colonialbob interacting with jay:
colonialbob wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:03 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:36 pm
Everyone should tell me what things in this thread you feel are most important/most warrant my attention and discussion among those I didn't just address.
I'd be interested in thoughts on me/jack/LC. Also the vote swapping from Epi to Nutella
Responds to Jay's initial plea for direction. Innocent enough. I raised a few objections to Jay's response in my mega post(s) earlier, though. Bob's
follow up response is also harmless. None of this moves the needle in either direction.
Plops Jay in the direct center of a rainbow
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:30 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:17 am
Elohcin's rainbow and dialogue with Sloonei
Sloonei's questions here were reasonable -- Elohcin voiced in vague terms that the high posters seem civ and that she'd be willing to vote for a low poster. The contents of the rainbow list don't align with that much. A change of heart is fine, but I don't know if that's even what happened in Eloh's head -- the progression is unclear. The names in the rainbow almost appear randomized. I'm surprised to see myself rated well given my own slow start, and I have no idea why Mesk is so high. I don't know why the low posters are split between yellow and orange. I don't know why the high posters Sloonei and Quin are orange. When given an opportunity to expand on these things, she just said
"relax" and restated the general purpose of a rainbow list.
Elohcin, you need to talk more about what's going on there.
So then if he was right on all that why did he drop the vote when Epi said the read/case was bad? What made him swap his vote?
This does not feel like a teammate interaction. It's not impossible for it to be, but I think this is a good look for Bob. I disagree with the line of thought he is presenting here, but it looks like a genuine inquiry for a player he is trying to understand. If Jay and Bob are teammates then they are carrying on an entirely fabricated dialogue here. Again, not impossible, but also not something I'd say is common.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:38 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:34 am
Moreover I think the low-poster lynch strategy is ideal under these conditions.
Explain please. I'm also curious why you're defending somebody you didn't seem to be fully onboard with as town.
I can see more of a teammate motivation here, as this post presents an opportunity for some soft distancing. But it's still the same dialogue as above, and I'd need to decide that this is definitely something they'd fabricate in the thread in order for the partnership to make sense.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:28 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 2:53 am
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:30 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:17 am
Elohcin's rainbow and dialogue with Sloonei
Sloonei's questions here were reasonable -- Elohcin voiced in vague terms that the high posters seem civ and that she'd be willing to vote for a low poster. The contents of the rainbow list don't align with that much. A change of heart is fine, but I don't know if that's even what happened in Eloh's head -- the progression is unclear. The names in the rainbow almost appear randomized. I'm surprised to see myself rated well given my own slow start, and I have no idea why Mesk is so high. I don't know why the low posters are split between yellow and orange. I don't know why the high posters Sloonei and Quin are orange. When given an opportunity to expand on these things, she just said
"relax" and restated the general purpose of a rainbow list.
Elohcin, you need to talk more about what's going on there.
So then if he was right on all that why did he drop the vote when Epi said the read/case was bad? What made him swap his vote?
This was where I started to doubt Bob in real time. This is a wonky line of questioning. "Well if Sloonei's right about Eloh, why isn't he voting for her?", as if Town Sloonei should be certain that his read on Elohcin was correct, and it is suspicious that Sloonbeard would not follow through on such a convincing self-made read. Bogus line of inquiry. He's voting for me because I'm considering voting for Elohcin, then turning around to criticize me for not voting Elohcin.
That question was directed at JJJ because it was intended for JJJ. He was supporting your posting, so I wanted to understand why the part that bothered me didn't bother him. I wanted his thought process to help formulate a read on him, not as part of my feelings on you. I can certainly see why you interpreted this thay way, though, especially on ISO.
A continuation of the same conversation, only here I've interjected myself into it. He's trying to understand Jay's thought process. I can believe that. I don't have to. we'll see.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2017 10:50 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2017 5:24 am
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:28 am
That question was directed at JJJ because it was intended for JJJ. He was supporting your posting, so I wanted to understand why the part that bothered me didn't bother him. I wanted his thought process to help formulate a read on him, not as part of my feelings on you. I can certainly see why you interpreted this thay way, though, especially on ISO.
Can you describe the mafia mindset you attributed to Sloonei at the time regarding his vote move off of Elohcin? What about that maneuver made you suspicious of him?
He threw out a case on Eloh, nobody followed out and somebody disagreed with it, he moved off Eloh but expressed he was still fine voting her. Similarly, his "I could end up on Epi." In my experience mafia often try to gain consensus on their votes and are less likely to stake bold voting positions.
(Keep in mind part of his defense was "this is normal play for me," but I've essentially never played with him before. I modded one game on another site that I think you ebbed up replacing him, I was only alive one cycle in Crossover (and maybe he was modding?), and CC123 is far from a normal game)
At this point the dialogue has become essential for the both of them and there's no escaping it. If my hangup on the likelihood of this conversation being held between two teammates is the only piece of evidence in colonialbob's favor then I'm not buying it. If there's a larger backdrop of evidence then I'll have to reconsider. The initial exchange looked spontaneous but the rest of it has felt rather formulaic to me. That could just be a product of Jay's behavior appearing off to me, and I'm also projecting the same awkwardness onto bob, whom I've not played a real game with before (which came as a shock to me; we've been
involved in several games together in the past, but never both as active players, CC-123 withstanding. Sorry you've been my prime susect, Bobert!

)
I won't keep pulling up every post from this exchange. It's there and we can all read it and judge its authenticity for ourselves. I do not find it hard to believe that Jay and Bob would willfully carry out an extended dialogue in the thread while secretly being scum partners. It's a good look, so it's something they might be inclined to coordinate. On the other hand, it's simply a good look.
Gives Jay the thumbs up during the GTH drill
colonialbob wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:58 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 1:00 am
~ I'm surprised by the even split on Colonel Bob. Through the long night phase he seemed to attract and hold negative press without receiving much support if any. This was one of the more conflicted reads for me, and I may not be alone in that given the lack of consensus.
Me too. I want to go back and cross check all the people who said "wow that's a good case Sloonei has" with how they read me.
(PS it's colonial, I'm not in the army or anything

)
Jay's observation about Bob doesn't move me in any meaningful way, nor does Bob's response. It's the postscript that gives me more pause on my Bob scumread. That would be an awkward public exchange for two players who've allegedly been in private contact with each other throughout the game. It reflects genuine uncertainty and desire to correct the mistake from Bob, and I imagine the proper spelling of his name is something that would have previously been established in BTSC. Or maybe not, and this was just a sudden flare up. I don't know. But that's two things that don't strike me as being indicative of teammates. Hmph.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:07 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:58 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 9:55 pm
Well I liked this game.
Idk if it made me do better reads but it forced me to make a firm decision on several players. Felt the need to elaborate on Bob (poe/gut/no obvious pairing) and Eloh (feels real in spite of everything) in the moment but choose not to.
I'm following the progression of Jack's read on the Colonel, as the latter alluded to. He did move quickly from a bottom-tier mafia read to a GTH good read in quick succession. One question emerges here for colonialbob:
In a world where Jack is mafia and you are a civilian, what is the mafia benefit Jack enjoys by reversing his perspective of you in the wake of the negative press you received in the night phase? In this scenario you ought to look like a juicy mislynch steak.
His read was wishy-washy all game, constantly qualified with "I can't read bob". Swapping to a good read (but a questionable one) puts him in a position to be convinced I'm bad while also not leading the lynch on me. Remember his GTH reads followed a bit behind others... perhaps enough time to see several people viewing me as town?
Also helps if he and speed are w/w, let one keep pushing on me while one holds back.
Another q&a between Bob and Jay, but this one is necessitated by Jay playing the facilitator role in an exchange between Jack and Bob. I'm not particularly moved.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 6:47 pm
Seeing some very potential JJJ/quin links page 65. Also, did tripJ ever explain his late swap from Eloh back to Mesk?
colonialbob wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:25 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 10:10 am
I don't think J is bad with Dunya or Quin.
Bad Jimmy and bad Quin don't team up to save bad Dom. That's really dangerous for little return, given Dom has been inactive.
I still think Wuin is good.
Disagree. The first death being a mafia death is very bad thing for mafia. Bad Quin has cover from pushing after lasagne from the beginning, plus it's easier to justify votes swapping around in a CFD type EOD. I mean heck Sloonei voted with JJJ and I'm almost positive they're not w/w. I think JJJ/Quin/Dom w/w/w is still very much on the table.
(Plus little return isn't necessarily true. He could be Sutter Buttes, or Gwendol Wreakin's kill might be special in some way. And if his teammates can submit an action for him, doubly so.)
Some inclinations that bob is starting to suspect Jay. Good at face value, but I take it with a grain of salt due to my overarching theory that Jay invited his team to distance themselves from him after Day 3. I won't discredit Bob for coming out against him. I will, however note that immediately following this second post in which he names Jay/Quin/Dom as a potential scum trio, he casts this vote:
colonialbob wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:28 pm
Kylemii
I didn't like his push on Jack, I don't feel like he's solving, and I don't want to tunnel in on JJJ this early in the phase.
Doesn't want to tunnel Jay too much. Fair, but in a chin-scratching, skeptical way. Because, you know, I have to read Bob as bad.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:23 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:16 pm
I said I was going to put reads in this thread and I will. I do not have time to be Jerry Seinfeld and I don't give a shit about trying to be Jerry Seinfeld. I frankly don't see how there could be any impression that I give a shit about trying to be Jerry Seinfeld or any other generic super-civilian cookie cutter rendition of myself given the posts I have made in this game. This variety of meta read is bogus, as though JJJ suddenly forgets how to make a million posts when he draws a mafia role.
There's a reason I am only here during brief windows right now. That won't change for the foreseeable future in this or ensuing games. I implore the civilians in this thread to engage a broad dialogue whether I am your locked vote or not. Nothing is friendlier to the mafia team right now than a continuing focus on me, especially when I am in no position to engage the discussion.
I'd really prefer you to give us reasons you're town, rather than "I'm not bad you'll regret voting for me because it's what the mafia wants"
This is a prod that doesn't move me, again. Just a vague plea for "reasons to read Jay as town." I like that he's on Jay's case, but I don't feel like this post accomplishes a whole lot.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 10:56 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 10:46 pm
colonialbob wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 10:34 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:04 pm
I'm also bothered by the lack of votes in this day.
If Jay is bad, it would make sense for there to be some counter-wagon by now (maybe Wilgy is the counter wagon?). And I don't like how everyone who is voting for Jay is someone I'm currently townreading (well there is Jack, but I like current Jack more than Day 1 Jack so i'm still on the fence about him). Maybe mafia is just watching from afar, since the civs are doing their dirty work for them. So they don't need to expose themselves, by making bussing too obvious or risking discussion going against them.
Still catching up but had to comment on this. Jay seems a pretty obvious target for today - if he is bad he seems a better candidate for bussing than saving, especially considering his availability.
What was the purpose behind making this post?
To express disagreement with DDL as well as point out a soft defense of JJJ.
Why are you asking about this post?
Here he's going after DDL for an apparent defense of Jay. I don't fault DDL for this line of thinking, but I suppose this is another good look for bob, but one which I am still taking with a grain of salt. He even acknowledges himself that Jay is more likely a bus candidate than someone his teammates would try to save. And it is exactly that line of thinking which has me eyeballing this post right now. Bob has been vaguely positive on Jay all game long prior to Night 3, with neither of them taking a critical stance toward the other at any point. There were a couple of back-and-forth discussions, but they never really dug into one another as players in the game, only discussed theories involving
other players. As such, it is difficult to get a sense that either of them was making an effort to read the other during those earlier exchanges. After Jay emerged as a public suspect, Bob was on board and did not look back. Phew. I thought I'd lost my tunnel vision for a moment.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 12:23 am
nutella wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 12:20 am
Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 11:45 pm
Jay's iso case posts read sincere to me.
I must say I strongly disagree. They look so, so fake to me. Either way, they will be interesting to consider once we know his alignment.
Intrigued. How so? Are you saying you don't see yourself moving off JJJ today?
"Intrigued" by nutella's harsh stance against Jay, feat. empty follow up question.
And then a vote for speedchuck
colonialbob wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:33 am
CFD. For the fourth night in a row. No thanks I'll stick with speed.
But why? And also, as speedchuck noted himself, he was the CFD option. Jay was the initial suspect. Bob would point out that wilgy was the CFD option. Both of them were. I don't know, and I still don't know why bob was voting for chuck, but I haven't exactly been looking for that so I shouldn't speak about it other than to note that speedchuck and jaggedjimmyjay are not the same person.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:25 am
I like the people on JJJ much more, so I'm swtiching over.
JJJ
About an hour later bob returned to cast his final vote on Jay, citing that the crowd around him were all top blokes; good eggs. This strikes me as a bit of an awkward explanation. He'd already come out as harshly opposed to Jay earlier in the day, so much so that he attacked DDL for offering a soft defense of the J's. But when it came time to vote, bob held off for as long as he could and then when he finally
did put his vote on Jay, it was not because of any case to be made directly against Jay, but because the players voting for him are all good.
I need a more thorough explanation from Bob regarding his votes and overall behavior on Day 4, because I'm feeling some inconsistencies (the bad kind) here. why were you on speed in the first place? How would you characterize your suspicion of Jay from the start of the day phase through to the end? who were the "good" Jay voters that inspired you to move your vote?
These interactions have brought Bob closer to a town read than he was previously, but the evidence in his favor is not strong enough to remove him from my hot seat. He'd still be a priority suspect going into tomorrow, but perhaps not
the priority suspect as he was before.