Stuff about sig:
Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 1:16 pm
OK you fence sitters- I'ma make a bold statement that I think sig is TOWN.
Tell me why I'm wrong without using previous metas.
Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 6:02 pm
I disagree with this sig lynch
Bold proclamation that Sig is town, which is never really followed up with reasoning. Then disagrees with the lynch after it's locked in. Not great, Bob.
Colin interactions (many more so comments inside the tags):
Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:11 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:00 pm
Scotty's drunk posts make me read him as town, simply because I don't think a scum would try to play drunk. I'll stand corrected if anybody can counter.
Yeah no, even I see the flaw in this logic. I’d live my life regardless and posting drunk should not be a cop out or a way to prop myself up.
-20 points to Griffynpuff
First interaction, not much here. Could be easy distancing, but hard to read it too strongly.
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:13 pm
I would say that analyzing day 1 votes with someone like Colin is most helpful if we had a confirmed scum, but what do I know.
Regardless, I don’t view Colin as guilty looking as some people do.
Deflecting from Colin. Not a good look... but it's also pretty similar to my reaction. So... eh?
Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:07 pm
The more I see Colin post, the more guilty he looks lol
This post came with (near as I can tell) an even 5-5 split between Colin and Sloonbeard. Good look... although no vote, so how strong is this opinion really?
Scotty wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:08 pm
Ok. Here’s where I stand after that rollercoaster.
[Other reads]
Colin is bad. He’s not bothering to defend against it. He gettin lynched and then we’ll have some juicy interactions to analyze. I’m aleave my vote on Sloonei as a sensible counterwagon but ready for Colin to be lynched.
Easy to say when he's got all the votes.
This is taking a while, so I dont have time to do a full speedchuck interaction, but this stood out pretty starkly to me:
Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:57 pm
Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:36 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 1:33 pm
Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 8:44 am
There's so much going on here, I'm having trouble getting a read on anyone at this point. But here's where I'm at right now: Dunya feels genuine to me, and as was mentioned before, the fact that she's added so much to the thread gives her a civvie vibe. It would make total sense for Persians to lead a lynch against Dunya on day one. To them, she's a threat, and getting her out of the game early gives them an advantage.
With that said, I'm still hesitant to place a vote right now. I'll check back in later.
Why are you hesitant?
I'm hesitant because I don't want to lynch a civilian on day one. I want my vote to count, and go towards the right person.
Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 1:33 pm
Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:39 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:08 am
Statistically speaking, we’re likely to catch a baddie by lynching Speedchuck.
That's not how statistics work. His chances of being scum in this game are the same as everyone else's. It is not dependent on previous games. I'm sure you realize that, but just clarifying for anyone who might think this is a good argument.
You have thus far defended dunya and subtly defended Speedchuck, while I guess shining on a light of suspicion on those that would have led a lynch on dunya without naming any names.
If I hadn’t offered the olive branch on people I haven’t played with before, you would be getting my vote rIght now
[/quote]
I appreciate you olive branch Scotty, I may have to return the generous favor.

I defended Dunya because I feel she's being genuine. I guess I'm better at defending than incriminating, I may have to work on my playstyle here.
I did not defend Speedchuck, I'm just really passionate about the misuse of statistics. If further evidence shows speedchuck may be scum, I will happily help lynch him (sorry @speedchuck , still love you).
[/quote]
I like your spoilers. Sometimes the quote mechanism is a bit screwy in this forum, but I like the de clutter.
Ok so when you say “return the favor” on the olive branch, are you just saying that because you suspect me? I think you should go for it if so, otherwise no need. I’m a strong boy (or so my momma says) and I can take it
And yes, you did defend Speedchuck by latching on to jack’s ‘statistically speaking’ comment. You are technically correct, but before he explains his motivation behind it, you made a conscious decision to respond to
that opinion, attempting to set the record straight for speed. That may very well be your playstyle to correct statistical misanalysis, but to not see that as a subtle form of defense is suspect too.
[/quote]
[/spoiler]
"Subtly defending"? First of all, that's a pretty weak accusation. Jack was being facetious but it's a clear gamblers fallacy; big reach to say calling that out is anything but calling out logic.
Secondly, why would you jump to defending? Speed wasn't under real pressure, and this was Scotty's first mention of him. Smells like setting up a future case if speed gets lynched... especially after Scotty goes after speed repeatedly to then vote luna.
Overall: not good, but not damning. IMO the Luna comment is the biggest negative point.