a teammate. But this is exactly what distancing with a teammate looks like"

I mean, if MP7 is civilian, what would you expect him to say here?

Not a thousand qualifiers in the event that LC is bad

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:41 am

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:39 am

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:38 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:37 am I also would like to say that if any of you all think I'm distancing with LC, then I have no idea what to say to that. My behavior surrounding him is not indicative of the way I would handle a teammate, but I suppose I can understand why the conclusion would arise.

"This is not how I would distance with a teammate. But this is exactly what distancing with a teammate looks like"

I mean, if MP7 is civilian, what would you expect him to say here?

Not a thousand qualifiers in the event that LC is bad

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:29 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:31 amAlso, MP said he was moving his vote to Jack, but didn't.

But I did move my vote to Jack? I voted you, then Jack, then back to you again.

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:40 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:39 am

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:38 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:37 am I also would like to say that if any of you all think I'm distancing with LC, then I have no idea what to say to that. My behavior surrounding him is not indicative of the way I would handle a teammate, but I suppose I can understand why the conclusion would arise.

"This is not how I would distance with a teammate. But this is exactly what distancing with a teammate looks like"

Pretty much, yeah. I don't distance like this. It's sloppy.

Is it?
I'm the only one who noticed it.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:40 am I can see all the logic in your explanation MP and totally missed the posts you quoted.

Now my question is why LC didn't actually do what you just did?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:35 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:30 am Where did you tell him you were going to do that?

In my vote post?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:04 am That has to be the most manufactured suspicion of me I've seen in quite some time, and boy have I seen a lot of it over the years. Congrats, LC. You're now blood red in my rainbow.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:04 am [VOTE: VOTE: LONG CON] aubergine

You're full of shit.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:09 am For the sake of truly letting this LC thing go until I return, the last thing I'll do (promise) is move vote to Jackofhearts2005. I feel like of every player in this game that hasn't been really quiet, he's the one I just cannot get any handle on whatsoever. What say you, Jack? Where's your head at? Show us that supatown Jack we all want to see.

But just know that I also still think LC is bad (even if I have my doubts) and I want to know what you all think.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:11 am Oh, whoops. Keep forgetting these vote tag things.

[VOTE: VOTE: JACKOFHEARTS2005] aubergine

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:58 pm I'll move my vote back to LC for now. Before I left I was afraid I was unfairly tunneling him, but having returned to all of this and seen subsequent posts from him, I don't think I was. What is bugging me right now actually is this post, which LC made right after I left earlier today. What bothers me about it is specifically the second section the most, where he simultaneously is backtracking on me but also doubling down on his perspective that I'm strawmanning. It reads inorganic and forced, like LC's trying to still be consistent in his suspicion of me (which mafia tend to do) while also putting his foot off the brakes a bit.

[VOTE: LONG CON] aubergine

I'd still like to engage with Jack though.

That's the train of events. I voted LC, then felt like I was tunneling him unfairly so I moved to Jack shortly thereafter, then came back into the thread a few hours after that and decided to vote LC again.

I have no idea why anyone would think I'd be then moving back to Jack again. There's nothing in my behavior or post history to suggest that. I'm assuming LC's post comes from a lack of realizing my vote was on Jack for a few hours.

The fact that he didn't clarify any of this though and just acted pissed off with you all means I'm totally fine with lynching him. But I'm certainly not involved in this.

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:42 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:29 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:31 amAlso, MP said he was moving his vote to Jack, but didn't.

But I did move my vote to Jack? I voted you, then Jack, then back to you again.

My brain is frying. I don't see a slip.

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:42 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:29 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:31 amAlso, MP said he was moving his vote to Jack, but didn't.

But I did move my vote to Jack? I voted you, then Jack, then back to you again.

My brain is frying. I don't see a slip.

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:42 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:29 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:31 amAlso, MP said he was moving his vote to Jack, but didn't.

But I did move my vote to Jack? I voted you, then Jack, then back to you again.

My brain is frying. I don't see a slip.

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:44 am I actually looked for that post, didn't find it, and thought I must have remembered wrong.

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:43 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:35 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:30 am Where did you tell him you were going to do that?

In my vote post?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:04 am That has to be the most manufactured suspicion of me I've seen in quite some time, and boy have I seen a lot of it over the years. Congrats, LC. You're now blood red in my rainbow.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:04 am [VOTE: VOTE: LONG CON] aubergine

You're full of shit.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:09 am For the sake of truly letting this LC thing go until I return, the last thing I'll do (promise) is move vote to Jackofhearts2005. I feel like of every player in this game that hasn't been really quiet, he's the one I just cannot get any handle on whatsoever. What say you, Jack? Where's your head at? Show us that supatown Jack we all want to see.

But just know that I also still think LC is bad (even if I have my doubts) and I want to know what you all think.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:11 am Oh, whoops. Keep forgetting these vote tag things.

[VOTE: VOTE: JACKOFHEARTS2005] aubergine

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:58 pm I'll move my vote back to LC for now. Before I left I was afraid I was unfairly tunneling him, but having returned to all of this and seen subsequent posts from him, I don't think I was. What is bugging me right now actually is this post, which LC made right after I left earlier today. What bothers me about it is specifically the second section the most, where he simultaneously is backtracking on me but also doubling down on his perspective that I'm strawmanning. It reads inorganic and forced, like LC's trying to still be consistent in his suspicion of me (which mafia tend to do) while also putting his foot off the brakes a bit.

[VOTE: LONG CON] aubergine

I'd still like to engage with Jack though.

That's the train of events. I voted LC, then felt like I was tunneling him unfairly so I moved to Jack shortly thereafter, then came back into the thread a few hours after that and decided to vote LC again.

I have no idea why anyone would think I'd be then moving back to Jack again. There's nothing in my behavior or post history to suggest that. I'm assuming LC's post comes from a lack of realizing my vote was on Jack for a few hours.

The fact that he didn't clarify any of this though and just acted pissed off with you all means I'm totally fine with lynching him. But I'm certainly not involved in this.

Hey, LC, here's your out.

MP, why did you provide LC with an excuse if you truly have no idea why LC thought that you planned on moving your vote back to Jack?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:46 am Damn, and here I thought you guys actually had something amazing.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:48 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:46 am Damn, and here I thought you guys actually had something amazing.

Well .... we figured out that wolbre and Sloonei are indie! That's something.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:49 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:48 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:46 am Damn, and here I thought you guys actually had something amazing.

Well .... we figured out that wolbre and Sloonei are indie! That's something.

Oh, I skimmed over that, didn't quite get it. What's the reason, because of reads spew basically?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:51 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:49 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:48 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:46 am Damn, and here I thought you guys actually had something amazing.

Well .... we figured out that wolbre and Sloonei are indie! That's something.

Oh, I skimmed over that, didn't quite get it. What's the reason, because of reads spew basically?

Wolbre is overprotective of Sloonei and outright indie read him. How could he be that sure he is indie? Because he recognised his btsc partner.

Quin is the other.

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:48 am

remmebering when i used to be funny

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:53 am I want to lynch Colin today and give LC some more rope to hang himself with tomorrow Long Con's energy might be off right now, y'know?

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:48 am I think what's apparent to come out of this situation too is, instead of trying to come to some kind of clarification with Mac and Dom, LC just rolled his eyes and continued to let the chaos ensue. I don't think that's town behavior. So add it to the fire and let's lynch this guy.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:54 am LCs explanation as to why he didn't defend himself is sound to me because I too couldn't find the post.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:48 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:46 am Damn, and here I thought you guys actually had something amazing.

Well .... we figured out that wolbre and Sloonei are indie! That's something.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:54 am

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:53 am I want to lynch Colin today and give LC some more rope to hang himself with tomorrow Long Con's energy might be off right now, y'know?

Is this a product of your earlier expressed town read on LC as well? Can you maybe explain to me where that's arising, or anything I should reconsider specifically?

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:53 am I want to lynch Colin today and give LC some more rope to hang himself with tomorrow Long Con's energy might be off right now, y'know?

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:55 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:54 am

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:53 am I want to lynch Colin today and give LC some more rope to hang himself with tomorrow Long Con's energy might be off right now, y'know?

Is this a product of your earlier expressed town read on LC as well? Can you maybe explain to me where that's arising, or anything I should reconsider specifically?

I'm simply tone-reading him as sincere and it's working for me so far.

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:54 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:48 am I think what's apparent to come out of this situation too is, instead of trying to come to some kind of clarification with Mac and Dom, LC just rolled his eyes and continued to let the chaos ensue. I don't think that's town behavior. So add it to the fire and let's lynch this guy.

I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior I don't think that's town behavior

Be quiet the coitus up with this fecal matter

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:54 am LCs explanation as to why he didn't defend himself is sound to me because I too couldn't find the post.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:56 am

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:55 am

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:54 am

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:53 am I want to lynch Colin today and give LC some more rope to hang himself with tomorrow Long Con's energy might be off right now, y'know?

Is this a product of your earlier expressed town read on LC as well? Can you maybe explain to me where that's arising, or anything I should reconsider specifically?

I'm simply tone-reading him as sincere and it's working for me so far.

Well, I was tone-reading him as sincere earlier in the game and even very occasionally since then, so I can understand that.

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:57 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:54 am LCs explanation as to why he didn't defend himself is sound to me because I too couldn't find the post.

I started from the posts where we both calmed down a little... I haven't looked back to see if I missed it because it was before those posts, or because I just missed it. Should have searched for 'Jack'... I was just scrolling through his ISO from that point. It was a bit half-hearted because I trusted that you witch hunt motherfuckers would exercise due diligence, but that trust was severely misplaced. You were all more interested in stroking each other's 'egos' than finding the truth.

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:46 amIt's not an excuse; it's an attempt to explain what transpired. Don't you care about that, or do you just want to blindly lynch two people?

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:57 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:54 am LCs explanation as to why he didn't defend himself is sound to me because I too couldn't find the post.

I started from the posts where we both calmed down a little... I haven't looked back to see if I missed it because it was before those posts, or because I just missed it. Should have searched for 'Jack'... I was just scrolling through his ISO from that point. It was a bit half-hearted because I trusted that you witch hunt motherfuckers would exercise due diligence, but that trust was severely misplaced. You were all more interested in stroking each other's 'egos' than finding the truth.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:58 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:57 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:54 am LCs explanation as to why he didn't defend himself is sound to me because I too couldn't find the post.

I started from the posts where we both calmed down a little... I haven't looked back to see if I missed it because it was before those posts, or because I just missed it. Should have searched for 'Jack'... I was just scrolling through his ISO from that point. It was a bit half-hearted because I trusted that you witch hunt motherfuckers would exercise due diligence, but that trust was severely misplaced. You were all more interested in stroking each other's 'egos' than finding the truth.

Lol oh shut the expletive deleted up we were just excited and having fun. Go have a warm glass of milk and a lie down old man.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:58 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:57 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:54 am LCs explanation as to why he didn't defend himself is sound to me because I too couldn't find the post.

I started from the posts where we both calmed down a little... I haven't looked back to see if I missed it because it was before those posts, or because I just missed it. Should have searched for 'Jack'... I was just scrolling through his ISO from that point. It was a bit half-hearted because I trusted that you witch hunt motherfuckers would exercise due diligence, but that trust was severely misplaced. You were all more interested in stroking each other's 'egos' than finding the truth.

Lol oh shut the expletive deleted up we were just excited and having fun. Go have a warm glass of milk and a lie down old man.

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:11 am Also, what's trading? I don't recall seeing any trading. We talkin' items here?

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:01 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:11 am Also, what's trading? I don't recall seeing any trading. We talkin' items here?

Genuine ignorance? Would suggest town.

Unless the scumsters aren't communicating about the trades. It's a pretty important mechanic in this game.

linki x6
Guys I'm not going to catch up if you make posts as fast as I can read them

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:01 pm MP has used vote tags for all his votes.

I'm really not understanding this.

He said that before he voting Long Con... agian.