The Syndicate

That's not accurate, I have never defended Enrique. The post you quoted earlier where I discussed Made and Enrique was intended to convey that I'm suspicious of both. I chose Made for this lynch because of the value we may find in regards to the Snow Dog lynch. Obviously you suspect me now, so that'...

I found Epig's points about Made repeatedly defending you, Enrique, coupled with the Made save seeming last lynch, compounded by Epig and BR unrelentingly suspecting you... To be very convincing. My vote will go to Made.

zeek wrote:Enrique's survival harelipped suspicious

Enrique's survival is suspicious.

I Baneslayer think it's that hard to figure out what capote insane person is terribly.

Hmm... I could be wrong. But I think getting a gist is easy enough.

Epignosis wrote:
Long Con wrote: Like, should Epig be not allowed to suspect Enrique now?

Exactly.

But that one is an especially fun one, and it is kinda traditional for us :) And the fact that hosts over time have requested certain additions to the "insane" word list makes for fond memories of games long past, bubbling up on the lips of the insane. Linki: yes! And it's pretty hard to ...

I think that trying to beat the Insanifier goes against the spirit of the game. There are ways to beat it, Chinese, repetition, whatever. I don't agree with doing any of that. So it's not a perfect system, so it's easy to beat. So what? When I get afflicted somehow, I don't look for ways to beat it...

I think that trying to beat the Insanifier goes against the spirit of the game. There are ways to beat it, Chinese, repetition, whatever. I don't agree with doing any of that. So it's not a perfect system, so it's easy to beat. So what? When I get afflicted somehow, I don't look for ways to beat it,...

I just wanted to do something to differentiate. If I just said 'Canuck was not around first', it could mean that you weren't around first, you were around second... or something like that.

Epig, you assume you get better as you go. I posit that your ego may convince you that you are a improving, despite evidence to the contrary.

You're all wrong. But I guess you'll see that. And thanks for all voting for me when I clearly stated I'd barely be around. I have been voting you for days! :) And Canuck was "not around" first. :p Why the quotation marks? I really, really hope you're not inferring that my absence is game...

LoRab wrote:You're all wrong. But I guess you'll see that.

And thanks for all voting for me when I clearly stated I'd barely be around.

I have been voting you for days!

And Canuck was "not around" first.

Ooo, yeah, 24 hour day, hosts!!

Dana wrote:Well I guess not just for now since we can't change votes.

Hey, I warned ya! Good choice though.

OH yeah, and Epig... sorry for voting for you. It was just one little vote, I didn't know you'd get railroaded like that.

Ha ha, I just posted this in the Polls thread. :blush: :blush: :blush: If Made isn't bad, then the theory that the Snow Dog voters are bad goes away. The baddies aren't going to pile on to one of two lead-vote-getters for no reason. Why would they do that? Why not just vote around, early, late, lik...

Epig, where were you?

MP07, I don't see how "No u"ing you is a baddie maneuver. Is that what a baddie does? Did I twirl my black moustache as I did it? It's not an alignment thing, it's just what it was. I didn't have a solid suspicion due to quick-catch-up reading on the phone... I get the basics of some of th...

Vote for MP07 because I see he voted for me.

Voted Lorab, unable to change my vote for the record. Vote wisely the first time.

Too much activity! You're seeing a quieter LC because of the amount of posts to catch up on . I can barely keep up with this insanity!

LC if what you say is true, then I understand you aren't bad. However, it still leaves Bullz on my list. Im trying to consider what's left. Lorab's vote for me VS you stood out to me for her needing Civs dead. How do you and everyone else feel about Lorab tomorrow maybe? I think you know how I feel...

Suddenly, I'm reminded of the end of King Arthur when you were trying to help the civs win. Did you mean to prompt that good memory in my brain LC? Ha ha, somewhat similar, but obviously I'm not the rabbit this time, so I don't get a kill. And hopefully there's no Kate this time to kill me needless...

Interesting. Long Con do you know why you didn't get lynched? Yes, know why. I told you it would be a waste of time, you guys have way better options than me for lynching, darn it. They're right in front of you! I just want to help the Civs win, I'm being honest here! Hopefully we can get another n...

I have to go to work. Juliets, you have to just go with your gut at this point. I will cross my fingers and vote Lorab, if you want a baddie this lynch then please do the same.

Your feelings betray you, Boogs, as they did when you vouched for Bea. I am 100% not a baddie. Killing me would be a waste of time.

Hey, I know I'm being quiet, but I'm reading along, trying to figure out what's what. I'm a little suspicious of MP for being The Master, but I think I'm more sympathetic at the suspicion he's gotten for surviving a night kill. I'll add it into the mix that there's a Civvie role I know he's not due ...

Two baddie teams would likely have to eliminate each other as well. If there were two baddies on one, two baddies on the other, and three Civs, then this is still anyone's game. Even if there were three baddies on one team, it could still work out. Maybe there's even two on one team and one on the o...

Last line of the Master: "This is up to and including kill attempts."

juliets wrote:That is not what I was wanting to hear but thanks for your insight.

What did you want to hear?

I estimate Two or three baddies per team, each with one recruit possible. We've killed three baddies so far if I recall correctly, leaving maybe four or five baddies left alive right now. Three baddies left alive in my most optimistic scenario.

Boogs, you're the one that has blatantly vouched for a baddie, plus all that stuff that Bullz won't let you off the hook for. What exactly is your case on me? A bad feeling? If you are still a Civ, which I very much doubt, trust me and vote for Canuck or Lorab. Just give me a chance before stringing...

Bullzeye wrote:Funny how you said Bea was definitely civ and then she turned out to be the role responsible for silencing me when you pushed your "case" against me.

How would you know that Bea silenced you? Her role has not been revealed on the first page.

bea wrote:LC - every time I see your avi I think it's face palming me.

Ha! Nice.

Let's see, Bullz voted for Boogs, Boogs voted for me, Dana voted for Bea (maybe not in that order). Then Bea came in and voted for Boogs, and I voted for Bea as the final vote.

RIP Epig! I voted for Karn because it sounds like a Magic card I know.

I voted Kraft Dinner.

:slick: Boogs, let's take the rest of them down. Also this seemed very odd to me. Boogs had just said he was suspicious of you, but then after Bea was lynched, you said this to him. I'm very undecided on whether this was sincere or not. It was sincere. I assumed that when Boogs saw that his assumpt...

I didn't have bad feelings about Bea, I just wanted to use my vote to avoid a Civ lynch - aka myself or Boogs. The "prove you wrong" to Boogs was basically 20% bravado and crossed fingers, 80% math. Bea was one of five or six people, and there are possibly three to five baddies in that gro...

I was immediately accepting of your Lorab case because I have been trying to get her lynched for a while myself. She's a baddie, and I want to take her out. Your case was like a breath of fresh air on the Lorab front.

Epignosis wrote:Be careful. I might change my vote and get everybody to vote the way I do.

I don't think you're scared of a couple of little votes.

Voting for Epig for now, I think his long-term game is to hide in plain sight.... in a baddie kind of way.

Epignosis wrote:Roxy, if you read the exchange in context, you will see that I did answer juliets, and there was no "Cheshire cat" responses. See for yourself. Mafia piggyback on suspicions, and juliets played me once before doing exactly that.

In which game did she play you like that?

Dom wrote:If Zeek would actually read my posts about him, it'd be helpful... I've never advocated once for his lynch-- I simply said one thing I noticed. I will not tolerate being lied about.

I always work hard to ensure my accusers are held accountable to truth and accuracy, because I feel the same way.

Dana, I'm sure I don't have to confirm that I agree with your thoughts.

. Nice work on the bea-Lorab connection.

I'm also "guilty" of only doing The Master for now. It's just because it was there first and I started it. Maybe I'll go Dalek tomorrow or something, I'm not doing it all at once. I think that, as a community, we'll get them all solved in no time,

That sucks, Canuck. I'll maintain my current suspicion of you, but that should be no surprise. I will assume your response to my continued suspicion will remain the same as you have already said.

Oh, I'm a hunter all right. Really I'm currently reading you as more of a phony. a BIG FAT PHONY!!! So let's play ball. *rolls up sleeves* *votes Epi* :feb: We finna go dirt sauce Linki- first blank might be blocked? correct amount of characters? Buried there at the end of Made's post. :)

"Blocked" is definitely good. Sorry, what? The first three attempts on his life will be blocked. Every night, he attempts to find(kill?) ---- -a---, --- ----/companions. If he finds him(her?), they gain BTSC. --- to --- -t---- a----t- as a scientist, ---- -- t-- -a-- -- -a- ----- ----- ni...

"Blocked" is definitely good. I like "scientist" too.

Search found 22221 matches