But I bet juliets doesSloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 11:14 pm![]()

Return to “MU Season 6 Scrimmage [GAME OVER]”
But I bet juliets doesSloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 11:14 pm![]()
Yeah that's another good point. We were just out there throwing around townreads based on wildly differing standards.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 11:07 pmI've always felt the tournament itself favors mafia teams for the same reason you guys had an advantage here: nobody knows each other. It's super easy to get away with phony behavior when no one knows what your authentic self looks like.
That's not to say it's not an awesome event and tons of fun to participate in. But it's a thing.
I smell an incoming uppity youtube presentation.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 11:01 pm Y'all are raising good points about the composition of an ideal civilian. I have a five-pronged image now:
1) Make good reads / have good instincts (the dunyas and Macs)
2) Pursue those reads in such a manner that others will be compelled to follow (the Jays and Goldens)
3) Avoid the noose (the Epis)
4) Promote a thread climate conducive to effective hunting (the Slooneis and MPs)
5) Know when to play the role of the follower (numerous)
LOL
Fair enough about kill suppression dangers, but still the randomized roles mean that mafia can safely claim and stuffJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 10:56 pmI have mixed feelings. On balance, I don't like the setup. Randomizing alignments to this set of roles means that the game can be super skewed in either direction depending upon the dice.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 10:52 pm I also think that the build, at least in this sites meta, favoured us. No night chat was a big deal.
In our case, I think the mafia team had one significant disadvantage: we couldn't kill anyone we wanted to kill until Night 5. Two jailers, two doctors, one JOAT, two trackers, and two watchers -- holy hell we had to tip toe around every damned thing to get anything done.
Locked nights were a huge advantage for us though. Just imagine if DDL had been able to rip us a new asshole on Night 5 before we killed him. That made a big difference in this game.
Strongly agree. Thread lock during night is a substantial skew in the mafia's favor. I know it's pretty standard on many other sites but I think perhaps a couple other details about this setup combined with it give the mafia an unfair advantage, and judging by how the champs games so far are going I just might be right.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 10:52 pm I also think that the build, at least in this sites meta, favoured us. No night chat was a big deal.
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 10:33 pm Trying to suspect Jay or Nutella was legitimately annoying. I did not enjoy it.
lol poor nova
Right, yeah.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 10:23 pmAnd if you hadn't jailed her, she would have jailed mac and prevented the kill from going through that night. Things would have been very different if that night had played out any other way.nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 10:18 pm also, lol that I was able to claim that I used the doctor shot on Lux when I really jailed her, even though she made a big deal puzzling out that she was roleblocked. I didn't actually know that Ultra had been the RB, but it's convenient that everyone seemed to just figure there must have been an RB out there and didn't question which JOAT ability I really used![]()
Yeah lol. You were so incredibly meticulous about making it look like you were actively discussing while actually not stoking activity and timing things so that the thread wouldn't get too excited about anything. So calculated.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 10:19 pm I also think that if I do too good a job matching my civilian meta, it can hurt the rest of my team. I don't want the thread to catch fire. I want it to look like I want it to catch fire, perhaps.![]()
DDL (and I before replacing in) was just able to identify scum Jay because of extensive familiarity with his town style. The differences are really subtle and you didn't have the privilege of having played with him several times before. And still, he basically was a deepwolf to most of the living town players toward the end.Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 10:13 pm I don't understand what was scummy about Jay. Dude provided all these big posts on player interactions and whatnot(albeit, didn't really lead anywhere), actually tried being a leader to some extent and was trying to game solve. The man was straight up powerwolfing. He was busting his ass to become a deep wolf. I'm surprised he didn't get that privilege.
Seriously. [mention]Dragon D. Luffy[/mention] you had us shaking in our boots til the end. If night phases weren't locked we might have lost to the pressure you would put on us then.
I'm having a nice day in the sunshine. I think speed is the better choice of course, if you are hoping I will persuade owner I don't know what else to say in this situation. I won't fault anyone for voting rdw at this stage as he has made no effort to prevent it himself.
....huh? I feel like that usually results in a mislynch??MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 5:27 pm There are two things that almost always result in a scum lynch. One is unversal red on GTH and the other is the lynch being settled well ahead of the end of day with little panic or resistance.
yeah but like just by default/poe, not super strongly, and I'm starting to feel weird about this
Scum
Scum
Town
sort of, yeah. my concern isn't necessarily that you conflated something you wanted to accuse somebody else of, it's more like you probably made up the read in the first place to justify a gemma vote, and when you couldn't find evidence to back up the reasoning you backed off on that but still came up with justification for the gemma vote.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 4:42 pm
I don't conflate reads as scum. I don't lynch people over crap then say "aw, shucks, I was thinking of someone else". That's not my scumplay. Nor is it my townplay, really, but that's beside the point. I wasn't faking conflating two reads (Owner and Gemma) then hoping nobody would notice when my vote stayed put. That's ridiculous.
I assume that's what the accusation is.
[mention]speedchuck[/mention] since you needed some helpnutella wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 3:23 pmthis is the most fascinating part of your findings imo. could be an attempt to draw a seemingly nonexistent connection between a teammate and an easy mislynch target.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 2:41 pm
speedchuck had dropped a vote on Gemma on Day 3, and this was his explanation after my prod. The highlighted portion seems to be an important thing, but on a scan I did not see speedchuck drawing this connection previously. If this associative read existed, it was exclusively in his head. I don't care for this.
As it happens, speedchuck wants that scratched. He said he was thinking of someone else, and that the Gemma suspicion was separate. Okay.Who was it supposed to be, chuckaroo? Luxurious suggested Owner. Yeh? Neh?
![]()
In any event, in absence of the Ultra connection this is what remained of speedchuck's suspcion of Gemma. It's where his vote remained.speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 6:19 pmBut I don't read ISOs, not lately.
Mm.
Gemma was saying a lot of things without saying anything, and the bird comics only got me so far. Suspicion. Don't remember anything more than that.
Feel Owner is town right now. Owner has a very specific was of scumhunting, and I didn't see it at first, but I've caught glimpses of it now.
I'm also not impressed by his nonchalant joining of the d2 soneji wagon when he clearly suspected jack more, and saying he was also "okay with a dragomir lynch" is patently unnecessary.
I liked the bit about the d4 reads as well, as I've pointed out earlier his "top scumreads" were big ol' nothings and particularly dragomir was in your words his "top waffle" lol. I been sayin.![]()
speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 4:27 pmnutella wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 3:37 pm it's not merely the fact that you threw weak reads out in isolation though, it's with the context of which players they were and what your reasons were and your relation to dragomir over the course of the game. Believe me, I understand throwing out weak reads, but I think you're missing the point of why I found that post particularly suspicious.
Now address the new points![]()
I see nothing there. You're throwing out buzzwords like "which players" and "your relation to dragomir" and I'm like... okay. So? What's scummy?
Like the first thing I addressed in the same post you just quoted? You have elected to ignore thatspeedchuck wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 3:50 pm... new points? You can ask me questions if you found something confusing, but I'm not going to hit that giant iso and start a bunch of disputes
this is the most fascinating part of your findings imo. could be an attempt to draw a seemingly nonexistent connection between a teammate and an easy mislynch target.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 2:41 pm
speedchuck had dropped a vote on Gemma on Day 3, and this was his explanation after my prod. The highlighted portion seems to be an important thing, but on a scan I did not see speedchuck drawing this connection previously. If this associative read existed, it was exclusively in his head. I don't care for this.
As it happens, speedchuck wants that scratched. He said he was thinking of someone else, and that the Gemma suspicion was separate. Okay.Who was it supposed to be, chuckaroo? Luxurious suggested Owner. Yeh? Neh?
![]()
In any event, in absence of the Ultra connection this is what remained of speedchuck's suspcion of Gemma. It's where his vote remained.speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 6:19 pmBut I don't read ISOs, not lately.
Mm.
Gemma was saying a lot of things without saying anything, and the bird comics only got me so far. Suspicion. Don't remember anything more than that.
Feel Owner is town right now. Owner has a very specific was of scumhunting, and I didn't see it at first, but I've caught glimpses of it now.
And easy enough to do so as mafia just for this reason (in case of tracking, which it seemed likely RDW would track dragomir since he stated suspicion of him, or alternatively they are teammates and just playing make believe) while killing another near universal townread
...what?rundontwalk2 wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 1:39 pmOn what dragon luffy says like what was impact of dragonmir targeting himJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 1:25 pm Right, I mean the "depends on what Dragon says" part though -- or is the entire post about Dragomir
rundontwalk2 please come explain your shit
I'm so confusedJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 9:19 pmRe-interpretation doesn't change context, it changes reads. In your suspicion of me, you're forced to assess the entire body of the game to generate the stance that you have. I don't give a crap what you think of my response to your suspicion -- your suspicion preceded it (indeed, the semantics of that sentence are self-evidentspeedchuck wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 9:15 pm linki: Then I guess I don't really get it. Actions seem towny or they don't. If the context doesn't change, then how does an interpretation completely flip it?). Is it even possible for you to develop a changed read on me without re-interpreting content which you had previously liked?
what?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 8:53 pmWhat is "hardass town Jay" and where did you see him?
Well the connection between you was just her protection and that iirc you two were fairly buddy-buddy. My main issue with Gemma was her hesitance to express scumreads, and some general tonal pingsJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 8:45 pm nutella, when you joined the game you said you'd had a theory that Gemma and I were both bad. Tell me about that, and more generally why you were beefing with Gemma
Haha get it
you could, like, read my posts and find outMacDougall wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 12:57 amHe is? Why?nutella wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 12:56 amHe's my top suspect...? Your tiers don't exactly reflect my view but Dragomir is a very close second choice for me so whatever manMacDougall wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 12:36 am I find your vote placement questionable nutella. How can you justify voting speed over dragdocwalk?
He's my top suspect...? Your tiers don't exactly reflect my view but Dragomir is a very close second choice for me so whatever manMacDougall wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 12:36 am I find your vote placement questionable nutella. How can you justify voting speed over dragdocwalk?
Yeah, I get a similar feeling - [mention]Dragomir[/mention] I had some trouble articulating the problems I've had with the way you've been pursuing Owner but this is sort of it. It's like you have chosen her as the scapegoat to come back to whenever you feel like lightly pressuring someone, in a way that slowly, gradually manipulates the narrative to set her up as a future mislynch in your favor.Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 12:19 am
But what Dragomir is doing doesn't look strong at all. I get why he's pushing me - cause there's a potential I might not really play that much, but still it's like dude, you were kind of caught in the act of overreacting to one vote. Yes, I get town has a reason to live too, but I did still claim early on. And you said "you wanted to scum read me"; it was like you knew I was town and what I did was townie. But then you decided/went ahead and scum read me anyway. It kind of feels like one of those grudge votes. (You were suspicious of me early, so I'm gonna get you back one way or another type deals. But yeah, it's not a super natural type read; it's like Dragomir is trying to hard to push something that isn't very natural or genuine feeling.