
Keterman wrote:hehehehehehehehehheheheheheh
Return to “Game Over! Monty Python and the Holy Grail”
Keterman wrote:hehehehehehehehehheheheheheh
"A"What is the capital of Assyria? (hosts, deads, nons etc.)
Assyria is no longer in existence, thus it currently has no capital.What is the capital of Assyria? (hosts, deads, nons etc.)
Rezz me like Jeebus, oh GOB?GOD wrote:Ask and you shall receiveBullzeye wrote:I wonder if the good Lord will show up tonight. I'm super tired so I hope I don't miss him. Or her. Whichever.![]()
The LORB is returned. Having perused your offerings from the other night, I have decided to shine my light upon YOU, Bullzeye. I have granted you a boon. You will not know what it is until games end, but with luck you will benefit from it.
Since the only LORBS more Magnificent than I, DP & Roxy, have graciously allowed me to be here, I would like to see some words of praise for them. It may be in any form you like, but the more praiseful, the better. The next night I have a boon, I will extend it to the best praise of our Hosts.
THE LORB HAS SPOKEN
You may now grovel.
It had a pre-emptive strike kind of feel to it, if that makes sense.juliets wrote: I don't remember MR answering this though it may be that he did and I missed it since I didn't really catch this point the first time around. MR, why did you call the BWT/Daisy/Canuck votes in a row coincidental?
I agree, I don't think the mystery theory lends any definitive insight into what Made's alignment is.Long Con wrote:I don't thinkis insulting, I think it's good for showing frustration.
![]()
I have bobbed for apples. I wouldn't now because, well, germs.
Still on the fence about Made... Canuck's theory could be correct, but it could just as easily be a baddie Made, hitting the right guy to lead us all down the yellow brick road, maybe forever. Enough people have also expressed doubts that I have to cast my own in with them in agreement.
This wasn't what I took it as at all...S~V~S wrote:Since the subtle video thing Canuck did was not so subtle (and since she was not punished for it, which I think she would have been had she been correct)~
Ninjajujube, the implication is that perhaps Made has a civ BTS role. Since the baddies would have to be on crack to kill Made, i don't think this is a real target painting per se. Canuck is frustrated with you for your belief that Made could be bad in light of her theory that he is not. A Person, the dead Concorde, does not seem to have particularly trusted him, so there is that.
Linki~ Canuck, that whole "beating the head into the wall" implies that people are stupid to me, so perhaps the sight of it, regardless of context, gets my whole "protect the oppressed" thing all grrrr and sassy. Apologies.
birdwithteeth11 wrote:Exactly.Canucklehead wrote:While I appreciate the props, Enrique, I can't claim to have come up with the idea out of thin air. It was bea's exchange with LC here that made me think of it:bea wrote:I tried to allude to that earlier - that given the game source - I can see ONE scenario where a switch wasn't what went down.Long Con wrote:Sorry for the non-response, Juliets. I had actually typed a response on my phone that was basically "That's interesting, if anyone could show me an example because I can't really read back right now", but it got linkitis'ed without me realizing it. It wouldn't have mattered because I didn't really get to check in until I just caught up now.
RIP A Person. I've seen plenty of Civvie roles that can switch a lynch, and probably ones that can reflect a lynch once or something, so I don't find the situation to be instantly incriminating to Made. However, the way he has been acting since then is a bit sketchy, as several people have pointed out. I'm gonna have to say that Made will likely get my vote. It doesn't look like he'll need it to get lynched anyway, but there you go.
We haven't gotten Concorde's role revealed yet.
I'm wondering if we won't see Concorde's role revealed for that very reason.
I still wait to see if I could be wrong about that.
All I will say is, read those quotes between bea and LC and hopefully it will click. For those of you who aren't seeing it that is.
I still think Made is likely bad, but there you go.
Not at all!S~V~S wrote:It isn't hard to piss SVS off, I have a fuse like a cheap Chinese firecracker for sure. Maybe it's the red hair~ my family DOES seem to have the "rage" gene, in all seriousness. Hope i didn't scare you, MR
K.Made wrote:Woah, Ignore this, I very VERY much misread your post. My bad.Made wrote:Mister Rearranger wrote:*waits patiently for the baddies and indies to all merc each other deaded*![]()
@Made: Go on...
Also, your "no u" accusation is apples and oranges. I have been mostly commenting on others' cases, yes, to confirm agreement with them; and I feel that I offer my own perspective as to why I share those pings. My point on Enrique was that he was middling and deflecting from cases being built. I like to night hide, so I'll offer some thoughts on the posts I read when I have time tonight.
Regardless, I'm placing my vote on him again, as I do believe his waffling from defending you to condemning you is calculated on his part.
But hey, if you continue to offer such damning evidence, maybe I'll switch my vote to me!
Linki: Maybe I'm misrememberng, but I thought Made hated the idea of night hiding in Misfits? If I'm thinking of someone else, please correct me.linki- Woah, Enri, my dude.Made wrote: The Trick to avoiding scrutiny:
1. Say someone's argument is stupid and has no basis
2. Refute a single point
3. Ignoring the accusing player for the remainder of the day
4. Repeat 1-3 with other as need be.
I'm glad you've moved over to the Made-train now that he's outlived his usefulness to your team. Should give you oodles of civ-cred.Enrique wrote:Yeah llama I really should have the whole game figured out from the get-go shouldn't I :/
I never said ONLY Made/Llama, I believe I mentioned you arbiting between Made/Llama as well as other players in your posts. I did a fairly thorough read back as I had to find the day 1 post that pinged me in the first place. I appreciate your response.Enrique wrote:Can I just say I disagree with the argument that I only ever talk about the Made / llama deal BS? I've been around, I've called people out, asked to participate, responded to most discussions in this thread so far. Maybe most of my posts have been in my own defense but I've been talking craploads and definitely ventured outside that bubble. I actually really needed this day break lol.
People that keep bringing up Hedgie... I think it's pretty funny that nobody ever talks about what the case on her is. It's like she's just a buzz name thrown around by people who want to act like they're all over this game. "Oh yeah, definitely looking at Hedgie's posts," "I'm gonna look back on the Hedgie case to see what's going on." But then there's absolutely no content?? What the hell are you guys thinking? What makes Hedgie stand out from the other 20 players that you're even consider her for a vote? Please enlighten me here!
Something something juliets. I don't trust her a lot, and that exchange with LC definitely pinged me some. Too tired to even think of specific points right now, just sharing how it made me feel reading it. It's reallyy late and I almost forgot to Mafia before bed, but here I am, up to speed again. I will go back on this tomorrow before the lynch. I definitely won't vote for her without having made a case before, but eh, I'm not really that deep into this. I've known juliets on IRC for a few years but I'm not sure we'd ever played together before? It's a lot harder to suspect someone when you're not all that familiar with their style. For the most part I've backed off the llama thing because people insist it's civvie llama talking, it's just my gut disagrees. w/e we'll see
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I dunno how you did that. I already made an argument about those two yesterday, and Made merely acknowledged it.Mister Rearranger wrote:I made Made's shortlist!If I had known that all it took to garner your suspicion was reference Enrique and you, I would have done so waaaay earlier in the thread.
His skepticism of Enrique and DF's interactions, not to mention how wavering DF was on you and Enrique.Made wrote:What specifically, I'm curious exactly what part of his post spoke to you.Mister Rearranger wrote: Epi's thoughts today touched on some things that I'd been pondering as well.
I'm open to watching a case get picked apart and hearing contrasting opinions, but I would be interested to see if Enrique can practice what he preaches here and bring other names to the table. Because all I've seen is him acting as arbiter between Made and various people. Maybe as a protective teammate? Maybe for vindication if Made were lynched and was civ? Maybe just out of his defensive nature (I recall Enrique being quite scrappy and holding his own in LP gamesEnrique wrote:I have no idea whether Made has BTSC. Do we really have to go over this every other post? I simply don't buy your case. I could argue all you've said is "I think Made has BTSC," and similarly, I'd say that's based on nothing.
Maybe, just maybe, llama, you should try to be a bit less vague. Get stuff out of the way. Something like telling Made "Hey, I did ask you if you had teammates, but only after you got weird about it." Emitting that sorta shit doesn't help anybody, except you if you ever needed to backpedal. No, making it seem like he's straight up lying from the very beginning only makes him a likelier lynch candidate. You've got your mind set on lynching Made for hardly any reason, and nobody can do anything to change that.
OK, if you want that, you know what's a good idea? Bringing other names to the table, instead of simply saying "let's not discuss this anymore because he's bad and that's final," as if that was good enough for everyone.thellama73 wrote:Thank you! I am sick of talking about this. I have said everything I have to say on the issue, and I have no new information, so I welcome the chance to move on and discuss other things.Black Rock wrote:Now, now boys.
I think Llama has been very consistent. I also believe Mades defense. Therefore I am moving on from this.
Reading other things now.
Not a case, as I planned on voting for MP anyways.Mister Rearranger wrote:My only experience in the challenge room was that juliets was very helpful and willing to collaborate on ideas about the challenge. I'ma have to use posts for the rest of my context since I wasn't there for long.
Lnki: I agree with your assessment of MP, Bullz.
I'd like to reread what the Made voters have said as well as the MP voters and go from there.
Linki: I disagree on Enrique though. He's closer to the less trusting side of the "unsure" zone right now...
*fixed as per your avatar*Enrique wrote: I'm not gonna defend a position that's not even mine. Gonna get my eye checked, see y'alls later.