Beck about Scotty
Nothing until after the flip; inquired on Scotty having been defended as villager; projected baddies giving a town read on soon to be lynched town. Has not returned so far with thoughs on the real denounment.
Scotty about Beck
Tinfoil/paranoia take on Beck's early activity.
Overall activity from Beck, given absence of relevant flip-ISO
Active D0, developed a baddie read and a vote out of a vibe that MP's in-and-out post gave him. Drop in activity (justified by RL, apparently), shallow remarks on ongoing events (Rick-Jay super slam), very late and self-declared uninformed EoD performance.
We are of course disappointed in Mr. Beck's D1 performance, after giving such a strong impression of a great guy, great Trump voter early on. We feel that his admittance to being uninformed during the late EoD, rather than try to scramble any reads and change his ping-vote, is a decent look. In case the baddie knew Scotty would fakeflip, then flip, Beck's reaction to the fakeflip is about as monotone as it can get; in case the baddies didn't, we imagine Beck would be capable to fake a good response, but overall we don't feel, as of now, that either of these scenarios would apply. His logistics as to how a baddie might have tried to defend Scotty - while invalided by the real flip itself - give the vibe of operating with an independent mentality. Taken from the other POV, Scotty's read on Beck looks like smear, quite frankly - it is only with a slight amount of tinfoil that one could perhaps read this as distancing, but overall it seems to reflect ok on Beck.
We have no reason, at this point, to believe Mr. Beck is a crooked Democrat. We do encourage better daily reports from him, however, on the whole.
=====================================================TRUMP=====================================================
Boomslang about Scotty
Corrected him on the Day 0 poll options meanings. Read RickJay super slam as meaningless with Scotty's own take on it as proxy.
Scotty about Boomslang
Included him in the total banter section of his fluff reads. Later, was one of the players he forgot about.
Overall activity from Boomslang, given absence of relevant flip-ISO
Null/meh read on RickJay super slam. Pressure voted leetic, finding his post towards JJJ hamfisted shade. Questioned Wilgy's posts and votes. Dead activity since.
We'd certainly appreciate if Mr. Boomslang could clarify what he meant in
this post. We feel there might be a slight dissonance in his read of leetic in this post (which is more positive - or at least doubtful of baddie moves?) and his previous post in which he agreed with JJJ on leetic's shady reactions, yet we fear we might be misunderstanding the whole situation.
Otherwise, we have no means to discern a connection between Mr. Boomslang and the liberal, crooked Scotsman. I could certainly have favored a baddie Boomslang to stay out of the picture, but it could also be nothing. Our case on Mr. Boomslang rests at a null.
=====================================================TRUMP=====================================================
DrWilgy about Scotty
...
Scotty about DrWilgy
Included him in the total banter section of his fluff reads. Later, was one of the players he forgot about. Legacy shade thrown on him.
Overall activity from Wilgy, given absence of relevant flip-ISO
Hokey garbage.
We certainly do not appreciate Wilgy's vote on a great campaigner such as Rick O'Shay. Seems as opportunistic as it can get, in the midst of the RickJay super slam. There is nothing uncharacteristic about DrWilgy's chaos play, nonetheless it sucks very much. We would very much like to see DrWilgy get spanked for it. Scotty's shade has absolutely no background in his ISO and could fall in the same category as with Beck. We feel the Scotsman did more effort to doubt Beck, compared to throwing DrWilgy in the mix. We get a null out of calling out DrWilgy, for the time being.
=====================================================TRUMP=====================================================
Epignosis about Scotty
Stated
early intent to attempt a Scotty-style vote - or at least pressure vote - on inactives. Right after Scotty's round of reads, picked up on Scotty giving MM cred for the latter's vote, describing it as direct without actually pointing out what's direct about them. Keeps pressuring him to vote. Second to vote (and stay) on Scotty for this ping of his. Post-lynch intense analysis for connections.
Scotty about Epignosis
Included him in the total banter section of his fluff reads. Later gave an empty serious read on him. Resorted afterwards only to try to answer to his inquiry. It could be described as fairly evasive, on a second look, especially
this post. Legacy serious rebuttal to Epig's vote.
As we've stated before, we feel Mr. Gnosis' vote came from a different, assumed perspective compared to the rest of the Scotsman's tally. We have no inclination to regard this as uncharacteristic, coming from him. We are aware that Mr. Gnosis could very well buss, but we also feel he might prefer to sketch a bigger buss case, rather than this kind of simple pingvote based on pointing out the Scotsman's read wasn't backed up by information in any way.
We have no reason, at this point, to believe Mr. Gnosis is a crooked Democrat, but, as always, we do pray to the God he usually prays that we're not wrong in this assessment.
=====================================================TRUMP=====================================================
Golden about Scotty
Receptive right away to crediting Sloonei's theory on Scotty - down to the Scotty & Quin detail. Switch vote (and first one to stay) on Scotty, also based on liking Sloonei's thoughts. Mild brag about the novelty of ever reading Scotty bad. Reactions to both fakeflip and flip fairly basic: would have flipped, then relieved to have been right. Post-lynch analysis for connections.
Scotty about Golden
Shruggy at Golden's activity, then read him better for picking up the pace and getting himself tangled in RickJay super slam.
Independent elements from Golden's activity and what could be read into it
Save for supreme fakery in how he phrased his reaction, Golden's said involvement into the RickJay super slam gave us the feeling that he would not be this uninformed and "not getting the point" about it, if he would have backup chatter for updates and such.
We find that Golden's immersion in Sloonei's case for Scotty looks deep and it can only be valued as a whole, either in a positive or negative light. The timing of his vote makes it difficult to believe there was a necessity to bus at that time, unless, of course [tinfoil], it was premature distancing [/tinfoil].
We are inclined to believe that Mr. Golden's language and adherence to another player's case on the ultimately lynched Scotsman is waaaaaaay too risky for an experienced player like himself to attempt this kind of distancing and wagoning. But we recommend further scrutiny on Mr. Golden, heading into the next phases.
=====================================================TRUMP=====================================================
insertnamehere about Scotty
Sided less with him in current matters, but agreed with him on Sloonei
attempting to push Quin around. Then threw his vote on Scotty after all, to test Sloonei.
Scotty about insertnamehere
Included him in the total banter section of his fluff reads. Later, was one of the players he forgot about.
Contrary to the first two permvotes on Scotty (Golden, Epignosis), INH's vote could already start to fall into the bus category. His switch stance on Scotty and vote reasoning certainly makes things look very bad. Our only sense of disbelief remains if a baddie INH would do such an awful move. In the words of our future POTUS, expressed during the meeting: "These crooked democrats must be really dumb, if that's how they get themselves caught. Too easy!"
Otherwise, we can safely say that
le mot du jour for INH, heading into the next phase, remains: shady!
=====================================================TRUMP=====================================================
JaggedJimmyJay about Scotty
[4 pages of ISO already!

] Banter about holding Scotty to his claim of not going after inactives, for once. Inquires on Scotty's banter reads. Confused by Scotty's second read on him and what that part about WIFOM implied. Offers input, when Scotty asked, on Scotty-Sloonei interaction (& about Quin). Tends to
appreciate Scotty's serious round of reads and his attempt to variate his D1 play. Then trusts Scotty
least in Sco-Slon-Quin triumvirate. Then
mild town assessment of Scotty's performance. Reads Scotty caught in a snafu, but
not necessarily bad for it.
Brush reply on MM calling him for that. Hops on INH counter-wagon.
Appreciative of Scotty's legacy post (particularly in regards to Quin),
pressures Scotty voters to take a last stance on voting him, despite Scotty's legacy rebuttal. Post-lynch intense analysis.
Scotty about JaggedJimmyJay
Included him in the banter part of his banter reads. Reads him "meh" (basically unchanged, lol) on second try. Kinda evasive/unprepared reply to JJJ's inquiry about the WIFOM part of his read/accusation(?). Vote on leetic for "JJJ's better reasons".
We think the American people can pretty much notice that this is not a perfect report on JJJ, following Scotty's flip. He certainly comes off as rather defensive or appreciative of Scotty's efforts and, aside for a few sinuous tilts in his reads (that sudden I trust Scotty least of a trio moment),
never really stepped into the pool of let's-lynch-Scotty-for-possible-snafu one bit, not even testing the waters with his pinky. As for the counter-wagon moment on INH, we believe JJJ has argued that, if baddie, he would have pressed on leetic, but the thing is: 1) we don't recall leetic wagon gaining serious traction (in fact, wasn't Scotty the
only player to lean on it) and 2) a counter-wagon on INH is, in principle, still a perfect viable counter-wagon to accomplish the essential: get Scotty out of the lynch spot.
Much of what (and how) JJJ has evaluated in the links above seem reasonable
coming from someone like JJJ, but somehow they're not warming our hearts, in light of the flip. Scotty's wagoning on JJJ's pick-of-the-day could be a mild point that he [Scotty] was trying to wagon on whatever stuff civs would put forward, but that's about it. We feel the need to reflect further on this and we encourage the American people to do the same.
=====================================================TRUMP=====================================================
leetic about Scotty
...
Scotty about leetic
Included him in the banter zone of his banter reads. One of the players he forgot about. Picks up on JJJ's case on him, votes him (wagons). Snark at leetic's NO U.
Just like INH, leetic's vote falls into the plausible bus category. Unlike INH's vote and reasoning attempt, which would be total herp-a-derp if he's bad, we find that leetic's inactivity, self-defense momentum and wordless vote could favor an under-the-radar approach. Re: Scotty's vote, we share slight disbelief in Scotty trying to counter-wagon on a teammate as his way of salvation, nonetheless, as stated in above, leetic's counter-wagon didn't feel truly ripe and it would serve as decent distancing. Also null on Scotty's snark towards leetic: could be genuine angery, could be keeping the facade.
We recommend full scrunity on leetic, pressure to talk more. We'd rank leetic's vote as potentially shadier compared to INH's, at this point.