The Syndicate

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:10 am**

jess wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 4:36 pm
gims wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 12:48 pm I thought dubz' defense on nutella last gameday, against DM, was pretty scummy

not that it was incorrect. its probably correct. but it felt like TMI. it felt like dubz has town!nutella as a given. only townies would get paranoid about her/poking her at that stage in the game. for wolves, its easy to just shrug that slot as town and focus on whatever is incorrect in POE.
yea i also was lightly pinged by this post at the time:

Dubz wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2026 10:51 pm Why, as I'm reading backwards, are DM and gims acting like nutella isn't one of the clearest people here lmao

As far as I can tell the game is not off the rails enough for us to be poking at people who should be in the towncore, unless I missed something major

SKREEEE— ahem. Legally distinct rawr.
because i agree that nutella is proly town but the language was decisive in a way that maybe clashes awkwardly relative to dubz lack of engagement, like a read that can stem from a position of TMI

Prolly town

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:12 am**

wow huh ok cool i proly would have needed another phase or two before i wanted to kill dubz

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:12 am**

easy game easy life

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:13 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:10 am
jess wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 4:36 pm
gims wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 12:48 pm I thought dubz' defense on nutella last gameday, against DM, was pretty scummy

not that it was incorrect. its probably correct. but it felt like TMI. it felt like dubz has town!nutella as a given. only townies would get paranoid about her/poking her at that stage in the game. for wolves, its easy to just shrug that slot as town and focus on whatever is incorrect in POE.
yea i also was lightly pinged by this post at the time:

Dubz wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2026 10:51 pm Why, as I'm reading backwards, are DM and gims acting like nutella isn't one of the clearest people here lmao

As far as I can tell the game is not off the rails enough for us to be poking at people who should be in the towncore, unless I missed something major

SKREEEE— ahem. Legally distinct rawr.
because i agree that nutella is proly town but the language was decisive in a way that maybe clashes awkwardly relative to dubz lack of engagement, like a read that can stem from a position of TMI
Prolly town

Looks like pretty basic distancing to me, keep in mind wolves were not aware Dubz would be going down so soon

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:13 am**

Nutella spewed clear imo
So is jess
So is DM
So is scotty
So is spurs
Idk game just over

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:14 am**

I'm pretty sure jess is just outed here

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:14 am**

leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:13 am
gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:10 am
jess wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 4:36 pm
gims wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 12:48 pm I thought dubz' defense on nutella last gameday, against DM, was pretty scummy

not that it was incorrect. its probably correct. but it felt like TMI. it felt like dubz has town!nutella as a given. only townies would get paranoid about her/poking her at that stage in the game. for wolves, its easy to just shrug that slot as town and focus on whatever is incorrect in POE.
yea i also was lightly pinged by this post at the time:

Dubz wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2026 10:51 pm Why, as I'm reading backwards, are DM and gims acting like nutella isn't one of the clearest people here lmao

As far as I can tell the game is not off the rails enough for us to be poking at people who should be in the towncore, unless I missed something major

SKREEEE— ahem. Legally distinct rawr.
because i agree that nutella is proly town but the language was decisive in a way that maybe clashes awkwardly relative to dubz lack of engagement, like a read that can stem from a position of TMI
Prolly town
Looks like pretty basic distancing to me, keep in mind wolves were not aware Dubz would be going down so soon

Redirectors went to wilgy/dubz

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:15 am**

leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:14 am I'm pretty sure jess is just outed here

Oh

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:15 am**

i dont think it's actually clearing for me per se but i will give a reminder that dubz spent badically all of d2 pushing on me iirc

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:16 am**

I am willing to accept a jess/Wilgy PoE

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:18 am**

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:19 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:14 am
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:13 am
gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:10 am
jess wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 4:36 pm
gims wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 12:48 pm I thought dubz' defense on nutella last gameday, against DM, was pretty scummy

not that it was incorrect. its probably correct. but it felt like TMI. it felt like dubz has town!nutella as a given. only townies would get paranoid about her/poking her at that stage in the game. for wolves, its easy to just shrug that slot as town and focus on whatever is incorrect in POE.
yea i also was lightly pinged by this post at the time:

Dubz wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2026 10:51 pm Why, as I'm reading backwards, are DM and gims acting like nutella isn't one of the clearest people here lmao

As far as I can tell the game is not off the rails enough for us to be poking at people who should be in the towncore, unless I missed something major

SKREEEE— ahem. Legally distinct rawr.
because i agree that nutella is proly town but the language was decisive in a way that maybe clashes awkwardly relative to dubz lack of engagement, like a read that can stem from a position of TMI
Prolly town
Looks like pretty basic distancing to me, keep in mind wolves were not aware Dubz would be going down so soon
Redirectors went to wilgy/dubz

Didn't see the post where this was planned. But if this was the case wouldn't Dubz carry the kill in a Dubz/Wilgy world (unless there's something I'm misunderstanding here)?

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:20 am**

leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:19 am
gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:14 am
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:13 am
gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:10 am
jess wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 4:36 pm
gims wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 12:48 pm I thought dubz' defense on nutella last gameday, against DM, was pretty scummy

not that it was incorrect. its probably correct. but it felt like TMI. it felt like dubz has town!nutella as a given. only townies would get paranoid about her/poking her at that stage in the game. for wolves, its easy to just shrug that slot as town and focus on whatever is incorrect in POE.
yea i also was lightly pinged by this post at the time:

Dubz wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2026 10:51 pm Why, as I'm reading backwards, are DM and gims acting like nutella isn't one of the clearest people here lmao

As far as I can tell the game is not off the rails enough for us to be poking at people who should be in the towncore, unless I missed something major

SKREEEE— ahem. Legally distinct rawr.
because i agree that nutella is proly town but the language was decisive in a way that maybe clashes awkwardly relative to dubz lack of engagement, like a read that can stem from a position of TMI
Prolly town
Looks like pretty basic distancing to me, keep in mind wolves were not aware Dubz would be going down so soon
Redirectors went to wilgy/dubz
Didn't see the post where this was planned. But if this was the case wouldn't Dubz carry the kill in a Dubz/Wilgy world (unless there's something I'm misunderstanding here)?

Theres two redirectors

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:22 am**

oh is wilgy outed mechanically? i havent really followed most of the mechanical discussion this game tbh

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:22 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:20 am
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:19 am
gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:14 am
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:13 am
gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:10 am
jess wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 4:36 pm
gims wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 12:48 pm I thought dubz' defense on nutella last gameday, against DM, was pretty scummy

not that it was incorrect. its probably correct. but it felt like TMI. it felt like dubz has town!nutella as a given. only townies would get paranoid about her/poking her at that stage in the game. for wolves, its easy to just shrug that slot as town and focus on whatever is incorrect in POE.
yea i also was lightly pinged by this post at the time:

Dubz wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2026 10:51 pm Why, as I'm reading backwards, are DM and gims acting like nutella isn't one of the clearest people here lmao

As far as I can tell the game is not off the rails enough for us to be poking at people who should be in the towncore, unless I missed something major

SKREEEE— ahem. Legally distinct rawr.
because i agree that nutella is proly town but the language was decisive in a way that maybe clashes awkwardly relative to dubz lack of engagement, like a read that can stem from a position of TMI
Prolly town
Looks like pretty basic distancing to me, keep in mind wolves were not aware Dubz would be going down so soon
Redirectors went to wilgy/dubz
Didn't see the post where this was planned. But if this was the case wouldn't Dubz carry the kill in a Dubz/Wilgy world (unless there's something I'm misunderstanding here)?
Theres two redirectors

Can you link to the post where the actions were planned just to make sure I'm not missing anything

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:23 am**

[img]https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5e/9f/e1 ... 0f6616.gif[/img]

And ye sure if someone else doesnt do it first just cause im on phone

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:24 am**

Had to repost

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:26 am**

Also, not sure this needs repeating but Dubz's death marks three flipped wolves who tried to get rid of me in the early game

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:26 am**

leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:26 am Also, not sure this needs repeating but Dubz's death marks three flipped wolves who tried to get rid of me in the early game

Yes youre Lock clear

You also tried killing dubz

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:27 am**

In their defense youre p scummy

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:27 am**

That is ofc not criticism

Some ppl just post like they have TMI lol

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:29 am**

this game does feel like the luigi wins by doing absolutely nothing meme insofar as ive basically been taking the backseat for the entire time, but im cool with that. sometimes it's good to not have to try hard

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:30 am**

leetic wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 10:25 pm DrWilgy: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 Trekkie99, D3 Epignosis, D4 Epignosis
Duelist Mirage: D1 Dubz, D2 leetic, D3 Long Con, D4 pyxxy
Gims: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 Trekkie99, D3 pyxxy, D4 leetic
GoSpursGo: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 MacDougall, D3 Long Con, D4 oyxxy
Jess: D1 Epignosis, D2 Trekkie99, D3 slank, D4 leetic
leetic: D1 Duelist Mirage, D2 Trekkie99, D3 pyxxy, D4 pyxxy
MacDougall: D1 Porscha, D2 RondoDimBuckle, D3 Long Con, D4 leetic
Nutella: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 MacDougall, D3 Long Con, D4 leetic
Porscha: D1 slank, D2 Trekkie99, D3 slank, D4 pyxxy
Pyxxy: D1 RondoDimBuckle, D2 MacDougall, D3 Long Con, D4 Epignosis
RondoDimBuckle: D1 slank, D2 MacDougall, D3 slank, D4 leetic
Scotty: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 Trekkie99, D3 pyxxy, D4 pyxxy
Tranq: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 Trekkie99, D3 Long Con, D4 pyxxy

NicoleandDime: D1 [color=80FF00]Vivax[/color]
Trekkie99: D1 Dubz, D2 leetic
Vivax: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 leetic
Long Con: D1 Duelist Mirage, D2 slank, D3 slank
Michelle : D1 Duelist Mirage, D2 Trekkie99, D3 pyxxy
Epignosis: D1 Duelist Mirage, D2 leetic, D3 pyxxy, D4 pyxxy
Dubz: D1 leetic, D2 Jess, D3 Long Con, D4 pyxxy

Updated colors, it looks like Trekkie's D1 vote was indeed a bus

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:31 am**

leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:30 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 10:25 pm DrWilgy: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 Trekkie99, D3 Epignosis, D4 Epignosis
Duelist Mirage: D1 Dubz, D2 leetic, D3 Long Con, D4 pyxxy
Gims: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 Trekkie99, D3 pyxxy, D4 leetic
GoSpursGo: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 MacDougall, D3 Long Con, D4 oyxxy
Jess: D1 Epignosis, D2 Trekkie99, D3 slank, D4 leetic
leetic: D1 Duelist Mirage, D2 Trekkie99, D3 pyxxy, D4 pyxxy
MacDougall: D1 Porscha, D2 RondoDimBuckle, D3 Long Con, D4 leetic
Nutella: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 MacDougall, D3 Long Con, D4 leetic
Porscha: D1 slank, D2 Trekkie99, D3 slank, D4 pyxxy
Pyxxy: D1 RondoDimBuckle, D2 MacDougall, D3 Long Con, D4 Epignosis
RondoDimBuckle: D1 slank, D2 MacDougall, D3 slank, D4 leetic
Scotty: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 Trekkie99, D3 pyxxy, D4 pyxxy
Tranq: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 Trekkie99, D3 Long Con, D4 pyxxy

NicoleandDime: D1 [color=80FF00]Vivax[/color]
Trekkie99: D1 Dubz, D2 leetic
Vivax: D1 NicoleandDime, D2 leetic
Long Con: D1 Duelist Mirage, D2 slank, D3 slank
Michelle : D1 Duelist Mirage, D2 Trekkie99, D3 pyxxy
Epignosis: D1 Duelist Mirage, D2 leetic, D3 pyxxy, D4 pyxxy
Dubz: D1 leetic, D2 Jess, D3 Long Con, D4 pyxxy
Updated colors, it looks like Trekkie's D1 vote was indeed a bus

Fixed one of the colors, sorry it's 5:30 AM

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:43 am**

jess wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:22 am oh is wilgy outed mechanically? i havent really followed most of the mechanical discussion this game tbh

I mean I think scotty laid that plan out with the redirectors but apparently most ppl missed

The dubz flip clears the field almost completely anyway

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:48 am**

For instance pyxxy is definitely just town now

He was pushing dubz hard the day he was wagoned with LC

Nutella was TMI spewed by dubz

Leetic is spewed clear by dubz going "oh I can just sheep spurs then *votes leetic*" amongst other things

I do think jess looks great for sussing dubz last night when she had no reason to

DM pushed dubz on the back of her nutella suspicion, thats very hard to fake

Spurs/dubz interaction is hardly ever paired, spurs simply had no TMI there

Then we have other slots who look good for other reasons

Then we have wilgy

Might want to reconsider mac If that flips town but considering what redirection did last night we flip wilgy first

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:50 am**

Scotty is def clear on the back of a strong dubz push last night as well

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:01 am**

rondo clear for randomly wanting to cfd dubz

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:01 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:06 am

lol you win, and once again I’ve failed to correctly read dubz

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:02 am**

nah mate

we both win

you played a fantastic game

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:04 am**

Tranq wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 1:02 pm How about this:
We ask BOTH Redirectors to target Dubz and redirect the action to DrWilgy.
We ask Parrot to target DrWilgy and use their target on Dubz.
If not possible due to double targetting, pick the other one.

If both of them are mafia, this could make one of them kill the other one. Could this work?

And we ask Doctor and Watcher to target Tranq in case mafia isn't fond of this plan

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:05 am**

it was tranq

im assuming parrot/redirectors maybe saw that and acted accordingly

also, and i think its fair to speculate, i think tranq is one of them lol

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:05 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:02 am nah mate

we both win

you played a fantastic game

You too—great reads.

So it sounds like we are assuming the redirectors went with Wilgy?

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:07 am**

well

I see no reason not to flip him atp even if we dont flat out assume that

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:08 am**

[VOTE: drwilgy] aubergine

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 7:30 am**

PIYAHAHAHAHAH PIYAHAHAHAHAHA

[VOTE: Wilgy] aubergine

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 7:38 am**

Good night.

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:27 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:01 am rondo clear for randomly wanting to cfd dubz

@pyxxy love you

yeah sorry Gims and spurs, I wanted to make it seem like you were pushable today so youd survive the night

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:32 am**

RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:27 am
gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:01 am rondo clear for randomly wanting to cfd dubz
@pyxxy love you

yeah sorry Gims and spurs, I wanted to make it seem like you were pushable today so youd survive the night

I had an inkling that if you were town, that was probably what you were doing. We're good.

Anyways I'm heading over to the hospital and it's a particularly busy day. I'll probably catch up on overnight stuff at some point just for completeness, but maybe not since it doesn't appear it's going to impact anything

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:35 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:05 am it was tranq

im assuming parrot/redirectors maybe saw that and acted accordingly

also, and i think its fair to speculate, i think tranq is one of them lol

i dont care what tranq is he is town for voting 3 mafia in a row

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:38 am**

RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:35 am i dont care what tranq is he is town for voting 3 mafia in a row

oh tranq is towncore since d1

the thing is that he is voting wilgy so that might hint us that the wilgy/dubz target coordination is real

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:39 am**

GoSpursGo wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:05 am So it sounds like we are assuming the redirectors went with Wilgy?

Redirectors were asked to change Dubz' target to Wilgy. Dubz died, so this is not what happened.
Parrot was asked to copy Wilgy and target Dubz. Maybe this is what happened. But if so we are still missing Wilgy's actual kill.
Any of the above could've been changed by the Bus Driver, or by Redirectors/Parrot doing their own thing.

So we can't really be sure it's Wilgy, but it looks that way.

Ignoring all of this, i'm happy sheeping Scotty's case on Wilgy tbh. He was right on Dubz. Let's see if he's right on Wilgy.

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:41 am**

leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:22 am
gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:20 am
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:19 am
gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:14 am
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:13 am
gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:10 am
jess wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 4:36 pm

yea i also was lightly pinged by this post at the time:

because i agree that nutella is proly town but the language was decisive in a way that maybe clashes awkwardly relative to dubz lack of engagement, like a read that can stem from a position of TMI
Prolly town
Looks like pretty basic distancing to me, keep in mind wolves were not aware Dubz would be going down so soon
Redirectors went to wilgy/dubz
Didn't see the post where this was planned. But if this was the case wouldn't Dubz carry the kill in a Dubz/Wilgy world (unless there's something I'm misunderstanding here)?
Theres two redirectors
Can you link to the post where the actions were planned just to make sure I'm not missing anything

dude this is the most mafia post i have read all day

[VOTE: leetic] aubergine

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:42 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:27 am In their defense youre p scummy

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:43 am**

jess wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 5:29 am this game does feel like the luigi wins by doing absolutely nothing meme insofar as ive basically been taking the backseat for the entire time, but im cool with that. sometimes it's good to not have to try hard

I have won a grand total of zero prizes, I give up. Im malding, seething

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:43 am**

Tranq wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:39 am Parrot was asked to copy Wilgy and target Dubz. Maybe this is what happened. But if so we are still missing Wilgy's actual kill.

we still have a doctor and a 1-x BP townie, right?

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:47 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 6:04 am
Tranq wrote: ↑Mon Oct 05, 2026 1:02 pm How about this:
We ask BOTH Redirectors to target Dubz and redirect the action to DrWilgy.
We ask Parrot to target DrWilgy and use their target on Dubz.
If not possible due to double targetting, pick the other one.

If both of them are mafia, this could make one of them kill the other one. Could this work?

And we ask Doctor and Watcher to target Tranq in case mafia isn't fond of this plan

huh, neat

[VOTE: wilgy] aubergine

why not me tho? I am super sus, cmon tranq, dont town read me

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:47 am**

would you scum read me? id scum read me

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:49 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:43 am
Tranq wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:39 am Parrot was asked to copy Wilgy and target Dubz. Maybe this is what happened. But if so we are still missing Wilgy's actual kill.
we still have a doctor and a 1-x BP townie, right?

wat?

Posted: **Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:52 am**

gims wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:43 am
Tranq wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2026 8:39 am Parrot was asked to copy Wilgy and target Dubz. Maybe this is what happened. But if so we are still missing Wilgy's actual kill.
we still have a doctor and a 1-x BP townie, right?

Aye, that could explain it.

The Syndicate

WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [NIGHT FOUR]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [NIGHT FOUR]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [NIGHT FOUR]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [NIGHT FOUR]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [NIGHT FOUR]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [NIGHT FOUR]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [NIGHT FOUR]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [NIGHT FOUR]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [NIGHT FOUR]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]

Re: WORLD TOUR MAFIA II: JAPAN [DAY FIVE]