How well the players know one another's personalities and play-styles.
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Seems like you're both saying you don't understand why Mac is voting for me AND you think he is voting me cause I'm suspicious because of culture clash/lack of skill/experience.
Which is it?
I'm not sure how you got that. I asked him for something substantial as opposed to just not liking the "cut of (your) jib." Do people on this site intentionally misinterpret what I say no matter how clear and direct I am?
FZ. wrote:I'm reading through. I have to say I'm leaning on agreeing with Epi on Scotty. Some of his posts feel to me like how I would play when mafia, by trying to look helpful in his attempt to analyse the host's post, and by looking like he's doing some serious hunting, while it doesn't feel genuine to me.
I have two reservations:
1. the part where he randomly chooses a low poster. That's poor hunting, and I think Scotty is smarter than that. 2. I also understand where he's coming from, with his suspicion of the marmot. He tends to lay low and be more fluffy when he's bad.
So
You can expect me to lay low somewhat in this game, I'm a bit busier these days.
Linki: @G-Man, yes I know. Just giving you a hard time.
thellama73 wrote:I don't think I'v played with Jack of Hearts before, but I'm finding him annoying. He apologized for not being "entertaining" enough. Entertainment is not the goal of the game, boyo. Finding baddies is. Take the snark down a notch, why don't you, and answer me this:
Who are looking at voting today and why?
I know this post was accidentally aimed at me but I'll answer anyway.
We were in Unfortunate Events together but you got lynched on Day 1.
If I had a day kill that I had to use this second, I'd shoot Mac. Three seconds in and he's sure I'm scum? Never played with him before so his certainty is either a bluff or a lie (depending on his alignment and if he's bad, how many scum he thinks exist outside his group). Plenty of townies are jokingly certain of scum on Day 1 but with two posts about it, I get the impression he isn't joking. Some townies can act really certain on Day 1 when they actually just have a hunch. Don't know Mac's meta to know if he plays that type of a townie game or if he's just looking for a mislynch or to look like he's contributing.
I'm not actually planning on voting for Mac, though. I'm planning on voting for whoever pings me enough that I want to lead a lynch or my top suspect that is getting enough votes to make them lynchable. (I don't vote third party very often cause I want my vote to matter.) I don't know who that is, yet, but I'll let you know.
Why you seem so bad then?
I don't know, Mac.
Why don't you tell me why you think I'm bad? Please be more detailed than your post about the cut of my jib.
Can you tell me more about yourself? How often do you catch scum on Day 1? How often do you act more sure of alignments than you really are? Whats your favorite role? You a site native or migrant mafia player? How long have you been playing?
I'm comfortable with Scotty voting for me early. Doesn't mean he's town but I've played enough with Scotty to kinda get his play style and I think is vote on me matches his style. I don't know you, though.
Am I McStrangepost? What's strange about which post?
I have a very very good day 1 scum catchy record actually. I just never ever convince people to follow me.
I always act with surety because I enjoy the melodrama.
My favourite role is insane indy role cop.
I am from RYM. I have been playing forums Mafia for 6 years.
Yes you are. Your posts make me scrunch my nose up. This usually tends to be when one is a bad.
Marmot wrote:I'm voting Scotty for this atrocity of a post.
Now you're going to get Eloh's vote.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
Breaking news tonight out of London. Details are still emerging at this time but it appears that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is dead. As Mr. Assange was revealing his latest batch of hacked emails from Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's personal email account, when some kind of explosion occurred behind him on the balcony of the Ecuadorian embassy in London where he has been confined for the last four and a half years.
British authorities have not been able to determine the cause of the blast yet and are reviewing security footage to determine whether the blast came from inside the embassy or if some kind of explosive device was thrown at the balcony. CNN can confirm, however, that Mr. Assange was not killed instantly by the blast. Sources inside the embassy have gone on record stating that the mortally wounded Assange crawled to his laptop and uploaded one final transmission to the WikiLeaks website.
CNN is trying to confirm the accuracy of that final transmission. We want to stress that, at this time, what we are about to report is unverified information but it is nonetheless information that our editorial staff feels should be relayed to our viewers in the interest of journalistic integrity.
According to the final document cache uploaded to WikiLeaks, it appears that Texas Senator Ted Cruz may have solicited private donations through his wife's position at Goldman Sachs. The released documents suggest that email messages from Senator Cruz's private and senate office computers under the pseudonym Jackofhearts2005 solicited several million dollars in donations to a secretive group using the initials VRWC in order to fund operations to harass, diminish, and impede the incoming Hillary Clinton Administration.
CNN is reaching out to Senator Ted Cruz's office, as well as to Goldman Sachs executives to confirm or deny these details.
JULIAN ASSANGE
Founder of WikiLeaks and an expert at stirring the pot, you are no fan of the United States government. Each night, and also Day 0, you will receive a dossier on any player of your choice, learning their role. You may not abstain from receiving these dossiers and you may only keep up to two dossiers a secret at a time. Once you have dossiers in your posession, you may choose to either implicate or expose one of the dossier subjects. Implicating exposes their role in the game thread. Exposing them will eliminate them from the game. While you have no love for the Republican Party, you can win with them, so long as you do not implicate or expose anyone on their side. As long as you keep implicating and exposing Democrats, the Republicans will not be able to nightkill you. Should you implicate or expose a Republican, you will have to win as a last man standing. At the beginning of the game, you may select one player to bring down with you should you be lynched or nightkilled. You must make this decision before receiving any dossiers and your decision cannot be changed. If this player dies before you in the game, your selection will not be made known to the rest of the game thread.
Jackofhearts2005 has been implicated in a conspiracy against the Hillary Clinton Administration. He is...
So is Ted Cruz dead or do we have to lynch him day 2? It says "he is" in the post where it says "he was" for Assange. So I'm assuming he have to lynch Jack next.
MacDougall wrote:I remember this feeling. Where nobody agrees with my mafia read. It usually ends in a Mac tantrum. So I am heading over to Redtube to cool off.
*fapfapfap*
Why won't anyone believe me?
*fapfapfap*
I know Jack is bad.
*fapfapfap*
I have really weird fetishes.
*fapfapfap*
MacDougall wrote:I remember this feeling. Where nobody agrees with my mafia read. It usually ends in a Mac tantrum. So I am heading over to Redtube to cool off.
*fapfapfap*
Why won't anyone believe me?
*fapfapfap*
I know Jack is bad.
*fapfapfap*
I have really weird fetishes.
*fapfapfap*
Fiddler on the Roof
